You are on page 1of 53

Advanced MR Imaging (2)

Advanced MR Imaging
g g

● Perfusion MRI

● Functional MRI

©louwutao@gmail.com
Advanced MR Imaging
g g

Perfusion MRI

©louwutao@gmail.com
Perfusion MRI

● Perfusion
¾ The delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the cells via
capillaries
ill i
¾ Identified with blood flow which is measured in milliliters
per minute per 100g of tissue

©louwutao@gmail.com
Perfusion MRI

● Perfusion MRI
¾ Methods
‹Exogenous tracers
● Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC
DSC-MRI)
● Dynamic
D i CContrast
t tE Enhanced
h d (DCE
DCE MRI)
DCE-MRI)
‹Endogenous tracers
● Arterial spin labeling (ASL
ASL MRI)
ASL-MRI)

¾ Applications
‹Stroke
‹Tumors

©louwutao@gmail.com
Perfusion MRI

● Brain Perfusion Techniques

©louwutao@gmail.com
Dynamic
y Susceptibility
p y Contrast ((DSC
DSC))

● Measurable Parameters
¾ Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) – The amount of blood moving
through a given amount of tissue per unit time
¾ Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) – The amount of blood in a given
amount of tissue at any time
¾ Mean Transit Time (MTT) – The average time it takes for the
blood to flow through a unit brain volume

©louwutao@gmail.com
Dynamic
y Susceptibility
p y Contrast ((DSC
DSC))

● Non
Non-deconvolution
deconvolution Approach
¾ Directly employ fitted curves of the concentration of contrast in
volume of interest
Time-to-peak (TTP)
Mean transit time (MTT)
Cerebral blood volume (CBV)
( )

©louwutao@gmail.com
Time-concentration curve

In normal brain tissue, vessel


autoregulation maintains CBF
at 50-60 mL/100g/min.

In irreversible cell
death, CBF<20% of
normal CBF

(Peter Adamczyk, and David S Liebeskind)


©louwutao@gmail.com
Dynamic
y Contrast Enhanced MRI ((DCE))

¾ Widely applied in clinical oncology


¾ Contrast agents
‹Commonly used gadolinium-based e.g. Gd
Gd--DTPA

Baseline ‹ Acquisition
Injection - T1 Map
- 3 Baseline images
- Imaging for ~ 5-10 min including
baseline
Redistri
bution

©louwutao@gmail.com
Dynamic
y Contrast Enhanced MRI ((DCE))

¾ Tofts Model

Bolus injection
j of contrast
agent (Gd-DTPA)

Plasma Ktrans Extravascular Extracellular


Space (EES)
Cp(t)
Ce(t)

⎧C e (t ) → contrast concentrat ion in EES


Kidneys C(t ) = ⎨
⎩C p (t ) → contrast concentrat ion in blood plasma
K trans ⋅( t −τ )

C(t ) = K ∫ C (τ )e
t
trans
p
ve

0

©louwutao@gmail.com
Dynamic
y Contrast Enhanced MRI ((DCE))

¾ ROI-based experiment of Tofts model

Normal Lesion
permeability-surface area Product: Ktrans 0.014 0.029
extra-cellular extra-vascular space volume fraction: Ve 0.2 0.5

©louwutao@gmail.com
Arterial Spin
p Labeling
g ((ASL))

● Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL)


¾ Using magnetically labeled arterial blood water protons as
endogenous tracer particles.
particles
¾ Noninvasive, quantitative measurements of cerebral blood
fl
flow (CBF) with
ith relative
l ti insensitivity
i iti it tto permeability
bilit
¾ Don’t require contrast agents
¾ Allowing repeated measurements that may be used to
evaluate multiple interventions

©louwutao@gmail.com
Arterial Spin
p Labeling
g ((ASL))

¾ 1. Tag inflowing arterial blood by


magnetic inversion
¾ 2.
2 Acquire the Tag Image
¾ 3. Repeat experiment without tag
¾ 4. Acquire the Control Image
¾ 5. Subtract: Control Image - Tag Image

©louwutao@gmail.com
Arterial Spin
p Labeling
g ((ASL))

Representative clinical applications of ASL showing hypoperfusion in an acute stroke (A)


and hyperperfusion in a glioblastoma (B).

©louwutao@gmail.com
Arterial Spin
p Labeling
g ((ASL))

A B

Normal ASL CBF maps in a pediatric patient (A) and an adult patient (B).

©louwutao@gmail.com
Diffusion-perfusion
p mismatch

● The combined use of diffusion and perfusion MRI for acute stroke is
based on the concept of the “ischemic penumbra”
● The “ischemic penumbra” is believed to be what can be saved with
prompt treatment
● The combination of diffusion and perfusion MRI offers a means of
visualizing the size off the ischemic penumbra
● Perfusion MRI shows the entire affected territory
● Diffusion MRI shows the already damaged and unrepairable territory
● The penumbra is the difference (the mismatch)

©louwutao@gmail.com
Diffusion-perfusion
p mismatch

©louwutao@gmail.com
Diffusion-perfusion
p mismatch

©louwutao@gmail.com
Diffusion-perfusion
p mismatch

©louwutao@gmail.com
Advanced MR Imaging
g g

Functional MRI

©louwutao@gmail.com
Principle
p of BOLD

● The physiology
- Neuronal activity causes an increase in regional Cerebral Blood
Flow (rCBF).
- There
Th is
i an excess off oxyhemoglobin
h l bi in
i active
ti bbrain
i ti
tissue
● The physics
- Deoxyhemoglobin is paramagnetic Æ T2 decrease
- Oxyhemoglobin is diamagnetic Æ T2 increase
- Paramagnetic objects become magnetized in the presence of a
magnetic field.
- Inhomogeneities in the magnetic field and signal dephasing
● Ph
Physics
i meets t Physiology
Ph i l
- More oxygenated blood when the activation started
- A net decrease in pparamagnetic
g material
- A net increase in signal in activated areas due to less dephasing of
the signal
(Institute of Statistics, National Chiao Tong University, Taiwan)
©louwutao@gmail.com
Principle
p of BOLD

↑neural activity Î ↑ blood oxygen consumption Î ↑ O/D increase Î


↑ T2 signal

©louwutao@gmail.com
fMRI resolution

● Relatively high spatial resolution


● Low temporal resolution
¾ Neural activity within tens to hundreds of ms
¾ Temporal resolution of fMRI = sec

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● The rise of fMRI

©louwutao@gmail.com
(Smith, Nature, 2012.)
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Applications
¾ Clinical diagnosis
‹Presurgical mapping
‹Risk assessment of invasive brain surgery
‹Assessment of brain injury
‹Assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness
¾ Research applications
‹Mapping brain functions
‹Detect abnormal neural activity for patients with brain
disease, e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Applications
‹ FMRI language mapping in children

©louwutao@gmail.com
(Guibert et al. NeuroImage, 2010)
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Applications
‹Resting Functional MRI in Traumatic Brain Injury

(Palacios et al. JAMA Neurol. 2013)


©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Applications
‹Adolescents with Online Gaming Addiction

©louwutao@gmail.com (Yuan et al. PLOS One, 2013)


Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● fMRI Setup

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Different mode of fMRI


¾ Resting-state fMRI
‹Mapping of functional networks during rest

¾ Task-based fMRI
‹Identify subdivisional functions of human brain
‹Activate neuron by performing different tasks

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Resting-state fMRI
¾ A scan in which the subject relaxes without falling asleep
and is told not to think about anything in particular while
activation is measured throughout the brain.

I don’t feel
good

The only true resting state?


©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Task-based fMRI

objects

faces

places

● Lateral Occipital (LO) • Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA)


– place-selective
¾ object-selective
• Fusiform Face Area (FFA) or pFs
– face-selective
– ~ posterior fusiform sulcus (pFs)
(Malach, 2002, TICS)
©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Data Analysis
¾ Hypothesis-driven
‹e.g. general linear model (GLM), dynamic causal model
(DCM)
‹ priori
‹a i i model
d l off activation
ti ti iis suggested
t d
‹data is checked to see how closely it matches components of
the model
‹most commonly used approach

©louwutao@gmail.com
SPM

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Data Analysis
¾ Data-driven
‹e.g. Independent Component Analysis (ICA)
‹no prior hypotheses are necessary
‹multivariate techniques determine the patterns in the data
that account for the most variance across all voxels
‹can be
‹ b iinspected
t d tto see if th
there are thi
things h
happening
i iin your
data that you didn’t predict
‹can be used to identify confounds (e
(e.g.,
g head motion)
‹need a way to organize the many possible components

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Functional Connectivity
¾ Areas show correlations in activation
¾ Those areas may or may not be directly interconnected
¾ Why connectivity?
‹Understanding communications in brain networks
● More interesting than regional activations
● May
M indicate
i di t some abnormal
b l situations
it ti (ASD,
(ASD schizophrenia)
hi h i )
● Connectome!!!

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Default mode network (DMN)

(Fox & Raichle,


Raichle Nat Rev Neurosci,
Neurosci 2007)

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● ICA in detection of resting-state network

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Functional Connectivity Reflects Structural Connectivity

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Altered DMN in AD

ICA-based detection of default-mode network in healthy aging (A) and AD (B).

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Altered DMN in AD

©louwutao@gmail.com
(Greicius et al., PNAS, 2004)
Functional MR Imaging
g g ((fMRI))

● Aberrant DMN in Early Onset Schizophrenia

(Tang et al., PLOS One, 2013)


©louwutao@gmail.com
Studyy Brain as a Network

Graph based network analysis offers new


fundamental insights into global and new integrative
aspects of brain function.

Networks are sets of nodes linked by connections,


connections
mathematically described as GRAPHS. Its structure
can be convenientlyy organized
g as adjacency
j y matrix.

©louwutao@gmail.com
Graph Theory in Brain Network Studies

● What makes such networks complex is not only their


size
i but
b t also
l the
th network’s
t k’ connection
ti t
topology
l and
d
the behavior of the individual network nodes.

● Brain graphs provide a relatively simple and


increasingly popular way of modeling the human
brain connectome, using graph theory to abstractly
define a nervous system as a set of nodes (denoting
anatomical or functional regions) and interconnecting
edges
d (d
(denoting
ti structural
t t l or functional
f ti l connections).
ti )

©louwutao@gmail.com
Brain as a Complex System

● A large number and a great variety of components


¾ Ca
Can be deco
decomposed
posed into
to co
components
po e ts a and
d
interactions, probably on several hierarchical levels
¾ A mixture of order and disorder,
disorder or regularity and
randomness (complex structure and diverse
dynamics)

Brain is a good example of a system that consists of components nested


across multiple hierarchical levels: brain networks
networks, anatomical brain regions
regions,
specialized neural populations, and single neurons

©louwutao@gmail.com
Brain Network Analysis
y

Network
N t k topology
t l analysis
l i
Edge density, Global efficiency, Small-world properties analysis
Cycle probability, Average Global clustering coefficient,
nodal degree characteristic path length,
Small-worldness
Nodal-based analysis S=(C/Crand)/(L/Lrand)
Nodal degree,
Betweenness centrality,
Nodal efficiency, Subgraph-based analysis
Hub identification Local efficiency
Participation coefficients
Network robustness analysis Subgraph centrality

©louwutao@gmail.com
Metrics of Brain Network

Scale Metric Definition

Local Nodal degree The sum of no. of connections

Local clustering coefficient Ratio of no. of existing edges between neighbors and no. of
potential
t ti l connections
ti b
between
t neighbors
i hb
Betweenness centrality Fraction of the number of all shortest paths that pass through a
given node.
Nodal efficiency mean, median,
mean median or harmonic mean of inverse shortest path length
between given node and all other nodes
Complex network analysis aims to characterize brain networks with a small
Global Edge density Proportion of connections relative to no. of potential connections of
number of neurobiologically meaningful
a network and easily computable measures.
Global efficiency Global mean, median of finite entries of the distance matrix (or
inverse distance)
Global clustering coefficient The average of the local clustering coefficient of all nodes.

Regional Subgraph subgraph detected in the correlation matrix at a given threshold

Local efficiency The mean of the finite entries of the inverse distance matrix in
subgraph
Participation coefficients Measure of diversity of inter-subgraphs connections of individual
nodes
(Fortunato, 2010, Latora and Marchiori, 2001, Guimera` et al., 2005).
©louwutao@gmail.com
Structural Brain Networks

White Matter Connectivity


Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
Diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI)
Cortical Connectivity – morphological correlation
T1W MRI

©louwutao@gmail.com
Functional Brain Networks

● The human brain can be conceptualized as a complex,


hierarchical network, in which billions of neurons are
precisely organized into circuits, columns, and
f
functional
ti l areas.
● Recent advances in MRI technology have enabled
precise measurements of correlated activity
throughout the brain, leading to the comprehensive
descriptions
p of functional brain networks in humans.
● Examination of functional connectivity become an
important tool to investigate functional changes in
patient populations, healthy aging, and recently also
child development.

©louwutao@gmail.com
Construction of Functional Brain
N t
Network
k

©louwutao@gmail.com
Brain Network Analysis
y in Alzheimer’s Disease

● Structural WM Network (DTI) (Lo et al., 2010)


¾ AD p
patients and controls all have a small-world topology
p gy
¾ AD:
‹Increase in shortest p
path length
g
‹Decrease in global efficiency compared with controls
● Functional network ((fMRI)) (Zhao et al., 2012, Sanz-Arigitaetal et
al., 2010)
¾ topological properties were disrupted in AD patients
‹increased local efficiency
‹decreased global efficiency
‹no significant differences were found in cluster coefficient
‹significant synchronization differences was found in AD
©louwutao@gmail.com
©louwutao@gmail.com

You might also like