Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis
Analysis
There is a comparison to bring out the writer’s point. Compares France to India.
Joke on Modi Sarkar. Being sarcastic. People are tired of waiting for ache din. Govt has not lived upto
their promise. Says the government has delivered nothing. Satirical reference to the way the govt
functions. No patriotic feeling if the govt is failing and does not have the trust of its citizens.
Implies that we have forgotten the victims of 26/11. This is because the people themselves are not
self sufficient and in order.
Becomes very blunt. A person who does not have time to manage their daily groceries has no time
to care for the dead.
“And yes, Mumbai is divided and disunited as the rest of India”-proves her argument, gives examples
and evidence to support her claim. Very opinionated and personal.
Keeps going back to the example at an international level. Mumbai was known for compassion, what
happened to it now?
Brings a counterargument. Candles and flower tributes are useless and have no meaning.
Counters her own point to bring a new perspective. Balances the opinion.
Author claims that the Mumbai which was so empathetic is now dead. She is nostalgic and
demeaning the past. The Bindaaz Mumbai era has died a long time ago.
Claims that grief unites and wants the Mumbaikars to come together using grief.
Again going back to how good Mumbai is, says what has developed now in France was always there
in Mumbai.
In opinion columns, there is always very clear stance. Strong words are used.
Tone is very emotional and critical. Emotional about the dead, about the people coming together for
the victims.
Local references