Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 / 29
Consumer’s Utility Function
x ≥ y ⇒ u(x) ≥ u(y ),
2 / 29
Price
Let p 0 be the price vector, where pk denote the unit price of good k for
each k ∈ {1, ..., n}.
Let w be the consumer’s wealth or income.
The budget set of the consumer is
B(p, w ) := {x ∈ R+n : x · p ≤ w }.
B(p, w ) contains all consumption bundles that cost less than or equal to w
under price p. In other words, B(p, w ) are all affordable consumption
bundles of the consumer.
3 / 29
Consumer’s Problem
The consumer’s choice set is B(p, w ), and her choice problem is to choose
x ∈ B(p, w ) such that
x ∈ arg max u(y ).
y ∈B(p,w )
Proposition
For any p 0 and w > 0, and any continuous utility function u,
is not empty.
4 / 29
Compact Sets
Definition
S i
A is compact in a metric space X if: whenever A ⊆ O (each O i is open), then
i∈I
there exists a finite subset I 0 ⊆ I such that A ⊆
S i
O.
i∈I 0
5 / 29
Example
S∞
Consider B1 (o) ⊆ R n : B1 (o) ⊆ n=2 B1− n1 (o) ⇒ no finite covering. B1 (o) is
bounded but not closed.
S∞
Consider interval [0, +∞) ⊆ R: [0, +∞) ⊆ k=1 (−1, k) ⇒ no finite
covering. [0, +∞) is closed but unbounded.
6 / 29
Weierstrass Theorem
Theorem
For any continuous function u : X → R and any compact set A ⊆ X , there exists
x ∈ A such that u(x) ≥ u(y ), ∀y ∈ A.
Proof.
Consider u and A. u is continuous ⇒ for any a ∈ R, {x ∈ X : u(x) < a} is
open.
Suppose to the contrary that for any x ∈ A, there is x 0 ∈ A such that
u(x 0 ) > u(x).
It follows that [
A⊆ {x ∈ X : u(x) < u(y )}.
y ∈A
Proof Continued.
Since
l
[
A⊆ {x ∈ X : u(x) < u(y i )},
i=1
∗ ∗
Consider y i such that u(y i ) ≥ u(y i ) for each i, contradiction.
8 / 29
Consumer’s Demand
9 / 29
More on Continuity
Proposition
Suppose % is continuous. If |x̄(p, w )| = 1 for any p 0 and w > 0, then x̄(p, w )
n
is a continuous function on R++ × R++ .
10 / 29
Monotonicity
x · p = w , budget identify.
Simple proof: if there exists x ∈ x̄(p, w ) such that x · p < w , then we can
consider y = x + (, , ..., ) for small enough > 0. y is strictly better than
x and affordable, contradiction.
11 / 29
Monotonicity v.s. Strong Monotonicity
Example
Strong monotonicity and monotonicity might have different properties on the
limit. Consider two utility functions over R+2 : u s (x, y ) = min{x, y } and
u f (x, y ) = x + y . If can be easily verified that for p n = (1, n1 ) where n ≥ 2 and
w = 1, we have
n n
x̄ s (p n , w ) = ( , ) and x̄ f (p n , w ) = (0, n).
n+1 n+1
This implies
12 / 29
Boundary Property
Proposition
Suppose that % is continuous and strongly monotone, and |x̄(p, w )| = 1 for all
p 0 and w > 0, if a sequence {(p k , w k )}∞
k=1 converges to (p, w ) such that
w > 0 and pi = 0 for some i, then define I = {i : pi = 0}, we have
X
lim xik = +∞,
k→+∞
i∈I
where x k = x̄(p k , w k ).
13 / 29
Convex Preference
Definition
A ⊆ R n is convex if for any x, y ∈ A and any t ∈ [0, 1], tx + (1 − t)y ∈ A.
Example
The budget set B(p, w ) is convex: if x, y ∈ B(p, w ), then
x · p ≤ w, y · p ≤ w.
14 / 29
Convex Preference
Definition
% is convex if x % y ⇒ tx + (1 − t)y % y , ∀t ∈ [0, 1].
% is strictly convex if for x 6= y , x % y ⇒ tx + (1 − t)y y , ∀t ∈ (0, 1).
Definition
A function u : X → R is quasiconcave if for all x, y ∈ X and t ∈ [0, 1],
15 / 29
Convex Preference
Definition
A function u : X → R is concave if for all x, y ∈ X and t ∈ [0, 1],
Proposition
Concave ⇒ quasiconcave; strictly concave ⇒ strictly quasiconcave.
16 / 29
Convex Preference
Example
Any strictly increasing function u : R → R is strictly quasiconcave: x > y ⇒
x > tx + (1 − t)y > y for t ∈ (0, 1), and thus u(tx + (1 − t)y ) > u(y ) =
min{u(x), u(y )}.
Not every strictly increasing function u is concave. Consider u(x) = x 3
y 0.5x + 0.5y
However, one can easily check that û(x) = x is concave. But ū and u represent
the same preference!
17 / 29
Convex Preference
Example
Here is an example of strictly concave function: u : R → R such that
u(x) = 2 − x 2 .
tx + (1 − t)y
x
18 / 29
Proposition
Suppose that % is monotone and continuous. If % is convex, then x̄(p, w ) is a
convex set. If % is strictly convex, then x̄(p, w ) contains only one point.
Proof.
First, assume that % is convex. To see that x̄(p, w ) is convex, consider
x, y ∈ x̄(p, w ) and any t ∈ [0, 1].
Since x ∼ y , we have tx + (1 − t)y % x ∼ y . Hence, tx + (1 − t)y is also an
optimal consumption bundle.
Next, assume % is strictly convex. If x̄(p, w ) contains x and y such that
x 6= y , we have for t ∈ (0, 1), tx + (1 − t)y x ∼ y , contradiction.
19 / 29
Corollary
If % is monotone, strictly convex and continuous, then x̄(p, w ) is a continuous
function.
20 / 29
Example
In R+2 , convexity indicates that the consumer’s demand is always an interval on
the boundary of the budget set:
y
x
21 / 29
Concave and Quasiconcave Utility Functions
Example
Cobb-Douglas Utility Function:
22 / 29
Example
Cobb-Douglas Utility Function:
23 / 29
Characterization by Differentiation
When the utility function of the consumer is monotone and differentiable, we have
a Lagrange multiplier characterization of the consumer’s demand.
Proposition
Suppose the consumer’s utility function u is monotone and differentiable. If
x ∗ ∈ x̄(p, w ) such that x ∗ 0, and there exists i ∈ {1, ..., n} such that
∂u ∗
(x ) > 0,
∂xi
then there exists λ > 0 such that
∂u ∗
∀k ∈ {1, ..., n}, (x ) = λpk .
∂xk
24 / 29
Proof.
If 1 ∂u
pi ∂xi (x ∗ ) > 1 ∂u
pj ∂xj (x ∗ ) for some i and j. WLOG, let i = 1 and j = 2.
We can consider another consumption bundle y ∗ = x ∗ + ( p1 , − p2 , 0, ..., 0).
When > 0 is close enough to 0, y ∗ is a valid consumption bundle.
When is close to 0, we know
∂u ∗ ∂u ∗
u(y ∗ ) = u(x ∗ ) + (x ) − (x ) + o() > u(x ∗ ).
p1 ∂x1 p2 ∂x2
25 / 29
Lagrange Multiplier
λ= 1 ∂u
pk ∂xk (x ∗ ) is called the Lagrange multiplier.
λ captures how the consumer’s utility would increase if her constraint is
relaxed by 1. Here, the constraint is income.
Following this idea, if the optimal consumption bundle is x ∗ = (0, 2, 3), how
do we define λ?
We should have
1 ∂u ∗ 1 ∂u ∗ 1 ∂u ∗
λ= (x ) = (x ) ≥ (x ).
p2 ∂x2 p3 ∂x3 p1 ∂x1
26 / 29
Solving for the Optimal Consumption Bundle
27 / 29
Cobb-Douglas Utility Function
28 / 29
Conclusion
29 / 29