Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1)
Most
writers
have
transposed
the
structure
of
the
Oedipus
onto
literature
and
film.
Freud
himself
constantly
juxtaposes
Hamlet
and
Oedipus
in
his
introductory
versions.
The
participant
of
the
course
should
be
familiar
with
both
the
plays
of
Oedipus
(at
least
Sophocles
version)
and
Shakespeare's
Hamlet.
3)
As
an
introductory
approach
to
the
Oedipus,
I
propose
the
following
exercise
as
a
'warm-‐up'
to
constructing
an
analytic
theory
and
practice.
Many
writers
have
attempted
to
understand
psychoanalysis
by
interpreting
the
dramatic
structure
of
film
within
the
theory
and
terminology
of
psychoanalysis.
But
what
are
the
scope
and
limits
of
this
interpretative
method
of
working?
And
can
transposing
the
structures
into
a
topology
and
logic
determine
a
constructive
approach
that
goes
beyond
the
hermeneutics
of
interpretation?
To
respond
to
such
questions,
it
is
proposed
that
each
person
watch
A.
Hitchcock's,
Frenzy
(1972),
then
interpret
its
dramatic
framework
in
the
language
and
theory
of
psychoanalysis.
This
exercise
aims
to
not
only
provide
a
concrete
example
of
'applied'
psychoanalysis,
but
show
the
limits
of
such
interpretative
methods
in
the
practice
and
theory
of
analysis.
The
2013
seminar
aims
to
examine
the
turn
from
interpreting
to
constructing
psychoanalysis
and
the
Oedipus
Complex.
This
will
be
used
as
a
reference
point.
a)
The
film
can
be
watched
for
free
on-‐line
at:
http://viooz.co/movies/1691-‐frenzy-‐1972.html
Then
find
examples
that
can
be
considered
interpretations
of
the
following
analytic
terms:
Oedipus
Complex,
Primary
Repression,
Secondary
Repression,
Id-‐Ego-‐Super/Ego,
Foreclusion
(Verwerfung),
Trauma,
Uncanny,
Fantasy
object,
Pulsion
(source,
aim,
goal,
object),
Symptom
Formation,
The
Thing
(Cause).
Include any other concepts or terms that seem to you pertinent to the film.