Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By wr1ter.com
SAMPLE TEMPLATE OF WRITING AN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY ON THE TOPIC
“DEATH PENALTY” 2
The death penalty remains a contested topic among scholars in the twenty-first century.
Basically, legal experts give moral justification that supports the existence of the death penalty.
However, people who advocate for human rights maintain that the death penalty lacks moral
justification. Although scholars disagree on the death penalty’s legality, the current justice
system provides the necessary protocols to avoid the convicted criminals’ inexcusable execution.
A. Argument
The justice system of the United States provides the necessary protocols to ensure that the
death penalty promotes justice. For example, the criminal justice system requires judges to
sentence convicts found guilty of first-degree murder into a death sentence (Garrett & Kovarsky,
2018). In this case, the ruling in first-degree murder relies on objective evidence and a justifiable
prosecution process. Besides, the convicted individual receives an opportunity to appeal. Hence,
people charged with first-degree murder receive a death penalty after going through a fair legal
process.
B. Counterargument
On the other hand, some people state that the death penalty does not meet moral
justification. Basically, contenders maintain that executing a first-degree murderer fails to give
him a chance to change (Brown, 2020). Also, the death penalty violates the convict’s
fundamental right to life. However, such claims fail to consider that people charged for first-
degree murder violated their fundamental rights. In turn, sentencing such people to death
eliminates possible threats to public lives.
Though scholars disagree on the legality of the death penalty, criminal justice provides
the convicts with a chance to receive a fair hearing. In this case, the current justice system
provides the necessary protocols to avoid inexcusable execution. Thus, the counterargument
presented fails to consider that first-degree murderers violate other people’s fundamental right to
life.