How useful in science is the Copernican

Principle?
Reville, William . Irish Times ; Dublin [Dublin]. 20 May 2021: 8.

Enlace de documentos de ProQuest

TEXTO COMPLETO
Reading John Gribbin's History of Western Science (The Folio Society 2006) recently, I was struck by his ringing
endorsement of the Copernican principle (CP). This prompted me to ponder CP again, a principle widely held to be
true, even essential, in science.
CP is a principle of mediocrity holding that neither we nor our earthly home occupy a privileged position in the
universe and, on a cosmic scale, humans should not be considered to be special creatures. I have written before to
shed doubt on the usefulness of CP and my current ponderings bolster that doubt.
CP is named after Polish astronomer and cleric Nicolaus Copernicus (1473- 1543) who initiated modern science
with the publication of his famous book On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres in 1543. Copernicus proposed
that the Earth is not at the centre of the universe but revolves around the sun.
This "demotion" of our locality was later amplified by the discovery that our sun is an ordinary star residing in the
Milky Way galaxy which contains 1011 stars, many orbited by planets with environments suitable for life, in a
universe containing 2x1012 galaxies.
It was also discovered that earthly life is not particularly special, being fully explicable in terms of interactions of
matter and energy under the laws of physics and chemistry. And it was discovered that all life on Earth has
evolved from a simple life form that seemingly arose spontaneously on Earth 3.5 billion years ago from lifeless
chemicals, and that we human animals recently evolved from an apelike like ancestor.
Philosophical guideline
The CP is not a scientific principle but rather a philosophical guideline. Although useful in some respects, I believe
the assertion that humans are not special creatures is unwarranted. There are reasons also to suspect Earth could
be a unique planet, or at least very special. Astronomical evidence published in 2016 indicates that Earth-like
planets are far rarer in the universe than we had hitherto thought.
The search for extra-terrestrial intelligence (SETI) programme rests firmly on CP. SETI scans the cosmos for radio-
signal broadcasts from extra-terrestrial civilisations. The reasoning is that since life arose spontaneously on Earth
from non-living matter and the universe contains countless planets whose environments could support life, then
life almost certainly arose on some of these planets and evolved into intelligent beings who wish, as we humans
do, to broadcast this news. Some SETI enthusiasts assume that intelligent life is common in the universe.
However, the fact is we don't yet know if any life, let alone intelligent life, exists elsewhere in the universe. And if
life does exist elsewhere, we cannot assume that evolution of intelligence is inevitable.
Indeed, the evolution of human intelligence on Earth may well have been an enormously improbable fluke. The
famous evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould plausibly contends in his book Wonderful Life that evolution is
such a contingent process that if we re-wound and replayed Earth's evolutionary life tapes we would end up with
entirely different results. And the father of 20th century evolutionary biology, Ernst Mayr (1904-2005), although
conceding that life could arise elsewhere in the universe, strongly asserted that the probability we will ever
encounter intelligent alien life is effectively zero.
The most complex known physical object in the universe is the human brain. About half the 35,000 genes in
human DNA are expressed in the brain. The brain has about 100 billion nerve cells, each connected with about

PDF GENERADO POR PROQUEST.COM Page 1 of 3

10,000 others. The number of interconnections in the human brain (1015) is vastly greater than the number of
stars in our Milky Way galaxy (1011). It is unwise to assume such complexity will commonly evolve in the universe.
It may happen, but we mustn't assume.
Another principle, the Uniformity Principle (UP) holds that the same natural laws and processes that operate in our
present-day scientific observations apply everywhere in the universe, now and in the past. This principle is closely
akin to CP but more universal and science could scarcely operate without assuming uniformity in nature. The
existence of habitable planets elsewhere in the universe is within the scope of UP but to say that planets inhabited
by intelligent life are necessitated would be an unwarranted stretch. Enthusiasts for alien life always quote CP. In
my opinion, CP should not be accorded the same respect as UP.
nWilliam Reville is an emeritus professor of biochemistry at UCC

DETALLES

Materia: Stars &galaxies; Brain; Science; Intelligence; Extraterrestrial life; Universe; Earth

Título: How useful in science is the Copernican Principle?:   The assertion that humans are
not special creatures is unwarranted

Autor: Reville, William

Título de publicación: Irish Times; Dublin

Primera página: 8

Año de publicación: 2021

Fecha de publicación: May 20, 2021

Sección: Features

Editorial: The Irish Times DAC

Lugar de publicación: Dublin

País de publicación: Ireland, Dublin

Materia de publicación: General Interest Periodicals--Ireland

Tipo de fuente: Periódicos

Idioma de la publicación: English

Tipo de documento: News

ID del documento de 2529000067

ProQuest:

URL del documento: http://www.espaciotv.es:2048/referer/secretcode/newspapers/how-useful-science-

is-copernican-principle/docview/2529000067/se-2?accountid=142712

PDF GENERADO POR PROQUEST.COM Page 2 of 3

 Copyright: Copyright The Irish Times DAC May 20, 2021

Última actualización: 2021-05-19

Base de datos: ProQuest Central

Copyright de la base de datos  2022 ProQuest LLC. Reservados todos los derechos.

Términos y condiciones Contactar con ProQuest

PDF GENERADO POR PROQUEST.COM Page 3 of 3