1a Sndeere Enoiei3* Feo i = rar =5 ed to Meet! specific requirements organisa tion or fndividual, Aeevibutes} characteristics of Prefect t- = Unique Activie?es aa = __Retainment of specific goals. Peeesetiience of “Pctivities. EE Specitted| Tim = _Interrelated Activities. Transeience Creates Urgency, J Préfect Management “process t+ D | } TrOcess tag a Planning | process pice epee 0) === = | Tmplementation Cassis te Process —_— Importance oe SE Paget aoagemen ee Compressi ae eRe ea Global ace = - Knowledge Ton, | 2 Corporat te Do! Ee InereasedWere adie BED © e555) a Videth 1 aes 7 “Tmplementatton phase POSS project clean up phase. — 1. Conception “phase oo Nisusirsalten de Tdea o 2. Definition phase > i. Ravs materials — pee aioe" * die Plant eo Capacity . Location and site — secre am selection . as cy project layouts i Engineeving hoovk 2 electrical, civil Mii,__Ubilibiess + 1) U—=——— viii. Manpower, In. Pinaneial Analy a ea reo Schedule. _ Wem Planning. and Ouganising phase: Budgets and all. 4. Snleneoration phase to Implementing all phases. S._Clean up phase v7 -Conelusion of prefect. 1 ae “Stakeholders t fin Individual ov a group or & fsabion can be a stakeholder, They, divect' ‘ndtvectly fofluence the decision, oy activitfes of project Types of stakeholders +- 1. Sponsor _ 2. Customer oy user.Choosing Dyemopat Profeet Manag evel of + eaniey and enable Profect managety _ke successfull: a prefect. de Osenantzt nel Considevations !-__ _+_ objectives _ of orga = Matrix arrangement Standard oducts and - distribution of project. 2. Prefect Considerations :~ - based on length of project tea beg i Te. Importance . an = Uniqueness and sequirement of fonova ne of dlepavtments Involved jn prcjedt eee of external’ jnterfaces oy orb zooms ba rf Preulere Restxictions » because of Lime: and. dhe FImplications of Ove oe bona] ae Management Ss = 2.. Reachr Com Sita = Capacity 33. Planning and — Design, 4. Time: Managernent Main Cause of prove. ob Failure = 7” Inadequate Prefect _| pee 2 2. Scope Creep 2 ES Use +f_unpracluh wale t te be. i bg jah mw WG ject. Seope Management *- Page Ne: 44. loork dene fox producing the delivera moveck in the form z a product se outcome With particular features and: & Establishing prefect prlorittes t- Page No. 6a, Urgent joovk te _perfivm and complete Piast and othey kept. for last. _ i : a Priovities befor effective pysjec t Man. ’ Diese f. Paioritising the _ prefect. $< ee [2. Stove Jasks on Master a 3. Fragment Large Jask on Smaller Ones. © 4 Estimate Time and Manpower. __— Is. Priovitise Change Requests» — aunt 6. Manage Deadiises. iii ~ ’ € Oork Breakdown Structure (108s) t- | Deliverqhle - oriented combina Lion oF acti Lorelated to the projec t he Ips jo gal defining the scope oF project. aa F yoken down the prefect on eo ~_ Ps phe de 4 9 + So ds ings & tly nivel 1@4» $2 2defines WBS: comprised of. - Method of spoork perrmed : = Method of determin’ prefect cost. ~=—Method of Sumering Information and Steps. Favdived =. 3. Inclusion of Ppreduct and Process welated Task 4. Revisi of W8s. ae : Crea ting/ process of aoe 02S ———_——_— mE cu ~ Feels and Techniques oF =XBs a ——_4, Cope, Manag, Plow - Decomposition Profeet -seepe plan Expert Requirements Decumenbatdy Judgement: Implementation of Lops 4. “Respensioility 2.) Authority, 3. Pecountabifiny, Leith organization t Coding kes Page No, $3 , 60, eae Pase No, 62. Telated to g7p_ _highes__Jevel_ of sun. bob. Pa eee eee U2, : Behan pu spilt oy a i Design phase Programe phase a aah acu 5,500) te en Cae te sre Bee. PLS 2 Prreqrrame bask 4 ‘ a = 1 a ole &3,000 of ” TN 3 Pesign Task 2 Programe task 2 ____ ‘Testing (H.2000 FHANSOO nh) aye = 1,500 - ¥ Project Breakdown structure a Page. 63, 48.64 Hl Responsietite, Matix - Page Ne~ 64, 6S Unit 2. oo) a skimMating project Times. . and Good. oss i Process oF forecasting vavious variables sueh and cost yelated: to project. las kime #|| Pactors~ Influencing Quality of. -estimates aaa 4. Past experience 2. Project. Unigueness. |3. People. 4. Planning Range. ae Ss. organizational Structure. Pie atcaitong! 2 CulENTe: seins lon- project Factors. _4. Responsibility 2. Use ad |3. Normal Je" te participate + Conditions: Regulay cenditions units; Hours, — weeks , ete. racers /_ Micro __Estimating op Devon | Bottom - up Bpproach Nersus Micro Estimating fer Estima Eing project = im Mievo approach Page No- 34 ic Page -Ne- a4 Budget fe prepared on based Ben cost baseline, Cost 1b i pees: is__bime phased budget , Helps s ng eS Oe Cas Eb clite Spent. Fiajews Land mont Invol ae Baseline nted =fe Direct: |gbouy Direct Non- bour Expenses Overhead , cena ts * : P Ddroinistrative: Expenses. A. Divect cost :- f Directly | [in ed bith - Tnelude labour , materfals ,: equi ment services Bereeses ran = These ave basic necessity for the objective Direct Labour = - Labour. thieh produces goods. 3. Divect Non-'labour Expenses i= | Expenses like sub-contractey, consultants telephone , Computer time , meterial costs (ay | the part oF non- Jabouy expenses. 4. Overhead geet and fdmintstrative: | Refinin Estimates + Page No- 84. Needs identified at fnitial stage fs diferent Jthe need at further stages. clearer picbuve Qs = Project manager gets propect pragresses: oat -Navigtion 19 cost and ma> Over estimation can vary bhis cost extent. ~i Tou. ovey this the Money “Must be a ropey 19a > Previded that predictable. the event should be ase |= TP estimation af contingency Fund js to meet the need than the do not vary the actual Cost. estimated — [Page No % 86 , 87, 38, 99,94, 95, 403. UNET: 3 » 2 HY Project. «Scheduling s- Technical adopted for the Management: activities _jpishich ave required te be ' project life ancle. 9spectS 0f various method Scheduling Process pr P_ project plan can be sehedule 101th Scheduling. ISplitting {Multitasking = Page No- dts.)Has Technical ov Logie « Constraints * - Normally associated With _ the pohieh aye project activities are sehe Such constraints can be represented ae = ||= Prefect Network Poy a Structure Prefect __pekyoor ke tener ©) foundation Physica) Constraints %> a _ of environmental Conditions. 7 ||. Resouvee Constraints %- . Materials. __ ae # | Benefits oF Scheduling Build Prame ._ Cover Took. in fei Constyaints velated to __contyact _o¥ becaus People 4 — Equipments. j Working Capital. : Resources %-adn, d and Public. Good vil] “bo Move Resourcespe of project Sceedetmy - Constraints Logic consreaints Technica) ) Physical cons tyair' Resource constraints | xe Jassificatfon of Scheduling Problem . Ske Scheduling - TA is the Process ot Ipork into daily routine Work, 60 {hot iin tess time ond With higher etficiency . The peoblern _avisi m this process ave Known as scheduling _peoblem. into Thee: {pe . 7 > mminnize Phe He duvny Preble Bei Sequencing Problem & \db~ Shop “Seheda! \ Project scheduling Problem? 7s ela elapse Assembly - ine _bavanding _ Pollen. fs bl ST is _classiticdManaging Risk Of Project = : a Risk moanayememnt invoiveds ai activities Pertaining to_iden¥iffeation, analyzing and maki provision Jor predictable cmd non-predtctable’ in tne Profect. Re a Risk may include the following Experienced staff Teaving ord new Stare Comming 7 chimge in oxganiration monayemant Requvvemnen\ Change . Technological _chonye , environmen chan compiti S "ge. a > Risx Shemogement _Proceds TLdenigication V Coveqerine \__ Mamaye WV Monitor Tdentitication ~ mare nore iB Ac_oF ON _ Pos \_Ane project Caresorize - Conenorsi ve Hmow visk into high medi “SK imtensily gs per " Yrojecr . Manaxe ~ Anawee Poses. moke winimize Ane}C\dse\ i \) __ $ym\oms \50_moniyor | miyigare or _avatd themS| Show) dered | | roject_ monagqer ~ | pronounce their fesue monayement pion at the onset + = JO the pwject. bane a A project _manayey is 4 professional eho Plans, ond executes profeds While working A__prajcct manayer should actively organises aeswainys Me budye's Ond Schedules | | f | HF Pore oF ‘he Project manager is Enterprencur a % Key Secision-manoy I 12) Good _tomnmaniccdor Ee i ___—a I Good roorsvartos hs — = i= | $)_Afoy Fighter | i 2H orsanisiny 3) —Conivattinis SiNs of Pro jock umate 1) Leadevenip Abilities } Communicoiicrn xii > Cocichiny BY menrorin D Woiities 10 Hondie stres I Problem. solving SKS“giuation: persond| Factors Brecon the Tear Suctove Relationship lecation - Teom fF ffectiveness> Sources _o1 conflict Conflict over project priorities Conpick over Technical opinions . > Gnplict related to staffing . Gonpict over cast and Budget . 4) Wandiing Cconfrict. [yy Preparing ick _> * Expecting conflich + planning ahead to handle conflict 12> Facing ‘ne contnct 3) Resolving the contiict + Nook Tor win-win Solution — | + Reduce the losses chem needed * Toumutated _congiict encnaye remy Managing Vivlugl Proje ees, ) Deke work System WSN “Tools % Establish muipie communica >_Sanedaie _Requioy meetings , Hy Find the Right People to work niin 5) VEE broiey monay eme,emen\ information system € project data tough One Os mort fh PMS 15 G Sorc ram and controls the Flow contso| __P¥occSS__— Q BaseNine San _—_— amd pesfor _acraal __— eq suring progress — n OO2 Need For On Integvated informotion i) Real _time dota. 2) Better communication, 3) Reduced vis of exvoss , 4) Greater productinity , S) safe locaton frofect nude a The process of inspection oF the management , metho hechnique , procedures, clocuments , propesties _ budgets expenses and level of Completion 6t project fs _bnown | project Rudth. | > beser Project puait process 11) Setesminokion of success cvfieria and questionnaive development, be vc |2) Data \lection and analysis 2) Rept development , Team member ond Project 1 mm Te6m_Evaiuation ~ Fin_efficient team is needed She rea uirements OF 4 project or Proyramn z Ynot_it is _q 4roup!_ot pexsons annum wnowredye _omd ove ShapeeC —| Mme wond projet Fecjet Moragement- e Project t - gp deroks a planned twos sKme acpihes. which ~ [| [ener entails evel 08 Ser is Ss. A project ts ia nature : Jessenti Hated otth a e040 mnt || Spee pequlrements of BwMes oMPanlsah'o, on Indindualy , eid May be (reahion of 0 Ore +m, New product | Sewice. 08 banging about pu) proces . Tenanges in Greens busi_precens-—___ | cer is a Soneduled Sth oP achihy ~ | eee jamie 4 soward: te Ortarion of parbauay Sar w pes panned SpeciArcanion . jet ts one Hme ach) Project is atemporary task wndertaicen to Creat aunigue product, Sermce, oy Utt me nakne oF 0 produce Is +m E A unique Seb 6 lo egeainakd awnrhe with deinite srasring d finishing polnts | und urtaken ee jnaindual or ; n ong , 40 Mut Specibe objeeny, ohthin deFi'ned cle [eos 4 pesfermance p i3 7 esi i peer psec Poet tnawic _¢ Non Anduabial Proje: [project Bae! on Cron ership + projet Rwel on size }- Shae | medium) Larry [Enfrashurriry Pret : . Building ot peciepmect project Barcel on Neel 1 Nad fou _ | Fackors Afteehng projet As ~Relatecl Factors Related factors= k p.m, Sructuce — © | dine + stat org. shucture - @® pirech ON Ne authowity naviseyy authority & a co Gheil Geeerive Sound deudton — mai a9 urs oF Ne ieuieatt ‘on,. a 7 ————== Factors intdencing quatiky of @armaty x : [ @ | Par mperence | © | Project Onlqnes © || project aurahon © | geopie if 3S planning Rang < 6 | Shuctine @ | Ove}. Culttine mato anmaring * Micro erimahn | @ can be wed when making | applied when cost gs srrategic decision Are is iompey @ |jadso known top bot+am als0 now bottom “ap OPpTaath @pprach . 9 laprricabie when projectis |twed be hen @ntract |s Fee) Smet, Internal, pess high |price , iF cost Aime variables [encertainty @ have unskible [ave imp. ¢ when Cuwtomes Scope . demand For detailed info.Bee —| Projet Planning awa Planning Means prediung of Yevelairing the Raton aivikes 4 jobs in advance. Inq bwi. environmenp Planning ts @ Pamary FANCH'ON , —-ae Adniening Hoe goa ¢ abyecnvey Discipline addwessing hew +o Complete a Project \N.a Cemttuin Hmetrame, WUalLy witty detined Stages ¢ designated waources dvperivy PP. MaiNtan Oisupline ln project acnnty 4 Bsrimanion of Bme ¢ awounce etquired 1n taen atin Making adequate Pronsion Foe the w'sie¢ uncertain vers, Qnpre' ent 1) Gmmenteanen dco -ordnahon Prion'sing the ackises , 2 Denpiement Contral ¢ aecluce durahon of ue EP Reh ts yesourtee UBI2ah'on 4 ea ai\ochimalh wakietdae Smnporta 4 cae pare xggn8? acnyine, Tae ave eee deKred Wore ShHedug art FLowel O Projece aoa Revs by A=W A onvity Ach wty Aaiiky [ : 2 penvity See = | pk | 6 | oi | sf Pro) Of WES Beaminahon of WBS | tnctusion of Beti'verreb/e [Sncusion of product ¢ procs Related Tr - | Rewsion oF wes. WBS is dened bY PMBOk Ba deitwable — we combinanion oF +e achribes eelatea| 4©_the projeth helps tn ongnising 9 detining | Compure scope oF project . The Gcahion of delivemeble deuk fs Aone in a Fouls way +at i+ can by Faisiy Ardea among people working eo 14d. the degree, of Conteo] 15 implement easy manner Bt ts inp. 9 !Eek —\nHehon, Fuduanon, bn demand ,wethange | 4 [Risk mgmt 15 Prousye appracn Tether ios a reactive SPPTOdUH, Thaims ar ne 1 be ae F— fewmal 4 intemal igh. | e—- ng the CRHectS OF WSks Jar 15 a6 Prt pare Mary +o +8ke SKS when aavantageou Sieg ppetanihe preacns themoeees | ai] ~ Weteren cut mgnt = proj ee manag ex betfor Contre) Over dhe projet - ative projet Gece win Kime Lbudges | ma) + # | Risk mgmt esa o Risk IdendAcakoy —— analysis | reponse ees f —t melee contingent _ planning- aera x eplening Imuiifekiag =) An cfhcienr Sthedwe Ror gq precr onan _[addinion +0 Hne raoures applicaren Can be | Creates) through ASHedusin 4 method tEnown | _| BS Spieing 6 én io mane a ali — | Leads +o medvahon Aisag . - | Shemling Communicenh'on | = keeps costs Under conrs) | I — E } Ea Disadvantage L - ||®eadting add pressure | = _| Mgn Schedute Con Leads to conPict . } A | Sonsoluting Recurce | gz A project plan can be transformed into 4 p= | [wert schedule ttn a 100) Know as Tex Scheduling — — | Schecluse. ond be nto .ool ie eee ———Sa a Chick Enecubre ' ®eresonn\ RAD, Manuf. Marken § — GradiHonal shuctuxR , i” rt Advantage 3 Fi P Wailability sf Qubticient pum Reoure Beiclepment OF O SyskNQ Vegan Og Verriiad sernmmuer3 Cal ee the Cost - wMpreve 4 canhal — Shang oF aeoponoibility & ra 4 Peubi lity jn ropeer of ae OF human waocrres, iaok #2 al BE cdi vonk ereciet oF a single Peron . | ats | ojeu i | FOUs, Foros | Ne aasigner| +ark. eta c.) ; ers, demands is Tathe 2 pohyahinel farce.Pert IS & Popatlay P-m. 4ech ahak ts applicable, when the PHme etqwised fo Bnish ao jeri | not Cemtarn . : 1 probabiisnhc Madey. j = Advantag & Ez | loppected tHme vequized for Coroplering each QU. |S dekrmired helps 1D Compleon OF Proj within an eppected Hme period . eeduce WSK Factor: Detail: plaoniog Qenvsty Faking Cowrett UcKon. For Complete proj on Keng Disadvantage absense OF past dat —ditthKut 40 provide Comtech me | y nor oe; | Prosion about wyuremMens of BWoUTtED— eHernve Control oF project whida bb very cosy | PERT@ ‘ £2 @ |Reourse mgmr ae , @ Feat oF PMI5 Sheduting ¢ Neteoorie any Bud igeting | Cost Control ¢ perfermana analysis Reporting ; Graphics d Commiuniasron = | ~antertace , Heoer bility at Y =a v Purpase. } a 4 |wadventage « a i & Disadvantage, ‘ us a | Ei a 7 Project contro } a 1S G PrOGd hat ecompases the reourea, A [procectura § tools for the rhe 1 Monitoring 4 ns of aul phases of the eae es zK Change contra) Mam+ 4 < — pa = + Plen is an integra df Funthonal pashoF the —— oer —eseervo — = Pro) ongrrs pa Fancriony ts ro_ monitors eanirs} thE Coange made to bhe baetina oF the prAjee = | Wracrions wequired +o Malte Unanges iO Hoe |oppreved £ standard documents, Scned Costs other — Parsametes OF the = |ecP- Precess of a35O51Ng, ALORS ing, 9 UE 1S _[montteang ¢ contraiting “Chang e * Press -of ccm @ | Crange Request tenrActh'on @ | Change —1— stmpacr Analysis © | Reseo gs Approve Change e Clase Change request - ’ + A= _||No need of dummy acnvity ‘ a ~ | beter For wsual preentanon becawe ib 1S S +e bate Chact+ t =| Peers) are Moh Ubesl | s Be TS emter todraw when the clependendo Mer A\nknse . [oe ts aback to trate paths bu aeninity @_|cast\eet path method | - CPM ts astwanca agenthm Wnich has 9 Cita Stavt dend. hme Fer a Project - IS @n Vaigomtam wed jin em thar Is Wee te Schectute Pref acne _ : a =| longot strenten of acs 2 Start 40 Finish | Peo; Advania a — i < te sa — | Petermineg she Kme Schecale ey = — | cenrrol oF Ane Seay for We mam) ee = Mae Mast 7 Scop< fer | Bt ae a a | Techatqae For Her. analysis &=I = p.m proces 2 7 AU the proces ax intr linked J oaks Place On afies ather mennoned. The ourput OF ane proces became He Enpat For the Neer proces. Eninahng proces | we I [ Planning process } 1] Renkray 1 7 exes Controlling proeas I —> Sates 1 aie =i = Think Hme ;€ Budget oF ishapensldem suns . Plann'- — Invelves a no.6f Neco atnning @ [Semple = — @ paject Plan | seep.vanncahen | Eee © Suatttry @ @ontroll ing i — Check project to Know that.cast ishigh | © Cheek Hme are no evead 9 joe Gs cles P: — Complet Lathleve goal obj need to. closed, ImMparanc of PM on 5 Compreeaiston of Product Hfe ce ) Global compenron — OB bd C1 Lise i 2 Knowlecl ge evplesion | Corporate Downsizing pacrensed Catomes Fou# [Factors Atreening pesoarr , Stnuluting @ | time ©) | Manpower 4 @ | Marema) © lpnachinery : GS) [Peep rie) Beoneffis of , SR.L — @ _| Pesterming | - a = | High taal of Punetion Is depleted by Ham ~ _|main Yous remain on @ttaining the a SO Aadjourning | — 1 = | Phis stege appears @ wel being oF 4am. | Be) a =| FRam leaders mur make sure thal Hrercanma) [naa the Hme to Cheer the project's Su cles $ ~ Fale note oF bat pracnce fox future purpabe = [opportunity ye Say Ged bye is obo fadltataf Iby is srage to greet best wished +e eth © [Shor Fox nest Project . {| Smp 6h Feamwork “ale | Showsng idew é @® | Aecounh yd) uty — morvede £ dupport —- 5 @ Bargerg : eas. SF PT Cpe) Team) — es Ready Ssubs'5 yahon st] Diversity of Tdea. | sfeam Bonding Z erat training Gepenien ces - — Lenhenceal « cemmuntcaion gsr, ed|; | (rom | ania {| evcicet 079" 4 : ] | \ orgn IS G@4ethnique where (rm Ste Set -ep ' Toe HR G+ VaTOUd Wikapacnicut levels. tne moles 40 | Tee played & eeponsibilines to be Shouldened by ath Youn Member ete . : | Project ™M ee | * pooject man ~ would jot hare 6 malice a Schedule, atlocal esounce . deagsemible a tam ‘d jwt ti phen what todo. We ha 4 Innova $ adept +0 ine Oren -Changing environment . He Must we able to eypond +o Changes in the Plan, IM He proj. Scope . 1M He Customer's hrequizements, nm the team 430,0n. ’ a PM mut BSIgn TRdUTre 4 See Hot the pra). \s Completed attomdingly +o plan. Managers Breet, Coordinate é conyms| aon’ d perpie the quairhea oF “eatep ronal Yeaderstup f mgmt ___|moy Net always be available iM one person. ‘ 4fe } : ae # Assigning Pe Worle = | Every 4am member sroutd now about his Jasork £ i+ Is Me @esponsiniriry of P¥S) - ang ger | dat he Shouwtd aasign Work +o aus team members a Sng oF signing Pio Responsibility of P. Team members ©_eFRueny ’ @ | Producnivity @ |Morale > ® Cons \d eran on —__| esrimased ePiner honing stage os dumog the | Pxprranon of the | prajeth Praposas . |— J Unt Or jeu Schedutin’ = . ian of athinnes helps wt | | atiocate wedourees actordingly ¢ +o plan Re —_||@neivs that pray arise. due to compen I wqremens. Ss 4 —| Schedluting abo heps w to plan wt COD Peay = || Schedule , eerocrse en f car. requ. ¢ aves lability rect bearing OM one another . = Tne Felahonsnip tnat One 4a 4 hay too Play 2M AMP Ft JH Stneduntd ng Page Wo. ate a Peatures Pre @ bnewledge ial @ Discipline Z @ ered ey ey 4 ; = Complete, = a Feel team Schedule GS | Shouid meet the eonwoetal Requi . & pe ee Shealuting =x Pred Proj. Life cycle - kK | @ | ® inifarion | @ | Ps Plannin: @ |? Geenns, Minteing 4 Contes) 1 2 @® | e-ctosuse Rewind my, i aentld 50. r Pr. Stakeholders * - T An, individuel ov a group or an org” Can be Jo Staxeholdes 6F a praject @ per the (PMBOk. PAU) Suth! stakeholders | are Brey OF INA re CH [iniuance the decisions auivina 4 gesuibs > “laccosiared wit a project 7 2 o7 7 fonypuchon | Condbuchon Andividua) eopentse ic not Halen into On idere $$ | a i, advantage ; Alocenion of Responsib)li4 [Suttepie Fer Compethve Mespep @ | mening He needs Of local Marker, | Cortiopment of Managers [Sarrabie fer ‘argve — PEt Prod - ¢ enanut jen \ \ J Pan | seatt Sart Stace ai ) T €ny Many aoe T sub Eng naan ; { ) ) ey ty we: ot * Ve Srouto bE He bet Fam oP OFF SrUG si + Advantage Q@ | AN the avaliable soured ae aS led k eweltplyery by He Pre manage @ | farnre Corea of Hearn ememnbers aa @ | H-vowws teennitel bareis derelopeal — @ _|PvFF oF opinion among A ameAbe £4 _grtat tient | Equlibjunmn among Wme, P nance : ie ri A Olsadvant ag. aioe al i Thene ave ~ poss u 7 _ | Awo boss 3 EEL. A Jot of ‘ ng. :Unf} No ft_| Pertoomanw Eretuanion t — | 4s te arse, row. pre) man.d P _|pertormed during dhe pro) es — || fe P.e of the PT rindin T-membes £ — || \s meressary to Idennry +he devel opments lof Yhe \ndindual a we a» fos ConHindoly AmMprovement In the ovg® Hyrrough os) OF Techniques of pr pes. & @ leaned vate analysis (__ © | vanance —~—— ai ctear-¢ common agenda ’ : 7 LAIN to judge opinion, Dick $ Respect canHics | Characken 8G. i: ; Meetecy THwh 4 Respect Clanity of INDY Roled Reapensib sity High Vvel oF Communtcanien Climate OF Co-Sperarigy, io > 1 Five 81090 deat Durel. Model. ey Fovming | — ’ i j Team membes meet etch other For Firs) Bme. ‘intro bout baceground | eapenene [iting Shaved] Misuws about UAE clement of pre) On Whit 4ney wosll ed6ek : ‘ Disany lon OF Prt. Goal ¢ obj 4 Evpemiencing enh other 4 mying +6 look: ab ho@ dney Can Nave a mute working together. | 7 Srommng 1, ed Compenng among kam, members For stand a acceprana 6f Mnely We. 4(roe) DerGep ing Phe pen. Grapriced WPMIcntertyoyy st a P70) - Opera rons, 18 (Ceetted netcoorvte cambinahon of een + achnng wonichn ave rtquire the end ob) ofa Projet . cm | objechve. Nekwore analysis Minimizahon of +eral prs) Coot —_t+_§|______ —— Ourenon Feade- oft bern Hme d cast of pra). Min. of idle weourers = ab IdensAce\ ng the Hoda § perinhea . A-0-A — fee Resnity -6n = Arrsw- iS Wecl For vepmenting the achivity € beth the ends of tne arsreo whith ane Called Madey Shown ne start ¢ tnd oF the acrvity | :