Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Midyear Review 2022-2023
Midyear Review 2022-2023
Timeliness
2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Quality Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 3.000 0.28
Environment and structure to engage 7 in Objective 4 as Objective 4 as shown in Objective 4 as shown in 4 in Objective 2 as 3 in Objective 4 as
Diversity of learners individually or in shown in COT rating COT rating sheets/ COT rating sheets/ shown in COT rating shown in COT rating
Learners groups, in meaningful sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
exploration. discovery and agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
hands-on activities wihin a No acceptable
range of physical learing 7% evidence was shown
environments
Efficiency Objective was met but No acceptable
Objective was met instruction exceeded the evidence was shown
within the alloted time alloted time
Timeliness
5. Managed learner Quality Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 4 5 5 5.000 0.350
behavior constructively by 7 in Objective 5 as Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown in 4 in Objective 5 as 3 in Objective 5 as
applying positive and non- shown in COTrating COTrating sheets/ COTrating sheets/ shown in COTrating shown in COTrating
violent discipline to ensure sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
learning-focused agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
environments. No acceptable
evidence was shown
7%
5. Managed learner Quality Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 4 5 5 5.000 0.350
behavior constructively by 7 in Objective 5 as Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown in 4 in Objective 5 as 3 in Objective 5 as
applying positive and non- shown in COTrating COTrating sheets/ COTrating sheets/ shown in COTrating shown in COTrating
violent discipline to ensure sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
learning-focused agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
environments. No acceptable
evidence was shown
7%
Timeliness
6. Used differentiated, Quality Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 5.000 0.35
developmentally 7 in Objective 6 as Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown in 4 in Objective 6 as 3 in Objective 6 as
appropriate learning shown in COTrating COTrating sheets/ COTrating sheets/ shown in COTrating shown in COTrating
experiences to address sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
learners’ gender, needs, agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
strengths, interests and No acceptable
experiences. 7% evidence was shown
Timeliness
Efficiency
Timeliness Participated in Participated in collegial Participated in collegial Participated in No acceptable
collegial discussion discussion that discuss discussion that discuss collegial discussion evidence was shown
that discuss teacher teacher and learner teacher and learner that discuss teacher
and learner feedback feedback across 3 feedback across 2 and learner feedback
across 4 quarters quarters quarters across 1 quarters
9. Selected, developed, Quality Demostrated Level 7 Demostrated Level 6 in Demostrated Level 5 in Demostrated Level 4 Demostrated Level 3 4.000 0.28
organized and used in Objective 9 as Objective 9 as shown in Objective 9 as shown in in Objective 9 as in Objective 9 as
appropriate teaching and shown in COT rating COT rating sheets/ COT rating sheets/ shown in COT rating shown in COT rating
learning resources, sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
including ICT, to address agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
learning goals. No acceptable
7% evidence was shown
9. Selected, developed, Quality Demostrated Level 7 Demostrated Level 6 in Demostrated Level 5 in Demostrated Level 4 Demostrated Level 3 4.000 0.28
organized and used in Objective 9 as Objective 9 as shown in Objective 9 as shown in in Objective 9 as in Objective 9 as
appropriate teaching and shown in COT rating COT rating sheets/ COT rating sheets/ shown in COT rating shown in COT rating
learning resources, sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
including ICT, to address agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
learning goals. No acceptable
7% evidence was shown
Efficiency Objective was met Submitted 3 different Objective was met but Submitted 1 different No acceptable
within the alloted time kinds of acceptable MOV instruction exceeded the kinds of acceptable evidence was shown
alloted time MOV
Timeliness
11. Monitored and Quality Involved learners in Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated Monitored and No acceptable 3.000 0.210
evaluated learner progress monitorig and learners paogress and learners paogress and evaluated learners evidence was shown
and achievement using evaluation of their achievement based on achievement based from paogress and
learner attainment data. own progress and attaiment data from an class attaiment data achievement based
achievement individual learner on existing grade
level/department/
learning area report
7%
Efficiency
Timeliness Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s No acceptable
show/s monitoring show/s monitoring and monitoring and show/s monitoring evidence was shown
and evaluation done evaluation done across 3 evaluation done across 2 and evaluation done
across 4 quarters quarters quarters across 1 quarter
Quality
Sustain regular Communicated promptly Communicated promptly Communicated
communication of & clearly using various & clearly using 1 learners’ needs,
learners’ needs, tools and strategies of strategies of learners’ progress &
progress and learners’ needs, needs, progress & achievement to key
No acceptable
achievement to key progress &achievement achieve ment to key stakeholders,
evidence was shown
12. Communicated stakeholders, to key stakeholders, stakeholders, including including parents/
promptly and clearly the including parents/ including parents/ parents/ guardians, as guardians, but not
learners’ needs, progress guardians, as shown guardians, as shown on shown on MOV regularly as shown
7%% on MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted on MOV submitted 3 0.21
and achievement to key
stakeholders, including Efficiency
parents/guardians.
Timeliness Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt No acceptable
communication of communication of communication of communication of evidence was shown
learners' needs, learners' needs, learners' needs, learners' needs,
progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement across achievement across 3 achievement across 2 achievement in only
4 quarters quarters quarters 1 quarter
5. Personal 13. Applied a personal Quality Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that No acceptable 4.000
Growth and philosophy of teaching that details the consistent reflects t involvement of shows the application of indicates personal evidence was shown
Professional is learner-centered involvement of learners in the teaching- a personal philosophy of philosophy o of
Development learners in the learning process teaching that is learner- teaching that is
teaching-learning resulting from the centered learner-centered
process resulting application of a personal
from the application philosophy of teaching
of a personal that is learner-centered
philosophy of
teaching that is
7%% 0.28
learner-centered
Efficiency
Timeliness Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal No acceptable
philosophy of philosophy of teaching philosophy of teaching philosophy of evidence was shown
teaching that is that is learner-centered that is learner-centered teaching that is
learner-centered across 3 quarters across 2 quaters learner-centered in
across 4 quarter only 1 quarter
14 Set Professional Quality Updated professional Discussed progress on Set professsional Accomplished the e- No acceptable 3.000
development goals based development goals professional development goals SAT at the beginning evidence was shown
on the Philippine during Phase II of development goals with bsaed on e--SAT results of the school year
Professional Standards for RPMS cycle as the rater during the mid- as evidence by MOV 2 ass evidence by
Teachers evidence by MOV 4 year review as evidence MOV 1
by MOV 3
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 acceptable Submitted 2 acceptable Submitted 1 No acceptable
7%% acceptable MOV's MOV's MOV's acceptable MOV's evidence was shown 0.21
Timeliness All four (4) submitted All three(3) submitted All two(2) submitted Only one (1) of the No acceptable
MOV's were MOV's were MOV's were submitted MOV's evidence was shown
accomplished within accomplished within the accomplished within the was accomplished
the prescribed RPMS prescribed RPMS Phase prescribed RPMS Phase within the prescribed
Phase RPMS Phase
Plus Factor 15. Performed various Quality Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 No acceptable 4.000 0.280
related works/activities that related work/ activity related work/ activity that related work/ activity that related work/ activity evidence was shown
contribute to the teaching- that contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the that contributed to
learning process. teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning the teaching-learning
process beyond the process within school/ process within the process within the
school/ Community Community Learning learning area/ class as evidenced
Learning Center Center (CLC) as department as evidenced by submitted MOV
(CLC) as evidenced evidenced by submitted by submitted MOV
by submitted MOV MOV
2%% Efficiency Submitted MOv that Submitted MOv that Submitted MOv that Submitted MOv that No acceptable
details achieved details percieved show interlap with the shows considrable evidence was shown
positive contribution positive contribution to actual teachin-learnig overlap with, hence
to the teachin-learnig the teachin-learnig process as evidenced by significantly affecting
process as evidenced process as evidenced by the annotation provided the performance of
by the annotation the annotation provided the teachin-learnig
provided process.
Timeliness Submitted MOV's Submitted MOV's were Submitted MOV's were Submitted MOV's No acceptable
were submitted submitted across 3 submitted across 2 were submitted only evidence was shown
across 4 quarters quarters quarters in 1 quarter
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Prepared by: Ariel B. Montecalbo, PhD
SGOD-Education Program Supervisor
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory Approving Authority
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND MIDYEAR REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Timeliness
2. Learning 4. Managed Quality Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level
Environment and classroom structure 7 in Objective 4 as Objective 4 as shown in Objective 4 as shown in 4 in Objective 2 as 3 in Objective 4 as
Diversity of to engage learners shown in COT rating COT rating sheets/ COT rating sheets/ shown in COT rating shown in COT rating
Learners individually or in sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
groups, in meaningful agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
exploration. discovery No acceptable
and hands-on 7% evidence was shown
activities wihin a
range of physical Efficiency Objective was met but No acceptable
learing environments Objective was met instruction exceeded the evidence was shown
within the alloted time alloted time
Diversity of to engage learners
Learners individually or in
groups, in meaningful
exploration. discovery
and hands-on 7%
activities wihin a
range of physical Efficiency Objective was met but No acceptable
learing environments Objective was met instruction exceeded the evidence was shown
within the alloted time alloted time
Timeliness
5. Managed learner Quality Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level
behavior 7 in Objective 5 as Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown in 4 in Objective 5 as 3 in Objective 5 as
constructively by shown in COTrating COTrating sheets/ COTrating sheets/ shown in COTrating shown in COTrating
applying positive and sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
non-violent discipline agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
to ensure learning- No acceptable
focused evidence was shown
environments.
7%
Timeliness
6. Used differentiated, Quality Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level Demonstrated Level
developmentally 7 in Objective 6 as Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown in 4 in Objective 6 as 3 in Objective 6 as
appropriate learning shown in COTrating COTrating sheets/ COTrating sheets/ shown in COTrating shown in COTrating
experiences to sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
address learners’ agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
gender, needs, No acceptable
strengths, interests 7% evidence was shown
and experiences.
Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met but No acceptable
within the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was shown
alloted time
Timeliness
3. Curriculum and 7. Planned, managed Quality Demostrated Level 7 Demostrated Level 6 in Demostrated Level 5 in Demostrated Level 4 Demostrated Level 3
Planning and implemented in Objective 7 as Objective 7 as shown in Objective 7 as shown in in Objective 7 as in Objective 7 as
developmentally shown in COT rating COT rating sheets/ COT rating sheets/ shown in COT rating shown in COT rating
sequenced teaching sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
and learning 7% agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
processes to meet No acceptable
curriculum evidence was shown
requirements and
varied teaching
Efficiency Objective was met Objective was met but No acceptable
within the alloted time instruction exceeded the evidence was shown
alloted time
Timeliness
Efficiency
Timeliness Participated in Participated in collegial Participated in collegial Participated in No acceptable
collegial discussion discussion that discuss discussion that discuss collegial discussion evidence was shown
that discuss teacher teacher and learner teacher and learner that discuss teacher
and learner feedback feedback across 3 feedback across 2 and learner feedback
across 4 quarters quarters quarters across 1 quarters
7%
9. Selected, Quality Demostrated Level 7 Demostrated Level 6 in Demostrated Level 5 in Demostrated Level 4 Demostrated Level 3
developed, organized in Objective 9 as Objective 9 as shown in Objective 9 as shown in in Objective 9 as in Objective 9 as
and used appropriate shown in COT rating COT rating sheets/ COT rating sheets/ shown in COT rating shown in COT rating
teaching and learning sheets/ interobserver interobserver agreement interobserver agreement sheets/ interobserver sheets/ interobserver
resources, including agreement forms forms forms agreement forms agreement forms or
ICT, to address No acceptable
learning goals. 7% evidence was shown
Efficiency Objective was met Submitted 3 different Objective was met but Submitted 1 different No acceptable
within the alloted time kinds of acceptable MOV instruction exceeded the kinds of acceptable evidence was shown
alloted time MOV
Timeliness
11. Monitored and Quality Involved learners in Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated Monitored and No acceptable
evaluated learner monitorig and learners paogress and learners paogress and evaluated learners evidence was shown
progress and evaluation of their achievement based on achievement based from paogress and
achievement using own progress and attaiment data from an class attaiment data achievement based
learner attainment achievement individual learner on existing grade
data. level/department/
learning area report
7%
Efficiency
Timeliness Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s No acceptable
show/s monitoring show/s monitoring and monitoring and show/s monitoring evidence was shown
and evaluation done evaluation done across 3 evaluation done across 2 and evaluation done
across 4 quarters quarters quarters across 1 quarter
Quality
Sustain regular Communicated promptly Communicated promptly Communicated
communication of & clearly using various & clearly using 1 learners’ needs,
learners’ needs, tools and strategies of strategies of learners’ progress &
progress and learners’ needs, needs, progress & achievement to key
No acceptable
12. Communicated achievement to key progress &achievement achieve ment to key stakeholders,
evidence was shown
promptly and clearly stakeholders, to key stakeholders, stakeholders, including including parents/
the learners’ needs, including parents/ including parents/ parents/ guardians, as guardians, but not
progress and guardians, as shown guardians, as shown on shown on MOV regularly as shown
7%% on MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted on MOV submitted
achievement to key
stakeholders, Efficiency
including
parents/guardians.
12. Communicated
promptly and clearly
the learners’ needs,
progress and
7%%
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including
Timeliness Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt No acceptable
parents/guardians.
communication of communication of communication of communication of evidence was shown
learners' needs, learners' needs, learners' needs, learners' needs,
progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement across achievement across 3 achievement across 2 achievement in only
4 quarters quarters quarters 1 quarter
5. Personal 13. Applied a Quality Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that No acceptable
Growth and personal philosophy details the consistent reflects t involvement of shows the application of indicates personal evidence was shown
Professional of teaching that is involvement of learners in the teaching- a personal philosophy of philosophy o of
Development learner-centered learners in the learning process teaching that is learner- teaching that is
teaching-learning resulting from the centered learner-centered
process resulting application of a personal
from the application philosophy of teaching
of a personal that is learner-centered
philosophy of
teaching that is
7%%
learner-centered
Efficiency
Timeliness Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal No acceptable
philosophy of philosophy of teaching philosophy of teaching philosophy of evidence was shown
teaching that is that is learner-centered that is learner-centered teaching that is
learner-centered across 3 quarters across 2 quaters learner-centered in
across 4 quarter only 1 quarter
14 Set Professional Quality Updated professional Discussed progress on Set professsional Accomplished the e- No acceptable
development goals development goals professional development goals SAT at the beginning evidence was shown
based on the during Phase II of development goals with bsaed on e--SAT results of the school year
Philippine RPMS cycle as the rater during the mid- as evidence by MOV 2 ass evidence by
Professional evidence by MOV 4 year review as evidence MOV 1
Standards for by MOV 3
Teachers
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 acceptable Submitted 2 acceptable Submitted 1 No acceptable
7%% acceptable MOV's MOV's MOV's acceptable MOV's evidence was shown
Timeliness All four (4) submitted All three(3) submitted All two(2) submitted Only one (1) of the No acceptable
MOV's were MOV's were MOV's were submitted MOV's evidence was shown
accomplished within accomplished within the accomplished within the was accomplished
the prescribed RPMS prescribed RPMS Phase prescribed RPMS Phase within the prescribed
Phase RPMS Phase
Plus Factor 15. Performed Quality Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 No acceptable
various related related work/ activity related work/ activity that related work/ activity that related work/ activity evidence was shown
works/activities that that contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the that contributed to
contribute to the teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning the teaching-learning
teaching-learning process beyond the process within school/ process within the process within the
process. school/ Community Community Learning learning area/ class as evidenced
Learning Center Center (CLC) as department as evidenced by submitted MOV
(CLC) as evidenced evidenced by submitted by submitted MOV
by submitted MOV MOV
2%% Efficiency Submitted MOv that Submitted MOv that Submitted MOv that Submitted MOv that No acceptable
details achieved details percieved show interlap with the shows considrable evidence was shown
positive contribution positive contribution to actual teachin-learnig overlap with, hence
to the teachin-learnig the teachin-learnig process as evidenced by significantly affecting
process as evidenced process as evidenced by the annotation provided the performance of
by the annotation the annotation provided the teachin-learnig
provided process.
2%%
Timeliness Submitted MOV's Submitted MOV's were Submitted MOV's were Submitted MOV's No acceptable
were submitted submitted across 3 submitted across 2 were submitted only evidence was shown
across 4 quarters quarters quarters in 1 quarter
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Prepared by: Ariel B. Montecalbo, PhD
SGOD-Education Program Supervisor
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory __________________________ LORETA M. NUÑEZ ERNESTO F. PAMABUSAO
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority