Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://theeducationhub.org.nz/principles-of-assessment/
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/jvl-narasimha-rao/self-assessment-
peer-assessment
Say the word "assessment," and most people envision sweating bullets
over a final exam or major unit test. The questions are many, the stakes are
high, and there are no do-overs if you make a mistake. There's a reason this
is the go-to image of assessment: For most of us, it's how we were taught.
For many students today, it's how it feels to take state-mandated
achievement tests each spring.
While end-of-year standardized tests play an important role in
measuring broad trends across grades, schools, and districts, they shouldn't
be the end of the story when it comes to comprehensive assessment.
High-quality assessments are balanced to provide instructors with
ongoing feedback about student progress. In particular, data gathered from
assessments given throughout the learning process give educators the
information they need to adjust their instruction. Assessment, then, isn't the
final word; rather, it should be part of an ongoing conversation that helps all
students get exactly what they need to meet learning standards.
If you've ever had the experience of sitting down to a test filled with
questions about topics that weren't discussed in class, you know just how
frustrating it can feel. Because high-quality assessments are designed to be
relevant, they eliminate anxiety about being unprepared and help maintain
strong student-teacher relationships.
A high-quality assessment also provides second chances for students
to succeed. Great assessments aren’t just about a one-time exam. Instead,
frequent, formative assessments are given throughout the learning process,
and students know that they will be allowed the opportunity to learn from
their mistakes and show growth. This takes some of the anxiety out of
testing and encourages a more growth-oriented mindset in the classroom.
worth looking at the ELA curriculum to see where poetry units need to be
updated and enhanced.
Great assessment isn't merely about giving a grade to students and
educators. At its best, high-quality assessment provides actionable
information to inform curriculum and instruction decisions and allows for a
real-time change of course to meet students' needs. The first step is to vet
and design relevant, standards-based assessments that are used at many
different stages of learning. From there, educators should approach the
resulting data with a spirit of flexibility and adjust their strategies
accordingly.
https://www.schoology.com/blog/role-high-quality-assessment-enhancing-
curriculum-and-instruction
https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/educational-assessment/assessments-
by-design-rethinking-assessment-for-learner-variability/
Authentic Assessment
involve real-world tasks, they are also likely to be more interesting for
students, and thus more motivating. And finally, they can provide more
specific and usable information about what students have succeeded in
learning as well as what they have not learned.
However, authentic assessments may require more time and effort on
an instructor’s part to develop, and may be more difficult to grade. To
address the difficulty of grading authentic assessments, it is often useful to
create a grading rubric that specifies the traits that will be evaluated and the
criteria by which they will be judged. (For more information, see the CITL
resource on rubrics.)
References
https://www.teachhub.com/professional-development/2020/02/how-to-use-
student-assessments-in-your-classroom/
choice questions does not allow for much variability in how students
demonstrate the knowledge and skills they have acquired. On the one hand,
that is a strength of tests because it makes sure everyone is being compared
on the same domains in the same manner which increases the consistency
and comparability of the measure. On the other hand, testing favors those
who are better test-takers and does not give students any choice in how they
believe they can best demonstrate what they have learned.
Thus, it is recommended (e.g., Wiggins, 1998) that multiple and varied
assessments be used so that 1) a sufficient number of samples are obtained
(multiple), and 2) a sufficient variety of measures are used (varied). Variety
of measurement can be accomplished by assessing the students through
different measures that allows you to see them apply what they have learned
in different ways and from different perspectives. Typically, you will be more
confident in the students' grasp of the material if they can do so. But some
variety of assessment can also be accomplished within a single measure.
Authentic tasks tend to give the students more freedom in how they will
demonstrate what they have learned. By carefully identifying the criteria of
good performance on the authentic task ahead of time, the teacher can still
make comparable judgments of student performance even though student
performance might be expressed quite differently from student to student.
For example, the products students create to demonstrate authentic learning
on the same task might take different forms (e.g., posters, oral
presentations, videos, websites). Or, even though students might be required
to produce the same authentic product, there can be room within the product
for different modes of expression. For example, writing a good persuasive
essay requires a common set of skills from students, but there is still room
for variation in how that essay is constructed.
http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whydoit.htm
https://home.edweb.net/webinar/gave-formative-assessment-now/
STEP 1 - Standards
An assignment should always be formed with standards and objectives
in mind (backwards design). In order to create a task for students to
complete, you must first ask yourself, "what should my students know
following this lesson and assignment". This will give you a starting point for
creating various ideas for assessment. You must first start by having the end
result of the assignment in mind. Once you have decided what you want your
students to get out of their task, you can move on to step 2.
STEP 3 - Criteria/Measures
In step 3, you will decide what the student performing the assignment
or task or will look like. What would you like the end product to be? You have
already chosen how you want the student to portray their knowledge through
an authentic task, and you must now determine what that will look like and
what criteria will prove student understanding. In other words, how will you
know that the student has performed well or not? Knowing what criteria you
are looking for in an authentic assignment will assist you in the next step -
creating a rubric.
STEP 4 - Rubric
After you have decided what task you would like students to complete,
and what criteria you will use to decide whether or not they have meet the
standards, you will create a rubric for evaluation of students. A rubric is a
way for you to evaluate what level of performance the students are currently
performing at. Rubrics will be discussed further in this unit.
A rubric provides a student with their own guidelines while they are
working on an assessment. They are able to guide themselves, as well as
assess their own work or the work of their classmates using the rubric
provided to them.
A teacher can work with his or her students to develop assessment criteria
for a rubric. This way, students are taking part in the evaluation process and
feel more of an attachment to what they are working on. They need to live
up to their own standards (criteria) as well as that of the teacher.
Higher Level Performance: Student is able to navigate the website with little
to no problems and is able to use the Internet to correctly answer research
questions.
A lower level, middle level, and higher level of performance were all given in
the above example. Usually, a teacher will use descriptive words or numbers
to grade each level of performance. The levels may be numbered 1-3, or
descriptive performance words might be used such as poor, good, fair, or
excellent to determine student success. Criteria are usually placed along the
left hand column of a rubric and levels of performance are placed along the
top row of the rubric.
See this blank rubric example: File:Examplerubrictable.doc
Here is another example of a rubric I created for ETAP 526 for students to
evaluate the validity of a website: File:Website evaluation.doc
Assignment
Using all of the information you have currently read regarding rubrics,
create a new rubric for an assessment that you currently give your students.
You may choose to update a rubric that you already use or create an entirely
new rubric for any assessment that you currently use in the classroom. You
may use your own format or Rubistar (link to program below) to create your
rubric. It is all about what works for you and your students.
The following is a link to "Rubistar" - a program in which you can create
rubrics for your classroom. Registration is free. [1]
Reflection
After completing this unit on creating authentic assessment and
rubrics, answer the following personal reflection questions:
What new information did you gain regarding the steps to creating authentic
assessment?
Were you already creating assignments in this way? If not, what ways could
you improve upon how you are currently creating student assessment?
Are you currently creating rubrics to assess your student's performance?
What did you get out of creating or recreating a rubric for a current student
assignment?
Reflect upon any other questions, thoughts, or ideas you had during this unit.
https://knilt.arcc.albany.edu/Unit_3:_Steps_to_Creating_Authentic_Assessmen
t