Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GENERAL EDUCATION
Names:
Score:
Section: Summative Assessment 1
Date: Facilitator: Althea Daphney C. Bayan
Instructions:
1. Group yourselves into five (5). Students may opt to accomplish the task individually.
2. Follow the guide and provide what is needed. All questions must be answered collectively.
3. Get 5 pieces of paper and label the first and second pieces “A”, the third and fourth pieces “B”,
and the fifth piece “C” then conduct a draw lot.
a. (Two) Student As (Pro) should provide five (5) arguments with references on why we
should accept the proposition.
b. (Two) Student Bs (Con) should provide five (5) arguments with references on why we
should not accept the proposition (or accept a different version of the proposition)
c. (One) Student C (Adjudicator) should synthesize and provide a decision with at three
(3) arguments supporting it.
4. Use APA 7th edition as your referencing format. Use Times New Roman (Font), 11 (Size), and
1.0 line spacing.
5. Submit your output in Canvas in MS word format. File name: [Section #_RPH_Surnames]. Do
not forget to put your names in the output itself.
6. Only one representative should submit the output in Canvas.
Note: The instructor has the privilege to deduct points from those who will not follow the instructions.
Rubrics
Data (40%) Analysis and Content (40%) Manner and Style (20%)
Information is taken from The critical issue/problem is stated All sentences are well
source(s) with enough clearly and described constructed and have varied
interpretation/evaluation to comprehensively, delivering all structures and lengths. The
develop a comprehensive relevant information necessary for author makes no errors in
analysis or synthesis. full understanding. grammar, mechanics,
and/or spelling
Note: Do not forget to use Turnitin to assess your plagiarism score. Those who will submit plagiarized
work will automatically receive 0. Repeated acts of plagiarism and cheating will be dealt with
according to the University rules and regulations against intellectual dishonesty.