Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to American Imago
Psychoanalytic Interpretation
In the first years, psychoanalysts examined myths to
confirm Freud's findings (Rank, 1912) that dreams and
myths are equivalent. Abraham (1909) found that dreams
were private myths and myths were collective dreams. With
the introduction of psychoanalytic ego psychology (1923),
the emphasis changed. Arlow (1961) stressed that myths
transmit the values of a culture; they help to mold individu
als to fit into a given culture. They can also be educational,
helping the ego to obtain mastery over the id.
Arlow (1964) also suggested that myths play an impor
tant role in the education of the younger generation. As
different societies have different ideals, they also have dif
ferent mythologies. Mythology can therefore be used as an
(Jowett translation)
[pp. 263-266]
Mythical Echo becomes the clinical "as if" which we under
stand as a developmental failure to internalize.
Psychoanalytic Interpretation
this trip, both noticed with amazement that they had lost
the need for the transistional object. This is indeed a psy
choanalytic fairy tale. It is conceivable that Pygmalion's
Galatea initially was such a transitional object.
The psychoanalytic understanding of perversions
opens still another door to the interpretation of the Pyg
malion tale. What happened to Pygmalion is the very op
posite of what transpires in fetishism and transvestivism.
In these perversions, the disappointment in the partner is
so great that the mate is replaced by some inanimate ob
ject. Unlike the living being, the fetish does not change,
has no wishes, and makes no demands. Pygmalion may
well have been such a fetishist before his wish was granted.
In that case, Aphrodite can be seen as a therapist who
helped him find the road back from fetishism to hetero
sexuality. Ovid gives us no further details. Did Galatea
become a real woman with her own personality, or did she
remain a statue endowed with locomotion and sexual re
sponsiveness? If she did become a real woman, would Pyg
malion be capable of accepting her individuality? Was he
able through this miracle to develop a human relationship?
Did the statue acquire both life and human independence?
Can one expect Galatea to love her creator or will she have
to find her own mate once her birth into womanhood has
been accomplished? To all these questions, Ovid gives no
answer. In Pygmalion, Bernard Shaw showed that, psycho
logically speaking, divine intervention is not necessary for
narcissistic love. The Pygmalion story is repeated in the
play though the education of a gutter snipe. Shaw should
be credited with the insight that Pygmalion is a variant on
the theme of Narcissus. The character of Professor Hig
gins is a composite of the two.
The Pygmalion story, so delightfully told by Ovid, rests
on deeper anxiety-evoking foundations. For an inanimate
object coming to life evokes feelings of the uncanny. In an
essay on the uncanny, Freud (1919) recapitulated Hoffman's
story where the student Nathaniel, already engaged to a real
woman, falls in love with the mechanical doll Olympia. In
Freud's interpretation, the mechanical doll (created by Na
thaniel's father in the split image of the all-bad father, the
"What I believe about dolls," she said, "is that they can
do things they will not let us know about. Perhpas Em
ily [the doll] can read, talk and walk, but she will only
do it when people are out of the room. That is her
secret. If people knew that dolls could do things they
would make them work. So, perhaps they have prom
ised each other to keep it a secret. If you stay in the
room, Emily will just sit there and stare. But if you go
out, she will begin to read perhaps or go and look out
of the window. Then if she heard either of us coming,
she would just run back and jump into her chair and
pretend she had been there all the time."
Dane rushes back, but she comes too late; Narcisus has
fainted. He has lost his power to speak. (In this version,
Narcissus becomes Echo.) By his gestures he conveys to her
that he had repented of his harshness. He holds out his
arms, moves his lips to show her that he is now capable of
loving. Dane cannot stand the thought that her own cruel
prayer was the cause of his death. There is no comfort for
her; she must die with him.
Guilt, remorse, and Liebestod differentiate the medieval
Narcisus from the classical. In a truly Christian fashion,
Narcisus dies a repentent sinner.
From a psychoanalytic point of view, it is of interest to
note that Narcisus first remembers his mother, father, and
sister, and then his thoughts turn to the woman who loves
him. The author intuitively understood that the road back
from narcissism to love leads through the revival of the
infantile and incestuous love for the parents.
Another medieval version of the myth of Narcisus is
found in the Romance of the Rose by Guillaume de Lorris. In
this story, the hero is a dreamer who, in his dream, walks in
a garden and discovers the fountain of Narcisus. A plaque
explains that Narcisus died here; the dreamer is pierced by
Amor's arrow. Because the dreamer knows the story of
Narcisus, he will escape death, but he has to go through a
long inner struggle.
Martin S. Bergmann
1130 nttn Ave.
References
Abraham, K. (1909), Dreams and myths. In Clinical Papers and Essays in Psycho
analysis, New York: Basic Books, 1955.
Arlow, J.A. (1961), Ego psychology and the study of mythology. J. Amer. Psycho
anal. Society, 9:371-389.
(1964), The madonna's conception through the eyes. Society of Psychoanal.
Study, Vol. 3.
Bergmann, M.S. (1953), Recall and distortion of legendary material in the course
of psychoanalysis. In Explorations in Psychoanalysis, ed. R. Lindner. The Julian
Press, 1953.
Bunker, H.S. (1947), Narcissus: a psychoanalytic note. Psychoanal, and the Social
Sciences 1:159-162.
Deutsch, H. (1942), Some forms of emotional disturbance and their relationship to
schizophrenia. (As if). Repreinted in Neurosis and Character Types, New York:
Int. Univ. Press, 1965.
(1973), Confrontations with Myself, New York: W.W. Norton.
Edwards, C.R. (1977), The Narcissus Myth in Spenser's poetry. Studies in Philology,
74:63-88.
Elkish, P. (1957), The psychological significance of the mirror./. Amer. Psychoanal.
Am. Volume V, pp. 235-244.
Freeman Sharpe, E. (1943), Cautionary tales. In: Collected Papers, London: Hog
arth Press, 1950.
Freud, S. (1900), The interpretation of dreams. St. Ed. 4 & 5.
(1905b), Three essays on the theory of sexuality. St. Ed. 7, p. 130-243.
(1908b), Hysterical phantasies and their relation to bisexuality. St. Ed. 9.
(1914), On narcissism: an introduction. St. Ed. 21.
(1916/1917), Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. St. Ed. 16 and 17.