You are on page 1of 46

R

E
H
o
GE
N
wt
E
oR
R
A
e
v
T
e
E
r
seC
OVI
DVa
xx-
Rel
at
edI
nj
ur
ie
san
dRe
pai
rDa
mag
edT
is
sue
REGENERATE: How to Reverse COVID
Vaxx-Related Injuries and Repair Damaged Tissue

REGENERATE: How to Reverse COVID Vaxx-Related Injuries and Repair Damaged Tissue
1
Introduction 2
Proof That COVID Vaccines Are Unsafe and Ineffective 2
The Clear Causative Relationship Between the C-19 Shot and Heart Disease 3
Dr. Brian Procter, MD 3
Dr. Angelina Farella 5
Public Reports and Testimonials That Contradict C-19 Shot’s Efficacy and Safety 9
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler 10
A Rising Concern About the Link Between COVID “Vaccines” and Increasing Miscarriage
and Infertility Rates 13
Dr. Lawrence Palevksy 14
Nicole Sirotek 14
The Mechanism of Destruction Caused by mRNA Tech 15
Dr. Seema Nanda 16
Highly Effective Treatments For Post-Vaxx Injuries 19
Dr. Henry Ealy - The 3 Stage Approach to Reversing “Sticky Blood” 19
Dr. Seema Nanda - Regenerative Healing of The Eye Using Amniotic Fluid 34
Dr. Cathleen Gerenger - What is Regenerative Medicine? 39
Conclusion 44

Introduction
When the COVID-19 vaccine rollout was first announced, many breathed a sigh of relief. They
thought that this would be the life-saving solution they needed to protect themselves and their
loved ones from dying from this “deadly virus” that the media had been reporting about.

On the other end of this, many people had concerns about the short amount of time that it had
taken for these vaccines to be developed. This sparked debates and even feuds between
families, friends, and work colleagues.

Many sided with the perspective that not getting the jab was selfish and meant putting the health
of others at risk. While others felt like there had to be dangers associated with putting something
in your body that had never been properly tested beforehand.
This debate isn’t settled yet. The corporate-sponsored media, Big Tech, the global government,
and health authorities are still doing everything they can to censor the truth about the rapidly
emerging dangers of the jab.

We’re still hearing news reports, health ads, and recommendations to get the jab. There’s still
ongoing talk about how COVID is still rife and that getting the vaccine is highly recommended
for protection.

This has been a mass fear campaign that has unethically given companies and authorities
power over our medical rights. And it has been done without true informed consent because
people were lied to about the safety of these vaccines.

Regardless of the arguments made to brainwash the population into getting poison shots,
there’s evidence that these vaccines are not safe, nor effective and so under many
circumstances should be immediately pulled from the market.

Proof That COVID Vaccines Are Unsafe and Ineffective


The extent to which the global government and the media use their authority to desensitize
people and divert them from the truth is shocking.

A recent documentary by investigative journalist, Stew Peters reveals the scary phenomenon of
“sudden adult death syndrome”. This is a term that has been coined as a cover-up for the
sudden deaths that are occurring right now.

And the major factor that correlates with this is the rollout of the COVID vaccines.

Experts have shown particular concern as healthy athletes have been collapsing on the field
due to cardiac issues.

Recently, Damar Hamlin, aged 24, who plays for the Buffalo Bills suffered a cardiac arrest
during a game after making a tackle. He had to be revived on the field and transferred to the
hospital where he remains sedated and in critical condition. [a]

This heartbreaking event has extreme significance because it has sparked the debate about
whether or not his vaccination status proves what surfacing reports have been saying all along.
The media has already responded by defending the possibility and has refuted the relationship
between vaccines and heart diseases like myocarditis.

There have been numerous testimonials and reports about the dangerous effects of these
so-called vaccines. With myocarditis being one of the most commonly reported side effects.
The Clear Causative Relationship Between the C-19 Shot and Heart
Disease
In June 2021, the CDC publicly admitted that heart inflammation had been reported at a much
higher rate in young people since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

During a presentation to a Food and Drug Administration advisory group last year, Dr. Tom
Shimabukuro who is the deputy director of the CDC's Immunization Safety Office confirmed 266
cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in vaccinated young people under the age of 30.

And the general number of cases before the vaxx rollout for this age group has been less than
100 in the past.

But sadly, even these numbers were underestimated.

In a recent interview I had with Dr. Brian Proctor, he revealed the real numbers of adverse
events post-vaccine since the rollout.

Dr. Brian Procter, MD

“Myocarditis cases related to the vaccine, likely exceed 2.1 million.”

I've been a physician for 25 years. When this crisis occurred, I knew as early as February 2020
that I needed to do something. I knew I couldn't count my regulatory agencies or my medical
boards or any of the professional societies. I didn't have any faith that they would tell me what to
do. And so I started researching in February about what I was going to do if this virus came to
my hometown. I developed a protocol based off of Raul's research in France and Dr. Zelenko’s
research in New York, and as well as Dr. Fauci's research from 2005 who said that the best way
to kill a coronavirus is to put the patient on Chloroquine, which shoots zinc into the cell to kill the
virus. He wrote it. It's in a textbook called Harrison's Textbook of Internal Medicine 2005. I saw
it.

I developed a protocol to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. I added vitamins C, B, D, and I


started treating patients. I treated my first patient in March of 2020. I treated 2,500 patients and I
tracked the data. Total to date, I've treated about 2,500. Three of them were incredibly ill and
unfortunately, I got to them too late and they passed away. My research was sought after and
ended up being published by Dr. Peter McCullough, and that's how I got my name on the map.

So he is my mentor. He is my hero. That's the way I see it. Most people see him the same. So I
wanted to talk to you about a couple of things, mainly about fear. There's nothing to be afraid of
here. Fear is his job. That's his job. Let him do his job. We have nothing to be afraid of,
especially something you can't even see. This virus, this disease, this pandemic, it's invisible.
There's nothing to be afraid of. There's nothing to fear, but fear itself. Fear is the enemy. It is the
devil's work. Destroying fear is God's work.
You have no reason to be afraid of this virus or any other virus. And everything I'm telling you is
based on actual data. This is what the actual data shows. The data that has not been given to
you, the people. The people have been denied the facts. You all been denied the facts for three
years. I've been denied the facts. We've all gotten censored. We got censored on Facebook,
Twitter, and everything else you can think of. But I want you to think about changing the way you
think, change the way you think to a critical thinking process. When you bring in information and
someone tells you something, I want you to think about what's said and analyze it. So I'm going
to say two simple questions that if someone can answer these in favor of it, let me know
because it doesn't make any sense to me.

Okay. Question number one, if your mask works, why do I need one? That should tell you
there's something wrong. If your vaccine works, why do I need one? There's something wrong.
There's something wrong with all of this. You do not have to be a healthcare worker to see that
these two simple questions refute everything we've been told about this pandemic and this
vaccine and this virus for the past two and a half years. What happened to the right to try? What
happened to HIPAA? When does an employer have a basic right to dive into your healthcare
private business? They shouldn't.

My aunt was pretty healthy. She was 79 years old. She took her second booster and passed
away three days later. This is a common occurrence. We all know somebody who's probably
had something similar happen to them. The various data that's out, the 32,000 deaths that were
mentioned earlier, not everybody goes online and says something when their loved one dies so
they estimated that you have to multiply those numbers by a factor of 41. So if you multiply
those by a factor of 41, here are the real statistics about this vaccine. Deaths related to the
vaccine likely exceed 1.2 million. Hospitalization related to the vaccine likely exceeds 7.2
million. Myocarditis cases related to the vaccine, likely exceed 2.1 million. Disability cases
related to the vaccine, likely exceed 2.3 million. If you get this vaccine, you have a one in 13
chance of needing to seek medical treatment.

This is a revolver with 13 holes in it, and one bullet. Who wants to spin that revolver and play
Russian roulette with this horrible vaccine? Not me. You shouldn't either. Nobody should. And
for God's sakes, don't give it to your children. Let them choose to do what they want with their
health when they grow up. We shouldn't make that choice for them, to alter their DNA
permanently. This vaccine alters your DNA. This defaces you before God. This changes our
DNA. That's what it does, permanently. This is gene therapy. It's bad. It goes against everything
I was taught in med school.

There are no advantages of this vaccine. They don't work. Everybody knows somebody who's
gotten a vaccine and they've gotten COVID at least one more time, so they don't work. So why
do it? And we're just supposed to get this gene therapy over and over again. I don't think so. So
in my book, the advantages of this vaccine are zero, absolutely zero. The disadvantages are
enormous. Enormous. Do not deface your body before God. Have faith in God, have faith in
God that his immune system is the best and will take care of you. You want to see my mask?
Here's my mask right here. It's my nose. God gave me a nose. That's my filter. That's all the
mask I need.
The truth is that there are now millions of people who have been injured or worse as a result of
these deadly poison shots.

Dr. Angelina Farella who recently gave a speech at the Stop the Shots event in Puerto Rico
shared insight into the real concerns about the dangers that these jabs pose to our kids.

Dr. Angelina Farella

“Safety signals were apparent in January of 2020. This should have been ripped off the market
in January of 2020 when 1,000 patients died from the vaccine.”

You have to understand that the AAP is also not for us. I have not been a member of the
American Academy of Pediatrics since 2008 because they do not stand for the advocacy of
children anymore. As you can see, they don't care about developmental delay. They said that
kids should wear masks. They still have not taken this off of their website. I checked this
morning.

This is also from their website this morning that vaccines are safe and effective in protecting
individuals against infectious disease and new vaccines, I want you to listen to this, "New
vaccines are evaluated by a longstanding, rigorous, and transparent process by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration, which is the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
which is the CDC. And all available safety and efficacy data are reviewed before authorization
or approval of policy recommendations." They have the nerve to blatantly lie. This is on their
website. This is from this morning.

"New vaccines are evaluated by a longstanding, rigorous, and transparent process." Guess
what? This vaccine for kids has been out for one year, one year. Do you notice it says, before
EUA use. Most children's vaccines are tested no less than 5 to 10 years. The COVID vaccine
has been out for one and that is before they... First, they have to do it in adults for five years,
adults. It's been out for two for adults, since December of 2020. This is a problem. Pfizer data,
when you look at it and you look at the raw data, it showed no efficacy. They lied to us. They lied
and they tried to hide it. And we told them from the beginning. I came out very early, I said, "This
is a bad idea for anybody." Anyone that took genetics 101 in college or in high school knew this
was a really, really bad idea.

Safety signals were apparent in January of 2020. This should have been ripped off the market in
January of 2020 when 1,000 patients died from the vaccine. That is not a vaccine. So they lied
again. And we are not keeping them accountable. We, the people, need to keep them
accountable. In contrast, in 1999, the Rotavirus vaccine was pulled off the market, made not
available for something that did not kill the children. It made them very uncomfortable. It could
be treated, it could be fixed.
They took it away and it took five more years for that same vaccine to hit the market again.
What is going on with over 300 kids dead from this vaccine? It should have been pulled when
1,000 adults were killed in January of 2020. One of which was a friend of mine, a physician, an
anesthesiologist who got the vaccine in December of 2020. He got it December 18th, 2020, he
was dead December 26th, 2020. They killed one of the best and brightest in the Houston, Texas
area.

This is the thing, vaccine faux pas. There's myocarditis. He probably died of a massive heart
attack and he almost killed his wife and three kids in the car. He was driving, flipped the car
three times. Thank God the children were fine and his wife was fine too, but they lost their dad,
she lost her husband. And we in the community lost a fantastic physician. Athletes, it is not
normal for an athlete to drop dead. I'm just going to put that right out there and for the fact that
everyone's turning their back on this is a sham. Blood clots, strokes, and neurologic effects. Let
me make this very, very clear. It is not normal for a child to have a stroke. I don't care what the
commercials tell you. It is not normal. I've been a pediatrician for 25 years. There has never
been a child that had a stroke that didn't have a major underlying health problem. We have
normal kids getting strokes, having heart attacks. Children don't have heart attacks.

Our children are not lab rats. Informed consent and medical power of attorney. You need to
understand, you need to be present because you know what they're doing now? They're using
our tax dollars to go into the schools and to pressure children to get medical things done to
them without their parents knowing. An injection is a medical procedure and they are forcing
and coercing our children into this.

So I tell my parents, you need to understand this. This is the nonsense that the FDA said,
"We're never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it." And this was
about the childhood vaccine, about introducing this to kids. This is from Dr. Eric Rubin. He's on
the FDA committee that approved the Pfizer vaccine for kids 5 to 11. We came out screaming.
Let me tell you, we had 16,000 negative comments on that particular day when they came out in
that committee. 16,000 people came out and wrote comments against them approving this and
they did it anyway. They ignored, we, the people. They did not care what we had to say. Kids
were unaffected. These are the numbers, they were unaffected.

Since January, 332 children under the age of 17 have lost their lives to COVID. We now
standing right here, right now, have lost more kids to the vaccine than we did to the illness we're
preventing that we're not preventing. More kids have died from the vaccine. Get it through your
thick skulls. Tell your people on the street in Puerto Rico do not bring your child to get a shot for
COVID. Stop the shot. We're killing our kids. Kids are unaffected. Here's our VAERS data. This
is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. We update this in my office every single week.
As of November 25th, this is what we're seeing. 2,368,650 vaccine-related adverse events have
been reported. In the last 32 years, 900,000 reports. But as of the last two and a half years, over
a million, double in just two years of what has been reported over the last 30.
Here's the deaths, look at this, from the vaccine. Just look at the numbers. Look at this. 269 kids
under the age of 25 have had heart attacks. Miscarriages and stillbirths. We've lost 150 babies
that they can actually trace back to the vaccine. Permanently disabled. The clots are real. The
shots are killing our kids. We need to stop the shots.

There have also been public reports from various doctors who share Dr. Farella's and many of
our other experts’ concerns about the link between the C-19 shot and heart disease -
particularly in young people.

Last year, a preprint study in Thailand conducted that close to 30% of the young people who got
the second Pfizer shot suffered from cardiovascular effects. [b]

This ranged from tachycardia, and palpitation, to myopericarditis.

The study enrolled young people aged 13 to 18 to monitor them for myocardial injury using
electrocardiograms, checking cardiac troponins and using cardiac ultrasounds.

Dr. Anish Koka, a well-known cardiologist raised concerns about the findings of this study.

In his newsletter titled, Vaccine myocarditis update from Thailand, he shared more evidence that
the second Pfizer dose is causing millions of cardiovascular side effects in young people…

He expressed his concern that Hong Kong’s robust surveillance system reported a rate of
1/2700 of myocarditis in 12 to 17-year-old boys who received the second Pfizer shot.

He also stated that Moderna’s vaxx is shown to be 3 times this amount…

“This suggests that the peak rates of myocarditis with Moderna in young men could be around
1326 per million vs. the 76 per million currently reported by the CDC.” [c]

Tech Entrepreneur, Philanthropist and investigative journalist, Steve Kirsch also shared
concerns about the findings of this study in one of his newsletters.[d]

“18% of kids had an abnormal EKG post-vaccine?!? That has to be extremely troubling. A
vaccine is not supposed to do that. Are doctors telling parents the vaccine causes serious heart
issues in 18% of kids? At least let them know.”
He points out that an honest study like this one would not be allowed to be conducted in the US
because the results will contradict the vaxx narrative.

Public Reports and Testimonials That Contradict C-19 Shot’s Efficacy and
Safety

Just last year, public debate over the effectiveness of the C-19 shot started after many authority
figures ended up with COVID despite being jabbed and boosted.

One of them being Anthony Fauci himself. He publicly stated that “COVID-19 vaccines do not
protect 'overly well' against infection”, but advocated that his vaxx status is what kept him out of
the hospital.

But research has shown otherwise. In fact, there have been major concerns that apart from the
side effects caused by the circulating spike protein, the C-19 shot actually enhances the risk and
severity of infection.

As overwhelming as this all may be, it points out that the vaccine is both dangerous and largely
ineffective.
Senior research scientist at MIT, Stephanie Seneff along with colleague, Dr. Greg Nigh - a
naturopathic physician - conducted a peer-reviewed study titled, Worse Than the Disease?
Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against
COVID-19.

This was published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research and
analyses the dangerous phenomenon that we’re seeing with the COVID shots called
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

Stephanie Seneff’s study shares insight into the phenomenon known as ADE:

“an immunological phenomenon first described in 1964 (Hawkes et al., 1964). In that publication
Hawkes described a set of experiments in which cultures of flavivirus were incubated with avian
sera containing high titers of antibodies against those viruses. The unexpected finding was that,
with increasingly high dilutions of the antibody-containing sera, cell infectivity was enhanced.”
[e]

She also referred to scientific literature that proves that Antibody-Dependent Enhancement
(ADE) is a highly predictable effect of the so-called vaccine.

A study published by the COVID-19 Long-hauler Research Foundation, led by Lele Xu and
colleagues, explains the phenomenon of ADE. The abstract states that antibodies can enhance
virus entry and replication in cells.

This phenomenon is called antibody-dependent infection enhancement. ADE not only promotes
the virus to be recognized by the target cell and enters the target cell, but also affects the signal
transmission in the target cell.

Seneff references another study, published by PubMed that was conducted by Li Liu and
colleagues.

Their study showed that in SARS-CoV/macaque models, anti-spike IgG (S-IgG), in productively
infected lungs, caused severe ALI by skewing inflammation-resolving response. In summary,
IgG antibodies that are induced by prior vaccination are shown to contribute to severe
pulmonary damage by SARS-CoV in macaques.

So, not only does the vaccine increase a person’s chance of being infected with the
SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it’s also dangerous.

One of our experts, Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, who is a bio-statistician research scientist, Author
and Editor-in-Chief of the journal Science explains ADE as a result of the COVID-19 shots in
more detail.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler

“I had downloaded and analyzed all the proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 virus and I identified the
immunogenetic epitopes of all the SARS-CoV-2 proteins”

So pathogenic priming is a process by which autoimmunity can be induced in humans or in


animals when they're exposed to an antigen source such as a bacterial or viral protein that is
too similar in shape to a human protein and it has the ability to induce an immune reaction. So
it's not a problem if your viral proteins are similar to human proteins and they don't induce an
immune reaction. In immunology, you have this immuno tolerance or self-tolerance of your own
proteins. The problem is if you have proteins in a pathogen that are both immunogenic, that is,
they are capable of causing an immune reaction and they are similar in shape to some human
proteins.

And I coined the term pathogenic priming specifically because it's a much more accurate
description of what is happening than immune enhancement. Immune enhancement was
actually a phrase that was being used prior to COVID to describe the problem that if you are
vaccinating against SARS or if you're vaccinated against respiratory syncytial virus or if you're
vaccinating against other respiratory viruses, a pattern that had been seen was that patients
that were actually vaccinated upon exposure or animals that were vaccinated upon exposure,
would have more severe disease.

So immune enhancement is not the right phrase for it and disease enhancement's a fine term
for it. But in addition to the virals being more easily able to enter the cells due to
antibody-dependent enhancement, it was also quite possible that some of what was disease
enhancement was actually new disease caused by autoimmunity upon the second exposure. So
in the vaccine trials, some children died when they were trying to develop respiratory syncytial
virus. The children were vaccinated against RSV upon a secondary exposure. So it seems like
there's a possibility that their immune system was primed. And then they experienced disease
symptoms that were more autoimmune in origin than necessarily caused by the pathogenicity of
the biology of the virus.

Okay. So in April, 2020, I had downloaded and analyzed all the proteins in the SARS-CoV-2
virus and I identified the immunogenetic epitopes of all the SARS-CoV-2 proteins. And I found
those that had epitopes that would likely cause autoimmunity due to, well, it's called molecular
mimicry, that they were too similar to human proteins. And then I've identified tissues through
which pathogen of priming might be an issue. In other words, what tissues were the proteins
that could be attacked by SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. What types of tissues, then that would tell us
what type of disease we could expect to see if a person is repeatedly exposed to SARS-CoV-2
proteins. This is before any vaccine. And so the messaging was clear to the vaccine
manufacturers, beware of these particular parts of these proteins if you are going to create,
manufacture and sell a vaccine.

This is the workflow for the pathogenic priming protocol, the analysis that's done at IPAK. We're
analyzing, not just SARS-CoV-2, but now we're analyzing hepatitis B and measles and mumps,
rubella, chickenpox and we're going through the entire childhood vaccine schedule to identify
the immunogenetics B-cell epitopes, say, in hepatitis B specifically out of concern that perhaps
some of what we're seeing in childhood illnesses might be induced by widespread exposure to
hepatitis B proteins whereas hepatitis B infections are not that widespread in children.

And we are very confident that this protocol is going to be useful because Aristo Vojdani and his
colleagues at Harvard University actually validated our pathogenic priming analysis and results
in the lab and they found that the parts of the proteins that we thought might be autoreactive
and might represent B-cell epitopes that could cause autoimmunity, they were a good match.
And Dr. Vojdani and his colleagues actually extended our analysis to include the mitochondrial
proteins which I hadn't thought to do, which I thought was brilliant. But these autoreactogenic
epitopes are created into a table and then I do a systems biology analysis, look at the biological
pathways and find out which tissues they're actually expressed in. Then we submit it for informal
friendly fire peer review to colleagues and then the finished product of the manuscript is
submitted to formal peer review and then publication.

This is all funded by the public. And the idea here is that if we can convince people that are
doing vaccinations to not put these particular parts of these proteins in their vaccines, perhaps
we would have reduced autoimmunity and reduced chronic illness in the human population. It's
one-to-one correspondence, right? We like to use SVM Trip, although there are other tools that
we're exploring as well for T-cell epitopes, but this is a very easy to use one and basically, if you
submit an amino acid sequence and it tells you the epitope and the score for the epitope, that is
likely to be a B-cell epitope. It's a brilliant, brilliant tool based on excellent science.

This was the publication, April, 2020. I'm one of the first scientists in North America, to publish
on...- Well, in the world really, to publish on the likelihood of autoimmunity due to exposure to
SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Other people have followed suit shortly after this. Darja Canduke
validated my result that titin, a protein in the heart, is likely to be a target for auto immunity with
her own analyses. And now there's an explosion of interest and the possibility, not just with
SARS-CoV-2 but many other viruses and how much of what we see is the symptoms of a viral
infection are actually autoimmunity, especially if we're vaccinating against that pathogen.

The table of results is a list of epitopes and the tissue that the auto reactogenic antibodies that
are likely to be produced potentially might attack as well as the self antigen. So there are other
labs that are doing their analysis in different ways, looking at structural B-cell epitopes, and ours
definitely overlaps with theirs. I don't want go too far into that particular slide because that's not
my result. The idea here is if we're going to live in a world with vaccines, then we should try to
make them as safe as possible, and I already published extensive analysis on the aluminum
toxicity of the CDC's pediatric schedule, recommended schedule of vaccines. Because the FDA
never published a pediatric dose limit for aluminum, they only ever published an adult dose,
recommended safe dose for injected aluminum.

The FDA actually had a problem with that analysis that they published because the data that
they used were not injected forms of aluminum from vaccines, they were oral forms of aluminum
and they were never injected into mice, they were fed to mice and the mice were adult mice, not
children, not infant mice, I should say. So really, I couldn't believe in 2016 when I first started
looking at this, looking at the literature, we did a deep deep dive into the providence of the
knowledge claim. Exactly how did the FDA determine that a 850 microgram dose was safe in
vaccines for children or for that matter, hepatitis B, on the first day of life, a 250 microgram dose
was safe for children? And the answer is they never did. They've never considered injected
forms of aluminum in infant mice or injected forms of aluminum in adult mice. Instead, they use
these oral forms that are fed to mice. And the mice were adults and they were mice, they
weren't humans.

And so we modeled the kinetics of the clearance of aluminum based on a pediatric dose limit
that we calculated, assuming that they were correct that 850 micrograms was safe for an adult,
and that is a major assumption. We just used Clark's rule, a standard toxicological scaling
function. That's volumetric. It's not just body weight, but it's volumetric. And so therefore it's not
linear. And we found that when an infant on the CDC schedule is injected with 250 micrograms
of hepatitis B vaccine, on the first day of life, they experience a dose that's 15 times their body
weight, what an adult would experience at 850 micrograms, which is shocking.

But we also then noted that we could - After publishing the pediatric dose limit in 2018, we noted
that we could use published models of the aluminum clearance in humans to determine and
how many days out of their first, say, seven months of life were children in aluminum toxicity.
And at IPEC, we found that the first seven months of life, children were in their aluminum toxicity
one out of four days. Then we wanted to compare the schedule to the CDC schedule, Dr. Paul
Thomas' schedule and we found in particular that we had forgot to consider the fact that the
kidneys in infants are not mature till age two. So when you factor in lower clearance rate of
aluminum in infants, so up to the age two compared to adults, we could say that the CDC's
schedule has vaccination schedule has children in aluminum toxicity 100% of their days in the
first year of life, whereas Paul Thomas's schedule, well, they had children in an aluminum
toxicity 5% of their days.

And so this probably goes a long way to explaining the results that we see when we look at Dr.
Paul Thomas' data from his practice in the study that we did, and it all ties together. If we're
going to live in a world with vaccines, then they should be made as safe as possible. Not just
made safer, but safe as possible, which is not done to say that they're safe. It is to say that we
should at least try. Also, from the humanities perspective, if a scientist like me can go into the
data and determine, yes, these doses of aluminum are too high and I can analyze data and find
excess need for medical care in children who are vaccinated compared to unvaccinated in a
way that's robust to the concerns that were stated by the presumption that led to the retraction
of our paper.

And then I can go even one step further and I can point to the very parts of the protein that
might be contributing to chronic illness in humans. If I can do it, then so can the pharmaceutical
companies and so can CDC, and so can NIH funded researchers all across the world. So
there's no excuses to not making vaccines safer. If they want to have vaccines, they should try
to make them as safe as possible. So, the old paradigm of the CDC just making a
pronouncement that vaccines are safe and effective for everyone and the vaccines don't cause
autism, even though not all vaccines have been studied even for association with autism and
that they're relying on association to test a hypothesis of causality, which is impossible. If I could
do it, then there's no excuse for them not doing it. And that's been the MO of my approach
towards research.

A Rising Concern About the Link Between COVID “Vaccines” and


Increasing Miscarriage and Infertility Rates

When the COVID-19 poison shots were unleashed on the population, vaccine manufacturers
and experts lied when they said that the spike protein would not be distributed throughout the
body.

There’s clear evidence that shows that it not only stays in the body, but turns the body into a
spike protein factory.

It also has a high affinity for the reproductive organs. As a result, many experts have spoken out
about the high rates of miscarriages, heavy menstrual periods, reproductive and infertility issues
and more since the vaccine rollout.

Dr. Lawrence Palevksy, a pediatrician shared insight into this heartbreaking phenomenon in an
interview I had with him.

Dr. Lawrence Palevksy

“We are seeing over a 400% increase in the number of cases of miscarriages in
women…”

We are seeing over a 400% increase in the number of cases of miscarriages in women. And the
thing is, is that we have to be careful because miscarriage is only defined by loss of the baby in
the first trimester. But multiple, multiple, multiple women are reporting true demise, true death of
their babies in the second and even third trimesters. That's not a miscarriage. That's murder
because those babies are not dying for no reason and those babies are coming out in response
to the mothers either being injected with the shot or exposed to others who have gotten the
shot.

And so you will hear the authorities say very clearly, "There's no shedding coming out of the
COVID-19 injection." And again, pick up the rock and look to see if they are substantiating that
with any scientific study that measures whether materials from the injection could go out of the
saliva, the stool, the airway, or the skin of those who've gotten the injection. And you will see
there are no studies of them looking for the answers to that.

But what we're hearing from hundreds of thousands of people is sickness, illness, symptoms,
bleeding, clotting, miscarriages, fevers, fatigue, neurological problems, heart attacks of people
who have been exposed to those who've gotten the shot who didn't get the shot, who are
coming down with very strange and very interesting symptoms. All of which the medical
community is denying. The scientific community is sweeping under the rug and saying that none
of this is even happening in the public.

Nicole Sirotek, a nurse who moved to NYC to work on the coronavirus frontlines also recently
revealed shocking information about the rising miscarriage and infertility rates.

Nicole Sirotek

“Ever watch that movie, what is it? The Time of Men, where all of a sudden nobody can
have children anymore? That's what we're moving towards.”

Before even the doctors notice, we can see you dying before you're dying because that's our job
as nurses. So we're going to tell you what all of our nurses in the American Frontline Nurses
Network is telling us."

We don't have just nurses in the United States, 'cause I've also done work in India too with
Coronavirus and Ivermectin and things like that, that we are having issues with people getting
pregnant now. So let me tell you what the fertility clinic nurses are telling us that yes, that there
is an increased number of women who have never had children before who are now not being
able to get pregnant. I was one of them. I did go through IVF. Magically, I broke my ankle, made
a baby and never had a problem since. But having been through that system, it's called
unexplained fertility and your insurance doesn't pay for it. Those numbers have doubled in the
past year of the number of people who are seeking IVF treatment. It's like, "Okay, maybe it's too
many years of birth control. Maybe you're like me and you wait till you're 34 to have children."

Well, what about everyone that already has one child, two children, three children, and you want
your fourth or your fifth or you have one and now you want your second, and all of a sudden,
you can't have children and you don't know why? I can tell you right now from the fertility nurses,
they always ask your vaccination status. That's standard because it's an infection control thing.
You always get an infectious disease workup, HIV, STDs, blah, blah blah. Doesn't matter if
you're married, doesn't matter if you're a virgin, you're getting that. It's part of the standard
process. They're always double-vaxxed, and they are not capable of getting pregnant, and the
issue is all their labs will always come back normal. Their hormone labs will all come back
normal, their ovarian nerves will come back normal and all of their genetic tests will come back
normal. In women, it's either genetic, hormonal, or structural.

Well, what we're starting to see is because the ACE-2 receptors inside the fallopian tubes, the
fallopian tubes do not have the patency level that they normally do. So when they go in there
and they typically, I had this done too, they shove some dye up inside your woo-hoo, and in
French, it's oh là là, and they fluorescent your fallopian tubes. We're seeing that there's
decreased patency. That's one reason. But a lot of the time there are a substantial amount of
ACE-2 receptors in your placenta. So as you implant the egg and it grows and starts to create
the placenta, it comes under attack by the spike proteins. So you actually abort or miscarry
before you even know you're pregnant. I was working with a reporter who I had said we were
working on this case of this down syndrome girl who was murdered by COVID protocols in
Florida.

I'm like, "You want to hold off on getting that because you're of reproductive years." Sure
enough, she miscarried and has not been able to have a baby since. Ever watch that movie,
what is it? The Time of Men, where all of a sudden nobody can have children anymore? That's
what we're moving towards. That's what the nurses are telling us, 'cause that's what they're
seeing on the front lines and the OB/GYNs and the miscarriages and everything like that. The
nurses know, but nobody wants to ever listen to the nurses. So I'm here to tell you that we're
starting to have these problems and we don't even know the effects of what that's going to be
for the little girls when they grow up to be adults.

The Mechanism of Destruction Caused by mRNA Tech


Eye doctor, Dr. Seema Nanda recently shared her concerns about the dangers of this
gene-altering technology that’s been injected into millions. She highlights how so many are
experiencing very abnormal eye diseases and why this jab impacts so many different systems in
the body.

Dr. Seema Nanda

“It's sending soldiers everywhere, it doesn't make any sense. Why is some targeting the
eye? Why is some targeting the heart?

Why is some targeting the reproductive organs? It's like an atomic bomb that went off as
opposed to a drone strike.”

So I'm an eye doctor, and I have been doing that for almost a decade now, and maybe a little bit
more, but we won't give the age. I also teach, and I teach not only students in clinic, so I teach
their med lab course in the second year. I teach in the clinic in their third year, and they come to
my clinic, which is basically focusing on the front of the eye. There's two parts of the eye,
basically anterior seg, anterior segment, sorry, I use the vernacular. Anterior segment, which is
the cornea, and posterior segment, which is the retina. So my focus in my clinic is the anterior
segment. However, we look at the eye from tip to top, and what we're seeing are a lot of
changes that are going on post-vaccination of these new shots that were never really tested on
humans. Or should I say, never really test on animals before given to humans, which most
drugs, whatever.

And it takes years before a drug gets approved. And this was just done at a rapid pace without
looking at the consequences. And now, I'm hearing at this conference, so many different parts of
the body that are getting affected. And when I started hearing about this and I started putting
two and two together, I'm like, "I'm seeing some strange things that are going on in the eyes."
So I started doing some research about it, and there's a thing that we don't realize that our body
goes through when we heal. I gave the example, when a man starts shaving and you get a nick
or a cut, there's four hallmark things to healing. One is the redness, okay? One is the swelling,
one is the heat, I call it... So there's the expression rubor, calor, tumor, and delore. So there's
pain. When all these things occur, it's normal. That's the way the body heals.

So white blood cells, which are the healing properties of the body, causes that thing to close.
However, what we're seeing now is there's something that's changing, that this vax, because it's
not a normal attenuated virus that former vaccines were. Now what's attenuated mean? That
means a lessening. So they give you just a bit of it, a taste of it, and then the body goes, "Oh,
what is this? Is this foreign or not?" So it creates an army. Those are the white blood cells, those
are the things... It creates an army so that when you're exposed to it, again, it's got that army
built up to fight. That's a normal response. Who figured that out? Him upstairs. That's the DNA,
we're all made of it. Each one of us is individual. That's our DNA. That's our blueprint. DNA is a
blueprint of each person.

Now, in order to get that message to say, heal that cut, the body creates mRNA, M is
messenger. So the message has been sent, body says, "Oh no, we're cut. Okay, well, we need
to replicate it and close that wound. Okay. We send the message, we transcribe it, there's tRNA,
we transcribe the notes, we send it, and then we glue it shut. We send the right amount of
soldiers, the right amount of white blood cells." But what's happening with this mRNA that's
being injected into us, and that's what it is. It's a different kind of vaccine that has never been
done before. And so we really don't know the ramifications of it. I know I'm kind of paddling on, I
don't mean to do that. I just wanted to explain the background, what it is. So now we're doing
this artificial, not the one that's in our body, but we're injecting an artificial mRNA or message.

And what's happening is, it's changing what our normal body is doing. It's changing the
message. So instead of sending the exact amount of white blood cells recruiting, it's sending
either too much or not enough. So what happens when there's too many white blood cells?
Cancer. It's an over-proliferation of cells that shouldn't be there. And now, we're seeing in the
eye. And I can even share with you a case that was done, I think it was in India, let me see.
49-year-old Indian male presents with rapidly progressive loss of vision. This was post mRNA
vaccine of 2019, the Pfizer biotech one in New York. The eye had secondary angle closure, a
retinal detachment, so the angle is closing in the eye because something was pushing forward.
That's something, they did an MRI of that patient, and they showed, and I would love to share
this with you and your audience.

I've been seeing just little things that I speculate. Again, it's that inquisitive nature of being a
doctor, and yet, somehow, everyone's become incurious. It doesn't make sense. When did we
become robots? We became in this profession, because we were like, "We see this. How do we
fix it?" Or "We see this, what is that?" There's two different things, and then you collaborate and
you talk to other doctors. Why is everyone being silenced? So I saw this meme the other day,
it's like, "Don't follow the science, follow the silenced," because those are ones who are trying to
say, "We're seeing this. Is anyone else out there seeing this?" And the blinders have been put
on. Why? Fear, maybe? Maybe if they come out and start telling, maybe they'll be silenced too?
They just want to eek through their life, get their paycheck, go home, feed their kids, and
whatever. And if they take that away from it... And I think that's happening with these shots.
As a professor, I see students, they're worried about... I was listening to Dr. Thomas, the same
thing's happened to my students. They go from rotation, to rotation. They're demanding them to
get the vaccine before they go see their clinical because they're worried about the patients in
the VA or the hospitals getting sick. Well, they're already sick. They're there. And then, I'm sorry,
it's probably in the water right now. Okay? We've gotten enough of this exposure, it's called herd
immunity, but somehow, that doesn't exist anymore. All these things that we've known for
centuries has all of been since shut off. It doesn't make any sense.

But anyway, going back to what I was saying before, so T-cells, okay, I didn't explain. So white
blood cells, again, I call them the army. There's different kinds. And one of them is T-cells or
cytokines. And so what they've been seeing is an increase, like I said, some of the patients have
an increase in those cytokines, and that's being in the back of the eye, which is in the retina,
and those patients are having this retina cancer, basically.

And not only in the back of the eye, but like I said, there's different front and back. I didn't go to
the middle. The middle is the colored part of the eye, the iris. It's also the uvea. Okay? Not
throat or anything, uvea. So that's the iris. They're showing uveal melanomas, melan, the
pigment, so the colored part of the iris, oma meaning tumor. So they're getting tumors, which is
cancer, on the colored part of the iris as well. And I can share that with your audience too.
Because whatever this vaccine is... And which is interesting too. The DNA knows when you've
got to cut at this particular spot or you hit your toe or you sprain your... It knows to send it to that
spot.

What's happening now is this messenger is just sending it randomly. It's sending soldiers
everywhere, it doesn't make any sense. Why is some targeting the eye? Why is some targeting
the heart? Why is some targeting the reproductive organs? It's like an atomic bomb that went off
as opposed to a drone strike. God knows where to hit. Okay? This is not hitting at the spot that
it's supposed to need. It's just sending out soldiers everywhere. I call white blood cell soldiers, to
heal the body, clear it up, and do everything that we need to.

But it's going everywhere. And because it's going everywhere, it's hitting different tissues. And
like I said, in this study here, it was just showing this one example. Well, that one person is...
Well, you know what? I noticed that too. So another example. Another example. Now what I told
you before is, I work on the front of the eye, which is the cornea. We have a lot of patients who
get injured, they get cut, they scratch their eye, and things happen. So when that tissue
regrows, sometimes it leaves a scar. So if it's so deep, the scar is so deep that even an amniotic
membrane, which is something that can heal it, even if the tissue's so deep that it can't heal it,
then sometimes a patient needs what we call a cornea transplant.

That's where they remove the tissue and get a donor tissue, and put it on. Now, the luckily thing
is, as opposed to the rest of the body, in order to heal, we have white... Sorry. In order to heal,
we have blood vessels. The cornea is avascular, meaning it has no blood vessels. So the
likelihood of a corneal transplant rejecting is extremely, extremely low.
Now, I did a search. They did 26 eyes, that search showed, online public search, 21 patients, 23
eyes. These 23 eyes got one form or the other of the vaccine. Within one to five days... Let's
see, sorry. The interval to vaccination says one day to six weeks. All were rejecting. Rejecting.
That doesn't make any sense. The cornea doesn't reject, why are these rejecting?

It is hypothesized because I was saying to you before, the white blood cells are going
everywhere. Those cytokines are going everywhere, including the eye. Normal corneas don't
reject. Why are they rejecting? Because it's an increase in white blood cells. The body's
rejecting, it says, "Get out of me." There's decompensation of the tissues. There's epithelial to
endothelial.

There's decompensation of those tissues, and then these patients are going blind, and they're
supposed to be healed with a transplant. It's blowing my mind. How come no one's saying
anything about it? I don't understand. The silence is deafening. It really is. So I guess my thing
is now, because of all this research that I'm doing, and I'm just trying to put the pieces together, I
start seeing hemorrhages. So again, the front of the eye versus the back of the eye. Back of the
eye has blood vessels. Actually, what happens is, you have the heart, has the aorta, has the
internal carotid artery, and it goes to the brain and has the ophthalmic artery that goes to the
back of the eye.

These haven’t been the only severe post-vaccine side effects though. Cancer rates have soared
through the roof and so have autoimmune disease diagnoses. There’s clear evidence that the
shot is causing a cascade in the body leading to serious disease processes.

The worst part is that people who have developed diseases and debilitating symptoms after
getting the jab are struggling to get help. Health authorities, the government, and health
institutions refuse to admit that these shots are causing major damage.

They continue trying to censor the dangers to prevent vaccine hesitancy. This leaves so many
people in the dark about the solutions that exist to successfully reverse post-vaccine injuries
and restore their health and quality of life.

That’s why books and documentaries like these are so important. I continually interview the top
health experts and natural and integrative medicine doctors to share the real treatments that are
reversing some of the most devastating injuries.

This next section will share insight into some of the highly effective treatments that tackle the
most deadly post-vaxx disease processes and are helping people to restore their health.

Highly Effective Treatments For Post-Vaxx Injuries


The reason so many experts and researchers are working hard to uncover the dangers of these
COVID shots is so that they know how to turn these deadly mechanisms off in the body. One of
the very concerning and deadly symptoms post-vaccine has been blood clotting.
Dr. Henry Ealy is a world-renowned Naturopath and the Founder of, and Executive Community
Director for, the Energetic Health Institute. He has been instrumental in helping people to fully
restore their health after severe vaccine-related injuries using a process called
autophagocytosis.

Dr. Henry Ealy - The 3 Stage Approach to Reversing “Sticky Blood”


I am Dr. Henry Ealy. I'm the founder of the Energetic Health Institute, an amazing school for
amazing people just like you. And I've been working night and day, more the words of Ray
Charles, to try and bring some sanity back into the world and definitely a whole lot of healing.
So, we've been working with severely injured people for the better part of a year and a half,
learning a lot. We've had, I think, some major breakthroughs recently, and we are still pushing
forward with the Grand Jury Petition as well to see if we can put some of these bad guys in jail.
That's pretty much what I've been doing. I think it's a proof of concept, and I'm really proud of
Moriah Mor. She's the founder of Green Silk Nutraceuticals and she's a graduate of the school
Energetic Health Institute. She has taken the concept that I've put together and applied it to a
patient and had a really phenomenal result.

Our concept is a 3-stage approach to this. The first stage being the production of energy and
really supporting that at the cellular level. The second stage being cellular detoxification and
then that steadying the stage for autophagocytosis and DNA repair in stage three when we're
working with people who've been severely injured, moderate to severely injured by the shots.
Now what she did was there was a patient in Israel, let's see, I think it was triple shot, and I want
to say it was Pfizer, diabetic had some pre-existing conditions, overweight. I don't want to steal
her thunder, but I just am sharing with the audience I'm really proud of her. The patient that she
was working with had a series of ulcerations on the tissue greater than the size of a palm, but
pretty much extending to the size of a hand.

Within 30 days, using the cyclic approach to fasting and making sure we have good
mitochondrial energy nutrients going and a few other things, she was able to help that patient
successfully close up all those wounds in really record time. It's phenomenal what she's done,
and then in a month after that, the tissue was looking even better. It was just really impressive to
see that when we focus on what's going on at the cellular level and especially with the
mechanisms of action that we're addressing, that the body does what it's designed to do. Like
we've been saying, the body is designed to heal even from this spike glycoprotein. That's
something I would like to talk about a little bit more today because we have now the mechanism
of action understood for why there's so many blood clots in cardiovascular events and
seemingly different causes of death that are still all coming from the same root cause, which is
basically, it's called hemagglutination, but it's where basically red blood cells and platelets get
stuck together. It's just sticky blood.

Once we resolve that issue, gas exchange, carbon dioxide and oxygen gas exchange occurs
more efficiently. Once that occurs, the system starts to self-correct, starts to get back into its
own homeostasis. So that's really the driving thing behind the thought process that we've been
sharing around for the last year plus. But now we're seeing a lot of proof of concept and seeing
it working with patients and we're just really excited for everybody that it's working for. The
symptomatology starts to the ulceration and ulceration of the tissue begins after the shots. So,
when you start talking about health history and you start setting up a timeline of symptoms, it's
like, well, what has changed for this patient? The only thing that had changed was the boosters,
the second shot, and then an immediate booster. Unfortunately, we don't have good testing
available globally to help us really ascertain how much of this would be an infection versus an
injection level injury.

We're still seeking what that is. So, so much what we're doing right now in the clinical realm is
putting things together and saying if it walks like a duck and it talks like a duck, it's probably a
duck. So, if we have someone who's gotten shot by Pfizer three times and ultimately, during that
process or not long after we start to see dramatic changes in their health, then it stands to
reason that that is the cause of it when there's been no other major changes going on in their
lifestyle. I think that's the first thing that we really look at with that is just unfortunately, we're
relegated to somewhat of presumption and somewhat of speculation, which is not a place any of
us like to be in, but you have to use the tools that you have available to you. I think the bigger
thing for me is just when people are feeling better, they show it, they see it. I have a severely
injured patient right now I'm working with and we are seeing some phenomenal signs of
recovery in her after a rough kind of a month or two start.

It really, I think, is predicated upon the thought process. When you go through a healing
process, it's important to have a reason and rationale on why you're doing things or else what
ends up happening is you get this really messy picture of just a shotgun approach of
nutraceuticals and harmaceuticals and everything mixing together and 5 or 6 doctors all
prescribing on top of each other, and there's really no organization or clean out. That's why it's
so important to understand what are we attempting to achieve at a cellular level, at a
biochemical level, at a physiologic level? If we have a really good understanding of what we are
attempting to achieve, then the pharmacopeia opens up to us because we have specific
nutraceuticals, specific nutrients, specific lifestyle practices that help us create that reality in the
physiology, in the biochemistry and at the cellular level. For example, the reason we focus so
ardently on mitochondria and energy production is because without energy production, you
have nothing.

Without energy production, the cell is going to die, the system is going to fail and it's going to be
really bad. So, the root of all roots is energy production when we're talking about restoration of
health. It is the most fundamental foundational thing that we have to address as medical
professionals. It's the thing that I see out there being addressed the least. It's like there's this
assumption that the mitochondria are just going to be able to produce unlimited amounts of
energy. Now, your body will produce roughly your body weight in energy every day. Alright?
Now, some people a little bit less, some people a little bit more. I've seen other folks say it's
about half of your body weight. It's all speculation to a certain degree. But suffice to say that
your body produces a lot of energy and that energy has a weight to it. When your body is
producing a lot of energy every day, what happens next at the cell level is your body starts to
produce a lot of enzymes. When your body starts to produce a lot of enzymes, some of those
enzymes are for metabolizing foods.
Some of those enzymes are just for normal cell function. Some of those enzymes are for
detoxification. Some of those enzymes are for cell replication, but it's enzymes that expedite
that, that dramatically increase the speed of biochemical reactions. So, the process is energy
helps the cell produce enzymes. Enzymes help the cell get back into homeostasis. And once
you've created that process, you've started laying out the groundwork for that process, what we
start seeing in this overall system is stability. Now instead of people declining very rapidly from
whatever cause, doesn't matter whether it's COVID shots or just their lifestyle leading up to that
moment in time for them, what we get is system stability. That's the first goal therapeutically, in
my opinion, that we have to really focus on is clinical therapeutic stability in our patients so
they're no longer declining. Once we get that achieved, what ends up happening is we start
getting a clearer picture, in my opinion.

You start getting a much clearer picture of what's actually going on, what really needs attention
versus what you can see if it's going to resolve spontaneously over a period of time. Once you
have that established and you have stability, you can start taking the next step. And that's where
we start getting into stage two of the healing process, which is gonna be about detoxification.
Cells, particularly fat cells will hold on to waste, fat soluble waste, for indefinite periods of time.
We have to get that mobilized back out of the cell, back into the interstitium, the fluid around the
cells, and then ultimately, taken up by blood vessels and by lymphatic vessels, because when
we do those things where we are really seeing a cell have the ability to finally detoxify, and I'm
talking about by engaging the P450 cytochrome system within the cell, when we get to that level
of specificity and precise nature of healing, now cells are getting cleaner and when cells get
cleaner, they work better.

It's a simple thought, right? When we are doing that, we are also addressing the environment
that the cell lives within. And when the environment, the water around the cell is really clean and
it's nutrient-dense, now the cell can grab whatever it needs as it needs it because everything is
readily available. And then, what that does is it sets the stage for stage three, which is getting
the body and the cell into a state of autophagocytosis, a state of hunger where the cell can go
into its own advanced state of healing. What's very interesting about that process is once the
cell starts getting into the peak levels of autophagocytosis, that seems to be when DNA repair is
actually turning on as well in the nucleic level, in the nucleus of the cell. When you have those
two things going on, autophagocytosis and DNA repair, we're now putting the person who is
likely injured in the most optimal position for their body to heal to do what it does best.

But the thing that I want to really convey to your audience and to, especially any practitioners
listening out there, is that it's a process. It's a sequential process that if we try to put somebody
into fasting before their body is ready, it's going to fail. If it's going to be too arduous, the person
isn't gonna get through it. It's just not gonna work. If we try to do that before, we've successfully
done some lowering of the chemical pollution levels in the tissue and heavy metals, solvents,
things like that, infections could count as well. If we try to fast then while that's still going on,
again, it's not gonna work, that this is a process. It's a thought process that you take the patients
through. And the first thing is energy production, the second thing is going to be all about
detoxifying the cell, and the third thing's gonna be about giving the cell the time it needs to
engage autophagocytosis and DNA repair.
When we do that in a staged process, in a staging process, stage 1, stage 2, stage 3, now we
are not overwhelming the patient anymore, understanding that the healing process is not going
to be overnight. It's not gonna be, "Hey, tomorrow we waved a wand and now you're all better,"
that you have to put in work. And when you put in work into your own health, into your own
healing process, you get the rewards of that work, especially when the work that you're doing is
supervised and logical at each step of the process. Now we've been successful working with
people through telehealth. That's what's been really nice. If you have a thought process for how
you're gonna approach this, the big thing right now, the last couple of weeks has been finally
confirmation that the spike glycoprotein does indeed create a stickiness in the red blood cells
and it causes them to clump together, and that when red blood cells clump together, what you
end up doing is you end up removing surface area for the red blood cells.

The red blood cells need that surface area because that surface area is essential for gas
exchange, carbon dioxide and oxygen. So let's make this really simple for everyone. The reason
we need oxygen is because oxygen gets bound to red blood cells and red blood cells carry it to
our cells and offload that oxygen, so that that oxygen can be used by mitochondria to produce
energy. That's ultimately what happens; oxygen becomes energy. Well, at the same time that
the red blood cell is offloading the oxygen to the cell, it's also picking up carbon dioxide and
getting carbon dioxide away from the cell because carbon dioxide is very toxic to the cell, very
acidic. It ultimately will kill the cell if it just accumulates there. So, red blood cells play this really
foundational fundamental role in what we know as life.

Without red blood cells being able to efficiently carry oxygen to cells and efficiently pick up
carbon dioxide so that they can bring it back to the lungs. And the lungs, we can exhale it and
give it to the trees, so the trees can recycle the whole process then without that, life as we know
it ends. Well, red blood cells are, think of a cherry lifesaver, they have like a- they're a biconcave
disc, so they have all of this surface area. And what's really fascinating about our red blood cells
is that they're so crucial to the maintenance of our life that your body will make roughly 2.5, let
me get the exact thing on this. I'm gonna pull up a little reference here. We just shot a really cool
video on this for everybody on the school's Rumble channel at the Energetic Health Institute. I'll
give you the link to it as well, but I wanna make sure I'm saying this right here. So where are
you, red blood cell? You are right there. So yeah, we make 2.5 million red blood cells every
single second of our life. Isn't that wild?

That's how important red blood cells are to the maintenance of our life that we make, our
bodies, make 2.5 million every second that we're alive. At any given moment, there'll be
anywhere from 20 to 30 trillion red blood cells circulating in our body. When we say circulating,
we're saying moving through the 60 to 100,000 miles of blood vessels in our body. This is a
crucial, absolutely crucial sacred event that's going on every single moment a day. We inhale
and oxygen comes in through the lungs. The oxygen is going to be loaded onto red blood cells
and then they carry it to the cells and then they pick up the carbon dioxide. When we exhale,
that's what we're getting rid of. We're getting rid of that carbon dioxide, that waste. Well, each
red blood cell, and remember, there's 20 to 30 trillion at any moment circulating in your
bloodstream. The red blood cell, that little cherry lifesaver is gonna be made up of anywhere
from 250 to 280 million hemoglobin units. Each of those hemoglobin units combine basically 8
molecules of gas, carbon dioxide or oxygen.

So, you have this incredibly well-thought-out design of a red blood cell, but it needs one thing. It
needs to be free and have space around it. It needs to be free from all the other red blood cells.
They need to move around each other and over each other very easily. When you factor in and
you start throwing in a spike glycoprotein, and I keep saying that word, it's so important, we've
said it wrong for so long, we've said it wrong for over 2 years now, two-and-a-half years. We
keep calling it spike protein, spike protein, spike protein. It's not spike protein, and we have to
really start correcting ourselves on that. It's a spike glycoprotein. What glyco means is that there
is a carbohydrate associated with it and carbohydrate, sugar, that makes the spike very sticky.
So when you have circulating spike protein, whether it's from infection or whether it's because a
person got injected, they got genetically modified and now their body is just producing a lot of
spike glycoproteins, when you have spike glycoproteins in the bloodstream, what they do is they
cause red blood cells to stick together.

They cause red blood cells and platelets to stick together, kind of a clumping kind of effect.
When you have that happening, what it does is it portends to red blood cells losing surface area.
Surface area essential for gas exchange, for carbon dioxide, oxygen gas exchange. So imagine
this situation. You have all these red blood cells that are supposed to be freely moving
throughout the bloodstream, but you have this clump of them there. When you get this clump of
those red blood cells, 20, 30, 40, 10,000 clump together, you lose all this surface area, so now a
person can be breathing in but they feel like they're suffocating. It's that exact phenomenon,
sticky blood, it's called hemagglutination if you wanna be technical, but sticky blood. It's that
phenomenon that explains why people, especially during the early stages of the infection in
2020 and into the summer months into 2020, why we were having such a hard time keeping
people's 02, oxygen saturation levels in their bloodstream high.

If you think back, and this is still a problem that's going on to this day for inexplicable reasons,
people who contract SARS-CoV-2 infections would ultimately have a terrible time maintaining
their oxygen levels in their bloodstream, and that became very concerning for us, obviously. You
can't get oxygen to the cell, the cell is going to die. We know now that the reason that that was
occurring was because of the spike glycoprotein. In addition to the spike glycoprotein acting like
a razor blade on the inside lining of the blood vessels, this is something from the American
Heart Association Journal in April of 2021, they confirmed this, that the spike protein injures the
inside lining like a little cut on the inside lining of the blood vessels. Well, we didn't really think
that as a glycoprotein maybe it's doing something else, and that's what we've honed in on the
last couple of weeks. It is doing something else. It's not just cutting the inner lining of the blood
vessel and causing damage, it's causing red blood cells to clump together.

Red blood cells clumped together lose surface area. Loss of surface area means that you could
be breathing pure oxygen. You could be having somebody put a ventilator down your throat and
trying to force oxygen into the system, but because the red blood cells are stuck together, they
won't be able to bind that oxygen. They won't be able also, therefore, to get rid of the carbon
dioxide. Ultimately, when you have a lack of oxygen and a buildup of carbon dioxide in the
system, the only result can be system failure. The only result can be death. When you start
factoring in that that's also the beginning sequelae for these massive blood clots that Dr. Ryan
Cole and others are really talking about, what you get is something that's really brilliant, but its
brilliance is only surpassed by the evil nature of it. What you get is plausible deniability. You see,
you have to think for this for a second.

If you have a bunch of eugenicists who are saying that they get to decide when people live and
people die and how many people are supposed to be on the planet, they are gonna take the
opinion that there are too many people on the planet right now for the resources we have
available and whatnot. They need to lower the population, so there's a few ways you can go
about lowering population. We know historically eugenicists were the first to put laws on the
books in the United States for forced sterilization. This started in the late 1800s after the Civil
War and continued all the way to 1981. The last forced sterilization that was performed was in
the state of Oregon. You can look this stuff up. These were all laws that were sponsored by
eugenicists. Eugenicists who went under the title of Progressives. That's right, the Progressive
movement in the United States is the Eugenicist movement, and that's when it started. It started
in the late 1800s. Eugenicists called themselves Progressives, and that's what you're seeing
right now.

All these people who are out there calling themselves progressives, they don't understand the
history of that movement. That movement is a movement sponsored by, funded by eugenicists.
So what happens next is you go, "Well, we can't use the forced sterilization anymore, but there's
something there." So what do they do? They create a shot that is going to lead to infertility, and
we've seen that already with this shot. We already have reports of infertility. We already have
reports of menstrual disruption. We already have reports from the Japanese study that came out
in 2021 showing that these shots do bioaccumulate in reproductive tissues, the gonads to be
specific. So, we're talking ovaries and testes; ovaries in women, testes and men. So we do
know that these shots are going to have a adverse interaction with the reproductive capability.
They're going to make people infertile, maybe even sterile, so that's one way you lower
population. People who can't reproduce, the population's going to go down, but you also need to
get rid of seniors. Why do you need to get rid of seniors?

Because Social Security is about to go under, it's completely underwater. So if you remove them
from the books, then Social Security looks like it's solvent again. So what did they go after with
the bioweapon that came out of the lab? They went after the seniors and that's the population
that got completely wiped out. But now with the shots, which is the real bioweapon, in my
professional opinion, what's happened is you can't have everybody dying from the same thing.

Because if you have people dying from the same thing across the board, then it's clearly the
shots and people just are not going to go for that. So what did Pfizer do? Pfizer, Moderna,
whatever entities were involved in this, Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, Fauci and friends, name the
cast of characters here, they came up with a way that they could co-opt normal cell function to
produce a spike glycoprotein that is toxic to the human body. But the toxicity is very unique in
that it creates a situation where red blood cells get stuck together, which affects gas exchange,
the most fundamental essential for health.
When you get those red blood cells stuck together, ultimately, they're gonna form a clot over a
period of time. It's those clots that can show up anywhere in the 60,000 to 100,000 miles of
blood vessels that a person has. Now, what's the big deal about that? Well, the big deal about
that is sometimes that's gonna show up as kidney failure. Sometimes it's gonna show up as
heart failure. Sometimes it's gonna show up as brain failure. Sometimes it's gonna show up as
liver failure. Ultimately, what you get is seemingly over 1,000 different causes of death. What
that does is it gives the manufacturers a chance to say, "Well, there's no shot ever that could be
that's that's been involved in over a thousand deaths. This one didn't do that either." You create
plausible deniability for what the cause of death actually is, is something Ed Dowd's been talking
about a lot.

Even though we had a dry, tender year in 2020 and more people died than were expected to
die, we've now, and John Bodwen, I've mispronounced his name, he's gonna be mad at me, has
also confirmed this with his analysis of death certificates in Massachusetts, that what's
happening is you get this incredibly diverse cause of death profile, but when you put them all
together, the effect is still the same. More people are dying than expected. This is now 3 years
in a row, which you can't have when you're talking about a dry, tender theory in epidemiology.
We've never had 3 consecutive years where more people have died than expected. There has
to be a cause for that. Well, the cause for that, in my professional opinion today, is that the spike
glycoprotein being manufactured in the bodies of people who've been genetically modified by
the shots is leading to red blood cells getting stuck together and completely disregulating the
most fundamental aspect of our health, which is gas exchange, oxygen and carbon dioxide.

When you do that, system failure, death, sudden adult death is a inevitable foregone conclusion
that it's going to occur. That's exactly what we've been seeing out there. So, we have a very big
problem in front of us and that we have to address this issue. Now fortunately, natural medicine
is poised to handle this issue of sticky blood. It's something I've been actually handling clinically
for over 20 years because the spike glycoprotein isn't the only way that red blood cells get stuck
together. Another way that red blood cells get stuck together is poor blood sugar management,
as in diabetic patients. We see it all the time.

The red blood cells are stuck together. So there's things that we do that can really help separate
those red blood cells, and that's a part of stage 1 of the process. That's what's going to facilitate
energy production and system stability to help us start working with people and moving them up
along into new stages, stage 2, stage 3 of their healing process so that they can ultimately
recover.

I don't know what's being discussed or not being discussed. I would hope it is. This is a
peer-reviewed confirmation. It was really interesting. There was a study that just came out
December 7th and Dr. Peter McCullough shared it with me. That's how I came across it. Let's
see. Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Hemagglutination, sticky blood, Implications for
COVID-19 Morbidities and Therapeutics for Vaccine Adverse Effects, performed by Boschi and
colleagues.
It was published in the International Journal of Molecular Science. Essentially, what they
concluded was, so the results of these experiments were first that spike protein from these four
lineages of SARS- CoV-2 induced hemagglutination. So it confirmed that the spike protein from
everything from the original Wuhan strain all the way through Omicron and beyond, the spike
protein, spike glycoprotein, did the same thing. It caused hemagglutination, sticky blood.
Omicron-induced hemagglutination at a significantly lower threshold concentration of spike
protein than the three prior lineages, which would go in line with what we saw clinically.

Going in line with what we saw clinically was Omicron was less virulent, less arduous for people
to go through. That was because the effect of the spike glycoprotein from Omicron was less in
terms of causing sticky blood. That's why it's symptomatically, it wasn't as arduous as the other
ones. What they say here is, "It was much more electro-positive on its central spike protein
region," but this is where it got a little interesting. "Ivermectin blocked hemagglutination, blocked
sticky blood when added to red blood cells prior to the spike protein being added and reversed
hemagglutination, reversed sticky blood when added afterward."

That's why the folks who have been taking Ivermectin as a part of their recovery process have
been very wise to do so, in my opinion, because it does have that effect of helping red blood
cells separate from each other so that their entire surface area can be used for gas exchange.

But the nice thing is that while in the pharmacopeia, Ivermectin is pretty much as close to
natural as you can get, its basis comes from the soil organisms. There are many other things
that help promote red blood cells having that separation. That's really the wheelhouse of what
natural medicine is all about, is making sure the blood is really clean, making sure the blood is
really strong and making sure the blood has the correct thickness to it, the correct viscosity to it
to optimize gas exchange.

When we optimize gas exchange, people get better because the body is designed to
self-correct. Keep in mind what I said early on, the goal of the body is getting oxygen to the cell
because the oxygen is gonna be used to produce energy. So the fundamental thing that we
have to make sure we are always focused on when we're talking about healing anyone for any
reason is energy production.

The number one symptom associated with disease, in any disease, whether we're talking
infections or whether we're talking about chronic disease, degenerative disease, doesn't matter,
the number one symptom across all pathologies is fatigue, which gives us incredible insight into
what we need to do to resolve these situations. Well, if you're not thinking energy production
first and foremost and always, as a medical professional, in my opinion, you are missing the
mark.

It's why you will see inconsistent results with your approaches with your patients. If you want
consistent results, you focus early, often and always on mitochondrial energy production and
then you use that as the foundation for your therapeutic approach and move on from there. For
hemagglutination, I'm actually doing some study. I was talking with Dr. Judy Mikovits last week
about it. We were looking up some potential blood tests for it, but the best test really for it is just
what's called a live blood cell analysis where you just take a little spot of blood, put it on a
microscope slide and look at it.

You can see it. It's not crazy. I know there's some folks on the white coat side of things who are
trying to poo-poo live blood cell analysis, and I'm like, if you're looking at live blood cell analysis
and trying to extrapolate nutrient deficiencies or things like that, sure, I could understand where
people would have trepidation about the accuracy of that as an investigative tool. But when
you're talking about just doing something as simple as checking for sticky blood, checking for
the hemagglutination is that's the best test for it. When you see it there, particularly in a person
who has received any shots and particularly, for a person or is recently infected and that's
confirmed and has symptomatology, in either case, has symptomatology for it, then when you
see that, I'm telling you, if I see sticky blood on a slide, I'm going to just go, "This is spike protein
until proven otherwise."

If I have that in their history that they've gotten the shots or they're currently dealing with an
infection and they have those symptoms, this is spike protein doing this, until proven otherwise.
The only other things that we know of that could really prove it otherwise would be a person
who's diabetic, but the symptomatology is very different, so I wouldn't be thinking about that in
any other way.

What's so important for us is that we don't pigeonhole ourselves into needing a test that likely is
not on the horizon for us before we start initiating treatment. Doctors have worked with patients
for thousands of years based upon taking clinical case history and reviewing symptomatology
and making educated guesses as to what needs to be done. When you have a doctor who has
a good clinical experience and understands biochemistry and understands physiology and
understands how the body works, we can figure out a lot of things without having the lab tests
that I wish we had.

That being said, that isn't to say lab tests aren't great, they're fantastic and we should always
seek to have tests so we don't have to guess when we can know. But we are in a situation right
now where there is a little bit of educated guessing that we have to do. Fortunately, what guides
us is our experiences with our patients, taking them through a healing process, and that's where
we learn so much. Early on, I made it a decision to take on a few severely-injured patients and
work with them through their process so I could learn what that really would mean, with the idea
being if I can help someone who's severely injured at least get stable in their system, then we've
started on the road to victory. I think it's a much better approach than trying to take on every
single injured person out there because there's so many because when you take on so many,
you don't necessarily get to have really in-depth interactions with any of them.

So for me, it's really about, "Let's prove that what we're doing is working." The way we prove
that what we're doing is working without having the tests that we would like to have is basically
symptom improvement in the patient we're working with. If people's health is improving, you can
see it, you can hear it, they'll tell you. People getting better that that's all I care about and that's
good enough for me. The worst thing we can do is take the opinion that nutrition is so simple,
and I see a lot of people doing that in the world. I see a lot of practitioners doing it. I see a lot of
practitioners who have no background in nutrition making nutritional recommendations as if it's
not a big deal. "This is so easy, I didn't even need to go to school for it." I think that's ridiculous.
It's insulting really, when you get down to it. I've dedicated my life to nutrition and natural
healing.

I've got well over 20,000 hours, I'm probably way past that in terms of education on these topics.
I can tell you, working with patients that it's not as easy as people make it out to be, which is
why I rely on principles rather than ideologies. When I take people through a healing process,
there's definitive goals and objectives that we are searching for. I'm looking for things in their
symptomatology improvement and so that I know they're ready to go to a next stage.

So when you have someone that is needing this, wanting this, but doesn't have the knowledge
base for it, it becomes very important to work with someone who does have the knowledge
base, whether that knowledge base be delivered via direct and formal education or whether that
knowledge base be delivered in terms of education in a clinical setting. The word doctor means
docere. It comes from Latin root docere, which means to teach, which means 'we are teachers',
ultimately. My job is to become obsolete in a person's life, and I can't do that unless I've
effectively imparted education to the person so that they can take care of themselves.

So I think it is and can be overwhelming. I think there's so much out there that's been said by so
many different people, the question becomes, "Who can I trust?" Which for me, takes me into,
"Well, let me design a curricula for this," and I have. I've designed a curricula for stage one of
this, so people don't have to become a certified holistic nutritionist to know how to do all this.
We've released a course at the Energetic Health Institute called The Art of Cellular Healing.

We have over 30 videos in there to help people get a foundational basis on what they're doing
and why they're doing it. I've learned over the years that when patients know why they're doing
something, they are more apt to continue through the process, especially if there's some
rollercoaster rides, which happen very frequently when you're using natural medicines because
your body going through a natural healing process is doing everything it can to recalibrate.
There's gonna be some highs and there's gonna be some lows, but over all, the goal is for the
trend line to go up.

What we do is we establish energy production and The Art of Cellular Healing. We explain and
express why. We talk about all of these topics. We give people a foundational approach and
something I'm working on with the people who've had success with the severely injured
following injuries following the shots has been something that I'm terming as the enhanced
elemental diet. We're gonna shoot a video on that this week, I'm sure, but it's a starting point for
people to stabilize their system so that we can terminate this declining process that they're
going through. We also offer free clinics every Tuesday at 1:00 PM Pacific at the school, free
injury clinics for people who are injured by the shots. I take one case every week to do what I
can and volunteer and help folks out. We've just partnered with Graith Care so people who
wanna get a consultation with me or one of my holistic nutritionists and work with them directly
can. But we're in the business of connecting people with people who can help.
We're in the business of developing curricula that people can take and start on that journey
themselves if they are more do-it-yourself inclined. In January, we're gonna be opening up The
Art of Cellular Healing to about 25 students who are injured but want to go through a formal
education with me and also, do so under supervision in a supervised format. Once we've gotten
that groundwork established where people know what they're doing and know that they're
feeling better and that they're stabilized, then we already have an existing program that we can
take students through called Energetic Cleansing. That certification program, I think we start
back up in March, maybe February, I don't know. I don't remember the exact date, but we start
that back up at the beginning of the year. We start taking people through the next stage, which
is to definitively detoxify the cell and clean up the cellular environment, the interstitium that the
cell lives within.

At the end of those courses, we also take students into stage 3, which is fasting, which is detox,
excuse me, autophagocytosis and DNA repair. So we teach people through it. I think the most
important thing, is if you don't know what you're doing and you're not confident about what
you're doing, you have really two options. Go and learn how to do it yourself, which is great and
something I did, but I did so after option number two, working with people who do know what
they're doing. The most important thing you can do right now is work if you're endeavoring into
natural medicine and nutrition, is to work with people who've actually been trained in it and who
utilize it not only in their lives but as a professional career. I love to give this example. The
average white coat out there will get roughly, according to The National Academy of Sciences, I
think it was 2014 was the last report I saw on this, the average white coat will get 19.6 hours of
nutrition over the course of 6 years of education in medicine.

That equates to roughly a weekend workshop on nutrition. They are not, by and large, qualified
to discuss nutrition, particularly in clinical settings. They're not qualified to discuss therapeutic
amounts. They're not qualified to discuss biochemistry. They're not qualified to discuss
physiology and the influences of nutrition upon the cell. They're not qualified to do it, by and
large. Now there's some exceptional MDs who've gone and gotten additional education, and
God bless them, the ones that have. I think everyone should. But I think that the biggest
misnomer out there is that because somebody's wearing a white coat makes them qualified to
talk about nutrition, that's nonsense. The people who are qualified to talk about nutrition are the
ones who've actually studied it and the ones who actually use it in a clinical practice. That's
where you'll find some naturopaths who do that, and hopefully, those naturopaths are really
good and are focusing on mitochondrial energy production as their foundation as well.

Well the first one, it's gonna be COVID-focused the first time we do it. It's going to be for people
who are injured by the shots or people who feel that they have long haul, and we're gonna
address those first. Ultimately, it will be anybody who wants to take it. If you have a health issue
that you need some direction on and you want to learn how to really take control of your health,
'cause this is what it comes down to. We are responsible for our health. No one external to me
is responsible for my health; not anybody in my family, not somebody walking down the street
that I've never met. It's nonsense. I'm responsible for my health and this is the thing that I start
with every patient on. Every patient that works with me actually has to sign a little thing
acknowledging that they are responsible for their health. That's really what it comes down to. So
if you want to be responsible for your health and be effective at taking care of yourself, you have
to learn how to do it. I had to learn how to do it.

Everybody who's good at it had to learn how to do it. So, we want to create the environment for
people to come and learn how to do it in a very loving way, a very positive way, a very
encouraging way. It's learning how to heal myself was the best skill set I could have ever given
myself. It was the best gift I could have ever given myself. It's paid me huge dividends, saved
me hundreds of thousands of dollars if not way more over the course of my life. It's something
that I love teaching people how to do, and that's very unique about the Energetic Health
Institute. Everybody there has that same addiction, if you will, to helping people discover what
life feels like when they're at their very best. You just can't be at your very best if you're
circulating spike glycoprotein incessantly. You can't be at your very best if you have some other
malady going on. The thing we can do, though, is we can learn something I think that's really
phenomenal and something I've come to in inescapable conclusion of.

We can learn that God lives in literally every cell of our body. Somebody explained to me, I can
explain what's happening with gas exchange. I can explain the chloride shift and how
bicarbonate it is made and the biochemical reactions that happen, I can explain all that. But
here's the thing that's so cool. It happens all day long, every day from the moment that the- from
the moment that really conception occurs. What's so crazy about this bioweapon is they figured
out how to attack the most sacred faith-level thing that goes on in our body, which is gas
exchange. It is the absolute foundation of everything we are about, and everything we know as
health is this ability for a red blood cell to bind oxygen and bind carbon dioxide, get oxygen to a
cell and get carbon dioxide away from a cell. It is literally everything for us. They've figured out
Ralph Baric and Peter Daszak and Fauci and friends and all and I'm sure a whole bunch of
other cast of characters, we don't even know their names, they've all figured out how to
weaponize our cells against us.

That weaponization is the incessant production of spike glycoprotein. So if the people that got
the shots, I think the message them is, don't feel bad. You were coerced, forced, chastised, and
lied to. You were lied to by the greatest liars that have ever lived. These are liars and you were
lied to by the greatest liars that have ever lived, so the most well-funded liars that have ever
lived. So don't take that as a personal attack on yourself, let's get you better. The folks that were
able to resist all of that influence and all that pressure, big high five to you. Let's talk about how
we make sure this never happens again, and let's make sure it never happens again because
we can make sure we don't need the pharmaceutical industry. That's where I'm heading with
this now. There's nothing that they have to offer me that I need.

Now, you get into an acute emergent situation where there's been some kind of trauma,
significant trauma, that's the only good thing I can find about that style of medicine. They will
save your life if you are in a car accident or something crazy has happened and you're really
banged up, they'll save your life. You want to make sure you give them credit for that because
that wouldn't have happened in previous centuries. But outside of that, their track record on
health, their track record on all of this is horrific. This COVID shot is just really the tip of the
iceberg with it. There is nothing in terms of real health, I'm not talking about emergency traumas
again, but there's nothing in current with respect to real health and what it actually is that the
'harmaceutical' industry can offer. I have no use for them when it comes to discussions of what
health actually is.

Intention is witnessed in our actions that you can look back and reflect and say, "I wasn't ready
at a certain point," shows that there's been a lot of growth in terms of spirituality within you and
that you are choosing a path of integrity. That's big time from what I'm hearing in you, that you're
talking in a way that people who heal talk. Now, when we talk about healing, what I first listen for
are questions. A person who has a genuine question about their health is a person, in my
opinion, who's ready to heal. The next thing that a person has to be willing to do is to do the
work, so I don't sugarcoat things for patients and people that I work with. I don't make promises
on anything other than me doing the best job I can do for them, and hopefully, they'll make the
same process that they'll do the best job that they can do for themselves.

But my job as a doctor is to educate my patients so they understand what they are doing, what
they're embarking on so that they can hopefully gain that knowledge along the way, this relief
through experience and really not need me in the future. I like being in a not-needed place
because people really have that confidence and know how to take care of themselves. With all
that being said, there's still this underlying foundation this, there's this thing that all people who
really heal, express that's the same. The thing that every person who heals, and we're talking it
not from a paper cut obviously, we're talking about serious things, is they exhibit belief -- belief
that they're going to heal. Now, one of my jobs in working with people is to impart that
confidence that would bring the opportunity for belief to come in. How do we do that? By
teaching people what's going on with them, so we remove the fear that comes with lack of
knowledge.

A lot of people get scared about diagnoses and these big words and they don't understand what
the big words really mean and they're too embarrassed to ask the doctor what they mean. Then
doctors sometimes are too bullish to even create that opportunity. It's why I don't understand
how people can say they're practicing medicine in 5-minute visits with their patients. I don't know
how you could get anything accomplished with that. I've had doctors say, "Well, I saw 60
patients today." I'm like, "Yeah, that's all you did. You saw them, you didn't treat them." I know
what it takes to work with someone. It takes spending hours with someone. I can really
effectively work with 3 patients a day. That's how this all works. If you want to be good at what
you're doing, you have to spend time with folks because you're teaching, you're explaining
what's going on, you're answering questions, you're creating courage within them.

The courage that they can ask questions and they're not going to be judged for things they don't
understand. The courage that they're going to have somebody who's going to be there with
them every step of the way. That they're not going to have to do this by themselves, especially if
they're not getting support at home or someplace like that. That there's gonna be courage that is
going to be realized in the approach, the design of the treatment and how we're doing it. That
there's a definitive thought process to it, and that thought process is a sequential thought
process that allows you to build upon what you've already accomplished each time so you're
getting better and better and better. One of the great experiences of my life is working with
patients because I'm one of the rare doctors that actually gets to see people getting better a lot.
Now, I'm not saying I'm 100% successful, and nobody is, but I got a really high success rate,
and I got a really high success rate because first and foremost, I care and my patients know
that.

Secondly, there is a definitive thought process that's based upon how the body is designed to
heal that I strictly adhere to. It's not an ideology, it's an understanding of physiology and cellular
biochemistry and what the needs of the cell are, and giving the body what it needs. And then,
having the belief, the faith that what I've given the body is going to work. That when I work with
patients have an expectation that they are going to get better and my patients can feel that. If
they do the work, they, by and large, do get better. So, what we have to have is that kind of
confidence that I know what I'm doing. I may not know everything and I certainly don't know
everything. But what I know I really know, and what I'm good at, I'm really good at. What we can
do with that is impart confidence, because ultimately, what we're repairing is a person's
relationship to their creator.

I know that sounds religious, it's not. What we're ultimately doing is helping the body heal
because the body is a tremendous antenna. It receives information all around. When we clean
that antenna up and we help that antenna right itself, we help it produce energy. We help it
stabilize the pH of the interstitium. We help it make sure that red blood cells are unstuck. We
help it make sure that the environment cells are in, is clean and optimized and is rich in
nutrients. We give the body its time that it needs to be hungry so we can do the things that we
didn't even know it needed to do through autophagocytosis and DNA repair. When we do these
things and we have a patience with that process, ultimately, what happens is we have an
experience that changes us indefinitely, and it changes us for the rest of our lives. We get
woven into the fabric of each other's lives.

My patients are as much a part of me as I am of them. My students are as much a part of me as


I am of them. We are all one because we've come to a fundamental understanding of the
majesty that we really exist within. Because we gave ourselves the opportunity to be
responsible for our own health, this gift of life we've been given. We've engaged the courage
and the willingness to do the work necessary to achieve what we are endeavoring into. The last
part of that process is just belief and faith, which builds as you have more success over time.
And so, when you bring those things to the table, working with people, you really understand as
a doctor, as a healer, which is what I really prefer to refer to myself as, is that I am participating
in an experience that is going to change me for the better rest of my life. If I put the right energy
and the right effort in with the person I'm working with, the same will be true of them as well.

That's where we can create the opportunity for what some people would consider to be
miracles, create the opportunity for those things to occur, 'cause really, all it is a blessing by our
creator and re-qestablishing that essential connection between us and our creator that's often
been muted due to the pollution that's accumulated all along our antenna. We have, I think it's
31 or 32 now, but it's splitting hairs. We are adding to that course as new information comes
available. The inspiration for that course were people who are severely injured by the shot.
That's the inspiration for it to start setting them, to give them an education that they can apply on
their own, so that they can start getting their system stable, because we realized early on we're
just not gonna be able--there's so many people injured--we're just not gonna be able to get to
everybody. But we can do our best through that education. We've had a number of nurses and
doctors start taking those courses as well, which is phenomenal. I love seeing doctors still
learning.

That's, to me, you want to talk about an integrity move, lifelong learner. I'm a lifelong student. I
respect people who do the same. The Art of Cellular Healing talks to people in a language about
natural medicine that's very easy to understand. I'm not gonna take people into the depth and
the minutiae just so that I can sound like I'm smart. I want people to get that their body is
something that's designed to heal and this is the process. This is where we start that process of
helping people create it. There's a lot of folks that look at pathology, and I just had one of my
colleagues say this to me over the weekend that she was getting a little bit thrown off by there
being so many different pathologies relative to the injuries from the shots. I said, "Well, when
you look at Pfizer's files that they didn't want to release, there were over 1,289 known different
pathologies associated with these shots, right?" Well, if we look at and try to solve every
individual pathology, we're gonna go crazy.

That's 1,289 different treatment approaches. So I said, "Look, let's just completely not do that.
Let's look at this a little differently. What do all of those 1,289 pathologies have in common?
They have in common fatigue. So what does that tell us? That's how we start. That's how we
start the healing process. That's the healing process. We start the healing process by helping
people produce energy and having faith that their body is gonna begin the self-correction
because energy becomes enzymes. Enzymes become rapid cellular activity. Rapid cellular
activity becomes the journey for the body at the cell level back to homeostasis, so it's a very
simple process. Now I don't have to worry about 1,289 different treatment approaches clinically.
I just have to focus on one thing, and the most important question, "Is this person producing
energy?"

If they are, then the symptomatology will improve and it will bear itself out. What we are talking
about bears itself out. This concept that I teach, it proves itself. That's why I've had so much
success in clinical practice. That's why my students are having insane levels of success
clinically and 'cause we're following principles and not protocols. We're following an
understanding of how the body is designed to heal and working in harmony with that as
opposed to trying to force our opinion of what should be happening or not happening upon the
body. My opinion is the body knows what it's doing, it just needs the building blocks to be able to
do it. It's been very effective for me the last 23, 24 years of working with people. I wish you great
luck with your naturopath. I hope they're awesome and amazing.

I would say make sure that like all healing relationships, it's a partnership and not a dictatorship.
Make sure that you can ask questions and make sure that they are focusing on energy
production in addition to whatever else they may be doing. I've worked with a lot of naturopaths
as well, and you'll find people a lot more compassionate, in my opinion, naturopathic doctors.
But I do still feel like we can all in the field of medicine do a better job of focusing on what's
going on at the cell level to help us get more consistent and better results. So, make sure
they're talking to you about mitochondria. If they don't, ask them questions about mitochondria
and what it takes for mitochondria to produce energy. I'll give you a little hint here. It's something
as simple as making sure that you're taking a multivitamin in addition to whatever else you're
doing. It's actually pretty easy to address.

Dr. Seema Nanda - Regenerative Healing of The Eye Using Amniotic


Fluid
So I learned this skill from someone, therefore I now know how to do it, now it's my job to teach
it. And I teach thousands of doctors all around the world. I have taught so many courses to so
many people in so many countries on everything, on anything. On healing of the cornea, which
is my specialty. I have patients coming in with scars, for years and years, they don't know what
to do. I remove that damaged tissue, I put an amniotic membrane, which is this regenerative
healing, and I grow their tissue back without the scarring, and then all of a sudden, they can see
again. It's miracle after miracle. And the lecture I wrote on it, it's called A New Hope. Kind of
based on Star Wars, A New Hope. And I give those patients a new hope. So that's why I have
60 plus doctors who refer to me in just Texas alone.

And I'm talking from all over. I have patients that come from Louisiana, I have patients that come
from... I gave a lecture in Montana and he says, "I'm going to refer to you." So that patient flew
from Montana so I can help them. I have a patient that flies in twice a year for me to treat them
for glaucoma from Nigeria, because again, he's not the same faith as I am, he's not the same
even political party. It doesn't matter because we're not part of, I'm this or I'm that. We're part of
a human race. When somebody asks you, what's your race? Human. That's what it is. I take
care of everyone.

And then they tell their friends and their friends and their friends. And I feel like, okay, I'm only
one person, so if I can teach what I know to as many people as I can, I do that. Sometimes
they're like, "Oh, well, she knows how to do, I'll just send it to her." I'm like, "No, you're supposed
to learn it and then do it yourself, and then tell me what results you got."

And that's what I love too. But everyone's got their safety net, what they're comfortable with,
what they want to learn, what they want to do. And there's a lot of people who coast, you get
your degree.

They get their degree, and after they get their degree, they just do their bread and butter. And
when they do their bread and butter, they don't really care to learn anything new. I'm the exact
opposite. I feel like I get bored with the bread and butter. I want something unique. Guava
butter, which I've learned here, is very tasty. But anyway, it's just unique to see different
perspectives and then learn from that and see if I can incorporate it into my own clinic and help
another patient.

Jonathan Otto:
Dr. Nanda, a lot of people are suffering right now, and a lot of people will suffer, and a lot of
them are going to continue to get lied to. And a lot of people have died and a lot of people will
die. How do you feel just looking at everything that's happening right now?

Dr. Seema Nanda:

Mass formation psychosis. We become robots. I do believe that a lot of the stuff they tell you,
when you watch the TV, it's called programming. They're programming us to be numb, to be
devoid... I've not watched TV in years. It's worthless. Because what they're trying to do is teach
you not to care. Why do you think there's all these shows on violence and this, so you become
numb to... Oh, you hear the gunshots in the street, oh, it's just another gunshot. Oh no big deal.
And then all of a sudden, you become numb to that. Why are we...

Why are we come numb to that? Oh, somebody else died. Yeah, I've heard that one in four
people know... And I don't know if the statistics correct or not, but if it is true, one in four people
know somebody who's died. That's what I heard on this island. One in four people know
somebody who has died. You see hashtag died suddenly, and you're again, not curious about
that? I don't know another word for not curious, because everybody by nature is curious. A child
looks at something, what's this? What's this? They start poking at it. Have we lost our childlike
innocence for everything in [inaudible 00:30:05] When we go to a new city, a new place, we're
like, "Oh, we want to see this. Oh, we want to see this." Why do we want to see it? Because
we're curious. We want to come to Puerto Rico, we want to see the beaches. We want to see
the what's going on.

We don't sit in our hotel room doing interviews. We don't sit there like, okay, I could sit here and
watch TV. I don't even understand why there's a 60 inch TV in here. You should be outside
enjoying the view of something that you've never seen before. Same thing. You should be
figuring out what's going on. It's interesting too, women are the nosiest people on the planet. I'm
just telling you. "Oh my God, she's wearing those pair of shoes. What the heck? That was last
season." Everybody's into somebody else's business, yet, except for this?

Yeah. And then again, have they been programmed to not care? Have they been programmed
to just say, Oh well, same stuff, different day?"

I'm trying to understand the logic of the... Here's another thing. If you go to a social setting,
nobody says, "Are you this or are you that?" Nobody cares. What I mean by this or that, are you
conservative? Are you liberal? Are you this? What party you belong to has nothing to do with
this, but when you ask somebody, "Why are you still wearing a mask?" Or, "Oh, I can't go..."
Because I have patients half and half. Some wear the mask, some don't. So I know the ones
that are wearing masks have been lockstep, brainwashed almost.

They're breathing their co2, the carbon dioxide, which we should be spitting out and breathing in
oxygen. The oxygen replenishes the brain to make you think, make you cognitive. You keep
breathing in that co2, which is what you're exhaling, you're dumbing down your brain. So then
taking in new information and trying to understand a different viewpoint is gone. Isn't that part of
it?

Everybody knows that something different, something new... Okay, perfect example. Okay, for
lets decades, I don't know how many years. For decades, the companies have been selling
something for heartburn. "Oh, you eat something bad, you have to take this." And I don't want to
give kudos to any company, so I'm not going to say a name. So these things, you take a pill that
decreases the indigestion and the pain and everything. And one doctor said, "Let me look at the
gut bacteria." And he found out it was helicobacter pylori. And he published the study, it's not
acid reflux, it's not indigestion, it's this bacteria. So he was trying to say, because of the bacteria,
this is what's causing the problem.

Okay. So all we have to do is quiet the bacteria, do whatever we need. The industry went after
him. All the pharmaceutical industry went after him because their multi gazillion, and again, I
don't know the number, so I'm just making it up. Multi gazillion dollar business is going down the
toilet because this one guy went outside the box and figured that it was actually a bacteria that's
causing the acid reflux, not hydrochloric acid spitting up and you have to take some kind of
anti-pepcid type thing. They fought and fought and fought. He finally won, and people now
recognize it. Now they have tests for it. You breathe into a bag, it sees if you have the increase
of this bacteria, and then you treat for that. They could have just gone that route instead of
fighting him. But they knew. So again, he was fighting against the machine. Isn't that what we're
doing here?

So amniotic membrane heals and regenerates the corneal tissue. And because it's such an
easy thing to do, we've got the epithelium, and we put this, it's like in a cookie cutter thing. And
so the amniotic membrane, the baby sits in. So when the mom delivers, you cookie cutter it out,
you make it into a ring, and then you put it on the cornea and you leave it on there for a couple
of days. What happens is, it regenerates the tissue like it did in the womb. It regenerates the
corneal tissue without a scar.

So you've got the chorion and you've got the amnion, and then you've got the amniotic fluid. So
the babies bathe in that fluid. Well, the fluid is sitting in the membrane. So that's the amnion,
remember, which has the fluid in it too. So now that's put onto the cornea, and it regrows the
tissue without the scarring. And I've done probably 1200 of these cases. I've done probably the
most in Texas.

And I teach all the doctors around the world how to do it. And now I've got something even
better. But anyway, that's still in the works. I've been doing that for the last year, which is based
on the umbilical cord tissue and everything. So can't really talk about that yet.

Jonathan Otto:

And it's all stem cell based?

Dr. Seema Nanda:


Correct. So what amniotic membrane does, so on our cornea, how cornea grows is the limbus.
So the limbus is the outer, how do I explain it? This is the cornea, and the circle around it is the
limbus. The limbus has stem cells. So let's say... I had a patient who had an acid burn on their
eye. The whole cornea was dissolved by the acid. He went to two different doctors, and they
tried to put a bandage on there, they tried to put antibiotics, this and that, and the tissue wasn't
growing. By day five, he came to my clinic. I saw that only one little part maybe had the limbal
stem cells there at the top. I was hoping it would grow. So one of my first cases was putting that
amniotic tissue on. Because it has stem cells, it causes limbal stem cell expansion.

So all of a sudden, this tissue that was totally gone, started growing. So it can grow the tissues
all the way from the top, and then it grows like this, right? And it grows centripetally. It means it
grows like a bicycle wheel all the way in. That's how the cornea grows. So it's not like a sheep
that grows like this.

It grows from the top and then grows around, grows around, the last spot is the center. And now
the patient can see. And he was not seeing, he thought he was going to lose that eye, and that
the scar tissue will go and he'd become either just all scar tissue and no seeing, or he'd grow it
back, but he might have to have a corneal transplant. We prevented him from having that. Mind
blowing. It was one of my first cases. And then after I saw that, I'm like, "Oh, I've got to try this
on everything." So I started doing case after case after case. So if I can get it as a preventative
or earlier on... So now, there's another company who produces amniotic drop fluid that we do in
the eye.

But anyway, you put it in the eyes, and I tell them three times a day, four times a day. On the
severe cases, twice a day on less severe cases.

Regenerate corneal tissue and make it heal, make it feel better, how long you put it on, and I
guess, or how long it lasts depends on the severity of the dryness and of the irritation on the
eye. And what I mean by dryness, it's such a vague term, but just to understand that there's
three layers of tears. So the top layer is the lipid layer, the fat layer, it's like the dam that keeps
the aqueous, which is the middle layer, that's provided by the lacrimal gland. It provides the
tears. And as we age, that signal that gets sent [inaudible 00:44:44] that signal to the brain, to
the lacrimal gland to produce tears, goes down as everything, as we age. And so the production
of the tear film on the cornea, on the front surface, every time we blink, should get a tear layer.

But we're on the computer, we're on everything, we blink less. So we usually blink 12 seconds a
minute, I mean 12 blinks a minute. But when we're on any type of device, it's half of that. So
now you're not coating that corneal surface and it's drying out. And then what we see as doctors
is spots. Dots and spots on that corneal surface. So instead of being a smooth, paved road, it's
got potholes. And we have to fill up those potholes, and that amniotic fluid does that. It fills it up,
makes the patient feel better until they don't. And then they put the drop in again. A lot of
inflammation gets dissolved in two days. Like my burn patient.

Jonathan Otto:
Oh, and then you put a patch over the top?

Dr. Seema Nanda:

Nope. It's a ring. Think of a crochet... I'm not sure you know what crochet is, so nevermind. Like
a knitting hoop or a crochet hoop. And then you want to do the thing, it's a ring.

Jonathan Otto:

So you can't see through it when it's on there?

Dr. Seema Nanda:

No, it's a big cloud. You're looking into a big cloud. So it's just a ring, it sits in there and then the
ring gets removed when you're done. In fact, the ring was... So some people's eyes are smaller
than others, that I devised a forcep, which I invented, it has my name on it, patented and
everything, to remove it. So it's the Nanda pro-grip forceps to remove that ring.

Jonathan Otto:

Amazing. Yeah. Amazing. And so I'm just trying to think of how people could do that with aged
urine. For example, if we found that to be safe, which I believe it is, because it would just keep
washing out.

Dr. Seema Nanda:

So no, you just put the drop and then you'd have to use it throughout the day, which is what we
do with the amniotic fluid.

Jonathan Otto:

So if you keep reapplying it...

Dr. Seema Nanda:

Yes. Throughout the day. Like a TID dose, or we would take a pill. So we know the pill is going
to wear away after six hours. Or five hours or eight hours or whatever it is. So depending on the
severity of the condition is how much of the drop you would put in.

Jonathan Otto:

And the amniotic fluid drops that you're putting, when you put it in, how many drop?

Dr. Seema Nanda:

Just one drop. One drop.


Jonathan Otto:

And then how many hours?

Dr. Seema Nanda:

Again, most of the patients, twice a day. So like 12 hours apart. If it's more severe, then maybe
eight hours apart. I have several very, very severe patients. I have to do it every two hours.

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger - What is Regenerative Medicine?


Jonathan Otto:

Dr. Gerenger, let's talk about regenerative medicine. Now, a lot of people hearing that, don't
know what that is. I mean, do you regenerate ... What's regenerative? I thought that medicine
was about giving something that would take away a symptom or make me just relieve a
symptom, or other people are like, well, it heals something. But why regenerative? What is this
regenerative medicine?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

Well, regenerative medicine is such a fascinating arena. When we talk about regenerative
medicine, the first thing that comes into mind is stem cells. There are so many different kinds of
stem cells out there, and I'd like to go through the basic stem cells. We have something called
PRP, that means stem cells that come from your body. We take the blood out, we spin it down,
and we reintroduce it into your body. As we age, our stem cell bank starts to decline. Usually,
PRP is great for regenerative medicine purposes, but what it does is that it helps your body to
stimulate your own stem cells to decelerate that aging process.

Then we have something called umbilical cord blood. These stem cells are just so pure that they
don't even have what we call HLA factors in it. That means that there's no allergic response
whatsoever, and that's the fascinating part about that, is that it's able to go in there and give you
these small minute type of stem cells that help your body regenerate and regrow and repair new
tissue. Now, we have breakthrough medicine that allows your body to heal from the inside out.
Not only that, it actually helps your body to regenerate new healthy cells. It's a fascinating
arena.

Jonathan Otto:

Now, Dr. Gerenger, what can these types of regenerative medicine practices be used for? Is it a
for just knee cartilage? Because a lot of people have heard of that, or shoulder or something like
that, or does it go beyond that?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:


Yes. Well, with stem cell therapy, you can use it for multiple uses. Again, what it does is that it's
able to hone in onto where the inflammation is at. For example, if you have lower back pain or
any sports injury such as an elbow or a back or a knee, you administer the stem cell
interaarticular, that means it goes around that joint and help those stem cells and also help to
rebuild your own stem cells, and heal that inflammatory process and decrease that pain. Also,
stem cells are often used where it's able to go and hone into inflammatory process, where we
have certain type of patients that would come in and say, "Oh my gosh, my knee hurts", and
then the medical team is able to administer these stem cells and suddenly they can see better.
It's like, how did that happen? Well, what happens is that yes, it goes and heal that area, but it
goes and circulates to other areas that need a little bit more help.

Jonathan Otto:

Wow, there you go. Now, what about with autoimmune disease? Are people using stem cell
therapy for autoimmune disease?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

Well, we're not supposed to make any claims, and we're not here to say, oh my gosh, stem cells
can cure this, can treat that. Again, these stem cells are smart enough where they hone into
where the inflammation is, so when the inflammation is, let's say in your head, or if the
inflammation is in the lower back, or if it is systemic, which is an autoimmune disease, it helps to
calm it down because we know that illnesses, pain, those pathway boils down to inflammation.

Jonathan Otto:

Dr. Gerenger, why do stem cells work?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

Well, stem cells is your natural internal repair system. What they do is that they actually help
your body to repair, rebuild, and also regenerate new tissues. That's the fascinating part of stem
cells. Because when we are just born, our stem cell bank is like rich of these baby stem cells,
but as we age, our stem cells start to decrease. So, by the time that we're in our 50s or 60s, our
natural stem cells are so scarce. That's why when we're able to administer these stem cells
inside the body, it helps to heal your body from a cellular level. What that means is that it's able
to, in the anti-aging world, it's able to bring your clock back or even decelerate your aging
process.

Jonathan Otto:
What makes you think that stem cell therapy is a breakthrough and amazing? There must be
something that makes you, from a firsthand experience, believe that this is the real thing. What
is that?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

Well, let me tell you a little bit about myself and what I used the stem cells for, myself. When I
was in college, I was in a debilitating car accident where every single morning I would wake up
with severe lower back pain. I would cry and my roommate would have to come into my
bedroom, help me out of bed, push me out of bed, because I was afraid if I move, maybe my
back would snap in half. That's how painful it was. Where did this lower back pain from? I was in
a severe car accident. Not only did I have back pain, but I also had headaches. I also had all
these other signs and symptoms, and of course I did what everybody would do, I went to my
primary care physician. I was placed on pain meds, which actually took the edge off, took the
pain off. However, what it did was that it robbed my body from the nutrients that my gut biome
actually needed. So then, I was placed on another medication to counteract the acid reflux I was
having, because it kept depleting my body from the nutrients that it needed, and interrupted my
natural microbiome, I started having allergic response. I start having all these hives, these
breakouts in lesions.

So, I went back to my doctor and he placed me on an allergic medication for allergies because I
was having allergy. But inside my body, my body was actually breaking down and my body is
showing me symptoms to say, hey, pay attention to me. One thing led to another, that's when I
went down to this alternative holistic approach, where I'm like, wait a minute, the last medication
that I was offered with something called ritalin, that was way back when. Now, the new medicine
is called Adderall because my grades were spiraling downhill because I couldn't even stay up to
actually study, because I was in college at that time, so my grades started to spiral downwards,
and I was like, wait a minute, this is not working. Every time when I go back, I get placed on
more medication and I did not feel better.

Then it got me to a chiropractic physician, where he was able to educate me about my gut
microbiome, how we need to heal the body from the inside out. Now that I am in my late 40s, I
wake up with no pain whatsoever. I took these holistic steps to repair my body from the inside
out. I am on no medication, I do not have to take any painkillers, I do not have to take anything
for allergies. I do not have to take anything to help me focus, except the supplements, things
that I need to actually support my brain function and my cellular function. But what does all this
have to do with you receiving stem cells?

People would ask. Well, I had damage to three discs. I had three herniated discs in my lower
back, three herniated discs in my cervical spine, that's why I was in so much pain. But yes, I
addressed all those issues, however, just like a sheet of paper, you crumble it up. I already have
damage there. Yes, I took the appropriate measures to be able to balance my body and
symptomatically, I am pain-free. But guess what? When you straighten this little paper, the
crease is still there. The damage is still there. So, I used stem cells to actually help my body
heal itself from the inside out and heal the damage, the physical damage, the physical trauma
that my body went through back in my 20s.

Jonathan Otto:

If I was to say to you then, what is that back look like now? How would you share that in regards
to a sheet of paper?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

Well, what I usually tell my patient is that sometimes you're so used to how you feel and how
your body feels. But how's your lower back now, Dr. G? Since you really don't have any pain,
what do you use to gauge? Well, you know what? I love spinning, I love my spin class, and also
I go to the gym and do my workout. Now that I go to my spin class, and then the next day when
I have my lower body workouts, such as squats and lunges, when I wake up in the morning, my
back, you know what, that twinge is not there. Whereas before the stem cell therapy, I wake up
and I feel that little twinge, but it wasn't painful. I myself got used to that pain. Now, after the
stem cell therapy, that pain doesn't exist anymore. So me, I was like, wow, this is really
amazing.

But not only that, I had this little lesion on my leg where when I get stressed out, I'll scratch it.
And after the stem cell therapy, that that area is totally gone, that area is clear. Did I use those
stem cells for my skin? The answer's no, because the stem cells is your internal repair system.
Your skin is the largest organ inside your body. What does that mean? Your stem cells hone too
where the inflammation is at.

Jonathan Otto:

Amazing. You know what's funny, is when I asked you how many sheets of paper do you want
to do that demonstration? You said one, I said, I'm going to give you two just in case if we have
a false state, but with the way you're feeling and the way you were feeling, the fact that you had
function but you still had pain, which is showing the body's remembrance, it was showing that
there was some dysfunction going on still. However, now for you to be doing these things, late
40s doing pretty aggressive exercise.

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

I mean, I just feel like you have this type of regenerative medicine where it's able to go in there
and it's able to repair. It's able to regenerate, and it's able to rebuild all this new tissue. This is
where we want to be at. It helps to decelerate our aging process.

Jonathan Otto:

Go ahead and turn back the clock, get a new start like a reset.
Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

Yes, a reset.

Jonathan Otto:

Cathleen, can you tell me where you're at today because of stem cell therapy?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

I believe that stem cell therapy is able to repair my internal system, where this is what I feel like
my back is like now. I wake up with no pain, I go to the gym, I have a hard workout, and the next
morning that twinge in my lower back is no longer there. Even if I wear heels all day long, I
stand all day long, that twinge in my back does not exist. It helps to rebuild, repair, and
regenerate new tissue. This is how I was in my 20s, now I am in my late 40s, we're talking about
regenerative medicine right here. I am healthier in my late 40s then I was back in my 20s.

Jonathan Otto:

Awesome. And Cathleen, how does that feel for you?

Dr. Cathleen Gerenger:

Oh, it feels absolutely amazing. I am out with my 20-year-old nieces and nephews, and they're
like, "Aunt Cathy, how in heavens do you have all this energy?" I tell them that you have to
protect your body from that cellular level. Because biologically our clock is aging, but now with
modern medicine, with regenerative medicine, we're able to decelerate that aging process, and
with the right nutrients, we're able to fortify our body and protect our body from age related
diseases later on in life.

Conclusion
We’ve been told that we only have limited solutions when we’re facing disease. A cancer
diagnosis feels like a death sentence, doctors don’t tell you that autoimmunity is completely
reversable, and hospitals are denying people life-saving early COVID treatments…

Let’s not even talk about the negative treatment - or lack of treatment - that vaccine injured
patients are experiencing right now.

The medical field has totally shifted the priority to profit. Patients are not prioritized in the
majority of the cases.
And people are not getting access to life-saving information that really exists and is truly helping
people to come back from some of the most life-threatening illnesses.

But millions of people feel lost right now… Millions of people have lost their lives unnecessarily
because they did not get access to the real life-saving protocols and treatments.

I’m hoping that today, this book got to you, and that your eyes have been truly opened to the
real possibility of totally restoring and optimizing your health, regardless of the challenges you’re
facing right now.

And then my hope is that you’ll share this with someone else - it may, and probably will, save
their lives.

We cannot reply on the media and global government to give people access to this censored
information that is saving lives. Big Pharma companies would lose Billions of dollars if they did.

This book is just a brief glimpse into the incredible and groundbreaking information that our top
natural doctors and health experts will be sharing in our latest docuseries, Absolute Healing.

If you truly want to learn about how to become your own doctor and live a full, healthy and
disease-free life without toxin-laden pharmacueticals…

And if you want to get access to the most successful treatments and protocols for disease
reversal, vaxx injury and COVID and long-COVID recovery, make sure you sign up for free now.
References:

a. https://kdvr.com/news/what-happened-to-damar-hamlin/
b. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
c. https://anishkokamd.substack.com/p/be9b479b-5f95-4fce-a48c-266463273cb9
d. https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/thailand-study-of-young-adults-post
e. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Worse-Than-the-Disease-Reviewing-Some-Possi
ble-of-Seneff-Nigh/2799933cc09be1a78ad8c5a5dca5ede497045d58

You might also like