File Name: [Bar Subject (depending on issues, pag marami indicate niyo

nalang po)_Item No_Case Number_Code Name]

e.g. (Crim_Labor_28_GR/AC123456_avocato)

SAMPLE FORMAT - upload in word format

SINGLE SPACE, ALL TNR, MARGIN 1 INCH EACH SIDE

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION VS. ROSELLE C. ANNANG – (14,

CENTER, ALL CAPS, BOLD)
G.R. No. 225895, September 28, 2022 – (13, CENTER)

FACTS: (13, BOLD, LEFT ALIGNMENT)

----- single space-----
X killed Y on 2021. (12, Justify)
----- single space-----
ISSUES: (13, BOLD, LEFT ALIGNMENT)
----- single space-----
1. Criminal Law (Subject, 12, Numbered)
a. Crimes Against Persons (Arts. 246-266) (Topic, 12, Numbered, Justify, please
pakimatch po sa topic sa syllabus para madali iconso)
i. Whether or not X is guilty of char. (Issue, 12, Numbered, Justify)
b. Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (RA 9995) - Definition of Terms
i. Whether or not xxxx
2. Civil Law
a. Nature and Effects of Obligations – Breaches of obligation
i. Whether or not xxxx
----- single space-----
RULING: (13, BOLD, LEFT ALIGNMENT)
----- single space-----
1.a.i. (13, Bold, left alignment, pa indicate po ung numbering based on the issues)
----- single space-----
IMPORTANT DOCTRINE FIRST. (BOLD, 12, JUSTIFY)
----- single space-----
No, xxx is not guilty of etcc. (BOLD, 12, JUSTIFY)
----- single space-----
Discussion (12, Justify)
----- single space-----
1.a.ii.

The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is a judicial recognition of certain

matters that are peculiarly within the competence of the administrative agency to address.
It operates as a shield that prevents the overarching use of judicial power and thus hinders
courts from intervening in matters of policy infused with administrative character.

No, xxx is not guilty.

Xxxx in this case is blah blah

 File Name: [Bar Subject (depending on issues, pag marami indicate niyo
nalang po)_Item No_Case Number_Code Name]
e.g. (Crim_Labor_28_GR/AC123456_avocato)

SAMPLE FORMAT - upload in word format

SINGLE SPACE, ALL TNR, MARGIN 1 INCH EACH SIDE

ERIC WU a.k.a. WU CHUN and DAPHNY CHEN VS. PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES and HAFTI TOURS, INC.,
G.R. Nos. 207220-21, March 16, 2022

FACTS: (13, BOLD, LEFT ALIGNMENT)

The spouses Wu are Taiwan Nationals residing in the Philippines under a Special Resident Retiree’s Visa
(SRRV) upon their investment and deposit of $90,000 with the Philippine Retirement Authority (PRA) of
the Board of Investments (BOI).

In 2002, the spouses Wu sought to transfer their dollar time deposit investment plus accrued interest with
the PRA and invest the money with HAFTI Tours, Inc.'s (HTI's), representing their capital contribution, in
exchange for the issuance of 47,440 shares of stock of HTI.

On 21 August 2022, Pending approval of the PRA of the spouses Wu’s dollar time deposit, HTI issued a
board resolution certified by its corporate secretary, Sandra G. Dy, listing petitioners as two of four
persons authorized to deposit and withdraw from HTI’s Globalbank deposit account.

On 09 September 2002, upon approval of the conversion of the spouses Wu’s dollar time deposit, the
PRA deposited the peso equivalent thereof amounting to P4,622,508.00 to HTI’s deposit account with
Metrobank. However, HTI failed to issue the promised shares of stock in Eric and Chen’s names.

Thus, the relationship between spouses Wu and HTI turned sour. On separate occasions, Eric and Chen
issued checks to various payees, for different amounts, drawn from HTI’s corporate bank deposit
accounts leading to the litigation between the parties.

HTI filed seven criminal complaints against spouses Wu before the Office of the City Prosecutor,
Parañaque City involving the same checks.

Spouses Wu on the other hand, filed separate motions to quash before the RTC branches 112 and
114.

The RTC Branches 112 and 114, quashed the Informations for Estafa against Spouses Wu on the
ground of duplicity of offenses charged and the charges for misappropriation filed before the RTC
Branch 195 in Parañaque. Spouses Wu on the other hand, filed separate motions to quash before
the RTC branch 112 and 114 of Paranañaque City Prosecutor

but were dismissed on the ground of duplicity of offenses charged. The dismissal brought up to the
Department of Justice (DOJ), the Court of Appeals (CA) and to the Supreme Court (SC) in G. R. No.
196066 which affirmed the Parañaque City Prosecutor’s Office’s dismissal of the complaints with
finality.

Hence, two of those checks are the subject matter of Criminal Case Nos. 06-1263-CFM and 07-0254-
CFM for Estafa against the Wu couple.
----- single space-----
X killed Y on 2021. (12, Justify)
----- single space-----
ISSUES: (13, BOLD, LEFT ALIGNMENT)
----- single space-----
1. Criminal Law (Subject, 12, Numbered)
a. Crimes Against Persons (Arts. 246-266) (Topic, 12, Numbered, Justify, please
pakimatch po sa topic sa syllabus para madali iconso)
i. Whether or not X is guilty of char. (Issue, 12, Numbered, Justify)
b. Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (RA 9995) - Definition of Terms
i. Whether or not xxxx
2. Civil Law
a. Nature and Effects of Obligations – Breaches of obligation
i. Whether or not xxxx
----- single space-----
RULING: (13, BOLD, LEFT ALIGNMENT)
----- single space-----
1.a.i. (13, Bold, left alignment, pa indicate po ung numbering based on the issues)
----- single space-----
IMPORTANT DOCTRINE FIRST. (BOLD, 12, JUSTIFY)
----- single space-----
No, xxx is not guilty of etcc. (BOLD, 12, JUSTIFY)
----- single space-----
Discussion (12, Justify)
----- single space-----
1.a.ii.

The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is a judicial recognition of certain

matters that are peculiarly within the competence of the administrative agency to address.
It operates as a shield that prevents the overarching use of judicial power and thus hinders
courts from intervening in matters of policy infused with administrative character.

No, xxx is not guilty.

Xxxx in this case is blah blah