You are on page 1of 9

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11157-5

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Heavy metal pollution and mobility of sediment in Tajum River


caused by artisanal gold mining in Banyumas, Central Java, Indonesia
Wawan Budianta 1

Received: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 5 October 2020


# Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract
The heavy metals Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd in the stream sediment of the Tajum River were studied based on 12 sediment samples
obtained from upstream to downstream. The artisanal mining activities in the study area generated mining processing waste
(tailing) and are the primary source of heavy metal pollution. The samples were analyzed for metal concentration as well as metal
mobility based on sequential extraction analysis. Heavy metal analysis for the concentration of the metals showed that the value
of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd in sediment samples transcends the mean crust. The change of the heavy metal concentrations in stream
sediment between the upstream and downstream areas showed that higher levels were located near mining activities in upstream
and that these decreased with distance to downstream. The result of the sequential extraction study revealed that Cu and Pb were
more found in the exchangeable and carbonate fraction of about 26% and 24%. Meanwhile, Zn and Cd were present in the Fe–
Mn oxide, an organic and residual fraction of about 90% and 85%, respectively. The mobility factor assessment revealed that the
heavy metals investigated had an average mobility factor of 25.89%, 23.9%, 14.4 %, and 9.24% for Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd,
respectively. Overall, Zn and Cd in sediment in the study area were less mobile compared with Cu and Pb.

Keywords Heavy metals . Pollution . Mobility . River sediment . Artisanal . Mining

Introduction activities have negative effects on the environment, especially


in aquatic systems located around the facility (Yolcubal et al.
Indonesia has a high number of artisanal gold mining facilities 2016; Li et al. 2011). The impact of mercury concentrations in
(Aspinall 2001; Reilly et al. 2016), one of them located in the river water and stream sediment in the study area was well
Paningkaban area of the Banyumas District in Central Java, documented in a previous investigation (Budianta et al. 2019).
Indonesia (Fig. 1). Artisanal mining processing activities in In addition to mercury contamination, the activities of arti-
the study area include rock crushing, grinding, milling, and sanal gold mining can cause other heavy metal pollution, es-
washing. This area is located in a hilly region and traversed by pecially in river sediments around the facilities (Karbassi et al.
the Tajum River, which is used by residents as a source of 2008; Klubi et al. 2020; Aghili et al. 2018). Heavy metals in
irrigation water as well as for washing and bathing (Fig. 1). In the river sediment in high concentrations will disturb and con-
the study area, the tailings are collected into small pits or taminate aquatic biota in river systems (Li et al. 2020;
ponds near to the processing plants. These ponds are built into Xiaohong et al. 2019). Evaluation and assessment of metal
the ground, and the processing waste goes directly into the contamination and mobility must be investigated by
river. Several studies indicated that artisanal gold mining conducting sequential extraction analysis because measure-
ment of the total concentration of heavy metals in the sample
only is not sufficient (Naji et al. 2010; Khadhar et al. 2020;
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues Tüzen 2003; Tessier et al. 1979). Stream sediment in aquatic
systems is significant not only for serving as sinks of these
* Wawan Budianta contaminants that release them under certain physical and
wbudianta@ugm.ac.id chemical but also to the adsorption of heavy metals (Li et al.
1 2019; Santos et al. 2020). Therefore, this research was con-
Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika 2 Kampus UGM, ducted to analyze the levels and mobility of heavy metals in
Yogyakarta, Indonesia the Tajum River sediment in the study area.
Environ Sci Pollut Res

2). The ore deposits present in the research area are low
sulfidation epithermal type and occur in carbonate-based met-
al-gold mineralization systems (Hakim 2014). The sandstone
and siltstone unit is the host rock of epithermal gold mineral-
ization in the study area. Vein structures are present, indicat-
ing the accumulation of precious and other metals associated
to sulfide mineral such as pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, ga-
lena, and arsenopyrite (Hakim 2014). The heavy metals on
river sediment in this study area were derived from this accu-
mulation process. The study area is situated in a tropical area
subjected to a rainy season with high rainfall and a dry season.
Tajum River is the primary river, and the flow direction is
north-west, then turns south-west, and finally to the south
(Fig. 2). This pattern of river flow follows the morphology
of the area because of the influence of tectonic processes
and erosion, which have resulted in a narrow V-shaped river
valley. The Tajum River has a wide variety of discharge rate
during rainy and dry seasons. The sampling collection was
conducted during the dry season, with the stream discharge
relatively low.

Materials and methods

Twelve river sediment samples were taken in the study area


systematically from upstream to downstream in the Tajum
River, as shown in Fig. 2. A tailing sample was taken from a
tailing pond near mining processing site. Sample S-1
representing the natural background metal concentration value
was obtained from the furthest upstream, which was assumed
not to be contaminated by processing waste of artisanal min-
ing activities.
The river sediment samples were dried in an oven of 105
°C for 24 h. The sediment sample was sieved, and the fraction
< 63 μm was grounded to powder by using an agate mortar.
The powdered sample of approximately 0.5 g weight was then
transferred in a glass beaker with 10 mL aqua regia. The
samples were then heated to dryness. Hydrofluoric acid (5
mL) was added after the mixture was cooled at room temper-
Fig. 1 The location of the study area ature. Later, the mixture was filtered by 0.45-μm membrane
filter. After filtering, the filtrates were placed into 50-mL vol-
umetric flasks after addition of 1 N HCl.
Chemical partitioning was investigated in sequential steps
as described by Tessier et al. (1979), which separate the sam-
Geology and hydrology ple in five fractions, namely exchangeable fraction, bound to
carbonates fraction, bound to Fe–Mn oxides fraction, bound
The rocks of the study area belong to the Halang formation, to sulfides and organic matter fraction, and residual fraction.
which consists of turbidite sedimentary units (Djuri et al. Before use, containers and sample bottles used in this exper-
1996). Prihatmoko et al. (2002) reported that a quartz- iment were washed in HNO3 (10%) and then soaked with
carbonate mineralization process occurred in the rock in the distilled water. All metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd) were mea-
Halang formation, which was of middle Miocene age. In the sured by an ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma–optical
study area, as reported by Hakim (2014), the rock unit area emission spectrometry). Calibration was conducted using a
consists of limestone, claystone–siltstone, and tuff clay (Fig. reference material of the Canadian Certified Reference
Environ Sci Pollut Res

Fig. 2 Geological conditions (Hakim 2014) and sediment sampling location points

Materials Project (CRMs). A calibration blank (2% HNO3) processing waste generation (S-3 through S-9). The variability
was run before the standards, and a multi-elemental solution indicates the significant impact of artisanal mining activities,
was used. The concentration corresponding to three times the which generated processing waste. Processing waste of metal
standard deviation of the intensities of the blank signals for ores can be a significant source of sediment pollution. Mining
each component were used for detection limits determination. processing, which involves grinding and milling, ore

Results and discussion Table 1 The heavy metal concentrations in river sediments and tailing
(mg/kg)
Heavy metal concentration Sample code Cu Pb Zn Cd

The information on the metal concentrations in the river sed- S-1 87 34 85 2.5
iment samples is shown in Table 1. Sample S-1 referred to a S-2 95 56 350 3.5
control sample from an upstream point that was assumed not S-3 135 46 450 5
to be contaminated by mining processing waste generation S-4 190 78 480 5
(Fig. 2). S-5 210 81 550 6.5
The background of metal level (S-1 sample) was higher S-6 190 85 450 6
than the mean crust levels (Table 1) because of the presence S-7 130 85 350 7
of a mineralization zone in the study area that is enriched with S-8 120 110 250 6
metal sulfides. According to Hakim (2014), the mineralization S-9 100 76 400 5
type in the study area is typical of low epithermal sulfidation, S-10 91 75 90 3
especially for a carbonate-based metal-gold mineralization S-11 101 71 90 2.5
system. The heavy metal contents in the tailing sample was S-12 96 65 83 1.5
also higher than the average of heavy metals in sediments, and Min 87 34 83 1.5
tailings may therefore serve as the primary source of heavy Max 210 110 550 6.5
metal pollution in stream sediment in the study area. The Mean 128.75 71.83 286.5 4.46
lower sediment metal concentrations were found on S-1 and Tailing 267 143 785 8.9
S-2 samples (upper stream) and S-10 through S-12 (lower Mean crusta 25 14.8 65 0.1
stream). The higher concentrations were found in the middle,
a
which was located close to artisanal mining activities and Wedepohl (1995)
Environ Sci Pollut Res

concentration, and tailings disposal, provides significant attributed to physical and chemical processes such as dilution
sources of contamination in the stream sediment, along with of contaminated sediment, hydraulic sorting of channel bed
the discharge of processing waste (Dudka and Adriano 1997). sediment, abrasion of polluted sediment grains, polluted sed-
Consequently, streams transport high contents of Pb, Cu, Zn, iment particles in floodplain deposits repository, sorption or
and Cd. It seems that stream sediment in the study area could co-precipitation of metals, and changes in metals in phases
be polluted with heavy metals, in which processing mining such as Fe and Mn oxides in downstream (Macklin 1996;
waste is the primary source that increases the content of heavy Hudson-Edwards et al. 2001; Hudson-Edwards 2003).
metals disposed into the river water.
The variation in the metal concentrations in river sediment The mobility of heavy metals
from upstream to downstream is shown in Fig. 3. Generally,
the pattern of the metal concentrations in river sediment sam- Metals’ chemical speciation based on sequential extraction is
ples followed the highest concentrations located near the min- important to their mobility, as stated by Tessier et al. (1979).
ing activities, after which the metal concentrations were get- The fraction of heavy metals obtained from the extraction
ting lower. The decrease in metal concentrations along the varied extensively in the current study, as shown in Table 2
stream illustrated that the sediment transport follows the river and Fig. 4.
stream and slope of the river basin. This process contributes to The two first fractions represent the fraction of exchange-
the dispersion of metals in sediments along the flow direction, able, reducible, and oxidizable elements. They likely contain
as shown in Fig. 2. metals that may be mobilized to the aqueous phase by chang-
There were several artisanal mining facilities located in the ing redox conditions, and contrary from oxidizing to reducing
study area (Fig. 2) that date back more than 10 years. The conditions (Byrne et al. 2012). Heavy metals may be
activity of these artisanal mining has generated processing transported to downstream of the river system in the dissolved
wastes, which are transported into the encompassing environ- phase or change to another solid phase (Audry et al. 2010;
ment and release Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd that were enriched in the Byrne et al. 2012).
mineralized host rock. Sequential extraction revealed that Cu was mostly found
Artisanal mining, as one of the anthropogenic activities, (about 26%) in the two first fractions, i.e. exchangeable and
has generated the transport of metals like Cu, Pb, Zn, and bound to carbonate bound. The abundance of Cu in the Fe–
Cd downgradient from their source, possibly as sorbed Mn oxide, organic, and residual fractions was about 74%. Pb
constituent materials. Furthermore, the distribution pattern was found on the Fe–Mn oxide, organic, and residual frac-
of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd investigated in this study points to tions, with an average level of about 76% (Fig. 4).
metal dispersion over at least 4000 m to downstream by These findings indicate that Pb was more mobile than Cu.
river water flow (Fig. 3). Several studies reported that the Zn was primarily found in the Fe–Mn oxide, organic matter,
heavy metal accumulation in stream sediment around min- and residual fractions of all samples. In the Fe–Mn oxide,
ing areas was highest near to the mining activities organic matter, and residual fractions, the presence of Zn
(Adewumi and Laniyan 2020; Chen et al. 2019; Niane was about 90% on average. In comparison, it was about
et al. 2014; Resongles et al. 2014). 10% on average in the exchangeable and the carbonate frac-
Other studies indicate that the heavy metal concentration of tion (Fig. 4). These results indicate that Zn was more immo-
stream sediment in the downstream decreases, which may be bile compared with the other metals.

Fig. 3 The change of heavy metal


concentrations in upstream to
downstream of Tajum river
sediment
Environ Sci Pollut Res

Table 2 Chemical partitioning of heavy metals in river sediments in the study area (mg/kg)

Sample code Cu Pb Zn Cd

I II III IV V Sum I II III IV V Sum I II III IV V Sum I II III IV V Sum

S-1 8.0 17.2 22.0 30.5 9.0 86.7 2.0 6.2 7.0 9.0 10.0 34.2 2.0 10.0 17.0 12.0 31.3 72.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.9 2.4
S-2 22.0 13.7 32.0 15.0 12.0 94.7 4.0 14.2 8.0 15.0 15.0 56.2 5.0 45.0 45.0 80.0 175.2 350.2 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.6 1.3 3.6
S-3 11.8 23.0 45.0 21.0 34.0 134.8 9.0 9.1 8.0 9.0 12.0 47.1 9.0 12.0 98.0 99.9 231.0 449.9 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.0 2.0 4.9
S-4 33.8 24.7 56.3 34.0 41.0 189.8 8.0 12.1 6.0 18.0 34.0 78.1 11.0 45.0 43.0 167.2 214.0 480.2 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.1 2.3 4.9
S-5 12.1 44.1 51.0 47.0 56.0 210.2 6.0 6.1 13.0 27.0 29.0 81.1 18.0 32.0 70.0 212.0 223.2 555.2 0.1 0.8 1.1 2.0 2.7 6.7
S-6 20.0 56.0 44.0 34.0 36.0 190.0 4.0 23.1 13.0 23.0 21.0 84.1 9.0 12.0 67.0 189.2 173.0 450.2 0.1 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.8 3.9
S-7 6.1 30.8 47.0 12.0 33.7 129.6 7.1 21.0 12.0 21.0 24.0 85.1 10.0 10.0 34.0 167.2 129.0 350.2 0.0 0.9 3.1 1.8 1.1 6.9
S-8 4.1 21.1 39.0 33.0 23.0 120.2 2.0 16.8 12.0 12.0 67.0 109.8 4.0 10.1 15.0 31.0 190.0 250.1 0.1 0.9 2.0 1.3 1.8 6.1
S-9 14.0 11.7 34.0 28.0 12.0 99.7 7.9 12.0 21.0 23.0 12.0 75.9 8.0 9.1 12.0 153.0 218.0 400.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 1.9 2.2 4.9
S-10 2.9 27.0 17.8 12.0 31.0 90.7 4.1 9.0 18.0 21.0 23.0 75.1 4.0 5.1 15.0 21.0 45.0 90.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.8 1.6 2.9
S-11 4.0 11.1 34.0 19.0 32.0 100.1 3.1 8.0 23.0 19.0 18.0 71.1 4.0 6.2 21.0 23.0 36.0 90.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.2 2.4
S-12 5.0 8.9 45.0 18.0 19.0 95.9 4.0 3.1 25.0 17.0 16.0 65.1 6.0 5.0 10.0 43.0 19.3 83.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.4

I, exchangeable; II, bound to carbonates; III, bound to Fe–Mn oxides; IV, bound to sulfides and organic matter; V, residual
Environ Sci Pollut Res

Fig. 4 Cumulative value of


chemical partitioning of heavy
metals speciation in river
sediments in the study area

A similar pattern was also observed for Cd, which was incorporated in the crystal lattices of clay with strong bonds
mostly bound to Fe–Mn oxide and organic matter with an and not efficiently released into the environment accordingly
amount of 47% and present in the residual fraction with an (Violante et al. 2010).
amount of about 38% average (Fig. 4). The amount of Zn and Previous studies state that the high concentrations of the
Cd in other fractions was relatively low compared with Cu and heavy metals in the Fe–Mn oxide, organic, and residual frac-
Pb. In the environment, Zn and Cd were more immobile com- tions in geochemical phase indicate that the metals that remain
pared with the metals that were particularly found in Fe–Mn in sediments were mainly of geogenic origin (Davutluoglu
oxide, organic, and residual fractions. Sequential extraction et al. 2011). There is a potential risk of heavy metals becoming
revealed that the highest amount in the Fe–Mn oxide, organic, chemically mobile caused by a change of environmental con-
and residual fractions was Cu–74%, Pb–76%, Zn–85%, and ditions, since a significant amount of metals can be released
Cd–90%. These findings were confirmed by the finding of from the Fe–Mn oxides and organic phases (Davutluoglu et al.
another researchers, in which Cd and Zn were primarily asso- 2011; Wang et al. 2010; Papadopoulos et al. 1997).
ciated with the residual phase (Ramirez et al. 2005; Sundaray Based on the results of the sequential extraction study, the
et al. 2011; El-Azim and El-Moselhy 2005; Li 2014; heavy metal investigated in this study was not only of
Venkatramanan et al. 2015). geogenic origin due to mining activities but also may be in-
The mobility of sediment samples revealed that the abun- fluenced by mining processing waste generation as an anthro-
dance of the Cd and Zn were strongly adsorbed in the organic pogenic factor. Generally, the slightly high amount in the Fe–
and residual fraction. Cd and Zn in sediment samples are Mn oxide, organic, and residual fractions indicates that the
Environ Sci Pollut Res

metals were not derived from the anthropogenic origin 25.89%. Cu was mobilized easily to the condition of the
(Venkatramanan et al. 2015). environment on the reducing and acidic conditions
Heavy metal analysis revealed high concentrations com- (Calmano et al. 1993). Several studies show that the solu-
pared with reference samples because of anthropogenic influ- bility of Cu is increased under oxidizing conditions as a
ences on geogenic sources, such as artisanal mining activities, chalcophile mineral that is primarily bound to sulfides
which generated mining processing waste in the study area. (Weisz et al. 2000; Tüzen 2003). The results were con-
This confirms the conclusion of another study (Sims and firmed by other studies (Guevara et al. 2004; Tokalioğlu
Francis 2010). et al. 2000), which state that Cu is associated with the
organic fraction in stream sediments on a high proportion.
Mobility factor Accordingly, Cu was more available and toxic in the envi-
ronment in comparison with specific metals that were mostly
Heavy metal mobility determination is calculated using pro- found in the two last fractions. The mobility factor on the
portions of the metal fractions. The partitioning variation of average of Pb was 23.9%, and it becomes very available and
the metals was classified into two groups based on the level of toxic in the environment because of the deterioration of or-
their affiliation with particular phases and would be used for ganic matter under strongly oxidizing conditions. Zn and Cd
mobility index determination. The groups are the exchange- had the lowest mobility factor (14.4 % and 9.24%), indicating
able and carbonate fractions as a mobile group, while Fe–Mn that they were relatively immobile.
oxide, organic, and residual fractions represent the immobile Heavy metals of anthropogenic sources generally are most-
group. The heavy metal mobility index was determined as the ly found on the first step of sequential extraction analysis. On
mobility factor (Mf), which is calculated referring to the equa- the other hand, the geogenic source is predominantly present-
tion by Kabala and Singh (2001). ed in the residual fraction as the last step of the sequential
extraction analysis (Ramirez et al. 2005). As shown in Fig. 4
M f ¼ ½ðM1 þ M2 Þ=ðM1 þ M2 þ M3 þ M4 þ M5 Þ  100 ð%Þ and Table 3, the order of mobility factors for the samples
agreed with the percentage of mobility. Pb, Cu, Zn, and Cd
The fractions are the exchangeable fraction (M1) and the
were released to the wash sediments as a result of the milling
carbonate bound fraction (M2), which together from mobile
process. Based on the processing mining waste (tailing) data
group. In contrast, the Fe–Mn oxide (M3) fraction, organic
in Table 1, they have been enriched in wastes by the anthro-
(M4) fraction, and residual (M5) represent the immobile group.
pogenic influences during the milling process. The heavy met-
The mobility index calculation is seen in Table 3, and the
al concentration in stream sediment in the study area was
result revealed highest mobility for Cu and the lowest mobility
found above background concentrations, which reflected for
for Cd.
the redistribution of contaminants by sediment transport from
Cu was mostly bound to the exchangeable and carbon-
where the source point has occurred.
ate fraction and had an average mobility factor of about

Table 3 Mobility factor Conclusion


Sample code Mobility factor (%) This research evaluated the levels and mobility of Cu, Pb, Zn,
Cu Pb Zn Cd and Cd in the sediment of the Tajum River. This study con-
cludes that the average of metal concentration sediments in the
S-01 12.68 23.53 16.67 18.18 study area exceeded the mean crust because the metals were
S-02 36.56 32.14 14.29 37.14 released from the host rock and enhanced by milling process
S-03 25.93 38.30 4.67 16.00 of the extraction process of valuable metals. The changes in
S-04 31.05 25.64 11.67 8.00 the heavy metal concentrations in the Tajum River sediment
S-05 26.67 14.81 8.99 13.85 between the upstream and downstream areas indicate that
S-06 40.00 32.14 4.67 15.00 higher concentrations were located near the mining activities.
S-07 28.46 32.94 5.71 12.86 These results indicate that artisanal mining as anthropogenic
S-08 20.83 17.27 5.60 16.67 activity has triggered the release and transport of metals from
S-09 26.00 26.32 4.25 2.00 their source location in the upstream point in the research area.
S-10 32.97 17.33 10.00 10.00 These results allow to conclude that the extraction of precious
S-11 15.00 15.49 11.11 12.00 metals by artisanal mining activity and waste disposal prac-
S-12 14.58 10.77 13.25 6.67 tices polluted sediments to the downstream area from the
Average 25.89 23.89 14.03 9.24 source point. The mobility study revealed that Zn and Cd were
present to be more abundant in the Fe–Mn oxide, organic, and
Environ Sci Pollut Res

residual fractions, demonstrating that the metals were more Calmano W, Hong J, Förstner U (1993) Binding and mobilization of
heavy metals in contaminated sediments affected by pH and redox
strongly retained in the minerals and were, therefore, more
potential. Water Sci Technol 28(8-9):223–235
immobile. The mobile fractions including the exchangeable Chen M, Li F, Tao M, Hu L, Shi Y, Liu Y (2019) Distribution and
and carbonate fractions were more established in Cu and Pb ecological risks of heavy metals in river sediments and overlying
compared with Zn and Cd, indicating that they have higher water in typical mining areas of China. Mar Pollut Bull 146:893–
mobility. The concentrations of Cu and Pb were relatively 899
Davutluoglu OI, Seckin S, Ersu CB, Yilmaz T, Sari B (2011) Heavy
high in the river sediment in the study area. This is an envi- metal content and distribution in surface sediments of the Seyhan
ronmental risk and requires future attention. River, Turkey. J Environ Manag 92(9):2250–2259
Djuri M, Samodra H, Gafoer S (1996) Geological map of Purwokerto dan
Acknowledgments The author thanks the Geoscience Center Georg- Tegal sheet Central Java, Scale 1:100.000. National Geological
August-Universität Göttingen, Germany, for the laboratory facility for Agency, Bandung
part of analyzing the samples under Erasmus project by European Dudka S, Adriano DC (1997) Environmental impacts of metal ore mining
Union on research fellowship program. The author also thanks to Hans and processing: a review. J Environ Qual 26(3):590–602
Ruppert, Wiebke Fahlbusch, Volker Karius, and Benedikt Sauer for valu- El-Azim HA, El-Moselhy KM (2005) Determination and partitioning of
able discussion. The author thanks Eska Rutana for picture editing in the metals in sediments along the Suez Canal by sequential extraction. J
manuscript and Fraga L. Fahmi for help conducting sediment sampling in Mar Syst 56(3-4):363–374
the field. The author thanks Fahmi Hakim for the sharing of a geological Guevara RA, Sahuquillo A, Rubio R, Rauret G (2004) Assessment of
map. The author also thanks Hinode Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of metal mobility in dredged harbour sediments from Barcelona, Spain.
Technology Japan, for providing facility on the sample analysis. The Sci Total Environ 321(1-3):241–255
author thanks respected reviewers for their valuable comments in improv- Hakim F (2014) Geologi, Alterasi, Mineralisasi Bijih, dan Karakteristik
ing the manuscript. Fluida Hidrotermal pada Endapan Emas Epitermal Sulfidasi Rendah
di Daerah Cihonje-Paningkaban, Kecamatan Gumelar, Kabupaten
Author contribution The author conducted all research work and wrote Banyumas, Propinsi Jawa Tengah, Undergraduate thesis, Gadjah
the manuscript. The author read and approved the final manuscript. Mada University, Indonesia (in Indonesia language – unpublished)
Hudson-Edwards KA (2003) Sources, mineralogy, chemistry and fate of
Data availability Not applicable heavy metal-bearing particles in mining-affected river systems.
Mineral Mag 67(2):205–217
Hudson-Edwards KA, Macklin MG, Miller JR, Lechler PJ (2001)
Compliance with ethical standards Sources, distribution and storage of heavy metals in the Rı́ o
Pilcomayo, Bolivia. J Geochem Explor 72:229–250
Competing interests The author declares that he has no competing Kabala C, Singh BR (2001) Fractionation and mobility of copper, lead,
interests. and zinc in soil profiles in the vicinity of a copper smelter. J Environ
Qual 30:485–492
Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable Karbassi AR, Monavari SM, Nabi Bidhendi GR, Nouri J, Nematpour K
(2008) Metal pollution assessment of sediment and water in the Shur
Consent for publication Not applicable River. Environ Monit Assess 147:107–116
Khadhar S, Sdiri A, Chekirben A, Azouzi R, Charef A (2020) Integration
of sequential extraction, chemical analysis and statistical tools for
the availability risk assessment of heavy metals in sludge amended
soil. Environ Pollut 263:114543
References Klubi E, Abril JM, Mantero J, García-Tenorio R, Nyarko E (2020)
Environmental radioactivity and trace metals in surficial sediments
from estuarine systems in Ghana (Equatorial Africa), impacted by
Adewumi AJ, Laniyan TA (2020) Contamination, sources and risk as-
artisanal gold-mining. J Environ Radioact 218:106260
sessments of metals in media from Anka artisanal gold mining area,
Li J (2014) Risk assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments from
Northwest Nigeria. Sci Total Environ 718:137235
the Yanghe River, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(12):
Aghili S, Vaezihir A, Hosseinzadeh M (2018) Distribution and modeling
12441–12453
of heavy metal pollution in the sediment and water mediums of
Li XH, Tang ZL, Chu FY, Yang LY (2011) Characteristics of distribution
Pakhir River, at the downstream of Sungun mine tailing dump,
and chemical speciation of heavy metals in environmental mediums
Iran. Environ Earth Sci 77:128
around Jinchang mining city, Northwest China. Environ Earth Sci
Aspinall C (2001) Small-scale mining in Indonesia. International Institute 64(6):1667–1674
for Environment and Development, Mining Minerals and
Li L, Jiang M, Liu Y, Shen X (2019) Heavy metals inter-annual variabil-
Sustainable Development Report, Jakarta
ity and distribution in the Yangtze River estuary sediment, China.
Audry S, Grosbois C, Bril H, Schäfer J, Kierczak J, Blanc G (2010) Post- Mar Pollut Bull 141:514–520
depositional redistribution of trace metals in reservoir sediments of a
Li M, Zhang Q, Sun X, Karki K, Zeng C, Pandey A, Rawat B, Zhang F
mining/smelting-impacted watershed (the Lot River, SW France).
(2020) Heavy metals in surface sediments in the trans-Himalayan
Appl Geochem 25(6):778–794
Koshi River catchment: distribution, source identification and pol-
Budianta W, Fahmi FL, Arifudin WIW (2019) The distribution and mo- lution assessment. Chemosphere 244:125410
bility of mercury from artisanal gold mining in river sediments and Macklin MG (1996) Fluxes and storage of sediment associated heavy
water, Banyumas, Central Java, Indonesia. Environ Earth Sci 78:90 metals in floodplain systems: assessment and river basin manage-
Byrne P, Wood PJ, Reid I (2012) The impairment of river systems by ment issues at a time of rapid environmental change. In: Anderson
metal mine contamination: a review including remediation options. MG, Walling DE, Bates PD (eds) Floodplain Processes. John Wiley
Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42(19):2017–2077 & Sons, Chichester, pp 441–460
Environ Sci Pollut Res

Naji A, Ismail A, Ismail AR (2010) Chemical speciation and contamina- Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction proce-
tion assessment of Zn and Cd by sequential extraction in surface dure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51(7):
sediment of Klang River, Malaysia. Microchem J 95(2):285–292 844–851
Niane B, Moritz R, Guédron S, Ngom PM, Pfeifer HR, Mall I, Poté J Tokalioğlu S, Kartal S, Elc IL (2000) Determination of heavy metals and
(2014) Effect of recent artisanal small-scale gold mining on the their speciation in lake sediments by flame atomic absorption spec-
contamination of surface river sediment: case of Gambia River, trometry after a four-stage sequential extraction procedure. Anal
Kedougou region, southeastern Senegal. J Geochem Explor 144: Chim Acta 413(1-2):33–40
517–527 Tüzen M (2003) Determination of trace metals in the River Yeşilırmak
Papadopoulos D, Pantazi C, Sauvides C, Haralambous AJ, Papadopoulos sediments in Tokat, Turkey using sequential extraction procedure.
A, Loizidou MA (1997) Study on heavy metal pollution in marine Microchem J 74(1):105–110
sediments and their removal from dredged material. J Environ Sci Venkatramanan S, Chung SY, Ramkumar T, Gnanachandrasamy G, Kim
Health 32:347–360 TH (2015) Evaluation of geochemical behavior and heavy metal
Prihatmoko S, Digdowirogo, Kusumanto D (2002) Potensi Cebakan distribution of sediments: the case study of the Tirumalairajan river
Mineral di Jawa Tengah dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. In: estuary, southeast coast of India. Int J Sediment Res 30(1):28–38
Proceedings XXXII Annual Convention of the Indonesian Violante A, Cozzolino V, Perelomov L, Caporale AG, Pigna M (2010)
Association of Geologists (IAGI) (in Indonesian language) Mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals and metalloids in soil
Ramirez M, Massolo S, Frache R, Correa JA (2005) Metal speciation and environments. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10(3):268–292
environmental impact on sandy beaches due to El Salvador copper Wang XS, Zhu GC, Wang SJ, Wan WY, Tan YB (2010) Distribution and
mine, Chile. Mar Pollut Bull 50(1):62–72 chemical partitioning of heavy metals in marine near-shore sediment
Reilly SB, Schierl R, Nowak D, Siebert U, Frederick J, Teorgi F, cores: a case study from the Xugou, Lianyungang, China. Environ
Ismawati Y (2016) A preliminary study on health effects in villagers Monit Assess 177(1-4):263–272
exposed to mercury in a small-scale artisanal gold mining area in
Wedepohl KH (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim
Indonesia. Environ Res 149:274–281
Cosmochim Acta 59(7):1217–1232
Resongles E, Casiot C, Freydier R, Dezileau L, Viers J, Poulichet FE
Weisz M, Polyak K, Hlavay J (2000) Fractionation of elements in sedi-
(2014) Persisting impact of historical mining activity to metal (Pb,
ment samples collected in rivers and harbors at Lake Balaton and its
Zn, Cd, Tl, Hg) and metalloid (As, Sb) enrichment in sediments of
catchment area. Microchem J 67(1):207–217
the Gardon River, Southern France. Sci Total Environ 481:509–521
Santos JL, Malvar JL, Martín J, Aparicio I, Alonso E (2020) Distribution Xiaohong F, Peng B, Wang X, Song Z, Zhou D, Wang Q, Qin Z, Tan C
of metals in sediments of the Guadiamar river basin 20 years after (2019) Distribution, contamination and source identification of
the Aznalcóllar mine spill: bioavailability and risk assessment. J heavy metals in bed sediments from the lower reaches of the
Environ Manag 260:110146 Xiangjiang River in Hunan province, China. Sci Total Environ
Sims DB, Francis A (2010) Anthropogenic influences on geogenic trace 689:557–570
elements and contamination in wash sediments from historical min- Yolcubal I, Demiray AD, Çiftçi E, Sanğu E (2016) Environmental impact
ing activities in the Carnation Wash system, Nelson, Nevada (USA). of mining activities on surface water and sediment qualities around
Int J Soil Sediment Water 3:1 Murgul copper mine, Northeastern Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 75:
Sundaray SK, Nayak BB, Lin S, Bhatta D (2011) Geochemical speciation 1415
and risk assessment of heavy metals in the river estuarine
sediments—a case study: Mahanadi Basin, India. J Hazard Mater Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
186(2-3):1837–1846 tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

You might also like