Enterprise

A Broken Global Pipeline; The world is facing a near-invisible financial crisis: the breakdown in
capital flowing to poor countries. Here's what should be done.
By George Soros Soros is chairman of Soros Fund Management and the founder of the Open Society
Institute.
797 words
16 December 2002
Newsweek
NSWK
43
English
Copyright (C) 2002 Newsweek Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The international financial system has broken down, although the authorities fail to recognize it. Ever since
the emerging market crisis of 1997-98, capital has ceased to flow to poor countries that need it and qualify for
it. The one exception, China, attracts the bulk of all direct investment. Markets suck savings to the center but
fail to pump it out to the periphery. The United States runs a current-account deficit near 5 percent of its
GDP--$242 billion for the first half of 2002. At the same time, Brazil--despite sound economic policies, a
primary budget surplus and a growing trade surplus-is unable to refinance its debt at acceptable rates.

Brazil became a target last summer because investors feared Argentine contagion and the left-wing
candidacy of Luiz Inacio (Lula) da Silva, who was elected president on Oct. 27. As of this writing, the jury is
still out on how the markets will respond to Lula's stewardship. Other less-developed countries that have
been faithfully following International Monetary Fund prescriptions are also in trouble because of depressed
commodity prices, lack of access to developed markets and weak domestic demand. Overall, there has been
a reverse flow of capital from the periphery to the center ever since 1997.

The authorities claim these are temporary aberrations that will be corrected by the market. I contend they are
symptoms of a deep structural problem. Until recently, the IMF was ready to bail out periphery countries.
Taxpayers in debtor countries, such as Mexico, picked up the tab. This may have been unfair, but it kept
money flowing to the periphery.

Then came the crisis of 1997-98, which was attributed to the "moral hazard" of IMF bailouts. Before 1997, the
IMF would step in to assure private creditors they would be paid in full, perhaps encouraging them to lend too
freely. This led to a U-turn from bailouts to "bail-ins." Since 1997, the IMF has tried to condition its financing
on private creditors' also stepping up to risk real losses, and it has been willing to let countries like Russia and
Argentina default on private loans. The moral hazard has thus been eliminated, but the risks of investing in
emerging markets have increased.

At the same time, the rewards in emerging markets have declined because of restrictive policies imposed by
the IMF. Countries that can borrow from the markets in their own currencies can engage in countercyclical
monetary and fiscal policies; countries that are dependent on the IMF cannot. The deterioration in the
risk-reward ratio for emerging-market countries explains the reverse flow of capital from the periphery to the
center.

During the bull market, the United States' current-account deficit allowed it to act as the master, and serve as
the motor, of the global economy. After 1997, the tech bubble made up for the devastation of the
emerging-market crisis. Now that the bubble has burst, the motor is stalling. Japan and Europe are in worse
shape than the United States. The American consumer is still holding on, but business investment shows little
sign of improvement. With risk premiums widening, cash flows are better used for paying down debt than for
making new investments. The global economy is hovering on the brink of deflation and depression. The
financial sector is under great strain, and a Brazilian default could push it over the brink.

There is an urgent need for a new motor. I've proposed an annual issue of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs),
an interest-bearing asset that would be issued by the IMF. Under my proposal, rich countries would donate
their allocations of SDRs to finance international assistance to fund development projects in poorer nations.
This is an idea whose time has come.
Page 1 of 2 © 2019 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved.
It would activate resources that are currently idle; it would counteract the widening gap between center and
periphery, and it would give the world a fighting chance to reach the United Nations' goals of eradicating
extreme poverty, providing universal primary education and greatly improving health care by 2015. I realize
that the international financial authorities will not even consider my plan, because they do not accept the
premise that the system is broken and in need of repair. Does that mean that it is unrealistic? No, it means
that the authorities are asleep at the switch.

Soros is chairman of Soros Fund Management and the founder of the Open Society Institute.

Photo: The hard part: Da Silva must try to revive investment

Document nswk000020021211dycg0000b

Page 2 of 2 © 2019 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved.