Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Material
Finances
Information
Reason 1: Complexity
Example:
Newsvendor model
• 1. ‘Ford’ Era
– Vertically integrated
– Less responsive
• 1. ‘Ford’ Era
– Vertically integrated
– Less responsive
• 2. ‘Toyota’ Era
– Keiretsu
– Still rigid
• 1. ‘Ford’ Era
– Vertically integrated
– Less responsive
• 2. ‘Toyota’ Era
– Keiretsu
– Still rigid
• 3. ‘Dell’ Era
– Highly responsive
– Extensive IT
Primary goal Supply demand at the lowest cost Respond quickly to demand
Create modularity to allow
Maximize performance at a
Product design strategy postponement of product
minimum product cost
differentiation
Lower margins because price is a Higher margins because price is not a
Pricing strategy
prime customer driver prime customer driver
Lower costs through high Maintain capacity flexibility to buffer
Manufacturing strategy
utilization against demand/supply uncertainty
Maintain buffer inventory to deal with
Inventory strategy Minimize inventory to lower cost
demand/supply uncertainty
Reduce, but not at the expense of Reduce aggressively, even if the costs
Lead-time strategy
costs are significant
Select based on speed, flexibility,
Supplier strategy Select based on cost and quality
reliability, and quality
Low High
Low
Supply Uncertainty
High
Source: Hau Lee, Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,
California Management Review
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 38
Demand Uncertainty
Low High
Efficient Supply
Low
Supply Uncertainty
Chain
Basis of competition is
efficiency.
JIT, Lean, Scale,
Productivity, D2C.
Eg: Toyota,
Walmart(some
categories)
High
Source: Hau Lee, Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,
California Management Review
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 39
Demand Uncertainty
Low High
Responsive Supply
Low
Supply Uncertainty
Chain
Source: Hau Lee, Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,
California Management Review
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 40
Demand Uncertainty
Low High
Risk-Hedging
High
Supply Chain
Source: Hau Lee, Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,
California Management Review
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 41
Demand Uncertainty
Low High
Source: Hau Lee, Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,
California Management Review
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 42
Demand Uncertainty
Low High
Chain Chain
Risk-Hedging
High
Source: Hau Lee, Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,
California Management Review
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 43
Emerging logic: Too much focus on efficiency can be extremely
counterproductive to supply chains. Instead, modern supply
chains require AAA capability
Read: https://hbr.org/2004/10/the-triple-a-supply-chain
Push/Pull view
Reference: https://scor.ascm.org/processes/introduction
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 52
Each of the blocks are further divided into a list of sub-processes
For example:
• Return
• Return Defective Product
• Identify defective product condition
• Disposition
• Request return
• Return authorization
• Schedule shipment
• Return defective product
Ordering Costs
Paperwork, communication, freight, inspection,
transportation, salary in purchasing dept, reject and rework,
delay etc
Key point: Depends on number of orders
Rakesh V | IIM Lucknow 64
Key Question
How much to order?
D DhC
n* = =
Q* 2S
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
12 10 8 9 5 4 4 7 7 6 6 10
2𝐷𝑆
𝑄∗ =
𝐷
ℎ𝐶(1 − )
𝑃
𝑄∗ =
2𝐷𝑆 (ℎ𝐶 + 𝐾)
∗
ℎ𝐶
ℎ𝐶 𝐾 𝐼2 = 𝑄
ℎ𝐶 + 𝐾
2D(S + Vi − qi Ci )
Optimal lot size for Ci is Qi =
hCi
D D
TCi = * S + V
i + (Qi
*
− q i )C
i h / 2 + V
* i
+ (Q
i − qi )Ci
*
Qi Qi
Step 4: Select the order size Qi* with the lowest total
cost TCi
External
Backorder costs
Loss of sales
Erosion of goodwill, loyalty
Internal
Idle machines, labour – loss of utilization
The following has been demand during lead time for last 25
instances
17 24 27 28 26
24 20 24 24 23
13 31 26 28 34
17 33 29 26 26
24 19 23 25 24
5
Frequency
Demand
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Inventory