Page Bush Finally Fires Mary Frances Berry By Linda Chavez December 14, 2004
Mary Frances Berry: A Relic Whose Time
Has Come By George Will December 17, 2001
Mary Frances Berry: Civil Rights Bully
By Linda Chavez December 11, 2001 Former Chair of U.S. Civil Rights Commission Contrary Mary Frances Berry Supporter of racial preferences in By The Washington Times employment and education December 8, 2004
Born in 1938 in Nashville, Tennessee, Mary Frances
Berry has been the Geraldine R. Segal Professor of American Social Thought and Professor of History at the University of Pennsylvania since 1987.
Berry received a Bachelors degree from Howard
University in 1961 and a Masters degree from the same institution a year later. She went on to earn both a Ph.D. in history and a law degree from the University of Michigan. She has held faculty appointments at Central Michigan University, Eastern Michigan University, the University of Maryland, the University of Michigan, and Howard University. In 1990-91, she served as President of the Organization of American Historians, a traditionally leftist group that has boasted among its other past presidents Eric Foner, William Chafe, and C.Vann Woodward. She has also held administrative posts at the University of Maryland and served as the Chancellor of the University of Colorado at Boulder.
Apart from her academic career, Berry has had a
long career in government, which she began as an Assistant Secretary of Education in the former Cabinet Department of Health, Education, and Welfare under then-President Jimmy Carter. After Dr. Berry returned from a trip to China and stated that Americans had no right to criticize Communist China's education system for requiring students to "develop what they call socialist consciousness and culture," Carter transferred her to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission (CRC). As Linda Chavez points out, "China's higher education system was still reeling from the devastating effects of Mao's bloody Cultural Revolution, which forced millions of intellectuals, ordinary teachers and students into forced labor on collective farms, or sent them to re- education camps where they faced torture and death. Berry, then the government's top-ranking official in higher education, nonetheless praised China's education system as a model for the United States and publicly criticized the press for printing 'false' reports about the Chinese system." It is notable that Berry was known to carry Mao Zedong's Little Red Book of aphorisms in her purse.
Denouncing America's multitude of alleged flaws,
and comparing the U.S. unfavorably to Communist nations, has been a longstanding practice for Berry. She complained, for instance, that the U.S. media's "massive barrage of propaganda" had made black Americans blind to the Soviet Union's virtues, including its "safeguards for minorities," "equality of opportunity," and "equal provision of social services to its citizens." Moreover, she characterized the 1960s as an era when blacks in America lived under a "threat of genocide"' that was "roughly comparable" to what Jews faced in Hitler's Germany.
Berry served on the CRC from 1980 until 2004.
Ronald Reagan, early in his presidency, attempted to fire Berry from the Commission, arguing that as a political appointment she served at the pleasure of the President. But Berry sued and eventually won the right to keep her CRC post. President Clinton made her the Chair of the CRC in 1993, a position she held until President George W. Bush eventually dismissed her in 2004.
Berry's worldview holds that white racism remains
an intractable and pervasive crisis in America. "The primary explanation for racially motivated violence against blacks," she has stated, "has been the need of a segment of the white population to preserve [its] belief in the inferiority of blacks, and to maintain the social and political subordination of an historically outcast group by any means, including violence." In a radio interview on National Public Radio in April 2005, Berry dismissed U.S. complaints of human rights violations in Cuba as examples of "the pot calling the kettle black."
A strong advocate of racial preferences in
employment and education, Berry deems the concept of race-neutrality in hiring and college admissions unacceptable, given what she believes is white America's ongoing desire to relegate blacks to subservient roles. In his book The End of Racism, scholar Dinesh D'Dsouza quotes Berry responding to the idea that racial preferences are inconsistent with the mandates of civil rights laws: "Civil rights laws were not passed to give civil rights protection to all Americans," she said.
Armed with this definition of civil rights, Berry
condemned President Reagan and his administration as people who "never met a civil rights law they liked." The laws to which she was referring were the aforementioned race-based preferences; set-asides that reserved a certain percentage of government contracts for minority-owned firms; and "disparate impact laws," which allowed minorities to "pass" qualifying exams (upon whose results employers base hiring and promotion decisions) with scores lower than those required of their white counterparts - on the theory that the tests themselves were racially biased and therefore created a "disparate impact" favoring whites over blacks and other minorities. Reagan opposed all of these measures; for this, he was condemned by Dr. Berry.
Notwithstanding Berry's assertions about Reagan's
hostility toward minorities, African Americans in fact thrived during his presidency, making impressive progress economically and professionally. As columnist Larry Elder notes: "From the end of 1982 to 1989, black unemployment dropped 9 percentage points (from 20.4 percent to 11.4 percent), while white unemployment dropped by only 4 percentage points. Black household income went up 84 percent from 1980 to 1990, versus a white household income increase of 68 percent. The number of black-owned businesses increased from 308,000 in 1982 to 424,000 in 1987, a 38 percent rise versus a 14 percent increase in the total number of firms in the United States. Receipts by black-owned firms more than doubled, from $9.6 billion to $19.8 billion."
Berry charges that Republicans are, at heart, racists
who deviously exploit African Americans by hand- picking a few conservative blacks - who, in Berry's view, can scarcely be considered authentic blacks - and parading them before the media in hollow gestures of "inclusiveness." "It's going to get worse for African Americans," Berry says. "They [Republicans] have really figured out that, in terms of diversity, 'If you want some black people, we'll give you some black people. We'll give you some black people in every kind of job. Because we know some black people who want to do what we want to do, either because they want to get ahead or because they believe it. You want black people? You want Latinos? You want Asians? We can give you them all day long.'"
Reasoning from that planted axiom, Berry derided
President George H.W. Bush's appointment of Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court as nothing more than the crass exploitation, for Bush's own political gain, of a black man whose views were not only out of touch with those of most black Americans, but would, because of Thomas' influential position, actually do great harm to blacks. "He [Bush] stood there talking about how he had looked all over the world and found the best person [Thomas] he could put there," said Berry, laughing. "Even the guy he was talking about knew he was lying. Everybody in the room knew he was lying."
In Berry's opinion, the appointment of such
individuals as Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, and Colin Powell to positions of high authority actually have the undesirable effect of fooling blacks into thinking that they live in a nation where they can in fact succeed on the strength of their own merits, where white racism is not nearly the imposing obstacle it once was, and where they are no longer viewed or treated as second-class citizens. It is this delusion - as Berry sees it - which, in Berry's view, causes blacks to complacently accept a status quo that is far more oppressive and discriminatory than they realize. Says Berry: "The reason there is no agitation among blacks — I don't see any — is because the symbolism is such that you could tell yourself - until something happens to you - that nothing is wrong. You could say, 'Look at Colin Powell. Blacks are everywhere. We can just do anything.' Our people don't draw a distinction between what people are doing."
Berry further contends that Republicans - although
their political candidates typically receive only minimal black support - have learned to manipulate black voters by appealing to their religious values. "One of the things [Republicans have] done with the rank-and-file black people is they know that many of the black people who do vote or will vote are religious," Berry says. "What they did was to figure out if they could pull the religious string, people will go crazy. For many black people, all they had to do was to start talking about giving money for a faith- based initiative, give some money to some preachers, have some church social services and then pull the same-sex marriage string. All they had to do then was to have him [Bush] stand up and say, 'I'm a Christian.'"
Berry's contempt for conservatives and Republicans
is palpable, as exemplified by her sneering assertion that Newt Gingrich "sometimes challenges my faith in God." This contempt, coupled with her political views generally, inform the instruction Berry gives to her students at the University of Pennsylvania, where she teaches three courses: (a) History of American Law to 1877, which, according to Berry's course description, places considerable emphasis on the law of slavery, the status of women, and civil liberties."; (b) History of American Law Since 1877, which examines, among other things, "the legal status of women and minorities"; and (c) History of Law and Social Policy, which explores "the role law, lawyers and judges have played in attempting to solve selected social problems," and assigns readings about "the history of such efforts as developing effective housing, public health or immigration policies, or remedies for invidious discrimination."
Berry's scholarship focuses almost entirely on racial
issues and gender politics. Her books include: Black Resistance, White Law: A History of Constitutional Racism in America; The Pig Farmer's Daughter and Other Tales of American Justice: Episodes of Racism and Sexism in the Courts from 1865 to the Present; The Politics of Parenthood: Child Care, Women's Rights, and the Myth of the Good Mother; My Face Is Black Is True; Why ERA Failed: Politics, Women's Rights, and the Amending Process of the Constitution; Overcoming The Past, Focusing On The Future: An Assessment Of The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Enforcement Efforts; Crisis Of The Young African American Male In The Inner Cities; Health Care Challenge: Acknowledging Disparity, Confronting Discrimination, And Ensuring Equality; and Military Necessity and Civil Rights Policy: Black Citizenship and the Constitution, 1861-1868.
Berry has received many awards over the years,
including the NAACP's Roy Wilkins Award, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference's Rosa Parks Award, the Ebony Magazine Black Achievement Award, and 32 honorary doctorates. She was designated one of the Women of the Century by the Women's Hall of Fame.