Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drying Technology: Please Scroll Down For Article
Drying Technology: Please Scroll Down For Article
Drying Technology
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713597247
To cite this Article Chong, Li Vun , Chen, Xiao Dong and Mackereth, Anthony R.(2006) 'Experimental Results Contributed
to Early Detection of Smouldering Milk Powder as an Integrated Part of Maintaining Spray Drying Plant Safety', Drying
Technology, 24: 6, 783 — 789
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/03602550600685382
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03602550600685382
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly
or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Drying Technology, 24: 783–789, 2006
Copyright # 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 0737-3937 print/1532-2300 online
DOI: 10.1080/03602550600685382
ing through the hot air could potentially start a fire or even an The work presented in this article was part of a larger
explosion in milk powder dryers. Explosive behavior is more fre- project in which the thermal ignition of dairy powders
quently experienced in the modern industry, where high production was studied.[3] The thermal ignition characteristics of vari-
throughputs are desired. It has been known that powder at such a
state emits carbon monoxide (CO). The work reported in this article ous milk powders have been established using the novel
is the study of the characteristics of CO generation during the basket heating methods that have been reported already
incomplete combustion of milk powders. The powders used in the in the literature[4,5] by the same authors. In these tests, steal
study were whole milk and skim milk. Samples placed in a reactor mesh baskets were used to contain milk powders with cer-
were heated using air at 300C. The exhaust air of the reactor was tain packing densities, which were heated in circulated hot
continuously measured for CO concentration using a highly sensi-
tive CO analyzer. Temperatures were monitored, and the smoke air oven. The transient method of measuring ignition para-
produced during the combustion of whole milk powder was collected meters such as activation energies was developed and
and analyzed using gas-chromatography mass-spectroscopy (GC- used.[3]
MS). Whole milk powder was found to produce significantly higher The aim of this part of the work was to determine the
amounts of CO than skim milk powder. Hydrocarbons, alcohols, characteristics of smoldering milk powder by examining
and carboxylic acids were tentatively identified during the GC-
MS analyses. Results from the study are definitely useful in optimiz- the generation of CO per unit mass of milk powders and
ing the use of an early fire detection system in milk powder plants. the changes in temperature as milk powder samples under-
went external heating. A reactor was designed for this pur-
Keywords CO detection; Fire detection; Smoke point; Spray pose so that the uniform behavior of each powder for CO
drying; Volatile analysis emission can be assessed. Hot air was used to heat milk
powder samples. The air leaving the reactor was analyzed
INTRODUCTION for CO by a very sensitive CO analyzer. Fresh whole and
It has been found that smouldering milk powder (before skim milk powders were tested. This article presents the
ignition occurred) produced detectable amounts of carbon results of the tests carried out. The significance of the
monoxide, CO.[1] The results of earlier tests have since been results on the design of an early fire detection system is
used by the Netherlands Institute of Dairy Research outlined.
(NIZO) in the design of an early fire detection system based
on measuring CO concentration in the exhaust stream of a
milk powder plant.[2] However, due to the confidentiality of EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS
the results, little about the characteristics of CO generation The combustion test rig consisted of a temperature-
controlled furnace, a reactor, a smoke detector, gas filters,
Correspondence: Xiao Dong Chen, Department of Chemical sample air cooling unit, gas analysis instruments, a data
and Materials Engineering, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1001, acquisition system and an optional air dilution line.
New Zealand; E-mail: d.chen@auckland.ac.nz Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the experimental
783
784 CHONG, CHEN, AND MACKERETH
FIG. 2. Cross section of the reactor showing the positions of the ther-
mocouples and sample; the right-hand end was attached to the furnace’s
quartz tube.
TABLE 1 TABLE 3
Composition of the whole milk powder (WMP) and skim Experimental parameters for the combustion tests
milk powder (SMP) used Whole Skim
Component WMP SMP Parameter milk powder milk powder
Protein 28.0 37.8 Inlet air 300 300
Lactose 36.8 49.8 temperature (C)
Fat 26.5 0.8 Rate of increase 3.3 3.3
Moisture 2.8 3.8 in temperature (C=min)
Ash=minerals 5.9 7.8 Air flow rate 10 11
(L=min at STP)
Dilution of sample air 10 times None
The pressure regulator and rotameter were adjusted to
give the desired air flows for the reactor and dilution
stream. For whole milk powder tests, the air flow rate in
The inlet temperature of 300C was found to be neces-
the dilution stream was such that the sample gas was
sary to ensure the ignition to occur, which guaranteed the
diluted ten times. The speed controller for the peristaltic
smoldering and then combustion states to be established.
pump was set to draw sample air from the reactor exhaust
Dilution was required for powders that produced more
tube at a rate of 0.3 L=min at STP. To dilute this sample air
than 1000 ppm of CO. This was because the highest output
ten times, the flow rate of the air for dilution was adjusted
range for the analyzer was 1000 ppm over a 10 V range.
to 2.7 L=min at STP. Temperature set-point and ramp were
Although readings above 1000 ppm continued to be dis-
entered on the controller, and the pump for the cooling
played on the analyzer’s LED display, the analyzer could
water was switched on.
not send an output signal of greater than 10 V.
Downloaded At: 03:21 21 January 2011
FIG. 4. CO and O2 concentrations measured during a whole milk FIG. 7. Sample temperature and CO concentration versus time mea-
powder test with inlet temperature ¼ 300C (sample ¼ 1.6 g); the time sured during a skim milk powder test with inlet temperature ¼ 300C
axis indicates time elapsed since the beginning of the experiments. (sample mass ¼ 2.1 g).
powder than for skim milk powder. This may be due to the
large fat content, which is the most oxidative component
in milk powder. This suggests that it is more difficult to
capture an early fire warning when producing skim milk
powder.
Downloaded At: 03:21 21 January 2011
TABLE 4
Maximum CO concentration, sample temperature and minimum O2 concentration measured for the smoldering
of milk powders
Maximum CO generated Maximum T Minimum Smoke
Powder Mass (g) (ppm) and per unit mass (ppm.g1) (C) O2 (%) point (C)
Whole milk 2.0 5890 440 (2945) 854 18 19.3 0.3 188 6
2.9 6360 200 (2193) 937 18 18.8 0.3 175 20
4.2 7850 550 (1869) 965 6 17.9 0.3 154 7
Skim milk 2.1 118 14 (56) 305 5 N=A 240 15
3.7 158 4 (43) 318 6 N=A 216 3
5.1 188 10 (37) 322 3 N=A 214 12
hot air, was insufficient to cause ignition of the sample. The reaction to form CO. Based on the simple reaction of car-
combustion behavior of skim milk powder was therefore bon and O2, 2C(s) þ O2(g) ! 2CO(g), the amount of O2
quite different to that of whole milk powder. Although consumed (initial O2 concentration minus the recorded
no visual inspection was possible (the reactor was made minimum O2 concentration) was used to calculate the
of solid stainless steel), the sample temperature (at times amount of CO formed. Table 5 compares the calculated
in excess of 750C) indicated that whole milk powder was maximum CO concentration based on the maximum
probably red hot at the peak of the combustion process, amount of O2 consumed (O2 concentration in air minus
Downloaded At: 03:21 21 January 2011
while there was only a brief smoldering period in the com- measured minimum O2 concentration) with the maximum
bustion of skim milk powder. CO concentration measured in the experiments for the
To examine the effect of temperature on CO generation, whole milk powder samples.
CO concentration was plotted against temperature. Figures It was obvious that the predicted CO concentrations
8 and 9 show the graphs of change in the exhaust air’s CO from O2 concentrations were significantly higher than the
concentration with sample temperature for three samples measured values from experiments. The calculated results
of whole and skim milk powders. Figure 8 shows that the indicated that the consumption of O2 was not solely for
first significant increase in CO concentration occurred at the oxidation reaction to form CO. The exaggerated pre-
200C for the two larger samples of whole milk powder. diction indicated that only a small amount of O2 was actu-
The second and even greater increase in CO concentration ally involved in the formation of CO. It was also possible
occurred when the sample temperature was about 260C that some of the O2 consumed was involved in the forma-
for the 4.2-g sample and about 320C for the 3.1-g sample. tion of CO2. Unfortunately, due to the lack of equipment,
The smallest sample showed a more gradual increase in CO no analysis on the formation CO2 was carried out.
generation with temperature. Another possible mechanism that consumed some of the
The increase in CO concentration for skim milk powder O2 was in the propagation stage of the autoxidation of the
was gradual for all three sample sizes. The two larger sam-
ples emitted similar amounts of CO for temperatures up to
about 240C. At a given temperature above 150C, the
amount of CO generated by the smallest sample was always
less than the two larger samples.
The main reason for the difference in amounts of CO
generated during the smoldering of the two types of pow-
der may be the composition of the powders. The major dif-
ference in the compositions of whole and skim milk
powders was the fat content, with whole milk powder hav-
ing a much higher amount of fat. It was suspected that
oxidation of fat was the main CO-generating reaction that
occurred during the heating of the sample. With a higher
fat content, more CO was generated during the smoldering
of whole milk powder.
The O2 concentration in the exhaust air was measured to FIG. 8. Change in CO concentration with sample temperature during
determine the amount of O2 consumed in the oxidation the smoldering of three whole milk powder samples of different mass.
788 CHONG, CHEN, AND MACKERETH
TABLE 5
Comparison between maximum CO concentration measured in the experiments with the
concentration calculated using the maximum O2 consumed for three whole milk powder tests
Calculated CO Measured CO
Mass (g) O2 consumed (%) concentration (ppm) concentration (ppm)
1.6 1.7 34,000 5890
2.9 2.2 44,000 6360
4.2 3.1 62,000 7850
MAINTAINING SPRAY DRYING PLANT SAFETY 789