Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enterprises in Tanzania
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the technological innovativeness in engineering enterprises in
Tanzania and analyses the factors affecting the innovativeness. It starts by analyzing
various concepts regarding innovation, then analyzed from documentary review factors
affecting innovativeness and then analyzed the innovativeness in Tanzanian enterprises.
From the documentary review it was learnt that the following key factors influence
technological innovativeness: Existence of innovation management; Existence of market to
absorb the products of innovation; Existence of partnership between the universities and
the firms; Existence of positive culture and politics towards innovation; The government
playing its role to influence innovation; Existence of the right knowledge; and Ability of the
enterprises to access to financing institutions that support innovation.The research shows
that there is hardly any fundamental innovation in Tanzania, what is presented as
innovation is the copying of technologies and manufacture them using local material. The
researcher established the following factors affecting the innovativeness of engineering
enterprises in Tanzania: Level of education among the entrepreneurs in engineering
enterprises; financing for the enterprises in Tanzania; partnership with R&D institutions;
innovativeness culture; and market for Tanzanian products.
Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13 1
Emmanuel A. M. Mjema
essential to continued economic growth of into practice various measures that will
a country. When analysing factors that ensure that technological innovations are
contributed to fast development of the taking place are two different things. We
emerging economies (i.e. India, China and should ask ourselves “What these African
Brazil) Juma (2006) noted that at least governments are doing to stimulate the
three key factors contributed to the rapid technological innovations in their
economic transformation of emerging countries?”
economies:
• They invested heavily in basic The Tanzanian government has developed
infrastructure (roads, schools, water, a number of policies and measures that
irrigation, telecommunications and are aimed at improving the position of
energy); enterprises and eventually improving the
• They nurtured the development of technological innovations in the country.
Small and Medium Enterprises; and The notable policies and measure include:
• They supported, funded and nurtured The National Development Vision 2025;
higher education institutions and Small and Medium Enterprise
mostly in Science and Technology. Development Policy; Sustainable
Industries Development Policy (SIDP)
The lesson that can be learnt from the 1996-2020; National Employment Policy,
emerging economies is that the source of 1997; The National Strategy for Growth
their fast development is based on and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP);
improving the status of the Small and Property and Business Formalisation
Medium Enterprises and a lot of Program (MKURABITA); The SME
investments in engineering and Competitiveness Facility (SCF); as well
technological sciences in higher as Business Environment Strengthening
education. At this point we have to ask for Tanzania (BEST). The existence of all
ourselves, we in developing countries, these interventions has not changed the
especially the Tanzanian: What are we innovativeness and competitiveness of the
doing to improve the performance of the Tanzanian enterprises.
enterprises? What are we doing to nurture
the higher education, especially in One of the concerns raised about
Engineering and Technological Sciences? investing in technical training in African
Do we give any kind of incentives for our countries is the migration of skilled
young generation to study science and manpower to industrialised countries. The
technical subjects? World Bank has estimated that although
skilled workers account for just 4% of the
It is reported that African countries sub-Saharan labour force, they represent
recognize the importance of science, some 40% of its migrants (Özden and
technology and innovation in economic Schiff, 2005). Our concern should not be
and social change and sustainable to curb the migration of our learned
development and the first NEPAD people to developed countries, but how to
Ministerial Conference on Science and use those Tanzanian in Diasporas for the
Technology called on the NEPAD development of the country. The most
Secretariat to initiate activities that would notable case is the Taiwanese Diasporas,
generate an African Innovation Outlook which played a crucial role in developing
(AIO), that is, a comprehensive profile or the country’s electronics industry
survey of the innovation landscape (Saxenian, 2001).For example, India
(UNU-INTECH, 2004). However, produces about 600,000 engineers each
recognizing the importance of science, year. In that case, even if half of them
technology and innovation and putting migrate to developed countries for
2 Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13
Analysis of Factors Affecting Technological Innovativeness in Engineering Enterprises in
Tanzania
greener pastures, India will still have Various authors view the term innovation
enough engineers for the development of in different perspectives.Bjorn (2003)
its economy. defines innovation as a continuous
cumulative process involving not only
The term innovation is used to describe a radical and incremental innovation but
process in which knowledge is applied to also the diffusion, absorption and use of
develop new products and services or to innovation. Lundval (1992) defines
develop new ways of designing, innovation as an on-going process of
producing or marketing an existing learning, searching and exploring, which
product or service for public and private result in new products, new technique,
markets. At its simplest form of definition new form of organization and new
we can say that, innovation is embodied market.
by a product or service offering that
contains a significant element of newness. Maria (2000) defines innovation as the
Technological innovations are measured search, discovery, development,
not only by looking at the creation of new improvement and adoption of new
production processes but also by the products, processes and new
adoption and adaptation of existing organizational structure and procedures.
technologies to local conditions. This Innovation is the generation and
broad concept of innovation is implementation of new products and
particularly important for firms in processes, or market and business systems
developing countries (Almeida and configurations offering competitive
Fernandes, 2007). There is a difference advantage for those firms that
between innovation and invention: successfully develop them. The term
Invention is the embodiment of something innovation can be summarized from the
new. While both invention and innovation following types of innovations (OECD,
have “uniqueness” implications, 1997):
innovation also carries an undertone of • Incremental innovation: involves small
profitability and market performance changes in products/process or both. It
expectations. is usually achieved through learning by
doing and does not involve major
Innovation is the quality of being novel: it investment or risks;
refers to originality by virtue of • Radical innovation: This makes a
introducing new ideas or creative ideas. substantial change, but does not lead to
Innovativeness is a noun that is new industry; and
originating from the main word • Fundamental innovation: This results
innovative. Innovative is an adjective that from new scientific knowledge leading
refers to a situation characterized by or to new product and new process.
tending to innovation. Innovation
involves acting on the creative ideas to What we see in most of the innovations in
make some specific and tangible the developing countries are innovations
difference in the domain in which the of incremental in nature. The fundamental
innovation occurs. A true innovation can innovations in developing countries like
take the form of a new product, new Tanzania are really rare. Therefore, the
technology, new process, new content, or questions to be answered in this paper are:
even the new presentation (e.g. a) What are the main factors that
packaging) and marketing of an existing influence technological
product or service. innovativeness?; and
Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13 3
Emmanuel A. M. Mjema
4 Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13
Analysis of Factors Affecting Technological Innovativeness in Engineering Enterprises in
Tanzania
Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13 5
Emmanuel A. M. Mjema
6 Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13
Analysis of Factors Affecting Technological Innovativeness in Engineering Enterprises in
Tanzania
Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13 7
Emmanuel A. M. Mjema
Table 2: Age Profile of the enterprises enterprises than graduate from vocational
visited schools. It seems that graduates from
Universities and Technical Institutes are
S/No Year of Number (%) not entrepreneurs or they do not invest in
Start of of types of SMEs visited.
Business Enterprise
1 Before 4 6 Table 4: Qualification of the owner
1994
2 1994 - 8 12
1996
S/No Level of Number of (%)
3 1997 - 10 15 Education Enterprise
1999 1 Primary 12 18
4 2000 - 7 11 education
2002 2 O-level 8 12
5 2003 - 18 27 (Form IV)
2005 3 A-level 2 3
6 2006 - 17 26 (Form VI)
2008 4 Vocation 22 33
7 Not 2 3 Education
answered (TT I III)
Total 66 100 5 Full 5 8
Value Technician
Certificate
6 Diploma 6 9
Table 3: Ownership of the enterprises Holder
Engineers
S/No Year of Number of (%) 7 University 2 3
Start of Enterprise Degree
8 Not answered 9 14
Business
Total Value 66 100
1 Private 42 64
2 Partnership 15 23
3 Cooperative 2 3 It is known that the qualification of the
4 Group 3 4 owner plays a decisive role on the
5 Not answered 4 6 activities that are being done by the
Total Value 66 100 enterprises and from the literature review
conducted, it was shown that existence of
Qualifications of owner right knowledge is critical to
In most of the enterprises the owner is competitiveness of the private sector. It
managing the whole activities of the was also observed that the performance of
enterprises. Even most of the ideas for the these engineering enterprises is mostly a
products are coming from the owner. one-man show. Therefore, if the
Knowing this kind of situation, the qualification of the owner is low, we do
researcher was interested to know the not expect radical innovation, we will
qualifications of the owner of these expect mostly modifications of the
enterprises. Table 4 summarises the existing technologies. Therefore there is a
profile of the qualifications of the owner. need for more entrepreneurship education
From the data shown on Table 4 only for University Engineering students in
12% of the engineering enterprises are order to ensure that the entrepreneurs in
owned and de facto lead by graduate engineering enterprises have the right
engineers (both diploma and degree knowledge.
holders). One would have expected that
more graduate engineers from At the University of Dar es Salaam all the
Universities and Technical Institutes engineering students are studying
would own most of the engineering entrepreneurship courses. Also the
8 Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13
Analysis of Factors Affecting Technological Innovativeness in Engineering Enterprises in
Tanzania
government is paying full loans for carrying out innovative researches. Even
students taking engineering subjects as a the existing “SME Competitiveness
kind of incentives for our young Facility (SCF)” is not geared towards
generation to study science and technical supporting the innovativeness in the
subjects. SMEs. We suggest that the government
should create competition in innovation,
Qualifications of the employees of the which are financially supported in order
enterprises to unearth the innovativeness in SMEs.
The enterprises were required to show the
qualification profile of their workforce. A Table 5: Qualification of the employees
table was prepared where the engineering of the enterprises
qualifications depicted on Table 5 were
listed. The enterprises were required to S/No Qualification Number of (%)
put the quantity of employees in each Enterprise
category. The data depicted in Table 5 1 B.Sc (Eng.) or 2 1.0
above
show the number of enterprises, which
2 Advanced 1 0.5
showed that they have people having the Diploma in
qualifications. Out of the 66 enterprises Engineering
visited only 2 had graduate engineers of 3 Ordinary 5 2.5
the level of B.Sc (Eng.) and only 6 Diploma
enterprises had Diploma holder graduate Engineering
4 FTC 8 4.0
engineers. The rest of the enterprises were 5 Trade Test I 14 7.0
run mostly by VETA graduates with TT (TT I)
as their highest qualifications, and the 6 Trade Test II 38 19.1
STD VII leavers as the main workforce. (TT II)
7 Trade Test III 42 21.1
With this kind of qualifications in the (TT III)
8 Form VI 3 1.5
enterprises it is hardly possible to get true 9 Form IV 12 6.0
innovation of products or process. From 10 STD VIII 8 4.0
the literature review it was shown that the 11 STD VII 60 30.2
existence of high quality innovation 12 Others 6 3.0
depends on the level of knowledge of the Total Value 199 100
human resource. We don’t expect to get
state of the art innovations from these Source of funding
enterprises unless something is done to Responding to the question regarding the
nurture the enterprises, or to transfer the source of funding, the data shows that
knowledge from R&D institutions to 75% of the businesses were started using
these enterprises. own funds, 9% got loan from friends and
family members, 6% got the donor
Source of funding financing group works, and 10% did not
Responding to the question regarding the mention the source of their financing. In
source of funding, the data shows that Tanzania there is no financial institution
75% of the businesses were started using that is supporting the small enterprises in
own funds, 9% got loan from friends and carrying out innovative researches. Even
family members, 6% got the donor the existing “SME Competitiveness
financing group works, and 10% did not Facility (SCF)” is not geared towards
mention the source of their financing. In supporting the innovativeness in the
Tanzania there is no financial institution SMEs. We suggest that the government
that is supporting the small enterprises in should create competition in innovation,
Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13 9
Emmanuel A. M. Mjema
10 Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13
Analysis of Factors Affecting Technological Innovativeness in Engineering Enterprises in
Tanzania
Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13 11
Emmanuel A. M. Mjema
12 Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13
Analysis of Factors Affecting Technological Innovativeness in Engineering Enterprises in
Tanzania
Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13 13
Emmanuel A. M. Mjema
14 Ta n z a n ia Jo u r n a l o f En g in e e r in g a n d Te ch n o lo g y , ( TJ ET) Vo l. 34 ( N o . 1) , Ju n e , 2 0 13