&® OHLRM isicntanacenenr ONE HEALTH & RISK MANAGEMENT Reviewer’s Name / Numele recenzentului: ‘Aysen Gargili Keles Reviewer's Academic Title /Titlul |{ProfDr. stiintifie al recenzentului: Affiliation / Afiliere ‘Marmara University Health Sciences Faculty Biosafety and Biosecurity Dept. e-mai ‘agargili@yahoo.com Manuscript Number /Numarul _|[02_4G)_23 manuscrisului. Title of article / Titlul articolului: A SWIFT RISK ANALYSIS FOR COVID-19 ‘TESTING FACILITIES USING RAPID TESTS 1. Please give ranked values by marking the relevant box (kindly mark with an X)/ Va rugdm sé evaluati manuscrisul dupa urmatoarele criterii (marcafi cu semnul X): Criteria / Criterii Excellent 1 Excelent Good Bun Fair / Mediu Poor/ Slab In which measure the manuscript corres- ponds with the subject of the magazine / In ce miisurd manuscrisul corespunde cu domeniile tematice ale revistei x The title reflects the purpose and the content of the paper / Formularea adecvatd a titului manuscrisului (concizie, concordarea cu conginutul) ‘The abstract is relevant and highlights the content of the paper / Relevanfa rezuma- tului (informativ, consistent, pune in evi- deni continutul integral al manuserisului) L_L_i__| Formation of the research hypothesis and level of achievement / Formarea ipotezei de cercetare si gradul de realizare ‘Methodology of the issue approach / Metodologia de abordare a problemei Expression style (clearness, accessibility, compliance with grammar rules) / Stilul de exprimare (claritate, accesibilitate, respectarea regulilor gramaticale)& OH.RM nisicanacenenr The graphical presentation, the rationa- lity of the included figures and the tables, their correspondence to the subject / Prezentarea graficé, rafionalitatea include- rii figurilor si tabelelor, corespunderea acestora temei abordate ‘Scientific base and relevance of the highlighted in the article data / Fundamen- tarea stiintificd si relevanta informatiei comunicate prin intermediul manuscrisului The level of corresponding between conclusions established purpose / Gradul de corelare a cocnluziilor cu scopul stabilit 10. Originality of the data presentation / Originalitatea prezentdirii materialului i. recente la subiectul studiat) recent data) / Referinjele (surse relevante si Literature review (relevant sources and 12. Technical quality of the paper / Calitatea redactétrii tehnice 13. Language / Calitatea redactiiriistilistice de limba 2. Please mention (kindly mark with an X) / Va rugdm sci mengionagi (marcai cu semnul X): Yes, it requires / No, it doesn't require / Nu, nu necesita ‘The need and importance of the positive opinion of the Ethics Commit presented in the manuscript / Necesitatea si importanga avizului \pozitiv al Comitetului de Eticit [pentru cercetare prezentata in manuscris. for the research x& OHLRM aisi'nanacener 3. Recommendation for publication (kindly mark with an X) / Recomandare pentru publicare (marcati cu semnul X): ‘Accept as submitted / Acceprat in |[X varianta inifialés: Requires minor corrections / | Necesitét corectii minore: Requires moderate revision / Necesitd revizuire moderata: Requires major revision / Necesitai revizuire majoré Rejection (with arguments) / Respingere (cu argumentare): 4. Additional recommendations (optional) / Recomandari aditionale (optional): The manuscript is evaluating an important issue and results&conclutions are extremely important and beneficial for diagnostic laboratories. 5. Detailed comments for the Author(s) / Comentarii detaliate pentru autor(i): The manuscript is evaluating an important issue and results&conclutions are extremely important and beneficial for diagnostic laboratories. Date of review / Data: Reviewer’s signature / Semndtura: 0b /ep./ 1012. .