Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gabriela Gonzalez
Introduction
Facebook acts as a great platform to connect with the people all over the globe. Within a decade,
it has completely revolutionized the lives of people connected through Facebook. It is widely
used in almost every aspect such as politics, academics, industries, etc. People posts pictures,
news, thoughts, and many more. Nearly three billion people or we can say that around 40%
population is currently using online social media (Brown, 2018). According to the reports, on
average, an individual is spending more than two hours every day, sharing, liking, reacting and
updating their profiles and around five hundred thousand of tweets and photos are posted on
Facebook every minute (Brown, 2018). The usage of social media is strongly connected with the
user's age. People between age group 18-29 have always been the most likely users of social
media (Perrin, 2015). The percentage of youth using social media has considerably increased
from 12% in 2005 to 90% in 2015, almost a 78% increase which surely has risen today (Perrin,
2015).
This has resulted in people picturizing in their minds what they see on Facebook and
began to judge them accordingly. Since a lot of people are using Facebook, News channels and
political parties have also created their Facebook pages to know the moods of the people before
elections. People tend to like pictures and posts that contains greater likes and ignores those who
have got only a few likes (Sherman, Payton, Hernandez, Greenfield & Dapretto, 2016).
This means that people generally tend to make an opinion about the post or picture based
upon the likes and types of comments it has received. The present study tries to determine if
Facebook feedbacks that seems to support or oppose cheating impacts how participants
FACEBOOK FEEDBACKS AND ITS INFLUENCE 3
perceived that cheating. That is, will Facebook feedbacks that appear to support a friend who
Literature review
Cyberbullying has been an intense problem on Facebook in which the user directs posts
and comments on a picture in order to harass someone. This cyberbullying has severe effects
such as social isolation and risk of depression in the victim. A study was conducted by Anderson,
Bresnahan and Musatics (2014) to determine how social support for the victim through
dissenting comments, can change the perception of bystanders. In this study, the experimenter
took 190 students as participants and 181 entered the portal link, out of which, 97 were men and
84 were women, of age group 18-24 (Anderson, Bresnahan & Musatics, 2014). The participants
were made exposed to a fictional Facebook page of a girl named Jessica, an obese girl, sitting on
a chair holding chips in her hand. The independent variable in this study was the three versions
of this Facebook page, one modelled as conformity, one as dissent, and the other without
comments and the participants were asked to post their own comments on this Facebook page.
The experimenter assumes the hypothesis that participants in the dissent group will be more
positive than comments posted by the conformity or control group questions and tries to
determine if the gender of the participant has something to do with the type of comment posted
The results of this study showed that participants who were exposed to dissenting
conditions posts more positive comments with a mean of 3.42 and standard deviation of 0.121,
than those in the conformity (M=2.80 and S.D= 1.33 or the control group (M=2.98 and
SD=1.22). (Anderson, Bresnahan & Musatics, 2014). It was also shown in the study that people's
empathy towards the victim of cyberbullying is not associated with the dissenting or conformity
FACEBOOK FEEDBACKS AND ITS INFLUENCE 4
conditions (Anderson, Bresnahan & Musatics, 2014). Moreover, the study found that
cyberbullying varies according to gender with women posting more negative comments as
compared to men (Anderson, Bresnahan & Musatics, 2014). also, it was found that men who
were in the control group considers Jessica severely unhealthy while men in the dissenting
conditions founds her less unhealthy. On the other hand, women in the conformity condition
considered Jessica much unhealthy as compared to women in the other group (Anderson,
Bresnahan & Musatics, 2014). “Male perpetrators of weight-based bullying typically use teasing
or direct verbal bullying, whereas women typically use relational forms of victimization like
People in this globalized world has now a tendency to judge each and everything they
encountered, and they generally put their opinion after knowing what others think about the
same. In a study on effects of comments on news sites and YouTube, it was shown that negative
user statements have more persuasive effects than positive user statements (Winter, Brückner &
Krämer, 2015). This means that negative comments can vanish the persuasive effects of
renowned articles published by the news channels. Winter, Bruckner and Kramer (2015)
concluded through their study that people are more influenced by the relevant arguments instead
of subjective opinion.
In the modern era, there are tones of fake news prevailing on the Facebook and these are
all because of the actions and comments of the users who just likes and shares the post on
evaluating how much likes and shares it has received by the fellow users. A recent study
conducted by Colliander (2019) concludes that “Users exposed to comments by others users that
were critical of the fake news had lower attitudes to the fake news, and were more likely to
FACEBOOK FEEDBACKS AND ITS INFLUENCE 5
comment critically and share the fake news themselves, than users who were exposed to
However, a recent study conducted by Kelly, Ngo, Chituc, Huettel & Armstrong (2017)
showed opposite results. According to their study, people are more influenced by rational
justifications as compared to emotional justification (Kelly, Ngo, Chituc, Huettel & Sinnott-
Armstrong, 2017). This means that people express their perception based upon reasons rather
than being influenced by emotional opinions of others. Another study showed that people who
view the Facebook profile of a person perceives him more favorably than one who perceives
References
Brown, J. (2018). Is social media bad for you? The evidence and the unknowns. Retrieved 22
for-you-the-evidence-and-the-unknowns.
Sherman, L., Payton, A., Hernandez, L., Greenfield, P., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The Power of the
10.1177/0956797616645673.
Perrin, A. (2015). Social Media Usage 2005-2015 (p. 4). Pew research Center. Retrieved from
https://www.secretintelligenceservice.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/PI_2015-10-
08_Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015_FINAL.pdf.
Anderson, J., Bresnahan, M., & Musatics, C. (2014). Combating Weight-Based Cyberbullying
Winter, S., Brückner, C., & Krämer, N. (2015). They Came, They Liked, They Commented:
Kelly, M., Ngo, L., Chituc, V., Huettel, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2017). Moral conformity
Vogel, E., & Rose, J. (2017). Perceptions of Perfection: The Influence of Social Media on
Interpersonal Evaluations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 317-325. doi:
10.1080/01973533.2017.1356303
Colliander, J. (2019). “This is fake news”: Investigating the role of conformity to other users’