Bulld something great™ [ey7aNH° Report Template -Revsion 2 Jan 2020- Autores by K Al Page iol Boral Construction Materials Materials Technical Services Unit 4, 3-5 Gibbon load Bauiknam Hils NSW 2153 Australia PO Box 400, Winston Hills NSW 2163 TEST REPORT +81 (02) 9624 9900 F461 (02) 9624 9909 ‘owboraLcom.au CLIENT: ALLSANDS PTY LTD PROJECT: Quality Control Annual Testing of Sand ex Allsends Kurnell for Nov. 2021. FILE No: 819/24 TEST PROCEDURE: AS1141 — Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates REQUEST No: 97140 SPECIFICATION: AS2758.1- Concrete Aggregates - Date: 7 Nov. 2014, DATE TESTED: 2.12.21 to 17.12.21 [ Sample Description: Conerete Sand Stockpile Location: Allsands Kumell Date Sampled 16.11.21 Date Received: | 19.41.21 Laboratory Sample No: 260745 Test Method: Test i Spec. Results: *ASTIALAT.A % Passing AS. Sieve 6.7mm 100" 475mm 90-100 236mm 60-100 1.18 mm 30-100 100 600 micron 15-100 98 425 micron - 84 300 micron 550 50 450 mioron 020 2 ASTIAT12 Material finer than 75 micron (%) 05 Nil ASTIALA Uncompacted Bulk Density Um? Min. 12 1.32 Compacted Bulk Density 7 1.45 ASTIATS Paricle Density (Dry) Um? Min. 2.47 253 Paricle Density (SSD) vm? 255 Apparent Particle Density Um? 258 Water Absorption (7) 08 ASTI A Sodium Sulphate Soundness Total weighted (% Loss) Max. 6 09 Fraction tested: -600 jum +300 jum (% Loss) 09 ASTIAT.33 Silt Content (%) 2 ASTTAT.34 Organic impurities other than sugar Not darker Lighter than Std, The colour assessment was made than std visually using coloured reference glass Note: Replacement for Report No: AGG97140.KA.1 *Sample washed over 7 micron sieve as per AS1141.11.1 Clause 6.5, **As per Fine Aggregate ~ Recommended Gradings (Table 82), AS2758.1 Sample submitted by cient, T. Schembri, Q.C File, File De oral ate Sil No, _ — NATA Accredited Laboratory eed or camance il GONES 17085 -Tesrg Teer al rol ero eer nha wou con fm Boi abrtry Number: 547 ‘Toests rie Tec Sao ay foe aoe aedBuild something great™ Page 1 of 1 Report Template ~ Rev. (2) Apri 2017 — Authorised by M.A. TEST REPORT CLIENT: ALLSANDS Ply. Ltd. PO Box 1630 North Sydney NSW 2059 BORAL Boral Construction Materials Materials Technical Services Unit 4, 9-5 Gibbon Road Baulkham Hils NSW 2153 Austria PO Box 400, Winston Hils NSW 2183 “+61 (02) 9624 9900 F: +61 (02) 9624 9999 ww.boral.com.eu FILE No.: 819 / 21 PROJECT: Quality Control Annual Testing of Sand from Allsands Kurnell for November 2021 REQUEST No.: 9714¢ to AS 2758.1 Specification. Concrete Aggregates, 7th November 2014. TEST PROCEDURE: AS 1012.20.1 — Determination of Chloride and Sulfate in Hardened Concrete and Aggregates — Nitric Acid Extraction Method AS 1141.31 — Determination of Light Particles AS 1141.35 — Detection of Sugar AS 1289.4.1.1 - Organic Matter content AS 1289.4.3.1 — Determination of the pH value of a Soil Laboratory Sample No.: 230745 Date Sampled: 16.11.21 Date Received: 19.11.24 Date Tested: 08.12.21 Sample Description Conerete Sand Stockpile Field No. 1 TEST RESULTS: Chloride as CI (%) 0.008 Sulfate as SO3 (%) 0.08 Light Particles (24) <1 Sugar Not Detected Organic Matter (%) 04 pH 85 Sample submitted by the Client, Tony Schembri, Q.C.File, Mat.File, File. NATA /9"23Sarst00. OTILIA COSTACHE ato 09.12.2021 guano) _ CHEMS7140.0C.1 TECHNICAL Tsp stot ered! astm a wma to pelt he Boe MTS Lely “as esr Test Rar vty ote saree NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 547Bulld something great™ BORAL NATA WwW TECHNICAL Page 1 of 1 Reger Tompa— Re. (9). 2021 Autoried by MA Boral Construction Materials Materials Technical Services Unit 4, 3-5 Gibbon Road Bauikham Hils NSW 2169 Austria PO Box 400, Winston Hills NSW 2183 +61 (02) 9624 9900 F: +81 (02) 9624 9809 \ww.boral.com.au CLIENT: —Allsands Pty. Ltd, FILE No.: 819/21 PO Box 1630 North Sydney NSW 2059 TEST REPORT PROJECT: Quality Control Annual Testing of Sand from Allsands Kurnell for REQUEST No.: 97140 November 2021 to AS 2758.1 Specification ‘TEST PROCEDURE: ‘AS 1141.12 - Material Finer than 75 micron * AS 1141.13 — Material Finer than 2 micron RMS T659 — Methylene Blue Adsorption Value of Road Construction Material Laboratory Sample No.: 260745 Date Sampled: 16.11.21 Date Received: 19.14.21 Date Tested: From 6.12.21 to 7.12.21 ‘Sample Description Concrete Sand Stockpile Field No, 1 TEST RESULTS: Material Finer than 75 micron (um) (%) * 1 Material Finer than 2 micron (tum) (%) Not Applicable Methylene Blue Adsorption value (mg/g) 1 Methylene Blue Adsorption value for a Duplicate (mg/g) 1 Average Methylene Blue Adsorption value (mg/g) 1 1 OFI= MBV x Material Finer than 75jum (mg/g x %) * ‘Sample was provided by the Client. * Note: This index calculation is not part of TINSW T659 or AS1141.12 and therefore not in the current scope of NATA Accreditation for the Boral MTS Laboratory. * The authorised signatory for AS 1141.12 is A. LIU. Tony Schembri, , Q.C,File, Mat File, File, Approved omnAle ALLIU S.DEBRINCAT 3 ~~ CHEM87140-SD-4- date 43.4224 seraino - ATA Accredited Laboratory Arse cmp wn BYES 108 Teg ‘pet shleloc mrad eli ed Pe ron Bors MS ator rnber: $4 Test reits n this Test Report late cry tbe sare tested ial6 Build something great™ ORAL Peas ots Rew (@)isy2001———_Athosed by Boral Construction Materials Materials Technical Services Unt 4 9-5 Gibbon Road aula ls NSW 2189 Atala PO Bo 400, Winston His NSW 2163 1: 461 (2) 9824 9900 F561 (2) 9624 9008 rest Repos wusntoralcoman ALLSANDS PTY LTD File No: 81921 PO BOX 1630, NORTH SYDNEY, NSW 2059 Req, N 740 Date Received: — November 2021 Date Sampled: 16/11/2021 J Quality Control Annual Testing of Sand from Allsands Kurnell for November 2021, Test Method: Accelerated Mortar Bar Test for AAR Assessment - RMS 7363 Lab Sample No ‘Sample Description Location 260745 Concrete Sand Stockpile Kumel NA Boral GPISL Cement Berrima Results: Flow (): 18 WIC Rati: 0.52 Mixing Date; 07/12/2021 Expansion (%) Aae (Dave) | avg. of I specimens 0.05 7 00s 10 0087 14 0088 17 0.108 21 0.134 4 0.000 4 & 4 os ws wos Age(Days) Mortar Bar Expansion (E) % Duration of Specimens In Amol. NaOH at RMS T363 Aggregate Reactivity Classification TO Days ZDays >0.1" Reactive *0.15% for naturally occurring fine aggregates NATA WwW Sirens Notes: ‘© Sample submitted by the Client Tony Schembri, QC File, Mat. File, File ei? Kaisar Humarhan Approves Sonatoy [Lover __ Kear Huma Date_0f.ef-2~ 2% sea no, CEMO7140.KH.1 ATA Accredited Laboratory oaated compen wt ISONED 172 Testo ‘Titec eal rote ecrsusd ect hh he sero he ors MTS Labeaey Number: 547 ‘osu nPe Test ert rat oe sage eesGEOCHEMPET SERVICES ABN 25 065 630 506 PETROGRAPHIC, GEOLOGICAL & GEOCHEMICAL CONSULTANTS 28 Cameron Stet (Conte, QLD 4019 ‘Telephone: (07)3284 0020 Rnaitinbd@gexhompsioon swwaugextenptoom PETROGRAPHIC REPORT ON A CONCRETE SAND STOCKPILE SAMPLE (260745) FROM KURNELL prepared for BORAL RESOURCES (NSW) PTY LTD MATERIAL TECHNICAL SERVICES WINSTON HILLS, NSW. Order Number: 6467368 Invoice Number: G2201505 Client Ref: Kamal Ali Issued by A 797, HLM. Spring BSc, 12 January 2022 January, 2022 Bo220102 Page | of 6 The material contained within this report may not be quoted other than in full. Extracts may be used only with expressed prior written approval of Geochempet ServicesGEOCHEMPET SERVICES, BRISBANE 260745 Date Sampled: 16/11/2021 21120059 Date Received: 06/12/2021 Kurnell Sample Type: Concrete Sand Stockpile Allsands Pty Lid Petrographic analysis in relation to use as concrete sand and in asphalt; petrographic assessment of potential for alkali-silica reactivity Methods Account taken of ASTM C295 Standard Guide for Petrographic Assessment of Aggregates for Concrete, the AS2758.1 —2014 Aggregates and rock for engineering purposes part 1; Concrete aggregates (Appendix B), the AS1141 Standard Guide for the Method for sampling and testing aggregates, of the content of the 2015 joint publication of the Cement and Concrete Association of Australia and Standards Australia, entitled (HB79-2015) Alkali Aggregate Reaction - Guidelines on Minimising the Risk of Damage to Concrete Structures in Australia. Identification Shelly, medium quartz sand Description The sample consisted of 500 grams of damp, clean greyish orange sand composed mainly of sub- rounded to rounded, small quartz grains, but in detail speckled by small shell fragments, Figure 1: Digital image of sub sample from supplied sand. January, 2022 Bo220102 Page 2 of 6 The material contained within this report may not be quoted other than in full. Extracts may be used only with expressed prior written approval of Geochempet ServicesGEOCHEMPET SERVICES, BRISBANE Ina crude test of a small dry subsample the following results were tabulated: Sieve Size Wt % of sample Coarse (>1.18mm) 0.3% Medium (>0.3mm) 81.6% Fine (20.075mm) 18.0% Silt (<0.075mm) 0.1% When a sub-sample was swirled in a beaker of water, the suspended fraction settled very rapidly, leaving no turbidity or argillaceous scum, denoting the presence of very little silts and clays. The coarse fraction cons lithic clasts sted of predominately shell fragments and quartz. grains with minor Figure 2: Digital image of sieve fractions. January, 2022 Bo220102 Page 3 of 6 The material contained within this report may not be quoted other than in full. Extracts may be used only with expressed prior written approval of Geochempet ServicesGEOCHEMPET SERVICES, BRISBANE Figure 3: Image of coarse sieve fraction dominated by shell fragments and quartz grains. An approximate composition of the sand, expressed in volume percent of clast types and based (on microscopic identification and brief counting of 100 points falling within sectioned fragments, is: 36% quartz as unstrained to mildly strained free grains (29%) and simple crystalline composite grains (7%) 22% quartz as moderately strained grains and crystalline composite grains 3% quartzite (2% moderately strained) 1% vein quartz (heavily strained) <1% chert 4% _feldspars (4% K feldspar and <1% plagioclase) <1% free mica 1% lithic clasts of intermediate volcanic rock 2% lithic clasts of acid tuff (<1% microcrystalline quartz) 4% lithic clasts of arenite (2% quartz) 2% lithic clasts of meta-pelite 25% carbonate shell fragments ‘The sand is dominated by quartz in the form of sub-rounded rounded grains (most commonly around 0.2 to 0.6 mm in size) of unstrained to mildly strained free quartz grains (29%) and less abundant rounded clasts of simple crystalline composites (7%) of two or more unstrained to mildly strained quartz grains. Simple or polycrystalline grains of moderately strained quartz amount to about 22%, Grains of quartzite amounted to 3% (25 moderately strained). About 1% deleterious heavily strained vein quartz and <1% microcrystalline quartz as chert was noted. January, 2022 Bo220102 Page 4 of 6 The material contained within this report may not be quoted other than in full. Extracts may be used only with expressed prior written approval of Geochempet ServicesGEOCHEMPET SERVICES, BRISBANE Fresh to slightly weathered, and in some cases slightly altered feldspar, amount about 4%. Free flakes of micas amounted to <1% of the supplied sand sample. Minor other lithic clasts comprise 4% arenite (including 2% quartz) and 2 1% each of acid tuff (mainly finely microcrystalline feldspars and quartz) , 1% intermediate volcanics (ferruginized in parts), and 2% lithic clasts of meta-pelite Carbonate shell fragments amount to 25%. The shells are wor broken fragments of various types of shells, some coiled or chambered, some platy and curved and some porous. They may include gastropods, bivalves, foraminifera and other organisms. Comments and Interpretations The supplied concrete sand sample (labelled 260745) from Allsands Pty Ltd, is considered to consist of clean, shelly quartz sand which may be described broadly for engineering purposes as ‘medium quartz sand. It carries minor other mineral grains and minor durable lithic clasts. The sand has a free silica content (or total quartz content) of about 64%, comprising 58% quartz as free grains and crystalline composite grains, about 6% quartz locked within lithic clasts of arenite, veined quartz and quartzite, and <1% finely microcrystalline quartz within lithic clasts of chert and acid tuff. The sand consists mainly of small, hard, strong, generally siliceous, rounded mineral and minor Tock fragments, so it is interpreted to be physically suitable for use as concrete sand. Whilst the carbonate shell fragments are not as hard as the dominant quartz and feldspar grains, they are considered not to detract substantially from the quality of the sand for use in concrete but should not be exposed to high temperatures. The sand is considered adequate for use as a fine component in asphalt, given the high carbonate and lower quartz, content. in conerete. It carries <1% of cherty or finely microcrystalline quartz and 24% moderately stained quartz and 1% heavily strained quartz. Thus, sand of the type represented in the supplied sample is interpreted to be suitable for use in conerete provided that appropriate precautions are taken in mix and engineering design to take account of its perceived potential for mild or slow deleterious alkali-silica reactivity Guidance on appropriate precautions can be obtained from the 2015 joint publication of the Cement and Concrete Association of Australia and Standards Australia, entitled Alkali Aggregate Reaction - Guidelines on Minimising the Risk of Damage to Concrete Structures in Australia, Free Content The free silica content is about 64%, January, 2022 Bo220102 Page 5 of 6 The material contained within this report may not be quoted other than in full. Extracts may be used only with expressed prior written approval of Geochempet ServicesGEOCHEMPET SERVICES, BRISBANE Figure 4: Microscopic image taken at medium magnification with transmitted cross polarised light. Image is dominated by rounded to sub-rounded quartz grains showing a range of straining and abundant shell fragment can be scen as well as minor lithic clasts (note the vein quartz fragment in the centre of the image). January, 2022 Bo220102 Page 6 of 6 The material contained within this report may not be quoted other than in full. Extracts may be used only with expressed prior written approval of Geochempet Services