Republic of the Philippines Sorsogon State University Live of tho President Sorsogon City Tek No: (056) 211 0178 - 71102005 reonvOronoqonstatecobegeedsh OFFICE MEMORANDUM Noles’, 2022 To: VPAA Dean School of Graduate Studies Campus Administrators Program deans/chairs Faculty Association President Faculty Organization Presidents Senior Faculty members Faculty HRMO- FROM: THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: COMPOSITION OF EVALUATION COMMITTEES FOR NBC 461 - 2019 CUT OFF (8™ CYCLE) DATE : February 4, 2022 In view of the call for evaluation of faculty per NBC- 461- 2019 Cut-off (8" Cycle) the following shall compose the evaluation committees: Local Evaluation Committee (LEC) Institutional Review Committee (IRC) Chairman: Campus Administrators | Chairman: Vice President for Academic Affairs Members: Deans/Program Chairs ‘Members: Campus Administrators FO President HRMO Senior Faculty FA President ‘Senior Faculty ‘The chairmen of these committees are advised to submit to this office the names of the LEC and IRC members on or before February 8, 2022. These committees must attend the orientation meeting via zoom on February 9, 2022 at 9:30AM. Zoom meeting credentials will be sent later thru messenger application. Due to the urgency of the evaluation, the members of the committees may work after regular working hours and on Saturdays anc holidays within the evaluation schedules. Service rendered may be applied for Compensatory Overtime Credit (COC)/ Service Credit (SC) upon submission of the accomplishment report, DTR and other supporting documents duly attested by the Chairmen of the committee and subject to the existing guidelines of the CSC and DBM. Please be guided accordingly. ‘SUC|President 1 " Ce: File, RecordsRepublic of the Philippines SORSOGON STATE UNIVERSITY Sfice of he Proident Sorsogon City, Sotsogon Telephone No. (056) 211-0200 Email Address: ssu@sorsu.edu.ph OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO.°°S, s, 2022 TO : ~ VPAA Dean School of Graduate Studies Campus Administrators Program deans Faculty Association President Faculty Organization Presidents Senior Faculty Faculty HRMO FROM: THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF NBC 461 - 2019 CUT OFF (8™ CYCLE) DATE: February 3, 2022 The following are the guidelines to be followed in the evaluation of documents for NBC 461- 2019 cut off using the existing NBC - 461 Instruments (CCE & QCE) A. Rating Period: July 1, 2016 to June 30,2019 B. Procedures of Evaluation a. Each faculty shall be provided witi the prescribed form by the dean/progrem chair. b, The original document shall be presented to the Program Deans/chair prior to authentication of photocopied documents c. The documents shall be pre-evaluated by the concerned faculty using black ink (use CCE Rating sheet and QCE Forms) d. Each document for CCE shall be labelled by item number found in the CCE rating sheet. Labels shall be at the upper right page of the documents, e. The pre-evaluated documents shall be submitted by the faculty to the LEC for evaluation and review on or before February 25, 2022. The LEC shall start the evaluation of documents on February 28 - March 18, and shall write their evaluation in the CCE Rating Sheet in blue ink. The IRC shall start the review of documents on March 23 ~ Apri 23, and shall write the results in the CCE Rating Sheet in black ink. f. The local draft print-out of evaluation shall be posted for dissemination to the faculty after the evaluations of the LEC and IRC have been accomplished, Rectification requests shall be accommodated for necessary rectification of points in the draft print-out within two (2) days after the date of posting.9. After considering the requests for rectification, the final print-out from the IRC shall be posted and shall be forwarded to the Zonal Center, BU Legaspi City, together with two sets of CCE and QCE folders of each faculty on April 2022 C. Preparation and Packaging of Documents 1. Each faculty shall prepare three (2) sets of photocopied CCE documents and two (2) sets of QCE documents. All documents should be stamped “true photocopy of the original”. One set of CCE and QCE document shall be retained at the dean's office. Each set shall be compiled in separate folders fastened on the left side. Folders are color coded, to wit: a. Sorsogon City Campus a.1 Teacher Education Department = - red a.2 Engineering Department = brown a.3 Technology - orange b. Bulan Campus b.1 BME Department - yellow b.2 ICT/Ed - pink c. Magallanes Campus > blue d. Castilla Campus = green e. Graduate Schoo! - violet 2. The folder should be labelled with the following data: SORSOGON STATE UNIVERSITY Sorsogon City, Sorsogon NAME OF THE FACULTY (Font: Times New Roman, size 24) ‘Academic rank as per 7-A Cycle Evaluation (font size: 20) “Campus (fontsie:20) 8" CYCLE NBC 461 CCE/QCE* DOCUMENTS (font size: 8) July 1, 2016-June 30, 2019 3. Each folder shall contain the follcwing documents: a. Summary of Points b. CCE Rating Sheet c. Pertinent documents duly stamped with “true photocopy of the original” by the program dean arranged according to the QCE rating criteria. (Note: Supporting documents should be attached following every page of the rating sheet.) d. Duly notarized Personal Data Sheet for NBC 461. 4a. For QCE folder (Instructors to Associate Professor) ‘a. QCE Form 2 - Summary of Computation of Four Evaluators b. QCE Form 1 - Computation of Evaluatorc. Tally Sheet d. Accomplished Rating sheet per semester of the NBC Cycle Covered (30 from students, 5 from peers, 1 from the head/ ‘supervisor and 1 from the faculty himself. 4b. For QCE Folder (Professor) a. QCE Form 5 - Summary of computation of four Areas of Evaluation b. QCE Form 3 - Commitment for research/extension/ production ¢. QCE Form 4 - Summary of Computation of Evaluator’s rating to their respective area of evaluation. . Tally sheets . Accomplished rating sheets ea To ensure a smooth and fast evaluation of documents, both the local and institutional evaluation committees shall observe their respective evaluation and review schedules. Please be guided accordingly. EN aa CHELEN-R. LARA, Ed.D. SUC President T11 Incl: NBC No. 461 CCE — 2017 - 10 Form QCE Forms (Appendices A-R) PDS-NBC 461 CCE Summary of Points Form Tally SheetNational Budget Circular No. 461. CCE Rating Sheet Name of Institutional/School: Name of Faculty/Member: Present Rank: EEL Eee SEELEEEEL ECOL TOCAL EVALUATION” | Review Committee | Committee Self Rating | “Rating Rating back in use Sed ‘SPECIFIC FACTORS AND GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING POINTS and | Hr ink baat enero ter | checkbox for | check box for i rsorng | pporing | suprorng | | documents | documents 4.0 Educational Qualification —- 5 pts. 4.1 Highest relevant academic degree or educational attainment N.B in cose of research-work graduate program, certified true copy of diploma and periodic evaluation of research from the supervisor/adviser shall be presented. 1.1.1 Doctorate — 1.1.2 Master's Degree —~ 1.1.3 Post Baccalaureate Degree (Law, Medicine): N.B.: MO is considered doctorate If holder is licensed and teaching in the College of Medicine. LLO is wusidered o Master's Degree if holder is a bar passer and teaching professional subject/s inthe College of Law. | 41.1.4 Diploma Course (Above a Bachelor's Degre NB. Diploma in line with the field of specialization 1.1.5 Bachelor's Degree a. Four Years. 45 . Exceeding years sono 5 pls pts, {for every year over 4 years, N.B.: Graduates of Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM), Engineering and DDM programs are considered bachelor’s degree holders with additional points for years beyand 4. 1.2 Additional equivalent degree earned related to the present | position 1.2.1 Master's Degree 1.22 Bachelor's Der i NB: An additional equivalent and relevant degree earned related to the aresent position refers ta anather degree on the same level as the advanced degree that the faculty has already earned. | | | i "Sub-Total CONFORM! Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 1of 13,Relevance is the applicability of the degree to teaching ond to the subjects the fecuty is teaching. or the duties and functions other | than teaching which the faculty performs, this also rejers to the | appropriate provisions from the CSC-MC and CMO of the respective programs. ‘Supporting Documents): a. Transcript of Records and/or Dipioma . Certificate of Authentication and Verification (CAV) *For those who graduated in Private Higher Education Institutions, the Special- Order Number should be reflected in the TOR or Diploma. ‘For SUCS, the BOR Resolution should be reflected in the TOR or Diploma Note: For degree obtained thru consortium, the faculty should present a MOA between the parties | Wi: Special Order i theofficial and authentic measure of degree earned thats refected in transcript of record. Date of raduation should not be the bass of crediting educational attainment earned. 41.3 Additional credits earned (maximum of 10 pts) 4131 For every 3-unit credit earned towards an approved higher gree course —~ 1.0 ‘Supporting Document(s) i 2. Transcript of Records (TOR) or Report of grades duly certified by [ \ the University Registrar Reports of grades will only be accepted in cases where the school does not issue Transcript of Records or uncompleted programs. In case the degree was obtained from foreign irstitutions, the concerned faculty needs to present a certification Issued by CHED that the degree Is equivalent to bachetor's/master’s/doctor’s degree and that the said institution is classified as a reputable college or university 2.0 Experience and Length of Service 2.1.1 Forevery year of fulltime academic servi i Institution of higher learning —~~ N.B Academic service refers to teaching in callege or doing research and extension functions. State institution of higher learning refers to.@ chartered SUC lr TESDA-Supervised TEI, the main function aid responsibilty of which is tertiary education that offers degree program. 25pts. 2.1 Academic Experience i | Sub-Total CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 2 of 132.2. For every year of fulltime academic service man Institution of higherlearning other than SUCs, CHED- Supervised and TESDA Schools; service in a public or private research institution 075 Supporting Docume a. Service Records b. Appointment/Contract or Certificate of Employment (In the absence of service record for private institutions) 2.2 Administrative Experience For every fulltime year of administrative experience as: a. President b. Vice President ~ ¢. Dean/Director/School Superintenden: SES deeateeeegaet Head of Unit 3.0 25 20 irperson/, 15 N.B.: The experience and services of a faculty designated to an administrative position lke Vice Presicent, Dean, Director, etc, shall be credited only once, whichever Is highest, within the period of his/her designation. ‘The credit for administrative experience is guen to a faculty — ronk holder designated to any administrative or supervisory position with line authority over at least four staff and programs. ifthe administrative experience isin a private {institution of higher learning, multiply the credit point by 75. Associate Deans/Assistant deans, performing exactly the same responsibilities as the deans shal be given the same point as deans. This applies to SUCS with multi-compuses. Supporting Document(s} | 2. Service Record Appointment and for designation ©. Organizational Structure which shows that the designee has at | least 4 subordinates experience a8: 1. Manager/Entrepreneur/Consultant b. Supervisor/Head of Unit "2.3.1 For every year of relevant full-time professional and technical ¢ Rankand File Note: For category C only those position thatrequires Baccalaureate Degree should be considered, NB. The experience should be prior to his entyy into the academe, Sub-Total ‘CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name ‘Signature over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, institutional Review Committee Page 3 of 13Supporting Documents): 2. Service Record/Service Contract ». Appointment and/ or designation ©. SEC/OT registration for entrepreneur . MOA or Contract of Service for Consultant 2.4.2 For every year of experience in the public and private basic institution: a, Basic Education Teacher —~ b. Cooperating Teacher ~ 0.50 075 Supporting Document{s): 2. Appointment/Designation », Service Record for Basic Education Teachers 3.0 Professional Development Achievement and Honors — ‘90 pts. 3.1 Discoveries, patented inventions, innovations, publications and other creative Works: (maximum of 30 points) 3.1.1. For every cost and time saving innovation, ratented invention and creative work as well as discovery of an educational, technical, scientific and/or cultural value —-—--- 2 to 7 pts. Sub-categories under 3.2.3 are as follows A. Inventions ‘These are original patented works which have ditect contrisution to ‘education, science and technology. Lif patented ~7 points for Philippine intellectual Property Office registered 2. Utility Model (UM) _-5 points for Philippine intellectual Property i Office registered N.B. Credit points are divided equally amang twa ar more individuals claiming credie for the same invention Evidence of utility must be presented Supporting Document(s): a. Patent Certificate b.UM Certificate Credit points are divided equally among two or more individuals | claiming credit for the same invention Sub Total CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Faculty Member Chatr, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 4 of 13B. Discoveries A discovery must be the first of itskind or not of camman knowledge. | It shall be the result or product of the research of an individual ora group ot | faculty, Criteria Points 1, Originality, educational impact, documentation 60% of 7(6x7) 2, Evidence of wide dissemination 40% of 7.47) i 24g exhibits, publication 'N.8.: Where there is more than one proponem,, the points are to be divided equally among them. If only one actor (e-,, [1]) is satisfied, credit is awarded only for that factor. Supporting Document(z}: 2, Full description of the discovery b. Confirmation of an international or nationa agency/ { “organization/association of experts \ oo0g « Evidences of dissemination and utilization | . Creative work has to satisfy one or more of the following criteria: Originality 25% of 2-7 pts j ‘Acceptability and recognition 25% of 2-7 pts. Relevance and value 259% of 2-7 pts. Documentation and | evidence of dissemination 25% of 2-7 pts. | 1 Hi Supporting Document(s): | 2. Full description ofthe creative work », Evidences that shal satisfy the criteria for evaluation ©. Appropriate certification fram the duly argenized committee | establishing the value of the output 4d. Score sheets of the organized accreditation committee N.B.:The scale of 2-7 is distributed on the basi of competitiveness, thus- | | International 7 EE eae National 5 snes Institutional 2 aoe Credits are divided among two or more claimarts. Examples of creative works are published articles, literary items, musical ‘compositions and /ar arrangement, painting scalpture and other performing arts, ‘An Accredited body which consists of experts ir the field of creative works shall be created by the SUC/TEl a avaluate the | work. ‘Sub-Total f CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, institutional Review Committee Page 5 of 13,made on existing design, process or product. The criteria for rating and the points for each criterion are. 1 2 3 4 5 Use of indigenous materials, Relevance and value to education, Science and technology Cost/time/eneray/saving Acceptability of peers Dissemination/documentation 20% of 2-7 pts, 20% of 2-7 pts. 20% of 2-7 pts. 20% of 2-7 pts 20% of 2-7 pts. . Research results and Innovations consist of improvements /modifications Supporting Document(s) 2. Full description of research/innovation », Evidence that shall satisfy the criteria for evaluation 3.12 For every published book: original, edited cr compiled, copy righted/ published within the last ten years, 2nd editions and succeeding editions will be credited like the original book if there is 2 major revision of the contents of the book evidenced by the granting of new copy right and new ISBN. 2. As single author... 37 essere eeeessiesasees|besisseeeesoy b. Asreviewer 1 —— | —__! © Astranslator snaenenenand a BAS edltOF an nnnnnnn mre) eee eee & Ascompiler. wd N.B. Points are to be divided equally among authors. The factors and their weights are: Textbooks, including Science and Technology and Reference Books Pole Tertiary Highschoo}——‘Elementacy Author/s Tots. pts. 3 pts. Reviewer 4 2 1 Translator 4 2 1 oe Editor 3 2 1 Compiler 2 1 1 N.B. The credit points should be given based on the date when the copyright and the ISBN were awarded. fn case of group i role, the total credits shall be equally divided among the _members Published books referred to in this item are: Textbooks, Science & Technology and Reference Books. The manuscript should pass through a review body of the institution before it willbe printed to be considered a book, ‘Supporting Document(s): if | 2. Copy of the book with copyright and ISBN b. Certification from the Book Review Commitee of the SUC/TE! Certification of Copyright ‘Sub-Total CONFORME: ‘Signature over Printed Name Faculty Member Signature Over Printed Name Chair, Local Evaluation Committ Signature Over Printed Name Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 6 of 13,3.1.3 For every scholarly research/ monograph/Eiucational technical articles in a technical/Scientific/professional journal including electronic and digital journals Included in the lists of ‘CHED, !S|, Harvard, SCOPUS and other jourrals of sterling reputation for international and national, Local journals refers ‘to Institutional research-based publications (excluded are ‘campus and departmental publications) 2. International National —~ ©. Local 1N.B. Research published in journals not mentloned above, but refereed shall be considered local. Only full peper will be given credit points. Even ifthe research i internaticnal if not recognized by CHED, IS, Harvard and Scopus, it will be considered as local with 2 point-credits, Articles must be researched-based. Commentaries, opinions, editorials are not credited. Publications in Magazines, newspapers/bulletins of information, abstracting journals, annual reports are not accepted. Published research should only be credited once. Abstracts are not glven ered. Thesis/dissertation if published as mentioned obove should be re ‘packaged to be considered research “Supporting Oocumentis): 2. Copy of the journal with ISSN b. Proof of circulation for local journals 3.1.4 For every instructional manual (IMj/ audio-visual (Maximum (of 10 points} Sere N.B. Credits are divided among two or more chimants ‘Supporting Document(s) a. Copy! sample of material b, Certificate of utilization ©. Course Syllabus 4. Evidence of circulation such as receipts of sale, PRO clearance for institutional circulation 8. Approval for institutional use by the instructional material reviewbody Under these items are modules, laboratory manuals, and ‘operation manuals, work books, course books approved by department or college for instructional purposes. Also included in this category are software, pratotypes and Computer aided instructional materials. Submission under this category should ‘cover the course content per syllabus, Excluded from this category of outputs are compilation of lecture nates, lesson plans, power point presentations, transparonces, handouts, and ‘other materials not particularly included, Sub-Total CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name Faculty Member Chale, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, institutional Review Committee Page 7 of 13"3.2 For expert services, training and active participation in professional/ technical activities {maximum of 30 points} 3.2.1 Training and seminars (maximum of 10 points) 3.2.1.1 For every training course with a duration of at least one ‘month not to exceed the full credit. 4. International b. National €. Local — 3.2.1.2 For participation in conferences, seminars, workshops. relevant to one’s field or assignment ‘Supporting Documents): a. Certificate of Attendance Appreci 1 Participation b, Letter of invitation and copy of the program 6, Travel Order/Memorandum Order ** Travel Order is not required for new entrants, 'N.B. Participation under this item is based on ive working days and points are pro-rated as follows: {international = 0.6/day not to exceed 3 points Nationai/Regionat 0.4/day not to xceed 2 points Local = 0.2/day not to exceed 1 point ‘Less than 2 day (half day) training cannot be considered as seminar 3.2.2 Expert service rendered {maximum of 20 paints) 3.2.2.1 For serving asa short-term consultant /expertin an activity of an educational, technological, professional scientific ar cultural nature (foreign o1 local) sponsored by government or other agencies International — National —~ Local Supporting Document(s): a Memo of Agreement or contract between the institution and the contracting party, or office order pertaining to the consultancy work '. Acknowledgment of output Participation under this item involves expert services in one’s area of specialization, 3.2.2.2 For services rendered as trainer, coordinator, lecturer, resource person or guest speaker in conferences, workshops, and/or training courses for professionals International National —— seer | acces toca aa . Stout aa CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 8 of 13Supporting Document(s) a. Certificate of appreciation/recognition Invitation and copy of the program «. Copy of the lecture/presentation 'NOi For Paper Presentation, an indorsement from the head of institution or his duly authorized representative allowing the faculty to present must be submitted. This is not however, appticable to new faculty whose previous employment does not provide indorsements + Echo trainings/seminars are not included, Graduate school speakership are not included under this category if is part of the degree of the faculty. Presentors who are mul author or co-author of the paper will not be given credit Professional refers to same distipine/peer af the speaker and the audience 3.2.2.3, For expert services as adviser in docteral dissertation, master’s and undergraduate thesis, ortheir equivalents 1s requirements for the completion of academic programs (maximum of 10 points) Doctoral dissertation. 1.00 Master's thesis eo ei 0.50 Undergraduate theSIs een : 025 Supporting Document(s): 2. Approval Sheet b. Certificate of Teaching Load NB, Equivalent requirement such as case study, feasibility study, terminal research paper, project study should be a terminal requirement for the degree. Services as adviser is credited only if advising s outside the full time equivalent (FTE} load of the adviser as certified by the Registrar/ Dean, An undergraduate thesis should be a degree requirement. A copy of the faculty load sheet signed by the Dean shall serve as a supporting document. 3.2.2.4, For certified services as member of the Board of Examiners in the Professional Regulatons Commission (PRC) or in the Civil Service Commissien (CSC) ——--~-1.00 Supporting Document(s}: 2, Appointment or contract, b. Identification card 'NB: Proctoring in CS exams are not consideredin this section. 3.2.2.5, For every year of expert services in accreditation/ quality assurance work as momber of the Board of Director, Accreditor, Member of the Technical Committee or Consultant Group in regional or national agencies ~~ 2.00) CONFORME: Sub-Total Signature over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Signature Over Printed Name Chair, institutional Review Committee Page 9 of 13‘supporting Document(s): 2. Appointment/designation/invitation from the accrediting body . Proof of acknowledgment of output 3.22.6 For every year of expert service par Tipline 3 tating oifcer in rade skis carfieation ~~ 1/feid of pecalaton Supporting Documentis) 2. Certificate of Trade Skill Examiner Results of the examinations conducted 3.2.2.7. For every year of services as coach /irainer of the students in oficial activites and adviser of accredited students’ organization not to exceed L point per year 00 N.B. For purposes of pro-rating, a yearis at letst 251 days, not to exceed 12 months. Intramurals and other school-wide activities are not considered, The credit points are given only for inter- Institutional or inter-agency competition Supporting Document(s): 2. Office Order b. Proof of output 3.3, Membership in professional organizations/honor soceties and honor received (maximum of 10 pts.) 3.3.1. For current individual membership in relevent professional ‘organizations) 4. Learned society Full member —- 20 Associate member == 10 b. Honor society 10 Scientific society ~ 10 4. Professional Officer Member 10 05 N.8. Membership will be credited only once per organization, Leamed society is an organization where the members are chosen by invitation and in recognition of their being considered | learned in 3 scientifie area of knowledge, e.g. National Research | Council Honor Society i a society of academic scholars, e.¢ Phi Delta Kappa, Gamma Sigma Delta | Professional/ Scientific organizations are national bodies or | professional practitioners ina specific field or science, e.g, Philippine Inventors Society for Mechanical Engineers, PIChE Faculty association is considered a professional orgenization : ‘SabTorar : CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature Over Print2d Name Signature Over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 10 of 13‘A copy of the Constitution and By Laws of the organization may be required to check whether the organization falls under any of the above-mentioned category/classification of relevaxt professional ‘organization Supporting Document(s} 2. Certificate of membership/ Identification card Official receipt of membership ', Official receipt of membership with SEC registration No. © Proof af Active membership (Certificate that the faculty is an active member) 3.3.2. For academic honors earned: 3.3.2.1, Undergraduate Degree a. Summa cum Laude b Magna cum Laude Cum Laude on 3.3.2.2. Graduate Degree a, Highest Honors/ With Distinction Or equivalent — ‘Supporting Document(s) 2. Acertificate or copy of a nermanent record af the schoo! 3.3.3. Scholarship/ Fellowship. This may be degree or non- degree granting. 2, International, competitive Doctorate Master's Non- degree ». International, non-competitive Doctorate Master's - Non-degree . National/Regional, competitive Doctorate Master's Non-degree ~~ 4. National/ Regional, non-competitive | Doctorate Master's . Local, competitive or Non- competitive N.B.: Competitive means the use of a selection/screening. __process or scheme for awarding a scholarshio. Supporting Document(s) a, Certificate of scholarship/ fellowship award b. Proof of completion of fellowship progeam or activity/ Transcript of Records ©. Scholarship contract/ agreement ‘Sub-Total CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Faculty Member Signature Over Printed Name Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Signature Over Printed Name Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 14 of 133.4 Awards of distinction received in recognition of achievement in relevant areas of specification/profession and/or ass gament of faculty concerned (maximum of 10 points) International ~ National/ Regional -3 Local Supporting Document) 2. Plaque of Recognit 8 oF copy of citation b. Criteria forthe selection Proof of competition 4d. SEC Registration for local organization N.B.: There should be evidence of search/ competition. The ‘award-giving body must have recognized mandate to search and: confer the award or recognition, (Only awards that concerns intellectual and with highest category should be given credits and should be competitive na particular field of specialization Service awards are considered local awards. The credits are given for 10,20,30,40 years of service per circular of the Commission Civil Service (we may consider 15, 25, 35.) ‘The awards of distinction granted by organizations ike NSTP, GSP, BSP, Red Cross, Barangay Offices and other Civic, Caltural, Religious Community, including Non-Government Organizations are classified as Community Outreach, | ‘The awarding body must be recognized, reputable organization relevant to the field of speclalization/ assignment of the awardees, | Incase of research award, the following conditions where award is applicable should be complied: 43) It should be institutional (University wide, not departmental); 2} Only Best Paperin Research is credited, Best Pos‘er and Best in Paper Presentation are not given credit, 3) Must be competitive in nature 3.5 Community Outreach (maximurn of § points) 3.5.1 For every year of participation in service-oriented projects in the community - 10 ‘Supporting Document(s): 2. An Office Order pertaining to the services rencered bo. Certificate/ Acknowledgement of Completion of project or activity These are activities related to participation in community projects on top of official duties and are voluntary in nature, with no additional ‘compensation received. One year is operationalized to be equivalent to at least 251 days, not to exceed 12 monthe per program per clientele. Sub-Total CONFORME: Signature over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Signature Over Printed Name Chair, Institutional Review Committee Page 12 of 13Examples are voluntary services in scouting, Cooperative, Red Cross, Kabataang Barangay, ete Activities undertaken as officer/ memher of any professional, social, ‘educational or other similar organizations which had already bee credited in this instcument shall no longer be considered. 43.6. Professional examinations 3.6.1 For every relevant licensure and other professional ‘examinations passed (maximum of 10 pts.) a. Engineering, Accounting, Medicine, Law, Teacher's Board, etc. ~ ». Career Executive Service Officers Examinatior / Career Service Executive Examination « Diplomate Speciaity Board Exam ——~ 4. Subspecialty Board Exam, Seaman Certificate; Master Electrician/Master Plumber Certificate, Plant Machanie Certificate ~ €. Professional Organization/IT Proficiency Certiication {. National Certificates (NC)/Trade Skill Certificates —- 2 atevel N.B, Other Civil Service eligibilities are not cansidared. Section b is only applicable to the faculty- rank holders designated to supervisory/executive positions. IT Proficiency certifications are for programs administered by the international T propriety Companies and the national Computer Center (NCC) and the Philippine National Information Technology Standards (PHILNITS) ligibilities must be appropriate for the position. ‘Supporting Documents): 2. Certificate of icensure b. Rating Slip . Skills Certificate/Identificatic Sub-Total Sub-Total Paget _ Page 6 Page 10, Page 2 Page 7 Page 11 Boge 3 Poge S Page 12 Poge 4 Pages Page 13, Page 5 Grard Total Renb/Sub-rank CONFORME: ‘Signature over Printed Name ‘Signature Over Printed Name Faculty Member Chair, Local Evaluation Committee Signature Over Printed Name Sec., Local Evaluation Committee Signature Over Printed Name Member, Local Evaluation Committee Signature Over Printed Name Chair, Institutional Review Committee Signature Over Printed Name Sec,, Institutional Review Committee Signature Over Printed Name Member, institutional Review Committee Page 13 of 13Appendix a ‘The QCE of the NBC No. 462 Instrument for Instructor/Teaching Effectiveness Rating Period: to Name of Faculty: ‘Academic Rank: Evaluators: © Self (© Peer © Student © Supervisor ___Instruction: Piease evaluate the faculty using the scale below. Encircle your rating. ae Descriptive Rating | ee ‘Qu: Description He [eee ‘Outstanding _ “The performance almost Sways exceeds ne job equrements, The Faityls an oieptonal rl wed a Weny Satisfactory z ‘The perteimance meets ad on exces the ob reaureneris see] | 3 satisfactory | aon Fair EEE aoe 00 Blas A. Commitment (205% 1. Demonstrates sensitivity to students’ ability to attend and absorb content Information, 2. Integrates sensitively his/her learning objectives with those ofthe students ina collaborative protass 3. Makes self available to students beyond official time 4 Reguloy comes to class on time, welrgroomed and well-prepared to coriplete assigned responses. 5. Keese accurate records of students! performance and promt submission of the same Total Score | _Knowledge of Subject (20%) HEE Sti a 1. Demonstrating mastery of the subject matter (explain the subject matter without relying solely on the prescribed textbook), 2. Draws end share information on the state on the art of theory end practice in his/her discipline _[statsiata | 2. tntegrete ebjoet 0 prastialeteurateness and em ig intens/purposes of sents syatstate | 4. Bilan the relevance of present topic tothe previous lessor, and relates the subject matter torelavant || 4727212 | current issues and/or dally Me acts. ['S. Demonstrotes up-to-date knowledge and/or awareness on Curent Wonds and waves othe abject 5 _ i E Total Score Teaching for independent Learning (30%) z= aa am 1. Creates teaching strategies that allow students to pradtice sig concepts they need to undaratand sfalapaa | (interactive discussion) i Baal jaa 2. Enhances student self-esteem and/or gives due recognition to students’ performance/patentials. Ts{a[ajairl P3.Allows students to create thelr own course with objectives and realistically defined studentprofersornles | Eta, (2/1) and make them accountable fr their performance : 4 Allows students to thinkindependently and make their own decisions and holding hem accountable for | S| 4a?) ther performance based largely on ther success in executing deceons, : ' | 5. Encourages students to learn beyond what i required and help/gude the eudents how io appW the spapayay i concepts learned ieareeaceran oa Total Scare aaa | D. Management of Learning (30%| a 2 ‘Scale 1. Creates opportunities fr intensive and/or extensive oniribution of students athe dass actties(eg. |S T@T3 1277 | breaks class into dyads, tlds or buzetack group). : { | 2.Assumes roles as fsitator, resource person, conc, ngoritgraton, weve i drawing tudentsto 3] #13] 777 | contribute to knowledge and understanding of the concepts at hands ou LEE | 3 Designs and implements learning conditions and experience tht promotes heathy exchenge and/or syaispaqa confrontations. “a a 4. Structures/restruclures learning and vaching ledning contexte enhance aanment of callectnve slalsyaa | Learning objectives. { |S. Use of instructional Materials (audio/ideo materials flaring tim zhowing, eomouteraidedinstiwcioms 3 14 [3121 a Eda ie einieaclonaey pease " Sonera || Bee eee - EE Bae Total Score | it ea i anes SanatureofEatuator Se ame of ehater aos Postion of falter DateAppendix 8 The QCE of the NBC No. 461 for Research Instrument 1: CLENTELE SATISFACTION Rating Perio 10 Name of Facuty ‘Academic Rank: Evaluators: Anyone trom the esearch clientele © Stutent © Parent © Teacher © Community © Othore (Please Indisto) Title of Project: Instruction: Please evaluate the faculty using the scale below. Encircte your rating Seale Descriptive Rating | ‘Qualitative Description 5 Outstanding |The performance almost always exceeds the job requirements. The Faculty an exceptional role modl a VerySaistatoy | The pafomince meets and ofan evceeds the ob 3 Satisfactory ‘The performance meets job requirements 7 Ri ] The performance needs seme development fo meet job requirements, 7 Poor The facully file to meet job requirements Facuilly ParformancelOut yt Seale yon ttt 1. masta oi date eta roatan wine we | s | «fa | 2 4 Sine canes Ge exes ona Meet and discusses with the clientele the know how of the research | results for its usability and/or clients benefits Disserninates and/or present research results in a forum or ‘symposium for proper information ofthe clienele. aoe = aie L Ltiizes appropriate research procedures, andor methodologies in | meeting cllents’ needs and problems. i Sncens | Total Seore:___ nature of WilnessAppendix C The QCE of tho NBC No. 451 for Research Instrument 2: LEADERSHIP Rating Period: to Name of Facully Acaemic Rank: Evaluators: The immediate supervisor © Program Project Leaders © College Research Coordinator Project Leader for Study Leaders College Research Director © Others (Please Indicate) Title of Project Instruction: Please evaluate the fecuity using the scafe below, Encircle your rating [Seale Descriptive Rating Quaittative Description i The performance almost always exceeds the job } 8 Outstandin: I standing | ceairements. ‘The Faculy s an exceptional role model i i The performance meets and often exceeds the job Very Satistactor eau requirements - He He) 3 Satisfactory The perfomance meels jb requirements 7 ra ‘The performance needs some development to meat job requirements, | june Poor ‘The faculty ails to meet job requirements Faculty PerformancelOutpu: 1, Regularly communicates quality output of the research proceeding 10 colleagues/stafficientele/ subordinates. 2, Manages priorities fo gel the job done and able to looks for better | |ways {0 contronts confict situations in an hones! and dicect manne: 3, Encourage/motivates participstion/cooperation af the people evolved | In the research proceedings ‘Suggesvintroduces strategies: ‘hat enhanced | | 4, coleagues/otfcentl/subordnass’ lil até abies © pororm | 8 | theroseerc acy ina nae effet manner | Communicates directly, openly, honestly and shares information with| 5. the concemed individual or’ people involved in their research| 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 procesding Signature of Evaluator Tame oF Winness Position of evaluator “Agency and Position Date DateAppendix D The QCE of the NEC No. 454 for Research Instrument 3: PARTRERSHIP DEVELOPMENT Rating Period: to Name of Faculty: Acadomic Rank: Evaluators: Anyone from the research slakeholders or immediate beneficiaries of research projectslaciities © Research Stakeholder (© Immediate Benoficities of Research Projects/Actvities, © Others (Please Indicate) Title of Project: Ieee eee ae eeeeeeeeeEeCeSHeTS ‘Instruction: Please evaluate the faculty usiig the scale below. Encitcle your rating. Descriptive Rating | Qualitative Description ‘The performance almost always exceeds the job _Teauirements. The Faculty is an exceptional role model Outstanding fery Satisfactory | Th* performance meets and often exceeds the job + Very Satisfactory | raquemonts a Satisfactory ‘The performance meets job requirements 2 Fie The performance needs some development ta mee! job requirements, eae 7 Toca fale ort iob equarent 11, Coordinates with (acai residents, businesses and other government functionaries for possible rosoarch collaboration | 2. Promotes networking activites with focal conmunities and various |g research agencies to gain supportcooperation on research activities. Conducts consultative meetings and/or dialogues with stakeholders: | 1 2. Gn poly reseoreh agenda suppertng tne ness fef4i 3]? Regulary meet concerned sector to disas ways in which the ] | 4. research undertaking can create belter earning and working] 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 ‘environment | Communicates directly, openly, honestly and shares information with | 5. the concemed sectors, and considering comments, and suggestions | 5 | 4 3 | 2 | 4 for improvement if necescary i Total Score “Signature of Eveluaior ‘Signature of Witness Wame of Evaliaior Name of Witness Position of Evaluator ‘Agency and Position Date Date‘Appendix & ‘The QCE of the NBC No. 461 for Research Instrument 4: COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY Rating Period: to Name of Faculy ‘Academic Rank: Evaluators: Anyone from the external and internal communities © Students, Community (Representative) © Local Community (Representative) © others (Please indicate) of Project Instruction: Please evaluale the faculty using the scale below. Encircle your rating, Seale Qualitative Description ane ‘The performance almost always exceeds the job a Cemaneina: racuirements. The Faculty isan exceptional role modet 4 | Vary Satitnctory The Pernmance meets and ofan exceeds the job 3 Satisfactory “Ths performance meets job requirements a The performance needs some development to meal job _? " recuirements. 4 1 “The faculty falls to meat job requirements Faculty Performance/Output ‘Scale ‘Greater cafe rorearch environmen! where actvlioe oonducled concider 1. the ethical and morat predicament of the community andlor the sector 3 1 invoWved Conducis. reacerches/feasibiliy studies where implications on the 7 7 responsiblity of he concemed sectors to the community are addressed 3, Itilates and develops inlerventons that Inerzase amareness of the 3 1 ponsiblty of polcy-makere, ele. based an the research findings. ‘The researchessfeasibilly studies conducted with signiticant contibution te 4. the community and intrease awareness on commurity Issues and 3 {a concerns, # Es |The researcher assumes impartial responsititty and accountabity an the | 5, research proceeding and its effect or impact to the community andlor other 3 1 sectors ivaived - Total Score! ‘Signature of Evaluator Signatue ofWiness Nae oF Brant Name Wines “Roslin ef Evaluator Tajeney and Powter Date batAppendix F ‘The QCE of the NBC No. 481 for Extension Instrument 4: CLIENTELE SATISFACTION Rating Period: to Name of Faculty Academic Rank: Evaluators: Clientele of the Extension Prograns/Projecis/Acivites ProsidenuChaliman of Orgenzatan Involved Barangay Chairperson Student Parent oo000°0 Others (Please Indicate) Title of Project: Instruction: Please evaluate the faculty usirg the scate below. Encircle your rating Scale Descriptive Rating ‘Quatitative Description - ‘The performance almost always exceeds the job requlcements, The Facully i an exceptional role mocel 5 Outstanding The performance meets and often exceeds the job 4 Very Satisfactory tilting Satisfactory Theperlormance meels jab requirements a The performance needs some development to meet job requirements, 4 Poor ‘The fecully fais to meet ob requirements [ Faculty Pertormance/Output Seale The exesin prgpcoaen bose oye vemdblwa of he clans T +. Chowan ene ate chanGuneg Hoceressoncetmmetie | 6 | «| 3 eer j Meet and discusses with the clerteie the know how of the extension | 5 | 4] a] 2| 4 2 _activity(s) for its usabilly andlor chents benetits feel ‘There is an information campaign ‘or proper information of the clientele 1 3 about the extension aciviys) Ee freee [see 4. Moners and evaluates te quenity ond qualiyofsenies movies to | [4 | 3 2] 4 45 Extension actviy(s) realy helps andor adcress the cients needs or! S| 4] 3] 2] 4 problems i Total Score: ‘Signature of Evaluator “Signature of Witness Wane of Evauator Name ofwitness Position of Evaluator ‘Tgeney and Position ae Date DateAppendix ‘The QGE of the NBG No. 461 for Extension Instrument ?: LEADERSHIP. Rating Perioe: to Name of Facuty ‘Academic Rank: Evaluators: Immeciate Suponssor © Director for Extension © TeanvProject leader © College Extension Coordinators © Others (Please Indicate) Title of Project: Instruction: Please evaluate the faculty using the scale below, Encircle your rating Seale [Deserts Rag ‘Quatatve Descrintion “he” perormance almost aways exceeds Te pb ‘ Cuntancing | requirments Th Foci an avceplonl le mesel | “The_performanco teels end cfen exceeds the ob + Ver Satisfactory | THe, sear 3 Salsfactory | Theperanance neeis ob equkonents i a The parormance needs some devlopmant To het lab auioment Peer Thefecuy fa fo nei regueneris ae Faclly PetormancslOutpar Seale 4, Regularly communicates quality output of the extension proceeding to colleagues/statticlientele/ subordinates, 2, Manages priorities to yet the job done and able 10 1o0ks fer better ‘ways fo confronts confit situations in an hones! and direct manner sfals|2]a +3, Encourage/motivates particpation/cooperation 3f the people evolved in the extension actvity(s). ‘Suggesvintroduces strategies that enhanced 4. colleaguesistaticlientele/subordinates’ skills ard abilties to perform| 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | + the extension activity(s) in 2 more atficiont manne. Communicates directly, openly, honestly and svares information with 5, the concemed individual or people involved in their extension| 8 | 4 | 3 | 2 | + aciviy(s) Total Seare: Bansture of Evaluator “Name of Evaluator Name of Witness: “Position of Evaluaior “Agency and Position eee Bate DateAppendix H Tho GCE of the NBC No. 464 for Extension Ingtrument 3: PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT Rating Period: to Name of Faculty: Academic Renk: Evaluators: Stakeholders of the Extension Programs/Projects/Activities © Barangay Chairperson 0 President of PO (© Municipal Mayor © President of NGO © Others (Please Indicate) Title of Project: Seer eee Instruction: Please evaivale the faculty using the scale below. Encitcle your reting. [-Seate Descriptive Rating Qualitative Deseription We perrarce almost ahvays encosds” he ob it Outstanding requirements, The Faculty is an exceptional role mode! i VerySainaceny | Te, mes ress an een oxreas Be Fo i Sainfactory | The porormance Tesi [5 eaters ; ee T tre pertormance neede some develop to real job __| regents z Poor [Tho leaf rae ob equaments Facully Pertormance/Outeut Seate Coordinates with local residents, businesses and other government | 5 functionaries for possible extension colaboraton, Conducts consultatwe meetings andlor diaiegues wih stakeholders | «| 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 on priority extension plan supporting their needs. Regularly meet concerned sector to discuss ways in which the 3. extension undertaking can create beller working environment, and ful| 5 | 4 | 3) 2 | 4 cooperation and participation I Establishes linkages with locelinational agencies for possible funding afa|a © of extension undertat ings {sourcing of funds). 7 f Communicates drei, openly, honesty and shares information with 5. the concerned sector. and eansdeang comments, a suggestions | 5 | 4 | 9 | 2] 4 forimprovernent necessary { Total Score ‘Signature of Evaluator Ar ‘Signature of Witness ‘Name of Evaluator “Name of Witness ~ Poslfon of Evaluator “agency and Pasion Date Date‘Appondix | ‘Tho QCE of tho N3C No. 464 for Extension Instrument 4: COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY Rating Period: to Name of Facuty: Academic Rank: Evaluators: Parties from the external and internal community (0.9. external: Head of an NGO, PO, Local Chief Execulive of the LGU, GO; Internal: Directors, Dept. Charman, Deans, ete.) © Head, NGO © Head, Go © Head, PO © Head, LGU © Others (Please Indicate) Title of Project: Instruction: Please evaluate tne faculty usng the ecole below, Encirole your rating, Sear Descriptive Rating 7 Tie perermance eimost_aivays exceads the jb 5 __ Outstanding requremante The Facutyis an eneptona le Model | fae Vary sates | TB, Pedoance mee and fon excests the i 3 Saliataciory | The pertormance meets jb eutements : ; The performance needs some development to meet job setae requrements, The facut fase eal Bb equ Faculty Performance/Outpat Creates safe working environment where actviias conducted consider the | ethical and motel predicament of he community andlor the sector mowed | © | 4 | 3 | 2) 1 Conducts extension aciviy(s) where the resporsiilies of the concemed sectors to the community are adkressed Rela eeee The exension ectviy(s) conducted with signfcant contibuton to the Community and increase awareness on comminty issues and cancers ‘The extension aciviy(s) is insvumental ander & of considereton of publie 4. safety, environmental sefety. and sharing of qualty.relaied information| 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 with the sector involved ‘Assumes impartial responsibilty and accountbilty on the extension 5 proceeding and its effect or impact to the communty andor omereeaore | 6 | 4 | a | 2 | + Invaives, Total Score: “Synalie of Signature of Witness ‘Namo of Evaluatar Name of Witness a Position of Evaluator ‘Agency and Position Date DateApparidix J ‘The QCE of the NBCNo. 461 for Production Instrument 1: CLIENTELE SATISFACTION Rating Period: to Name of Faculty Academic Rank Evaluators: Clientele (ie. Students, Faculty Members, School Administrators, Agency Head, Community Residents) © Stusent © Schoo! Administrator © Faculty Member © Agency Head © Community Resident (Reprasentalvs) © Others Please indicate) Title of Project: Instruction: Please evaluate tne faculty using the scale below. Encircle your tating Scale Descriptive Rating Qualitative Description The requirements. The Fact ormance almost always exceads the joD san exceptional role mode! ‘The performance meets and offen exceeds the job sequivements 5 Outstanding 4 Very Satisfactory __ Satisfactory ‘The performance meets job requirements 5 eal ‘The performance needs come development to meat job cequirements. 7 _____ Poor “The faculty fails to meet job requirements Faculty Performance/Output Scale Involves centele in the planning process of the intended production 4, actvily there is @ consultation withthe client dug the conceptuaizaton | 8 | 4 | 3 | 2 | + ofthe said activity) Mest ond discusses with the clertela the know how of the produetion 2. actiity(s) for its usabilty andlor clents benefits, ardiorto asses ‘ho qualty | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 of production services provided 55, There is an information campaign for proper infermation of the clientele | 5 about the production activity}. Monitors and evaluates the quanti and qu iy of services provided to | 5 Clentele {5 Ad0pta ara implementa a aytom that cupporie of eaiang ornteoe |, | |g | eedlprblems Total Score Signatare of Wn ‘Name of Evaluator oe ‘Name of Witness on Postion of Evaluator ‘gency and Postion Date Date‘Appendix The QCE of the NBC No. 461 for Production Instrument 2: LEADERSHIP Rating Period: to Name of Facuty ‘Academic Rank: Evaluat "28 Clientele (i.e. school administrator, agency heed, immediate Supervisor) © immediate Supervicor ° ‘School Administrator Agency Head ° © Others (Please indicate) Title of Project: ee Instruction: Please evaluate the facuity using the scale below. Encircle your rating Scale Descriptive Rating ‘Qualitative Description i tstanding | TS palace altent sors esceedh be pb jeeteaaae acne requlrements. The Faculty is en exceptions role model The performance meets and often exceeds the job 4 Ver Satstectony | fhe, peter z Saisiaciory | Theperomance mooi eqlreren iaans — The perarmanca needs some development mee ob | _| eonuement ee Poor Tho uty aa 1 meet ob Fearon Faculty Performance/Output Scale Regularly communicates quality output of the production proceeding to coleaguesistatficiontele! suborcinates, ‘Manages prortes to get the job dane and able 1 looks fer better ways fo confronts confit situations in an honest and direct manner I +, Encaurageimotvates part cpation/cooperation of te people evelved inthe | production acts} Suggesvintrasuces ‘strategies what enhanced 4 collesguesistatictentelersubordinates' kis and abiities to perform tee | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | + Production activity in a more efficient marine | Communicates directly, openiy, honestly and shaves information with the concerned individual or seopie involved in their production activiy(s} Total Score: “Signature of Evaluator ignalure of Witness “Wame of Evaluator Name of Wines: 7 Position of Eval ‘Agency and Posilian Date DateAppendix L ‘The QCE of the NBC No. 461 for Production Instrument 3: PARTVERSHIP DEVELOPMENT Rating Period, to Name of Faculty Academic Rank: Evaluators: : Clientele (e , students, administrator, agency head, business entities) © Student © Agency Head © Schoo! Administrator © Business Entiios © Others (Please Indicate) Title of Project: eu Instruction: Pleese evaluate the faculty usng the scale below Encicle your rating Scale Descriptive Rating ‘Qualitative Description ae The performance slmost always exceeds the job a cestendiog: recultements. The Faculty is an exceptional role model i Tha” pavormanca meets and otlen exceeds the job m4 atistacton ee "| EEE Salsfastory The perormance mgas jb equvenens pea ; The perormance needs some development W rest job fees ie reculrements ee a Poor Th oct aw neat eaiFomenia Faculty Performanee/Outpat Seale Coordinates with tocal residents, businesses and other govemment functionaries for possible production artivty(s) collanoration 2, Conducts consultative meetings andlor dialogues with stakeholders (on priority production plan supporting thelr needs, Regularly meet concerned sector to aiscuss ways in which the| | 3, production undertaking can creaie better working environment, and | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2) 4 full cooperation an participation. 4, Establishes linkages with local/national agences for possible funding lale of production undertakings (sourcing of funds). I Communicates directly, openly, honestly and shares information with | 5. the concemed sectors, and considering comments, and suggestions | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 {or improvement f necessary. Total Score: ‘Signature of Evatuator ‘Signature of Witness Narve of Evaluator Nama 6 in Position of Evaldator ‘Ageney and Posi Date DateAppendix M ‘The QCE of the NBC No. 481 for Production Instrument 4; COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY Rating Period: to Name of Facuty: Academic Rank: Evaluators: Gilentele (e.g. students, faculy members, school edminisrators, Agency head, business entities, community residents) © Student Agency Head Faculty Member © Business Entities Schoo! Administrator Community Resident © Others (Please indicate) Title of Project: = see Instruction: Please evelvate the faculty using the scale below. Encircle your rating Seale | Dosoiptve Rates| Quattatve Desorption viotonai The perormance ainost aways exceeds the. 6b cece ee «| voryaeuscen |, faromace ments an fen sends ion a "Satisfactory | The performance ees ob reauterona Fal va The pevermance needs sore development to eat ob Bett Boot “The ec fale 6 oa ob requremeria Faculty Portomance/Output Seale 1, Ceates safe working environment where activities canducted consider the ethical and mara prediecamant of the community andlor the sector involved | 7 Sond prodscton avi) were espesbes of ie concord eee | sla}ala}a ‘The production program extends technical assbtance which supports community activites, UUtizes eppropriate production procedures that conserve and prevent aie damage tothe environment I ‘Assumes impanial responsibly and accountabiy on the production | : 5. actvity(s) and its effect or impact to the community and/or other sectors| § | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 Involved Total Seore: ‘Signature of Evaluator ‘Signature of Witness Namie of Evaluator Name of Wiiness “Position of Evaluator ‘Agency and Position Date DateAppendix N The QCE of the NBC No, 461 (Commitment Form for RESEARCH/EXTENSION/PRODUCTION) Rating Period: : to Name of Faculty: Academic Rank: Subject Matter (Title of Study/Activities): Rationale (Significance and/or Relevance of the Study/Activities) : Objectives (Consider the four areas of assessment): HEE Signature of Faculty Concerned Recommending Approval Approved Dean — Director (Research/Extension/Production)Appendix O The QCE of the NBC No. 461 (Sample Computation for Instruction Area per Rating Period) Rating Period: to Name of Faculty: Academic Rank: COMPUTATION PER EVALUATOR Formula/Equation Areas of Evaluation — | 308! | % 0 pone fps. ‘A, Commitment 25 | 20 25 =25%20 20 B, Knowledge of Subject 25 | 20 25 +25 x 20 20 ©. Teaching for independent learning} 25 | 30 | 25+25%30 30 | D, Management of Learning 25 | 30 25 = 25 x 30 30 | Total QGE Point 100 Legend for the Formuta/Equation: fs = Total Score fps = Highest Possible Score: % = Percentage Signature of Evaluator Name of Evaluator Position of Evaluator DateAppendix P The QCE of the NBC No, 461 (Sample Computation for Instruction Area per Rating Period) Rating Period: to Name of Faculty, Academic Rank: SUMMARY OF COMPUTATION OF FOUR EVALUATORS A % Formula/Equation | QcE iat Rating |Pscenaoo] aan Point IA. Students 100 |~.30 7oo%30 | 30 IB. Peers too [20 400 x 20 20 IC. Self 400 _|~.20 [400 x.20 20 |. Immediate Supervisors] 100 [30 700.30 30 Total QCE Point 100) Legend for the Formula/Equation ar = Average Rating % Percentage Recorded and Computed by: Reviewed by: Signature over Printed Name ~~ Signature over Printed Name Position/Designation Position/Designation Hs Date ~ a Date Conforme: _ Signature of the Ratee DateAppendix Q The QCE of the NBC No. 461 Sample Computation per Rating Period (RESEARCH/EXTENSION/PRODUCTION) Rating Period: to Name of Faculty: Academic Rank: ae SUMMARY OF COMPUTATION OF EVALUATORS’ RATING TO THEIR RESPECTIVE AREA OF EVALUATION : Average % : Areas of Evaluation Seere ae tage | QCE Point A, Clientele Satisfaction 25 25 25 B. Leadership 25 25 25 C, Partnership Development 25 25 25 D. Community Responsibility 25 oeetta| 25 Total QCE Point _] 100 Recorded and Computed by: Reviewed by Signature over Printed Name "Signature over Printed Name Position/Designation ~~ Position/Designation seeeeceeveaee Date = i Date Conforme: _ Signature of the Ratee DateAppendix R The QCE of the NBC No. 461 Sample Computation per Rating Period (RESEARCH/EXTENSION/PRODUCTION) Rating Period: to Name of Faculty: Academic Rank: SUMMARY OF COMPUTATION OF FOUR AREAS OF EVALUATION ace | % |_Formula/Equation | ace ees |am ecg apx% Point [A instruction 400 |36 | __ T0036 35 B. Research 00_[ “50 100.50 | 80 Ic. Extension “100 |~10 400%.10 10 0. Production foo [5 100 x05 5 Total QCE Point 400 Legend for the Formula/Equation: QD QCE Points per Area of Evaluation % = Percentage Recorded and Computed by: Reviewed by: “Signature over Printed Name ‘Signature over Printed Name ~ Position/Designation Position/Designation Date : Date Conforme: _ ‘Signature of the Ratee DateSORSOGON STATE UNIVERSITY Sorsogon city, Sorsogon Name of Faculty: College/Campus: Present Rank: Department: PASUC COMMON CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF FACULTY Nec 461, ‘SUMMARY OF POINTS “| Previous | Additional Major Components | Maximum | Poinisof | Pointsofnec | TOTALCCE} ace ee Points | NBC463, | 461,8™ Cycle | POINTS | POINTS a 7*-acycle utc Educational Qualification 85 Experience and Length of Service 25 i Professional ae Development, 3-9 Achievement and ia Honors _ : i TOTAL _ | \ f L Rank: LOCAL EVALUATION COMMITTEE: REVIEW COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS: ‘MEMBERS: I iEVALUATION OF FACULTY PERFORMANCE ON INSTRUCTION ___Sem.$.¥. TALLY SHEET NAME OF PROFESSOR Campus/College/Department a 7 Evaluator/s: |A. COMMITMENT (20%) 5 ‘ 3 2 a | Weighted | Mean ceo 7 bs 1 aoe : Be Total i KNOWLEDGE OF ie i 1 meseet s ; sf ok fa | Maiee | (MATTER eae : | 2 - Es 3. a a ait 5. a é z ee z ; Total i ". TEACHING FOR - a = i: INDEPENDENT 5 4 3 2 a | Melehes NING ic — z i - [ Totl| | 3. MANAGEMENT OF ‘ Weighted | Leaanns betel Eee Ae : 2 | mean a ete a Total |ws PERSONAL DATA SHEET - NBC 461 NOTE: THIS FORM WILL BE FILLED BY THE FACULTY MEMBERS OF a STATE COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTIONS: 1. FILL OUT THIS FORM ACCURATELY AND LEGIBLY. TYPEWRITTEN OR HANDWRITTEN, REFER TO TO ATTACHED NOTES FOR DETAILS. 2. FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE SAME SIZE OF BOND PAPER. FOLLOW THE SAME FORMAT. Name: Date Sex Civil Status: Home Address Telephone No, Mailiig Audiess: ‘Telephone No, College Deparmest: Present Rank / Sub-Rank: Status of Appointment: Annual Salary: Date of Last Appointment / NOSA: Page 1 of 7EDUCATION QUALIFICATION LL. Highest relevant academic degree or educational attainment and additional equivalent degree earned related to the position, fice Degree Earned ‘Specialization Tastution ‘Year obtained 1.2. Additional credits earned towards an appropriate higher degree. Baccalaureate Maser Doctoral EXPERIENCE AND LENGTH OF SERVICE 2.1. Service Record (including full- ne, research, exiei snsion service, admi ative experience and industrial experienc: Tnclisive Position Held Page 20f73.0 Professional Development achievement and honors 3.1. Discoveries, pat ed inventions, innovations, publ ions and other creative works, Nature of innovations 71 tions Patent Number ‘Year Patented 3.1.2, - 3.1.5. Published books, research, monographs, articles, insiructione! manual, workbooks, and AV mat Nature (books researches, monographs, Date of film, rnstryctional materia Publication/copvricht Completa Title Role Page 3 of 73.2. Expert Services, Training and Active Participation in professional/technical activities 3.2.1. Training Courses and Services, (including academic, technical, industrial, agro-industrial and fishery training) A. Training “Title of Training Sponsoring Agenov Level (int, Natl, Reg’ Local, Instl) Inclusive Dates E ‘Rdcitional sheel/s may be wed if necessary B. Conferences, seminars, etc. E “Tile of Conference ‘Sponsoring Agency Inclusive Dates nal sheel/s may be wed ir necessary 3.2.2. Expert Services A. Consultancy Name’ Area of Consultancy Country Sponsoring Agency inclusive Dates Page 4 of75. Active Participation in racing, workshop, conference, as coordinator, lecturer, resource person, guest speaker — Title of Conference, Seminar, Workshops, ete Nature of Participants Sponsoring Agency Additional sheet/s may be used if necessary C. For expert services as adviser in doctoral dissertation and masteral thesis. Tile of Paper Nawe Tnclusive Dates ‘Additional sheet/s may be used if necessary n, service as coach/trainer, adviser of student organization. D. For Certified Services (including reviewer/examiner in PRC, accreditation work, trade skill cert Name/ Area ‘Company T Agency ‘Additional sheet/s may be used if neccssary Page § of 73.3. Membership in professional orgenizations/honors societies and honors received. 3.3.1, Menibership in professional/honors societies Name of Organization Date of Membership ‘Additional shoots may be used if necessary 3.3.2, Academic received Honors Received ‘Degree Obtained Trattution Address 3.3.3, Scholarship/Fellowship Nature (Compative: intl Natl, Regi, Lec a ina tone eee Non-Competitive: Page 6 of 73.4, Awards of function received, recognition of achievement areas of specialization professior/assignment Title of Award of Distinction Field of Services Grantee Organization 3.5. Community Outreach Service oriented projects participated in the community Project Panicipants/Service Sponsoring Agency Tnelasive Dates 3.6. ‘Adivieaal sheets may be used Wf necessary Professional Examination Rating Date Thereby certify to the correctness and accuracy of the above statements. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to me before me this day of to me his/her Page 7 of 7 ued at Signature of Faculty Member . affiant exhibiting (Person Administering Oath)