Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Looking for the human condition of architectural and urban design research practices and theories
Phenomenal Deformations:
Affordance as a Design Tool
to Deal with Subject-Object Complementarity in Architecture
Andrea Zammataro
Politecnico di Milano-ABC PhD candidate
e-mail: andrea.zammataro@polimi.it
ABSTRACT
The production of knowledge related to the architectural project during the design phase mainly
concerns the object in itself, while its relationship with occupants is an underrated factor for design
success. This is due to the fact that architecture as a formal design field is naturally devoted to deal
with the physical and geometric characteristics of the design object identified in unequivocal ways,
while occupancy implies a degree of subjectivity and contingency which phenomenally deforms the
object into its many manifestations.
This paper analyses the concept of affordance by Gibson (1979) as a suitable tool to deal with
occupancy in terms of subject-object complementarity because it addresses the ecological value of
an object, i.e. its value in relation to a perceiving subject and not in itself. The first problems posed
by the concept of affordance, hence, is how the subject can be identified given the variety of real
occupants which interact with a certain environment. The common answer is to address only those
aspects which are in common between all the subjects, i.e. the ones who define occupants as
members of a species. At this level, indeed, occupants are natural subjects, which can only express
basic needs to be met by sensorimotor activities, and for this reason a different approach
considering the subject as culturally and also individually defined is needed in order to shift from an
automatism of inhabitation to the self-determination of occupancy. Affordance must therefore be
considered in a broader context going beyond sensorimotor activities and dealing also with upper
cognitive faculties. However, an affordance related to a culturally-defined subject does not entail
self-determination per se, since also cultural and individual schemes can be absorbed without the
exercise of critique due to habituation. Activities driven by natural, cultural or individual schemes
differ with regard to the interval they entail between the action received by the environment and
subject's reaction. Indeed, more individuality is implied, longer the time needed to process data
received from the environment. Time is here intended not as an extensive but as an intensive
dimension. This means that it cannot be considered as a sum of instants, but an unitary event having
a specific character. This is the concept of duration in Bergson, as opposed to spatialized time, and
it also recalls Bakhtin's idea of chronotope.
In the overall framework interweaving design activity and time through cognition, chronotopes can
be useful in the definition of an affordance-based architectural approach. Indeed some chronotopes
describing duration in its becoming are related to the contingent and direct relationship between the
subject and his object which is expressed by the concept of affordance.
The present paper aims at understanding how these contributions from cognitive sciences, literature,
philosophy and semiotics can allow architects to improve affordance as a design tool starting from a
review of the state of the art. At the end, some case studies from the past which address the question
of a self-determined occupancy are proposed as exemplary of an affordance-based approach to
architecture.
Symposium Arquitectonics Mind, Land and Society 2018:
Looking for the human condition of architectural and urban design research practices and theories
consciousness. Since the hierarchy of needs seems to parallel personal growth, the membership of
the subject could be imagined as a series of stages which are achieved step by step. Indeed, the
characteristics of the subject as member of each group recalls the characteristics of the child in the
various stages of his cognitive development. However, the Piagetian model of cognitive
development can only be used to understand the behaviour of the subject as member of different
groups, and must not be adopted in its temporal formulation, because membership, for the purpose
of this paper, depends on the context, and not on the age.
object, otherwise it would become something ambiguous, capable of being interpreted in the light
of various different codes, so that it becomes suitable to any use imaginable and to none in
particular (Eco, 1997, p. 178). Anyway, this position should be updated, as nowadays the
globalization of capitalism and the individualization of consumption patterns make language
ineffective and architecture as well as industrial design are turning to affect as an uncoded, pre-
linguistic, and for this reason universal, form of identity for any subject (Spencer, 2016). The result
is that inhabitation is less about doing what some designer or manager explicitly intended in a space
and more about imaginative, ad hoc appropriation for unanticipated purposes (Mitchell, 2012, p.
154).
The real interest in the concept of affordance exactly lies in its suitability to move from the logic of
recognition expressed by Norman and Eco to the logic of encounter required by present times.
amount of new information which cannot be dealt with by the subject unless he completely
disavows his previous experiences and the schemata they produced. However, this break paralyses
action, and therefore the subject is unable to react to environmental stimuli.
spaces through uses which transgress their program, for instance to experience a stairwell through
bungee jumping.
In relation to the 'chronotope of the parlor', instead, exemplary practices can be derived from radical
movements of the 60's and 70's. Guy Debord, an important representative of the International
Situationist, adopted a technique he called 'détournement' which essentially reinterpreted the
formalist technique of 'defamiliarization'. The linkage between the International Situationist and
architecture is represented by Constant Nieuwenhuys, who experimented what he calls the 'ancient
powers of architectural confusion' in his unrealized project New Babylon (Andreotti, 2001).
Constant Nieuwenhuys also collaborated with Aldo van Eyck, an architect who has, quite the
opposite, lots of built projects. The proximity of Aldo van Eyck and Constant Nieuwenhuys in
particular is witnessed by their collaboration for the 'Man and House' exhibition at the Stedelijk
Museum in 1953, as well as by van Eyck's article on labyrinthine clarity published on the
Situationist Times in 1963 (Sadler, 1999). Labyrinthine clarity can be considered an architectural
technique drawing upon occupants' consciousness with the aim of suspending their preordained
schemata and allow their reformulation. This couple of contradictory terms refers on one hand to
the difficult perception entailed by the labyrinth, as well as the high level of attention it arises. On
the other hand, the term 'clarity' indicates that once the occupant is situated in the labyrinth, he can
confer to it a meaning which is clear from the subjective standpoint, but absolutely obscure from the
exterior (Wellmer, 1991).
REFERENCES
● Andreotti, L. (2001).
Ludic Practices of the Situationist Urbanism. Lotus, 108, 40-6.
● Bergson, H. (1910)
Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. London: George Allen &
Unwin Ltd.
● Deleuze, G. (1997).
Cinema 1. The Movement-Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
● Díaz E. (2008).
The Ethics of Perception: Josef Albers in the United States. The Art Bulletin, 90(2), 260-285.
Symposium Arquitectonics Mind, Land and Society 2018:
Looking for the human condition of architectural and urban design research practices and theories
● Eco, U. (1997).
The semiotics of Architecture. In N. Leach (Ed.), Rethinking architecture, a reader in cultural
theory. London, New York: Routledge.
● Ehrenzweig, A. (1971).
Hidden Order of Art: A Study in the Psychology of Artistic Imagination. Oakland: University of
California Press.
● Gibson, J. J. (1979).
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
● Keunen, B. (2010).
The Chronotopic Imagination in Literature and Film: Bakhtin, Bergson and Deleuze on Forms of
Time. In N. Bemong et al. (Eds.), Bakhtin's Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections,
Applications, Perspectives. Gent: Academia Press.
● Sadler, S. (1999).
The Situationist City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
● Shklovsky, V. (1917).
Art as Technique. In C. Harrison and P. Wood (Eds.), Art in Theory 1900-1990: An Anthology of
Changing Ideas. Oxford: Blackwell.
● Spencer, D. (2016).
The architecture of neoliberalism: how contemporary architecture became an instrument of control
and compliance. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
● Tschumi, B. (1996).
Architecture and Disjunction. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
● Wellmer, A. (1991).
The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics and Postmodernism. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
Symposium Arquitectonics Mind, Land and Society 2018:
Looking for the human condition of architectural and urban design research practices and theories