Professional Documents
Culture Documents
—
. . .
science a nd te chnology
H1 General Paper Content Notes
Science and Technology
Essay Questions..........................................................................................2
Quotes.........................................................................................................3
1 The Fourth Industrial Revolution..........................................................5
1.1 Trends in Science and Technology............................................................5
1.2 Automation and Employment..............................................................7
2 Ethics of Science and Technology........................................................11
2.1 Ethics of Artificial Intelligence............................................................11
2.2 Digital Authoritarianism.....................................................................13
2.3 Ethics of Scientific Research..............................................................14
3 Privacy and Regulation of Technology.............................................................16
3.1 Big Tech..........................................................................................16
3.2 Internet of Things............................................................................22
4 Technology Cold War...........................................................................25
5 Science, Technology and the Humanities.........................................................28
6 Technological Innovations..................................................................33
6.1 Artificial Intelligence and Robots.............................................................33
6.2 Facial Recognition.............................................................................37
6.3 Smart Cities.....................................................................................37
6.4 Biotechnology...................................................................................40
6.5 Technology and Healthcare.....................................................................43
6.6 Technology and the Environment............................................................47
6.7 Technology and Education......................................................................51
6.8 Technology and Retail.......................................................................51
6.9 Technology and Security.........................................................................52
6.10 Technology and Empowerment...............................................................52
H1 General Paper Content
Notes
Essay Questions
GCE A Level Paper 1 Questions
1. In an age of rapid technological advancement, is a single career for life realistic?
(2018 Q3)
2. Can the use of animals for scientific research ever be justified? (2017 Q2)
3. How far is science fiction becoming fact? (2017 Q7)
4. ‘Longer life expectancy creates more problems than benefits.’ Discuss (2016 Q3)
5. ‘Human need, rather than profit, should always be the main concern of scientific
research.’ Discuss. (2016 Q5)
6. How far has modern technology made it unnecessary for individuals to possess
mathematical skills? (2016 Q7)
7. ‘Books serve little purpose in education as technological developments become more
sophisticated’. How far do you agree? (2015 Q8)
8. To what extent can the regulation of scientific or technological developments be justified?
(2014 Q9)
9. Is there any point in trying to predict future trends? (2013 Q3)
10. “Scientific research into health and diet is unreliable as it so often contradicts itself.” Is
this a fair comment? (2013 Q7)
11. Should people be allowed to have children by artificial means? (2012 Q3)
12. How far is it acceptable for technology to be used only for financial benefit? (2012 Q12)
13. ‘The more science advances, the more religion will decline.’ To what extent do
you agree? (2008 Q3)
14. Should research into expensive medical treatment be allowed when only a few can afford
them? (2007 Q11)
15. Does modern technology always improve the quality of people’s lives? (2006 Q3)
16. Is effective farming possible without science? (2005 Q1)
17. ‘Medical science has been so successful that people now expect too much of it.’ Do you
agree? (2005 Q5)
Science encompasses the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical
and natural world through observation and experiment, and technology is the application of
scientific knowledge for practical purposes.
Quotes
Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum
The changes are so profound that, from the perspective of human history, there has never
been a time of greater promise or potential peril. (2016, The Fourth Industrial Revolution)
Technology is not an exogenous force over which we have no control. We are not
constrained by a binary choice between “accept and live with it” and “reject and live
without it”. Instead, take dramatic technological change as an invitation to reflect about
who we are and how we see the world. The more we think about how to harness the
technology revolution, the more we will examine ourselves and the underlying social
models that these technologies embody and enable, and the more we will have an
opportunity to shape the revolution in a manner that improves the state of the world.
(2016, The Fourth Industrial Revolution)
7. Food and water security technologies (e.g., water harvesting, lab-grown meat)
8. Synthetic biology
9. Space technologies (e.g., asteroid mining, commercial space travel, antisatellite weapons)
10. Climate change adaptation technologies (e.g., geoengineering, super-carbon-absorbing
plants)
The Biggest Tech Takeaways From the 2018 World Economic Forum
Vanessa Bates Ramirez. Singularity Hub. Feb 4, 2018
1. Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are forecast to add US$15 trillion to the
global economy by 2030.
Google CEO Sundar Pichai said in an interview, “AI will be bigger than electricity
or fire” because it has the potential to fundamentally change how we do everything—
significantly, because it’s not subject to the constraints most resources are.
Mary Cummings, the director of Duke University’s Humans and Autonomy Lab,
cautioned that “technology is not a panacea.” With technology in general and AI
especially, she believes we’re getting ahead of ourselves.
2. Automation
The 2018 Global Risks report, compiled from survey data before the summit, lists
“adverse consequences of technological advances” as one of the top risks societies
are facing today.
The report notes that automation has already disrupted the labor market, and not only
will it continue to do so, it will do so in a way that’s widening the gap between rich
and poor; low-skill jobs are being eliminated fastest, leaving uneducated workers
without many options while adding to the bottom line of big tech companies. The
report warned that this divide has repercussions beyond just economics.
The Forum also announced its Closing the Skills Gap initiative, a global, business-led
plan to deliver new skills to 10 million workers by 2020, and its IT Industry Skills
Initiative, whose SkillSET portal aims to reach one million IT workers by 2021.
3. Bitcoin
Bitcoin aside, the panelists were all more enthusiastic about Blockchain as a
promising technology with many useful applications.
4. Cybersecurity
Cyberattacks and massive data fraud are among the top five global risks by perceived
likelihood in the 2018 Global Risks report.
The Internet of Things is expected to grow to around 20.4 billion devices by 2020,
and use of cloud services will grow as well. That growth will bring us numerous
benefits and conveniences, but it will simultaneously give hackers an exponentially-
increasing number of targets. Beyond just stealing credit card numbers or individual
identities, cybercriminals could trigger a breakdown in the systems that keep societies
functioning—such as power grids.
Most significantly, the Forum announced the launch of the Global Centre
for Cybersecurity.
5. Regulating Tech Giants
British Prime Minister Theresa May devoted a portion of her Davos speech to
regulation of technology companies as well.
Businessman George Soros was quite straightforward in calling out Facebook and
Google as “obstacles to innovation,” saying “…social media companies influence
how people think and behave without them even being aware of it. This has far-
reaching adverse consequences on the functioning of democracy, particularly on
the integrity of elections.”
A new joint venture was launched between the Craig Newmark Foundation and the
WEF to bring together internet platform giants and multi-stakeholder leaders.
6. Biotech
Panelist Feng Zhang, MIT neuroscience professor and one of the scientists who
developed CRISPR gene editing, spoke of the promise and peril of advancing gene
editing technology.
But he also emphasized the importance of exercising extreme caution when altering
organisms’ DNA and developing a “containment mechanism” to control technologies
that turn out to be dangerous for humanity.
The Forum announced a partnership between the Earth Bio-Genome Project and the
Earth Bank of Codes. As part of the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution for the Earth
initiative, these organizations will collaborate to sequence the DNA of all life on
earth, a hugely ambitious project estimated to take ten years and cost $4.7 billion.
Current technological trends are bringing about an unprecedented rate of change in the
core curriculum content of many academic fields, with nearly 50% of subject knowledge
acquired during the first year of a four-year technical degree outdated by the time students
graduate, according to one popular estimate.
Of more than 150 such experts drawn from a larger global survey on AI in the
enterprise, almost 60% say their old job descriptions are rapidly becoming obsolete
in light of their new collaborations with AI. Some 70% say they will need training and
reskilling (and on-the-job-learning) due to the new requirements for working with AI.
And 85% agree that C-suite executives must get involved in the overall effort of
redesigning knowledge work roles and processes.
What the next 20 years will mean for jobs – and how to prepare
Stephane Kasriel. World Economic Forum. Jan 10, 2019
AI and robotics will ultimately create more work, not less. As the number of robots at
work has reached record levels, it’s worth noting that in 2018 the global unemployment
level fell to 5.2% – the lowest level in 38 years. In other words, high tech and high
employment don’t have to be mutually exclusive.
There won’t be a shortage of jobs but – if we don’t take the right steps – a shortage of
skilled talent to fill those jobs.
As remote work becomes the norm, cities will enter the talent wars of the future.
Untethering work from place is going to give people new geographic freedom to live
where they want, and cities and metropolitan regions will compete to attract this new
mobile labour force.
The majority of the workforce will freelance by 2027, based on workforce growth
rates found in Freelancing in America 2017.
Technological change will keep increasing, so learning new skills will be an ongoing
necessity throughout life.
Jobs lost, jobs gained: What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages
McKinsey Global Institute. 2017
McKinsey Global Institute found that robots could replace up to 800 million jobs by
2030.
About half the activities people are paid to do globally could theoretically be automated
using currently demonstrated technologies.
Asilomar AI Principles
Future of Life Institute. 2017
The Asilomar A.I. Principles were developed at the 2017 conference hosted by Future of
Life Institute. These principles have been endorsed by Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, and
hundreds of other tech leaders, entrepreneurs and scientists.
Meanwhile, in China, companies are taking divergent approaches to ethical AI. De Kai, a
computer scientist at Hong Kong’s University of Science and Technology, and a member
of Google’s shortlived ethics council, said that Chinese companies are generally more
concerned with solving real-world problems as a way to do good, rather than
focusing on abstract ethical principles.
How they define “doing good”, however, has been the subject of intense criticism from
some quarters. AI companies such as CloudWalk, Yitu and SenseTime have partnered
with the Chinese government to roll out facial recognition and predictive policing,
particularly among minority groups such as the Uighur Muslims.
In March, Robin Li, Baidu’s chief executive, urged the “contribution of Chinese wisdom”
to the ethics debate, and emphasised that providing a “good life to common people” was
the ultimate goal. Tencent declares on its website that one of its goals is to “use
technology to accelerate the development of the public good”.
Ultimately, experts say the field is still nascent, and a joint approach between the
private and public sectors is required to build consensus.
Ethical questions abound with AI systems, raising questions about how machines
recognise and process values and ethical paradigms. AI is certainly not unique among
emerging technologies in creating ethical quandaries, but ethical questions in AI research
and development present unique challenges in that they ask us to consider whether, when,
and how machines should make decisions about human lives – and whose values should
guide those decisions.
Some military strategists already view future AI-laden battlefields as “casualty-free”
warfare, since machines will be the ones killing and at risk. All the leading AI
researchers in the West are signatories to an open letter from 2015 calling for a ban on
the creation of autonomous weapons.
Just as Microsoft proposed in 2017 a Digital Geneva Convention that would govern
how governments use cyber capabilities against the private sector, an international
protocol should be created. Attempting to govern AI will not be an easy or pretty process,
for there are overlapping frames of reference.
We may see a profound shift in agency away from man and toward machine, wherein
decision-making could become increasingly delegated to machines. If so, our ability to
implement and enforce the rule of law could prove to be the last guarantor of human
dignity and values in an AI-dominated world.
Some professionals in the field worry that regulations imposed in the future could prove
to be unhelpful, misguided, or even stifle innovation and cede competitive advantage to
individuals and organisations in countries where the principles may not be adopted.
Others see them as a definitive step in the right direction.
The number of AI researchers who signed the Principles as well as the open letters
regarding developing beneficial AI and opposing lethal autonomous weapons shows that
there is strong consensus among researchers more generally that much more needs to be
done to understand and address known and potential risks of AI.
As science becomes more international the risk of ethics dumping, both intentional and
unintentional, has risen. The suggestion in this case is that Dr He Jiankui was
encouraged and assisted in his project by a researcher at an American university, Dr
Michael Deem of Rice University in Houston, Texas.
The Commission of the European Union (EU) has sponsored a three-year, €2.7m
investigation into ethics dumping, TRUST. It scrutinised past examples of ethics dumping
and sought ways of stopping similar things happening in the future.
Zhai Xiaomei, the executive director of the Centre for Bioethics at the Chinese Academy
of Medical Sciences, in Beijing, who is also deputy director of the health ministry’s ethics
committee, welcomes what TRUST has done. “China’s weak ethics governance has made
it an attractive destination for the export of unethical practices from the developed
world,” she says.
Another case highlighted by TRUST involved the San, a group of people in southern
Africa. In 2010 a paper published in Nature on the first San genome to be sequenced
caused an outcry among some San. They found the consent procedures inappropriate and
some of the language used in the paper, such as “Bushmen”, pejorative.
Though the number is a fraction of Facebook’s 35,000-plus work force, the signatures are
a sign of internal resistance that is in line with criticism from presidential candidates,
lawmakers and civil rights groups.
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive, has defended the policy by citing freedom
of expression and the policies of other social and broadcast networks. “We remain
committed to not censoring political speech,” a spokeswoman said in response to the
letter.
When Zuckerberg says, in defense of the ad policy, “most people don’t want to live in a
world where you can only post things that tech companies judged to be 100 percent true,”
and, “in a democracy people should be able to see for themselves what politicians are
saying,” what he’s not saying is that the underlying problem is that policing political ads
would be politically tenuous and hard.
Facebook Can Be Forced to Delete Content Worldwide, E.U.’s Top Court Rules
The New York Times. Oct 3, 2019
Europe’s top court ruled that an individual country can order Facebook to take down
posts, photographs and videos around the world.
Facebook went under intense fire after it reported early last year sharing the private
information of as many as 87 million users with political consultancy firm Cambridge
Analytica. The third-party firm had used users' personal data to design advertising and
content to influence their votes during the 2016 United States presidential election.
Experts say tighter regulatory scrutiny and heightened consumer awareness are two
key drivers in protecting user privacy among big tech firms.
For instance, the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into
force in May last year, is the biggest shake-up of data privacy laws in more than two
decades. It allows users to better control their personal data and gives regulators the
power to impose fines of up to 4 percent of global revenue for violations.
But critics have pointed out that some of the changes pledged by the tech firms are not
enough to address the central issue of privacy related to data sharing. So far, only Google
and Apple have applied an advanced privacy preservation mechanism, and only in some
of their data collection processes.
Mr Claus Mortensen, principal analyst of Ecosystm, a technology research and advisory
firm, did not think Facebook would walk the talk and put new privacy safeguards into
effect until it comes up with a clear business strategy to wean itself off data sharing as
the main revenue-generating tool.
But he said that Google, on the other hand, has taken some real steps that would help
protect user privacy, including stopping the scanning of Gmail users' e-mails for ad
targeting and rolling out an auto-delete feature that erases web and app activity after three
or 18 months.
“I’m disappointed in myself and the early Facebook team for not thinking more about
how the News Feed algorithm could change our culture, influence elections and
empower nationalist leaders,” Mr. Hughes writes.
3. Facebook’s concentration of power and influence is part of a trend that extends
beyond Silicon Valley.
Mr. Hughes sets the power of Facebook in the context of a broader movement toward
monopolistic consolidation.
“The results are a decline in entrepreneurship, stalled productivity growth, and higher
prices and fewer choices for consumers.”
4. There are no alternatives to Facebook. That’s the problem.
No major social networking company has been founded since the fall of 2011. In
the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, as many as one in four Facebook users
in the United States deleted the app from their phones, at least temporarily. But they
often migrated to Instagram or WhatsApp, not realizing that both companies were
also owned by Facebook.
Mr. Hughes writes that Facebook’s ubiquity was a result of Mr. Zuckerberg’s drive
to grow and the government’s unwillingness to do anything to stop it. “The
company’s strategy was to beat every competitor in plain view, and regulators and the
government tacitly — and at times explicitly — approved.”
Now, Facebook isn’t checked by conventional market forces. “This means that
every time Facebook messes up, we repeat an exhausting pattern: first outrage,
then disappointment and, finally, resignation,” Mr. Hughes writes.
5. We have the tools to regulate Facebook but not the will. Yet.
The government has had an aversion stretching back decades to bringing antitrust
cases. But the statutes are still on the books and could be used to rein in even the
biggest tech giants. “We already have the tools we need to check the domination of
Facebook. We just seem to have forgotten about them,” Mr. Hughes writes.
Mr. Hughes’s call for breaking up Facebook may have greater resonance given the
political moment. The Democratic senator and presidential candidate Elizabeth
Warren has called explicitly for the breakup of tech giants including Amazon, Apple,
Google and Facebook.
Mr Zuckerberg said that the company would expand end-to-end encryption of messaging.
In addition to releasing Facebook from the obligation to moderate content, encrypted
messaging won't interfere with the surveillance that Facebook conducts for the benefit of
advertisers.
Another point that Mr Zuckerberg emphasised in his post was his intention to make
Facebook's messaging platforms, Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram
"interoperable". Merging those apps just might, however, serve Facebook's interest in
avoiding antitrust remedies.
In short, the few genuinely new steps that Mr Zuckerberg announced seem all too
conveniently aligned with Facebook's needs, whether they concern government
regulation, public scandal or profitability. This supposed shift towards a "privacy-
focused vision" looks more to me like shrewd competitive positioning, dressed up in
privacy rhetoric.
FaceApp Lets You ‘Age’ a Photo by Decades. Does It Also Violate Your Privacy?
The New York Times. Jul 17, 2019
The popular app, FaceApp, which uses “artificial intelligence” to make users’ faces look
older, has raised privacy concerns that security experts believe are mostly exaggerated.
The Internet of Things will bring the internet’s business model into the rest of the world
The Economist. Sep 12, 2019
Data are the currency of the online world, gathered, analysed, sold and occasionally
stolen in a business model that has built some of the world’s most valuable companies—
but which is attracting increasingly unfriendly scrutiny from governments and regulators,
and which its critics decry as “surveillance capitalism”.
If ubiquitous computing will turn companies of things into companies of services, the
IOT will transform consumers of things into computer users, with all that implies. Like
social networks or email, smart gadgets offer convenience and comfort, at the price of
turning everything done with them into fuel for an ever more pervasive data economy.
Smart televisions already watch the users watching them, sending back data on
programme choices and viewing habits; some even monitor background conversation.
Consent is murky. In 2017 Vizio, an American TV-maker, was fined $2.2m by the
Federal Trade Commission after regulators found it was not properly seeking users’
permission to harvest and resell information on viewing habits.
Smart scales monitor weight and fat percentage, a gold mine for the fitness industry. The
advertising industry is already experimenting with “smart” billboards, which can use
cameras and facial-recognition software to assess people’s reactions to their contents.
The rise of surveillance capitalism proves that, in the end, consumers are willing to trade
their data for the products and conveniences that it offers. A survey in 2016 by the
Interactive Advertising Bureau, a trade body, reported that 65% of IOT users seemed
happy to see advertising on their devices, presumably in return for lower prices.
Another reading, though, is that the business models of the internet established
themselves early, at a time when neither regulators nor consumers properly understood
the technologies underlying them, and when not even the most avid techies could have
predicted all their implications.
These days, things are different. Blamed for everything from addicted children to
nurturing terrorism, Big Tech has lost its Utopian shine. That disillusionment has fed
back into gloomy predictions about the IOT. In many ways, that is valuable, for if
problems can be foreseen they can be more easily prevented.
But if the techno-optimism that infused the 1990s and 2000s now looks naive, the
techno-pessimism that is fashionable today can be similarly overdone. Like the
original internet, the IOT promises huge benefits. Unlike the original internet, the IOT
will mature in an age that has become sceptical about where a connected, computerised
future might lead. If it has to earn the trust of its users, it will be the better for it in the
long run.
Without Naming Huawei, E.U. Warns Against 5G Firms From ‘Hostile’ Powers
The New York Times. Oct 9, 2019
In language that appeared to point to but did not name the Chinese giant Huawei, a
European Union report warned that a 5G supplier from a “hostile” country could be
forced by its home government to wreak havoc by causing cyberattacks.
Huawei was blacklisted by the U.S. after the White House labeled it a tool for espionage
by Beijing.
China’s Silicon Valley is transforming China, but not yet the world
The Economist. Jul 11, 2019
Zhongguancun is now a concept as much as a place, China’s “Silicon Valley”. It is also
China’s best hope for the domestic innovation that might insulate the country from a
world perturbed by its rise. The government calls this “self-dependent innovation”, an
idea that the trade war with America has given urgency.
Xi Jinping, China’s leader, emphasised the need for Zhongguancun to generate “high-
quality” economic development. The country must accelerate a shift from assembling
tech products to creating them. Surrounded by the world’s largest, fastest-growing market
for such goods, Zhongguancun is creating new apps, services and devices more speedily
and cleverly than ever before.
The ingredients for success are in place, though it is hardly assured. The amount of
money pouring into Chinese technology companies has grown rapidly over the past ten
years, with the total annual levels of venture-capital investment now reaching parity with
America.
China has long since moved beyond producing merely Chinese versions of Silicon Valley
companies. WeChat, an all-encompassing chat and payment app introduced in 2011 by
Tencent, an internet giant in the southern city of Shenzhen, has inspired copycattery from
Facebook.
The newest firms in Zhongguancun employ business models that do not exist yet in
America. One company (YunHu Health) lets doctors in small family practices order up
complex lab tests for their patients on their phone. Another (Rokae) sells robotic arms
to knife factories, which use them to sharpen the blades automatically.
The international popularity of TikTok, a video-sharing app made by Bytedance, a
Beijing company, shows that even in areas where Silicon Valley dominates globally,
like social media, Zhongguancun can compete.
Investment firm Shunwei also aims to address Zhongguancun’s greatest weakness—a
reliance on imported components and technology. If Zhongguancun is to blossom as a
global, not just a regional, tech hub, and if it is to insulate China against protectionism, it
will need to nurture its own suppliers.
The latest crop of startups have set their sights on foreign markets. They see the trade
war not as a threat, but as an opportunity—to fill the gaps in Chinese supply chains
and then compete in the West. But to become a world-shaping force like Silicon Valley,
Zhongguancun will have to overcome Western concerns about the potential misuses of
Chinese technology. So far, very few Chinese tech companies have managed to go
global, Huawei and Bytedance being the most prominent. And Huawei, in particular, is
under threat due to security fears raised by Western governments.
Trump’s feud with Huawei and China could lead to the balkanization of tech
Will Knight. MIT Technology Review. May 24, 2019
America’s foreign policy, and tensions with China especially, are threatening to carve
up the tech world along national boundaries.
“We are already seeing the balkanization of technology in many domains,” says Zvika
Krieger, head of technology policy at the World Economic Forum. “If this trend
continues, companies will have to create different products for different markets, leading
to even further divergence.”
Incompatible products and platforms that replicate the same function would take
things backwards, Krieger says: “This will also have a chilling effect on innovation,
where digital companies can no longer assume the ability to scale globally with the
same ease and speed that has defined the past decade of unprecedented innovation.”
Huawei executives claimed the company would ride out the storm. But they also
argued that whatever happens to Huawei, Trump’s actions risk creating an increasingly
divided tech world, most immediately by eroding trust in an electronics supply chain
that spans the globe.
“This is the real danger,” said Vincent Peng, a senior vice president and the company’s
head of corporate communications. “Different standards, different ecosystems, different
technology—it will make the whole world a mess. From the short term you are damaging
Huawei, but longer term you are damaging the American supply chain system and the
American industry.”
If science is the study of the natural world and how it works, the humanities are the study
of our place in it. Anthropology is the study of humanity, and history is our written
record. Politics and sociology teach us about our collaborative and interdependent nature.
Psychology and philosophy are the introspection into our fears, passions, and motivations.
They are the study of how we persuade and how we can be manipulated, a contemplation
not just of what we can do, but the more complex how and why we actually do them.
One look at Facebook today and it’s clear that the gravest challenges are ethical, editorial,
and philosophical. They’re issues of culture and communication, of politics and law.
While they certainly face technical challenges daily, these algorithmic tweaks in how they
store, sort, and retrieve data are less interesting than the sociological and political
ramifications they take on when they become public.
People don’t understand or question the technology in the abstract, but they question the
outcome any technology generates. We forget that it is the application of technology that
matters—its touch point, or friction, with human beings.
Fei-Fei Li (Google Cloud’s head of artificial intelligence) recently wrote a piece on The
New York Times in which she called for “human-centered AI.” Along with Melinda
Gates, she founded an organization called AI4All, a non-profit with the mission of
broadening the diversity of those who participate in shaping our AI.
There is no way to build effectively for human beings without engaging in the
study of human nature.
At Stanford University, some of the most successful founders have come out of a major
called “Symbolic Systems.” The course gives graduates an appreciation for technology
while at the same time teaching philosophy, psychology, linguistics, and logic.
How the humanities, not STEM, can lead Chinese students towards creative innovation
Elaine Tuttle Hansen. South China Morning Post. Jul 4, 2017
Future global citizens who study the humanities – including language, literature, history
and philosophy – will be best prepared for success in a world that increasingly depends
on innovation and creativity.
6 Technological Innovations
6.1.1 Breakthroughs in AI
6.1.2 Applications of AI
From conducting the world’s first 5G-enabled surgery on a human and transmitting 8K
ultra-high-definition TV content through 5G networks to piloting self-driving buses and
cars, a range of cutting-edge technologies are being put to commercial use.
The nation is implementing an AI development plan that aims to build a 1 trillion yuan
(US$141 billion) AI core industry by 2030, which is expected to stimulate related
businesses to the tune of 10 trillion yuan.
The commercial use of 5G will impart further momentum to AI, but more discussions are
needed to talk about the legal and ethical issues surrounding its wider applications. China
took a step in that direction in June when it issued new guidelines for scientists and
lawmakers to promote the “safe, controllable and responsible use” of AI for the benefit of
mankind.
AI has raised many new and complex issues, like data privacy, machine ethics, safety,
risks and misuse like spreading misinformation using “deepfake videos”, and AI-
manipulated footage. But AI is not as uncontrollable or mystical as some people appear to
presume, experts said. The regulatory or supervisory mechanisms could steer it in the
right direction and leave enough room for exploration, course-correction, remedies and
calibrated growth, analysts said.
Smart cities put data and digital technology to work to make better decisions and improve
the quality of life. More comprehensive, real-time data gives agencies the ability to watch
events as they unfold, understand how demand patterns are changing, and respond with
faster and lower-cost solutions. As cities get smarter, they are becoming more liveable and
more responsive—and today we are seeing only a preview of what technology could
eventually do in the urban environment.
Singapore tops list of 105 cities most ready for AI disruption, new index shows
The Straits Times. Sep 26, 2019
The other cities in the top 10 on the Global Cities AI Disruption Index are London (75.6),
New York (72.7), San Francisco (71.9), Paris (71.0), Stockholm (70.4), Amsterdam
(68.6), Boston (68.5), Berlin (67.3), and Sydney (67.3).
Cities in China, known for the widespread roll-out of AI technologies, did not appear in
the overall top 10, pulled down by relatively lower scores in most of the categories.
But Chinese cities Shenzhen, Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai and Hangzhou scored the
highest in the growth trajectory category, which measures how fast technology
infrastructures evolve, city administration effectiveness and the size of venture capital
investment.
o For one thing, gait and facial recognition technologies are already in use by law
enforcement in Beijing and Shanghai to help identify individuals even when their
faces are obscured.
o Meanwhile, Shenzhen is home to telecommunications equipment giant Huawei,
which is leading the world in 5G technology developments, and Hangzhou is home to
global e-commerce titan Alibaba.
o Alibaba’s AI-powered technology is also automating traffic management in
Hangzhou such as changing traffic lights in favour of ambulances.
Mr Jacob Hook, managing partner of the research outfit Oliver Wyman, said China’s
high tolerance for privacy invasive technologies has led to the introduction of citizen
surveillance systems which employ facial and gait recognition technology. This, he
argued, encourages innovation and “creates a strong runway for Chinese cities to deploy
AI, giving them a stronger growth trajectory”.
6.4 Biotechnology
Scientists restore some brain cell functions in pigs four hours after death
The Straits Times. Apr 18, 2019
Researchers have restored some cellular function in pig brains from animals
decapitated four hours earlier.
This startling research provides the latest reminder that science and medicine
continuously create innovations that offer hope for treating dreaded diseases (such as
Alzheimer's or other brain disorders) while simultaneously raising head-scratching issues
about how to apply transformative technologies and procedures.
Ethicists say this research can blur the line between life and death, and could
complicate the protocols for organ donation.
Even as Dr He waits for the siege to lift, his research has sparked a broader global debate
on where the scientific community and governments draw the line on pushing the
boundaries of genetics science. "This is not just about J.K.," said Dr Hurlbut. "It's about
the whole meaning of how we govern and guide international science."
Scientist Who Shocked World Drew Backing From China Biotech Push
Rebecca Spalding. Bloomberg. Nov 28, 2018
The researcher who shocked the world with claims that he was the first to genetically
modify human embryos drew early support from Chinese government initiatives designed
to build up the country’s nascent biotechnology industry.
Scientist He Jiankui, who said he edited the genes of twin girls to shield them from HIV,
had participated in a program designed to capitalize on training Chinese nationals get at
Western universities. Additionally, a company that He founded has received government
funding.
The unfolding controversy over He’s research could heighten a battle for global
technological dominance between the world’s two largest economies.
The “Thousand Talents” initiative was designed to lure foreign-educated researchers
back to China to fulfill Beijing’s broader desire to become a global leader in high-tech
fields.
China’s biotechnology industry, which lags well behind the U.S. in terms of approved
drugs and global market power, has been one of the beneficiaries of Beijing’s generous
funding policies and recruitment efforts. A recent regulatory overhaul also has made it
much easier to get drugs onto the market in China.
Researchers in China have also become adept at using Crispr, the gene-editing technology
He is reported to have used to alter human embryos. It has many potential applications
from agriculture to basic medical research. China is “particularly competitive” in
Crispr, said a November report from the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review
Commission, which oversees national-security risks posed by trade with China.
China has made no secret of its ambitions to become a technological superpower in the
21st century. Its “Made in China 2025” blueprint outlines its plans to become a global
player in artificial intelligence, robotics, and biomedical research, among other areas.
Those ambitions have set off alarms in Washington.
We have seen an explosion of tech-driven gains and innovations that have the potential to
reshape many aspects of health and medicine. All around us, technologies from artificial
intelligence (AI) to personal genomics and robotics are advancing exponentially, giving form
to the future of medicine. These innovations enable the shift away from our traditional
compartmentalized health care toward a model of “connected health.” We have the
opportunity now to connect the dots—to move beyond institutions delivering episodic and
reactive care, primarily after disease has developed, into an era of continuous and proactive
care designed to get ahead of disease. Think of it: ever present, analytics-enabled, real-time,
individualized attention to our health and well-being. Not just to treat disease, but
increasingly, to prevent it.
Gut probe in a pill: Small, swallowable capsules that contain miniature microscopes
can capture detailed images of the gut without anesthesia. The device makes it easier to
screen for and study gut diseases, including environmental enteric dysfunction (EED),
which causes malnourishment and developmental delays in millions of children in poor
countries.
Custom cancer vaccines: Scientists are on the cusp of commercialising the first
personalised cancer vaccine. The treatment incites the body’s natural defenses to destroy
only cancer cells by identifying mutations unique to each tumour. Unlike conventional
chemotherapies, this limits damage to healthy cells.
An ECG on your wrist: ECG-enabled smart watches, made possible by new regulations
and innovations in hardware and software, offer the convenience of a wearable device for
people to monitor their hearts. Last year, Apple released its own FDA-cleared ECG
feature.
Sanitation without sewers: Energy-efficient toilets, designed by the University of South
Florida, Biomass Controls, Duke University and more, can operate without a sewer
system and treat waste on the spot. About 2.3 billion people lack safe sanitation, causing
spread of diseases and death.
Implantable devices may include a radio-frequency ID chip under the skin that holds a
patient’s medical records, or a subcutaneous sensor that could continuously monitor
blood chemistry. Ingestible devices in capsules will perform tasks from delivering
treatment to isolating foreign objects.
A monitoring patch on a pregnant woman’s belly can detect uterine muscle movement,
the better to know when labor is progressing.
Engineers at MIT have modified a WiFi-like box so it can capture vital signs and sleep
patterns of several people in the same residence.
Private Skype-like interactions between patient and physician will take place through
web-based portals. Patients’ vital signs will be obtained and shared with the physician
via web-integrated wireless scales, blood pressure cuffs, and monitoring devices.
Some digiceuticals are demonstrating effectiveness. At least two firms have developed
apps to reduce the relentless noise of tinnitus by retraining the brain to turn down the
volume. To manage heart failure patients, the Mayo Clinic prescribed the use of a
tracking app that resulted in a 40 percent reduction in hospital readmissions related to
cardiac issues.
The conventional prescriptions in your future could be doled out by an ATM-like robot,
remotely controlled by a provider or algorithm to ensure the right doses at the right
times.
Harvard and MIT scientists found a way to much more accurately forecast an
individual’s risk score for five deadly diseases, by looking at DNA changes at 6.6 million
locations in the human genome and applying a sophisticated algorithm.
Consider the robotic phlebotomist, equipped to ultrasonically confirm which vein is the
best target. In countries short on human caregivers, caretaker robots may be employed
to lift and move patients, as well as interact socially. And robots programmed as physical
therapy coaches can help patients stick with their exercise regimes.
Artificial Intelligence Detects Heart Failure From One Heartbeat With 100% Accuracy
Forbes. Sep 12, 2019
Doctors can detect heart failure from a single heartbeat with 100% accuracy using a new
artificial intelligence-driven neural network, according to a recent study.
Millennials ‘Make Farming Sexy’ in Africa, Where Tilling the Soil Once Meant Shame
The New York Times. May 27, 2019
Africa’s “agripreneurs”: A growing number of young, college-educated entrepreneurs are
using apps and technology to increase yields and profits across a continent where most
agriculture is still subsistence.
8 Crazy Innovations That Could Save the Planet From Climate Change
Global Citizen. Apr 20, 2018
Tree-planting Drones
UK-based company BioCarbon is using drones to spray tree seeds throughout
ravaged forests and claim they can plant 1 billion trees per year.
Speed is the most revolutionary aspect of this “precision planting” technology.
Current tree-planting programs are not fast enough; the technology is automated, so it
can be scaled up realistically and quickly.
The drones can reach places that tractors and humans cannot.
Massive, ‘Palm Tree’ Wind Farms
A group of engineers is trying to build wind turbines that are more than twice as large
as the biggest turbines in use today.
Wind power is a largely underutilized resource. The technology could reduce the
cost of offshore wind power by 50 percent.
Satellites That Spot Methane Leaks
A team of scientists is trying to send a satellite into space that can pinpoint when and
where methane leaks take place so they can be plugged sooner rather than later.
If successful, the satellite will be able to reduce methane emissions from the oil and
gas industry by as much as 50%.
Plastic-Eating Enzymes
A team of researchers in Japan inadvertently developed an enzyme that can break
down plastic in a matter of days; this is far faster than the hundreds of years that
plastic usually takes to decompose.
The new research shows there is strong potential to use enzyme technology to help
with society’s growing waste problem.
Futuristic Solar Panels
Recently developed solar panels in China harvest energy from raindrops.
A team of researchers at Michigan State University believe that all windows and cell
phone screens could begin cultivating the sun’s energy. In future, they are exploring
integrating these into mobile and flexible devices, such as electronic clothes.
Solar Geoengineering
Researchers at Harvard are proposing to send sun-blocking particles into the air to
cool the planet.
An intentional strategy to block the sun could help to buy some more time for
countries to reduce their emissions — the only realistic way to avert climate change.
6.6.2 E-waste
Beauty goes high-tech: AI and AR are being used to spot imperfections on your face
The Straits Times. Jul 9, 2019
A growing number of companies are tapping technologies such as artificial
intelligence (AI) and augmented reality (AR) to stay ahead in the lucrative but
competitive beauty market.
Beauty companies have launched apps and online tools to help customers analyse their
faces to spot issues and experiment virtually with beauty products.
Hate lining up for the fitting room? Stores turn to tech to address gripes about queues
and more
The Straits Times. Jun 17, 2019
Clothing stores are turning to tech to address gripes about queues and more. Retailers are
using mobile apps and image recognition so shoppers can hunt for items and avoid long
queues.