Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On 16th November 1998 the Lanka National Bank entered into a Lease Agreement bearing
No. 2609/007/119 (C1) with Gold Entertainments, a partnership, and the signatories who
signed for the firm ‘Gold Entertainments’ were Mr. Linus Udurawana and Ms. Preethika
Viswakula. Gold Entertainments required the subject matter of the lease, namely a set of
Apogee Speaker System to conduct musical shows which was the main business of this
partnership.
However, the said partnership was converted into a sole proprietorship on or about 19 th
August 1999, and Mr. Linus Udurawana became the sole proprietor. Neither of the
partners had agreed to the purported amendment to Article 14 of the Lease Agreement
contained in the document marked CIA.
Mr. Linus Udurawana made several payments of the lease rentals in terms of the Lease
Agreement (CI) out of his personal funds both before and after the establishment of the
sole proprietorship. He made approximately 33 payments in respect of the lease rentals
falling due under the Lease Agreement.
It is admitted that Mr. Linus Udurawana received the purported letter of termination
dated 2nd June 2001 (C2), but it is his position that the purported termination as contained
in the aforesaid letter is wrongful and illegal as he was not in arrears of rentals. In terms
of Article 17 of C1, the Agreement can only be terminated if the lessee is in default, and
that too after giving an opportunity to pay up the arrears by demanding the amounts due
under Article 17 (2). None of these steps had been taken by the Claimant Lanka National
Bank. Futhermore, the Claimant has not acted on the basis that the lease has been
terminated and in particular, the Claimant has continued to accept monies from Mr. Linus
Udurawana notwithstanding the aforesaid purported termination.
In terms of Article 14 of the Lease Agreement, the Claimant Lanka National Bank should
have insured the Apogee Speaker System leased by them. As the claimant had failed to do
so Mr. Udurawana made an effort to claim the value of this item under the Insurance
Policy relating to the lorry. He failed in this as the award made by the arbitrator under the
Policy covered only the value of the lorry. Had the Claimant insured the item as provided
in Article 14 of the Lease Agreement and processed the Claim, Mr. Udurawana would not
have suffered the loss amounting to Rs. 3,199,972.10 which is the present value of this
item.
It is the position of Mr. Udurawana that there had been no termination in law or in fact of
the Lease Agreement at the time the musical instruments were destroyed in the fire that
took place on 5th July 2001 at Peradeniya. Even at that time, the aforesaid Lease
Agreement was in force, and with the fire the Agreement became frustrated. In the
circumstances, it is the position of Mr. Udurawana that the Claimant Bank is not entitled
to claim and he is not obliged to pay the Claimant the monies claimed in this arbitration.
It is also Mr. Udurawana’s position that in terms of the Lease Agreement, the Claimant
Bank was obliged in law to insure the property leased as provided in Article 14 of the
Lease Agreement. The purported amendment to Article 14 contained in C1A is an after
thought and has not been agreed to by him or the other partner. As he has suffered loss
and damage in a sum of Rs. 3,199,972.10 as a result of the Claimant’s failure to insure the
Apogee Speaker System, Mr. Udurwana wishes to make a Cliam in Reconvention for this
sum as the benefit that would have accrued to him had the Claimant entered into an
Insurance Policy as required by Article 14 of the Lease Agreement and the Bank had
properly made a claim thereon. The Claimant Bank has refused and / or neglected to pay
the said sum to him though demanded.