Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[9] N i c k T r a n s l a t i o n
By JUDY MEINKOTH and GEOFFREY M. WAHL
I p. W. J. Rigby, M. Dieckmann, C. Rhodes, and P. Berg, J, Mol. Biol. 113, 237 (1977).
2 j. Meinkoth and G. Wahl, Anal. Biochem. 138, 267 (1984).
3 G. M. Wahl, M. Stern, and G. R. Stark, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 3683 (1979).
4 R. H. Singer, J. B. Lawrence, and C. Villnave, BioTechniques 4, 230 (1986).
Notes
I. Nick translation kits are now available from Bethesda Research
Laboratories, New England Nuclear, and Amersham. In general they
provide instructions, a stock mixture of Pol I and DNase I, and a series of
buffers lacking one or more unlabeled deoxyribonucleoside triphos-
phate(s). The radioactive triphosphates are the sole source of the missing
nucleotides.
2. Failure to nick translate a fragment is almost invariably a function of
the quality of the DNA. Once the enzymes have been eliminated as the
cause by successfully nick translating a known control DNA and once the
quality of the radioisotope has been established (by successfully using it
to label control DNA), one should focus attention on the sample DNA.
The problem can sometimes be alleviated by phenol extracting the DNA
(this volume [4]) or by purifying it on a column such as Elutip (Schleicher
and Schuell) or NACS (Bethesda Research Laboratories). If neither pro-
cedure solves the problem, the concentration of DNase and the incuba-
94 ENZYMATIC TECHNIQUES [10]
tion time before Pol I is added may have to be increased. If one is using a
kit with premixed enzymes, better results can sometimes be obtained by
simply nick translating in a larger volume. Buffer and enzymes are scaled
up accordingly, but sample DNA and sometimes radioisotopes are not
increased.
[10] E n z y m e s f o r M o d i f y i n g a n d L a b e l i n g D N A a n d R N A
By FABIO COBIANCHI a n d SAMUEL H . WILSON
K l e n o w F r a g m e n t o f Escherichia coli D N A P o l y m e r a s e I