Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Approaches
It should have the potential to produce sufficiently relevant results to increase and
synthesize existing knowledge or correct and integrate previous knowledge.
Good reflective research produces theories and hypotheses and benefits any
intellectual attempt to analyze facts and phenomena.
The word ‘research’ perhaps originates from the old French word “recerchier” which
meant to ‘search again.’ It implicitly assumes that the earlier search was not
exhaustive and complete; hence, a repeated search is called for.
Research Definition
Characteristics of Research
3 Basic Operations of Research
Research Motivation – What makes one motivated to do research?
9 Qualities of Research
Goals of Research
Research Approaches
Areas of Research
Precautions in Research
Research Definition
The chief characteristic which distinguishes the scientific method from other methods
of acquiring knowledge is that scientists seek to let reality speak for itself, supporting a
theory when a theory’s predictions are confirmed and challenging a theory when its
predictions prove false.
Scientific research has multidimensional functions, characteristics, and objectives.
Keeping these issues in view, we assert that research in any field or discipline:
Characteristics of Research
Keeping this in mind that research in any field of inquiry is undertaken to provide
information to support decision‐making in its respective area, we summarize some
desirable characteristics of research:
1. Data collection;
2. Data analysis;
3. Report writing.
If you note down, for example, the reading habit of newspapers of a group of residents
in a community, that would be your data collection.
If you then divide these residents into three categories, ‘regular,’ ‘occasional,’ and
‘never,’ you have performed a simple data analysis. Your findings may now be
presented in a report form.
A reader of your report knows what percentage of the community people never read
any newspaper and so on.
The above examples are all researching whether the instrument is an electronic
microscope, hospital records, a microcomputer, a questionnaire, or a checklist.
He might have genuine interest and curiosity in the existing body of knowledge
and understanding of the problem;
He is looking for answers to questions which remained unanswered so far and
trying to unfold the truth;
The existing tools and techniques are accessible to him, and others may need
modification and change to suit the current needs.
Better livelihood;
Better career development;
Higher position, prestige, and dignity in society;
Academic achievement leading to higher degrees;
Self‐gratification.
At the individual level, the results of the research are used by many:
All involved in the above processes will benefit from the research results. There is
hardly any action in everyday life that does not depend upon previous research.
Research in any field of inquiry provides us with the knowledge and skills to solve
problems and meet the challenges of a fast‐paced decision‐making environment.
9 Qualities of Research
Good research must have its purposes clearly and unambiguously defined.
Any recommendations from such research justifiably get little attention from the
policymakers and implementation.
The procedural design of the research should be carefully planned to yield results
that are as objective as possible.
In doing so, care must be taken so that the sample’s representativeness is ensured,
relevant literature has been thoroughly searched, experimental controls, whenever
necessary, have been followed, and the personal bias in selecting and recording data
have been minimized.
A research design should always safeguard against causing mental and physical harm
not only to the participants but also those who belong to their organizations.
Limitations revealed
The researcher should report with complete honesty and frankness any flaws in
procedural design; he followed and provided estimates of their effects on the findings.
This enhances the readers’ confidence and makes the report acceptable to the
audience. One can legitimately question the value of research where no limitations are
reported.
Adequate analysis reveals the significance of the data and helps the researcher to
check the reliability and validity of his estimates.
Data should, therefore, be analyzed with proper statistical rigor to assist the researcher
in reaching firm conclusions.
When statistical methods have been employed, the probability of error should be
estimated, and criteria of statistical significance applied.
readers, and organized so that the readers can readily locate the critical and central
findings.
Proper research always specifies the conditions under which the research conclusions
seem valid.
No inferences or generalizations should be made beyond the data. If this were not
followed, the objectivity of the research would tend to decrease, resulting in
confidence in the findings.
The research report should contain information about the qualification of the
researchers.
Goals of Research
goals of research
The primary goal or purpose of research in any field of inquiry; is to add to what is
known about the phenomenon under investigation through applying scientific
methods.
Though each research has its own specific goals, we may enumerate
the following 4 broad goals of scientific research:
The link between the 4 goals of research and the questions raised in reaching these
goals.
Goals/Purposes of
Types of Questions in Research
Research
The explorative study aims to gain familiarity with a phenomenon or gain new insights
into it.
Exploration is particularly useful when researchers lack a clear idea of the problems
they meet during their study.
The end of an explorative study comes when the researchers are convinced that they
have established the major dimensions of the research task.
Here we attempt to describe situations and events through studies, which we refer to
as descriptive research.
Such research is undertaken when much is known about the problem under
investigation.
Descriptive studies try to discover answers to the questions of who, what, when,
where, and sometimes how.
Such research studies may involve the collection of data and the creation of
distribution of the number of times the researcher observes a single event or
characteristic, known as a research variable.
A descriptive study may also involve the interaction of two or more variables and
attempts to observe if there is any relationship between the variables under
investigation.
Research that examines such a relationship is sometimes called correlational study. It
is correlational because it attempts to relate ﴾i.e., co‐relate﴿ two or more variables.
A descriptive study may be feasible to answer the questions of the following types:
What are the characteristics of the people who are involved in city crime? Are
they young? Middle‐aged? Poor? Muslim? Educated?
Who are the potential buyers of the new product? Men or women? Urban people
or rural people?
Are rural women more likely to marry earlier than their urban counterparts?
Does previous experience help an employee to get a higher initial salary?
Thus, descriptive research cannot be used to create a causal relationship where one
variable affects another.
In other words, descriptive research can be said to have a low requirement for internal
validity. In sum, descriptive research deals with everything that can be counted and
studied.
But there are always restrictions on that. All research must impact the lives of the
people around us.
For example, finding the most frequent disease that affects the people of a community
falls under descriptive research.
But the research readers will have the hunch to know why this has happened and what
to do to prevent that disease so that more people will live healthy life.
It dictates that we need a causal explanation of the situation under reference and a
causal study vis‐a‐vis causal research.
Thus if a researcher finds that communities having larger family sizes have higher child
death or that smoking is correlated with lung cancer, he is performing a descriptive
study.
Why are people involved in crime? Can we explain this as a consequence of the
present job market crisis or lack of parental care?
Will the buyers be motivated to purchase the new product in a new container?
Can an attractive advertisement motivate them to buy a new product?
Why has the share market shown the steepest ever fall in stock prices? Is it
because of IMF’s warnings and prescriptions on the commercial banks’ exposure
to the stock market or because of an abundant increase in the supply of new
shares?
Prediction seeks to answer: when and in what situations will occur if we can provide a
plausible explanation for the event in question.
However, the precise nature of the relationship between explanation and prediction
has been a subject of debate.
One view is that explanation and prediction are the same phenomena, except that
prediction precedes the event while the explanation takes place after the event has
occurred.
Another view is that explanation and prediction are fundamentally different processes.
We need not be concerned with this debate here but can simply state that in addition
to being able to explain an event after it has occurred, we would also be able to
predict when it will occur.
Research Approaches
4 research approaches
The first is the basic approach, which mostly pertains to academic research. Many
people view this as pure research or fundamental research.
1. Basic Research.
2. Applied Research.
3. Evaluative Research.
4. Precautions in Research.
Areas of Research
1. Social Research.
2. Health Research.
3. Population Research.
4. Business Research.
5. Marketing Research.
6. Agricultural Research.
7. Biomedical Research.
8. Clinical Research.
9. Outcomes Research.
10. Internet Research.
11. Archival Research.
12. Empirical Research.
13. Legal Research.
14. Education Research.
15. Engineering Research.
16. Historical Research.
Precautions in Research
Whether a researcher is doing applied or basic research or research of any other form,
he or she must take necessary precautions to ensure that the research he or she is
doing is relevant, timely, efficient, accurate, and ethical.
The research is considered relevant if it anticipates the kinds of information that will be
required by decision‐makers, scientists, or policymakers.
Research is efficient when it is of the best quality for the minimum expenditure
and the study is appropriate to the research context.
Research is considered accurate or valid when the interpretation can account for
both consistencies and inconsistencies in the data.
Research is ethical when it can promote trust, exercise care, ensure standards, and
protect the rights of the participants in the research process.
Name *
Email *
Subscribe Now
← →
Theoretical Framework Theory: Definition, Meaning, Concepts
Research Paradigm
▸ Management
▸ Organizational Behavior
▸ Human Resource Management
▸ Accounting
▸ Principles of Accounting
▸ Marketing
▸ Principles of Marketing
▸ Marketing Management
▸ Consumer Behavior in Marketing
▸ Communication
▸ Leadership
▸ Entrepreneurship
▸ Insurance
▸ Auditing
▸ Banking
▸ Business Studies
▸ Finance
▸ Research Methods
▸ Legal Research
▸ Economics
▸ Blog
© 2023. iEduNote™