REPORT Order No.: Client: Date of order: Receipt of sample mater Origin of sample material: Purpose: Forschungs- und Untersuchungs- Gesellschaft mbH Aschaffenburg Postfach 100565. 63704 Auchafeburg Tepelinaae 35 62741 Sechaba. Germany Fon: s49 6021 499.0, Fx +49 6021456030 Malt flo@isega rega.de Aschaffenburg, 30 August 2019 From: Be-ptidb Authorized by: Behrendt 1638415 Page tof 4 pages Hangzhou Todaytec Digital Co., Ltd. 600 KangXin Rd HangZhou Qianjiang Economy Development Zone LinPing Hangzhou, 311106 P.R. China 30 January 2019 27 May 2019 From the client Analysis of 4 thermal transfer ribbons for their compliance with the demands on food contact materials 1’ Derra) (Behrendt) Managing Director Officially certified ‘and authorized food chemist The present report cefers exclusively tothe samples as laid out therein. Information and statistical data on the resuls can be obtained on request. ((DakksPage 2 of 4 pages ISEGA - Forschungs- und Untersuchungsgesellschaft mbH Aschaffenburg Date: 30 August 2019 Order No: 16384/15 (f 30 January 2019 Sample Material For analysis the following sample material was in hand: Sample 1 ‘TDW 108 Resin Enhanced Wax Sample 2: ‘TDM200 RED Wax Resin Sample 3: ‘TDM200 BLUE Wax Resin Sample 4: ‘TDM200 GREEN Wax Resin Comment: Unless stated differently, the analyses were carried out on a mixed sample consisting of sample 2, 3 and 4 (= MP2), Carrying out of the Tests Examination period: 11 July 2019 to 19 August 2019 1, Determination of the Specific Migration into Tenax® (Modified Polyphenylene Ox- The migration was performed according to DIN EN 14338:2004-03. Conditions: 10 days at 40°C Testing procedure: Between thermal layer and Tenax, a wrapping paper of approx. 20 g/m? was used. Subsequently, the volatile components adsorbed onto Tenax were extracted. Gas chromatographic Analysis The determination was performed according to SOP 160.200 by means of GCMS after extraction with methyl tert-butylether. a) Sum of the volatile components The volatile components were summarized semi-quantitatively using deuterated nonadecane as internal standard. Result: Sample 1 0.11 mg/dm? Sample MP2: 0.14 mgfdm?Page 3 of 4 pages ISEGA - Forschungs- und Untersuchungsgeselischaft mbH Aschaffenburg Date: 30 August 2019 OrderNo: 16984/15 (of 30 January 2019, b) Screening Further signals in the chromatogram were evaluated semi-quantitatively using deuterated non- adecane as internal standard; for their identification a commercially available mass spectra library was used. Result Sample 1 ‘Sum of alkanes 0.011 mg/m? Sample 2: ‘Sum of alkanes 0.014 mg/dm? 2. Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (Headspace-GC/MS-Screening) * The determination was performed according to SOP 160.200 by means of head space chromatography and mass spectrometric detection after a storage of 60 minutes at 80 °C. The air space above the sample material was examined for volatile components and was identified against a spectrum library and additionally according to the retention times. Besides, it was tested for the listed solvents on the basis of the standard EN 13628-1 for the examination of flexible packaging materials as well as for volatile monomers. If not stated differently, a semiquantitative estimation of the signals was performed against the internal standard trichlorotrifluoroethane. Result: ‘Sample MP2: Evaluation of direct quantified compounds: Ethanol not determinable < 0.2 mgim? Isopropanol not determinable < 0.2 mgim? Hexane not determinable < 0.2 mgim? Ethyl acetate not determinable < 0.2 mgim? 1-Ethoxy-2-propanol not determinable < 0.2 mgim? Butyl acetate not determinable < 0.2 maim? Hexanal not determinable < 0.2 mgm? Cyclohexanone not determinable < 0.2 mgm? Vinylacetate not determinable < 0.2 — mgim? Benzene not determinable < 0.04 maim? Toluene not determinable < 0.04 mg/m? Evaluation of the compounds quantified against the internal standard. Ethylbenzene 0.15 mg/m? xylene 0.68 — mg/m?Page 4 of 4 pagos ISEGA - Forschungs- und Untersuchungsgesellschaft mbH Aschaffenburg Date: 30 August 2019 Order No: 1698415 of 90 January 2019 The following compounds were not determinable in the corresponding chromatograms: Residual solvents: Monomers: Acetone < 02 mgm? Butyl acrylate < 0.01 mg/dm? 2-Butanone < 02 mgm? Ethyl acrylate < 0.01 mg/dm? 4-Butanol < 0.2 mgm? — 2-Ethylhexylacrylate << 0.01 mg/dm* Isobutanol < 0.2 mgm? — Methyl acrylate < 0.01 mgfdm? Isopropyl acetate < 0.2 mg/m? Butyl methacrylate. << 0.01 mgfdm? Methanol < 0.2 mg/m? isobutyl methacrylate < 0.01 mgfdm* ‘1-Methoxy-2-propanol_ < 0.2 mgim* Methyl methacrylate < 0.01 mgfdm? Methyl acetate < 02 mgm? — Styrene < 0.01 mgfdm? Methyltert-butylether < 0.2 mgim* — alpha methyl styrene < 0.01 mg/dm? 1-Propanol < 02 mg/m? Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH The determination was performed according to SOP 162.200 by HPLC Result: Naphthalene 0.43 mg/kg Acenaphthylene not determinable < 0.6 mg/kg Acenaphthene not determinable < 0.69 — mg/kg Fluorene not determinable < 0.3 mg/kg Phenanthrene not determinable < 0.3 mg/kg Anthracene not determinable < 0.3 mg/kg Fluoranthene not determinable. < 1.5" — mg/kg Pyrene not determinable < 0.3 malkg Benzo(a)anthracene hot determinable < 31 ma/kg Chrysene not determinable < 1.57 mg/kg Benzo(b)fiuoranthene not determinable < 0.3 mg/kg Benzo(k)fluoranthene not determinable < 0.3 mg/kg Benzo(a)pyrene not determinable < 0.67 mg/kg Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene not determinable < 0.3 mg/kg Benzo(g,h,i)perylene not determinable < 0.3 mg/kg Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene not determinable < 0.6 mg/kg ‘1 The determination limit had to be raised due to matrix interferences ‘The accreditation applies to the methods marked with * in the test report (Register no. D-PL-14160-01-01 and D-PL-14160-01-02). End of report