POLITICAL
ANALYSIS
Series Bator: B. Guy Pots, Jon Piee and Gent Stoker
Colin ay
Pott Analyte
‘avi are aay Sika (ce)
‘Theory and Mode In Pole! Selene (nd etn)
Jon Pa and 8. Guy Petes
‘Governance, Pottioe andthe State
Fontoomng
bras Karn an, yn Gl ar aay
‘Tho Plcsophy and Methods of Pole Scance
‘nator Matar
ava Mars
omar Police andthe State
Theory and Methods
in Political Science
Second Edition
Edited by
David Marsh
and
Gerry Stoker
palgraveREVIZE 2008
3
‘Terral notin amet wih Core
Saige mene ne
ES.
Sor
ee
(iar itt Page srs eset nD Eon
Tha nn pes eae
‘ony mye oe eae en
essing ec to for Be ey
Aca rrr ik atte Be Ube oes.
Seated atc
‘SSN tye
‘rae Pe bbe fen ake
missions nein
Contents
List of Fgures, Tables and Boxes
Preface tothe Second Eton
[Notes on Contributors
Introduction
Gary Stoker and David Mar
The dscitine of political since: celebration of dverty
‘What is police? What ft that poical seis?
What ic cienifc approach to plies?
CConneting tothe world of pies
Is there a sandard method for undertaking poll since?
Concision
1A Skin nt a Swester: Ontology and Epistemology in
Politeal Science
Dad Marah and Pant Furlong
Ontology and epistemology
Diferen approaches o ontology and epistemology
COnilogy amd epistemology in plial cence: to ses
Concho
Frher reading
PARTI APPROACHES
2 Rehavournin
Devs Sanders
The rie ofthe behvioual movement ands one
sharctersics’
Ctcime ofthe behavioral approch
The strengths ofthe behavioural approach a example
Conclusion: the behavioural legac inthe went-istcemtary
Porter reading
SeRke
a4 Bebaviowalion
(On poses and “cnc? approaches to socal explanation more
fevealy see Kuo (1970), Hempel 0965, 1960, Hanson (0958),
Halfpenny (182) and Chalmers (1990),
On the pilosophial ongine of bekavouralsm, see Carnap (1936
1950), Schlck (1978) and Aver (970:
For uufal explanation of some of he terms sed in these sts, See
Laces (1976
For tstfiaton of quantitative approaches to the analy of empiri
‘idence nthe soil sence, ce Blalock (196, 1969, 1970, 1972) and
King (1989)
Fora recent summary of che ways in which qualitative data can be
ployed within she bekavioura-enie approach, ee King
(i589
Chapter 3
Rational Choice
HUGH WaRO
The essence of rational ehoie theory is that “when faced with several
courses faction, people sally do what they belive ely to have he
Ist overall outcome’ Elter 196 2) | will aru that etna choice
sm indispensable part ofthe rool ofthe polite sccm, becsbe there
Ste important poltial phenomena which ie can parilly explain
NNeverteles do not claim that rational choice theoty i eeestanding
(el Almond 199). It needs other perspectives to help explain. why
indiidcals have she ieests they do, how they persvethowe incest
nd the dracon of rules, powers and seal roles that determines the
onstrains on thee actions Fee | brfly sketch how atonal choke
Imathods have developed over the lst 40 years. Then explain, what
‘onal choice modeling involves and examine the epistemological
Sderpnnings of the method, I saborte my argument that ral
howe best regarded as 3 tolkt rather than ax an approach by
Eensideving the aray of ecm that have boon made of i ily
onside some scent development in rational shoe, pry show ow
‘ational choice theory have responds! tothe ein
‘The development of rational choice theory
Rational choice arose as par of dhe Bchavioual revolution in American
polital since ofthe T9805 and 196s hat sou actly to examine
how individual behaved using empiri methods ce Chaps 2) Ie has
arguably become she daminant =spproach to polite cence ee in he
Unted Suite However, tinal choice draws on the methadolgy of
conomicr in contrat t0 hehaiouralite who sew on sociology or
‘eychology (Brey 1970), Anthony Downs (1357s. Downs 191) wat he
reer nthe appliction of anal choc theory to ecorl Behaviour
tnd party competion and his work revoluionaed electoral seus
{reviewed ia Hnich and Munger 1997). The nda vote forthe party
which fi got imo oie, i expecta 0 yield them the higher wey.
Panes ae sssmed to be motivated slay by the dete for office
alate tata deena inne dee66 Rational Choice
From Down's pioneering work rations choi has ower in 4 vatety
‘of drections, Mancur Olson (195) showed tha self imereed india
sould not alway ake paren cole action to further shared goa
For example, why do so many of us consinge ro st in ways which harm
"he cnvtonment eventhough we know what we ae doing ants A
Pausible explanation that we fel charging our own ways wil hee
‘no impact onthe overall prblem anthers are major Financ ahd
other cous asocated with bing. ifereny. The result collene
ton flr in which tana enters lads to everyone bing wore
‘off Hardin 1969). His work constitutes a fandamenal ctgee of
Pluralism and orthodox Marxism, which both asume that shared
ners ssn for poital mobilisation to overt has generated
‘empirical workin areas as diverse as the study of soil revolons
{Gor example, Popkin 1873) and cooperation berncen states one nich
problems as the deterioration of the plbal envionment for example
Sandler 199,
Game theory dels with seustions where othe’ choice of satoey
alfets your best choce and vce vers, I has led to important dere
‘ments in colleive ation theory, enabling ro explain why collec
‘scion failures can sometimes be sro ifthe member of indie