Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Multiple choice
I. Review
II. Practice
B
When the Europeans arrived, Rapa Nui was grassland, with only a few
scrawny trees. In the 1970s and 1980s, though, researchers found pollen
preserved in lake sediments, which proved the island had been covered in lush
palm forests for thousands of years. Only after the Polynesians arrived did
those forests disappear. US scientist Jared Diamond believes that the Rapanui
people – descendants of Polynesian settlers – wrecked their own environment.
They had unfortunately settled on an extremely fragile island – dry, cool, and
too remote to be properly fertilized by windblown volcanic ash. When the
islanders cleared the forests for firewood and farming, the forests didn’t grow
back. As trees became scarce and they could no longer construct wooden
canoes for fishing, they ate birds. Soil erosion decreased their crop yields.
Before Europeans arrived, the Rapanui had descended into civil war and
cannibalism, he maintains. The collapse of their isolated civilisation, Diamond
writes, is a ’worst-case scenario for what may lie ahead of us in our own
future’.
C
The moai, he thinks, accelerated the self-destruction. Diamond interprets
them as power displays by rival chieftains who, trapped on a remote little
island, lacked other ways of asserting their dominance. They competed by
building ever bigger figures. Diamond thinks they laid the moai on wooden
sledges, hauled over log rails, but that required both a lot of wood and a lot of
people. To feed the people, even more land had to be cleared. When the wood
was gone and civil war began, the islanders began toppling the moai. By the
nineteenth century none were standing.
D
Archaeologists Terry Hunt of the University of Hawaii and Carl Lipo of
California State University agree that Easter Island lost its lush forests and
that it was an ‘ecological catastrophe’ – but they believe the islanders
themselves weren’t to blame. And the moai certainly weren’t. Archaeological
excavations indicate that the Rapanui went to heroic efforts to protect the
resources of their wind-lashed, infertile fields. They built thousands of
circular stone windbreaks and gardened inside them, and used broken
volcanic rocks to keep the soil moist. In short, Hunt and Lipo argue, the
prehistoric Rapanui were pioneers of sustainable farming.
E
Hunt and Lipo contend that moai-building was an activity that helped keep
the peace between islanders. They also believe that moving the moai required
few people and no wood, because they were walking upright. On that issue,
Hunt and Lipo say, archaeological evidence backs up Rapanui folklore.
Recent experiments indicate that as few as 18 people could, with three strong
ropes and a bit of practice, easily maneuver a 1,000 kg moai replica a few
hundred meters. The figures’ fat bellies tilted them forward, and a D-shaped
base allowed handlers to roll and rock them side to side.
F
Moreover, Hunt and Lipo are convinced that the settlers were not wholly
responsible for the loss of the island’s trees. Archaeological finds of nuts from
the extinct Easter Island palm show tiny grooves, made by the teeth of
Polynesian rats. The rats arrived along with the settlers, and in just a few
years, Hunt and Lipo calculate, they would have overrun the island. They
would have prevented the reseeding of the slow-growing palm trees and
thereby doomed Rapa Nui’s forest, even without the settlers’ campaign of
deforestation. No doubt the rats ate birds’ eggs too. Hunt and Lipo also see no
evidence that Rapanui civilization collapsed when the palm forest did. They
think its population grew rapidly and then remained more or less stable until
the arrival of the Europeans, who introduced deadly diseases to which
islanders had no immunity. Then in the nineteenth century slave traders
decimated the population, which shriveled to 111 people by 1877.
G
Hunt and Lipo’s vision, therefore, is one of an island populated by peaceful
and ingenious moai builders and careful stewards of the land, rather than by
reckless destroyers ruining their own environment and society. ‘Rather than a
case of abject failure, Rapa Nui is an unlikely story of success’, they claim.
Whichever is the case, there are surely some valuable lessons which the world
at large can learn from the story of Rapa Nui.
Could the same approach also shed light on abstract twentieth-century pieces,
from Mondrian’s geometrical blocks of color, to Pollock’s seemingly
haphazard arrangements of splashed paint on canvas? Skeptics believe that
people claim to like such works simply because they are famous. We certainly
do have an inclination to follow the crowd. When asked to make simple
perceptual decisions such as matching a shape to its rotated image, for
example, people often choose a definitively wrong answer if they see others
doing the same. It is easy to imagine that this mentality would have even more
impact on a fuzzy concept like art appreciation, where there is no right or
wrong answer.
And what about artists such as Mondrian, whose paintings consist exclusively
of horizontal and vertical lines encasing blocks of colour? Mondrian’s works
are deceptively simple, but eye-tracking studies confirm that they are
meticulously composed, and that simply rotating a piece radically changes the
way we view it. With the originals, volunteers’eyes tended to stay longer on
certain places in the image, but with the altered versions they would flit across
a piece more rapidly. As a result, the volunteers considered the altered
versions less pleasurable when they later rated the work.
It is also intriguing that the brain appears to process movement when we see a
handwritten letter, as if we are replaying the writer’s moment of creation.
This has led some to wonder whether Pollock’s works feel so dynamic because
the brain reconstructs the energetic actions the artist used as he painted. This
may be down to our brain’s ‘mirror neurons’, which are known to mimic
others’ actions. The hypothesis will need to be thoroughly tested, however. It
might even be the case that we could use neuroaesthetic studies to understand
the longevity of some pieces of artwork. While the fashions of the time might
shape what is currently popular, works that are best adapted to our visual
system may be the most likely to linger once the trends of previous
generations have been forgotten.
It’s still early days for the field of neuroaesthetics – and these studies are
probably only a taste of what is to come. It would, however, be foolish to
reduce art appreciation to a set of scientific laws. We shouldn’t underestimate
the importance of the style of a particular artist, their place in history and the
artistic environment of their time. Abstract art offers both a challenge and the
freedom to play with different interpretations. In some ways, it’s not so
different from science, where we are constantly looking for systems and
decoding meaning so that we can view and appreciate the world in a new way.
29. Results of studies involving Robert Pepperell’s pieces suggest that people
A. can appreciate a painting without fully understanding it.
B. find it satisfying to work out what a painting represents.
C. vary widely in the time they spend looking at paintings.
D. generally prefer representational art to abstract art.
30. What do the experiments described in the fifth paragraph suggest about
the paintings of Mondrian?
A. They are more carefully put together than they appear.
B. They can be interpreted in a number of different ways.
C. They challenge our assumptions about shape and color.
D. They are easier to appreciate than many other abstract works.
Let us start with dialogue. As is the case with stage drama, dialogue serves to
tell the story and expresses feelings and motivations of characters as well.
Often with film characterization the audience perceives little or no difference
between the character and the actor. Thus, for example, the actor Humphrey
Bogart is the character Sam Spade; film personality and life personality seem
to merge. Perhaps this is because the very texture of a performer’s voice
supplies an element of character.
When voice textures fit the performer’s physiognomy and gestures, a whole
and very realistic persona emerges. The viewer sees not an actor working at
his craft, but another human being struggling with life. It is interesting to note
that how dialogue is used and the very amount of dialogue used varies widely
among films. For example, in the highly successful science-fiction film 2001,
little dialogue was evident, and most of it was banal and of little intrinsic
interest. In this way the film-maker was able to portray what Thomas
Sobochack and Vivian Sobochack call, in An Introduction to Film, the
‘inadequacy of human responses when compared with the magnificent
technology created by man and the visual beauties of the universe’.
The comedy Bringing Up Baby, on the other hand, presents practically non-
stop dialogue delivered at breakneck speed. This use of dialogue underscores
not only the dizzy quality of the character played by Katherine Hepburn, but
also the absurdity of the film itself and thus its humor. The audience is
bounced from gag to gag and conversation to conversation; there is no time
for audience reflection. The audience is caught up in a whirlwind of activity in
simply managing to follow the plot. This film presents pure escapism – largely
due to its frenetic dialogue.
Asynchronous sound effects, on the other hand, are not matched with a visible
source of the sound on screen. Such sounds are included so as to provide an
appropriate emotional nuance, and they may also add to the realism of the
film. For example, a film-maker might opt to include the background sound of
an ambulance’s siren while the foreground sound and image portrays an
arguing couple. The asynchronous ambulance siren underscores the psychic
injury incurred in the argument; at the same time the noise of the siren adds
to the realism of the film by acknowledging the film’s city setting.
We are probably all familiar with background music in films, which has
become so ubiquitous as to be noticeable in its absence. We are aware that it is
used to add emotion and rhythm. Usually not meant to be noticeable, it often
provides a tone or an emotional attitude toward the story and /or the
characters depicted. In addition, background music often foreshadows a
change in mood. For example, dissonant music may be used in film to indicate
an approaching (but not yet visible) menace or disaster.
15. One reason that the writer refers to Humphrey Bogart is to exemplify
A. the importance of the actor and the character appearing to have similar
personalities.
B. the audience’s wish that actors are visually appropriate for their roles.
C. the value of the actor having had similar feelings to the character.
D. the audience’s preference for dialogue to be as authentic as possible.
16. In the third paragraph, the writer suggests that
A. audiences are likely to be critical of film dialogue that does not reflect their
own experience.
B. film dialogue that appears to be dull may have a specific purpose.
C. filmmakers vary considerably in the skill with which they handle dialogue.
D. the most successful films are those with dialogue of a high Quality.
18. The writer refers to the ‘click’ of a door to make the point that realistic
sounds
A. are often used to give the audience a false impression of events in the film.
B. may be interpreted in different ways by different members of the audience.
C. may be modified in order to manipulate the audience’s response to the film.
D. tend to be more significant in films presenting realistic situations.
D. On the question of mitigating the risks farmers face, most essayists called
for greater state intervention. In his essay, Kanayo F. Nwanze, President of
the International Fund for Agricultural Development, argued that
governments can significantly reduce risks for farmers by providing basic
services like roads to get produce more efficiently to markets, or water and
food storage facilities to reduce losses. Sophia Murphy, senior advisor to the
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, suggested that the procurement
and holding of stocks by governments can also help mitigate wild swings in
food prices by alleviating uncertainties about market supply.
F. Nwanze, Murphy and Fan argued that private risk management tools, like
private insurance, commodity futures markets, and rural finance can help
small-scale producers mitigate risk and allow for investment in
improvements. Kabir warned that financial support schemes often encourage
the adoption of high-input agricultural practices, which in the medium term
may raise production costs beyond the value of their harvests. Murphy noted
that when futures markets become excessively financialised they can
contribute to short-term price volatility, which increases farmers’ food
insecurity. Many participants and commentators emphasized that greater
transparency in markets is needed to mitigate the impact of volatility, and
make evident whether adequate stocks and supplies are available. Others
contended that agribusiness companies should be held responsible for paying
for negative side effects.
G. Many essayists mentioned climate change and its consequences for small-
scale agriculture. Fan explained that ‘in addition to reducing crop yields,
climate change increases the magnitude and frequency of extreme weather
events, which increase smallholder vulnerability.’ The growing
unpredictability of weather patterns increases farmers’ difficulty in managing
weather-related risks. According to this author, one solution would be to
develop crop varieties that are more resilient to new climate trends and
extreme weather patterns. Accordingly, Pat Mooney, co-founder and
executive director of the ETC Group, suggested that ‘if we are to survive
climate change, we must adopt policies that let peasants diversify the plant
and animal species and varieties/breeds that make up our menus.’
Why does music make us feel? On the one hand, music is a purely abstract art
form, devoid of language or explicit ideas. And yet, even though music says
little, it still manages to touch us deeply. When listening to our favorite songs,
our body betrays all the symptoms of emotional arousal. The pupils in our
eyes dilate, our pulse and blood pressure rise, the electrical conductance of
our skin is lowered, and the cerebellum, a brain region associated with bodily
movement, becomes strangely active. Blood is even redirected to the muscles
in our legs. In other words, sound stirs us at our biological roots.
One way to answer the question is to look at the music and not the neurons.
While music can often seem (at least to the outsider) like a labyrinth of
intricate patterns, it turns out that the most important part of every song or
symphony is when the patterns break down, when the sound becomes
unpredictable. If the music is too obvious, it is annoyingly boring, like an
alarm clock. Numerous studies, after all, have demonstrated that dopamine
neurons quickly adapt to predictable rewards. If we know what’s going to
happen next, then we don’t get excited. This is why composers often introduce
a keynote in the beginning of a song, spend most of the rest of the piece in the
studious avoidance of the pattern, and then finally repeat it only at the end.
The longer we are denied the pattern we expect, the greater the emotional
release when the pattern returns, safe and sound.
33. What view of the Montreal study does the writer express in the second
paragraph?
A. Its aims were innovative.
B. The approach was too simplistic.
C. It produced some remarkably precise data.
D. The technology used was unnecessarily complex.
34. What does the writer find interesting about the results of the Montreal
study?
A. the timing of participants’ neural responses to the music
B. the impact of the music of participants’ emotional state
C. the section of participants’ brains which was activated by the music
D. the type of music which had the strongest effect on participants’ brains
35. Why does the writer refer to Meyer’s work on music and emotion?
A. to propose an original theory about the subject
B. to offer support for the findings of the Montreal study
C. to recommend the need for further research into the subject
D. to present a view which opposes that of the Montreal researchers
There is a poem, written around 598 AD, which describes hunting a mystery
animal called a llewyn. But what was it? Nothing seemed to fit, until 2006,
when an animal bone, dating from around the same period, was found in the
Kinsey Cave in northern England. Until this discovery, the lynx – a large
spotted cat with tasseled ears – was presumed to have died out in Britain at
least 6,000 years ago, before the inhabitants of these islands took up farming.
But the 2006 find, together with three others in Yorkshire and Scotland, is
compelling evidence that the lynx and the mysterious llewyn were in fact one
and the same animal. If this is so, it would bring forward the tassel-eared cat’s
estimated extinction date by roughly 5,000 years.
However, this is not quite the last glimpse of the animal in British culture. A
9th-century stone cross from the Isle of Eigg shows, alongside the deer, boar
and aurochs pursued by a mounted hunter, a speckled cat with tasseled ears.
Were it not for the animal’s backside having worn away with time, we could
have been certain, as the lynx’s stubby tail is unmistakable. But even without
this key feature, it’s hard to see what else the creature could have been. The
lynx is now becoming the totemic animal of a movement that is transforming
British environmentalism: rewilding.
Such findings present a big challenge to British conservation, which has often
selected arbitrary assemblages of plants and animals and sought, at great
effort and expense, to prevent them from changing. It has tried to preserve the
living world as if it were a jar of pickles, letting nothing in and nothing out,
keeping nature in a state of arrested development. But ecosystems are not
merely collections of species; they are also the dynamic and ever-shifting
relationships between them. And this dynamism often depends on large
predators.
15. What point does the writer make about large predators in the third
paragraph?
A. Their presence can increase biodiversity.
B. They may cause damage to local ecosystems.
C. Their behavior can alter according to the environment.
D. They should be reintroduced only to areas where they were native.
16. What does the writer suggest about British conservation in the fourth
paragraph?
A. It has failed to achieve its aims.
B. It is beginning to change direction.
C. It has taken a misguided approach.
D. It has focused on the most widespread species.
17. Protecting large areas of the sea from commercial fishing would result in
A. practical benefits for the fishing industry.
B. some short-term losses to the fishing industry.
C. widespread opposition from the fishing industry.
D. certain changes to techniques within the fishing industry.
To some extent, we are all familiar with computerized art. The question is:
where does the work of the artist stop and the creativity of the computer
begin? Consider one of the oldest machine artists, Aaron, a robot that has had
paintings exhibited in London’s Tate Modern and the San Francisco Museum
of Modern Art. Aaron can pick up a paintbrush and paint on canvas on its
own. Impressive perhaps, but it is still little more than a tool to realize the
programmer’s own creative ideas.
Simon Colton, the designer of the Painting Fool, is keen to make sure his
creation doesn’t attract the same criticism. Unlike earlier ‘artists’ such as
Aaron, the Painting Fool only needs minimal direction and can come up with
its own concepts by going online for material. The software runs its own web
searches and trawls through social media sites. It is now beginning to display
a kind of imagination too, creating pictures from scratch. One of its original
works is a series of fuzzy landscapes, depicting trees and sky. While some
might say they have a mechanical look, Colton argues that such reactions
arise from people’s double standards towards software-produced and human-
produced art. After all, he says, consider that the Painting Fool painted the
landscapes without referring to a photo. ‘If a child painted a new scene from
its head, you’d say it has a certain level of imagination,’ he points out. ‘The
same should be true of a machine.’ Software bugs can also lead to unexpected
results. Some of the Painting Fool’s paintings of a chair came out in black and
white, thanks to a technical glitch. This gives the work an eerie, ghostlike
quality. Human artists like the renowned Ellsworth Kelly are lauded for
limiting their color palette – so why should computers be any different?
Researchers like Colton don’t believe it is right to measure machine creativity
directly to that of humans who ‘have had millennia to develop our skills’.
Others, though, are fascinated by the prospect that a computer might create
something as original and subtle as our best artists. So far, only one has come
close. Composer David Cope invented a program called Experiments in
Musical Intelligence, or EMI. Not only did EMI create compositions in Cope’s
style, but also that of the most revered classical composers, including Bach,
Chopin and Mozart. Audiences were moved to tears, and EMI even fooled
classical music experts into thinking they were hearing genuine Bach. Not
everyone was impressed however. Some, such as Wiggins, have blasted Cope’s
work as pseudoscience, and condemned him for his deliberately vague
explanation of how the software worked. Meanwhile, Douglas Hofstadter of
Indiana University said EMI created replicas which still rely completely on
the original artist’s creative impulses. When audiences found out the truth
they were often outraged with Cope, and one music lover even tried to punch
him. Amid such controversy, Cope destroyed EMI’s vital databases.
But why did so many people love the music, yet recoil when they discovered
how it was composed? A study by computer scientist David Moffat of Glasgow
Caledonian University provides a clue. He asked both expert musicians and
non-experts to assess six compositions. The participants weren’t told
beforehand whether the tunes were composed by humans or computers, but
were asked to guess, and then rate how much they liked each one. People who
thought the composer was a computer tended to dislike the piece more than
those who believed it was human. This was true even among the experts, who
might have been expected to be more objective in their analyses.
Where does this prejudice come from? Paul Bloom of Yale University has a
suggestion: he reckons part of the pleasure we get from art stems from the
creative process behind the work. This can give it an ‘irresistible essence’,
says Bloom. Meanwhile, experiments by Justin Kruger of New York
University have shown that people’s enjoyment of an artwork increases if they
think more time and effort was needed to create it. Similarly, Colton thinks
that when people experience art, they wonder what the artist might have been
thinking or what the artist is trying to tell them. It seems obvious, therefore,
that with computers producing art, this speculation is cut short – there’s
nothing to explore. But as technology becomes increasingly complex, finding
those greater depths in computer art could become possible. This is precisely
why Colton asks the Painting Fool to tap into online social networks for its
inspiration: hopefully this way it will choose themes that will already be
meaningful to us.
28. According to Geraint Wiggins, why are many people worried by computer
art?
A. It is aesthetically inferior to human art.
B. It may ultimately supersede human art.
C. It undermines a fundamental human quality.
D. It will lead to a deterioration in human ability.
29. What is a key difference between Aaron and the Painting Fool?
A. its programmer’s background
B. public response to its work
C. the source of its subject matter
D. the technical standard of its output
30. What point does Simon Colton make in the fourth paragraph?
A. Software-produced art is often dismissed as childish and simplistic.
B. The same concepts of creativity should not be applied to all forms of art.
C. It is unreasonable to expect a machine to be as imaginative as a human
being.
D. People tend to judge computer art and human art according to different
criteria.
31. The writer refers to the paintings of a chair as an example of computer art
which
A. achieves a particularly striking effect.
B. exhibits a certain level of genuine artistic skill.
C. closely resembles that of a well-known artist.
D. highlights the technical limitations of the software.
Most managers can identify the major trends of the day. But in the course of
conducting research in a number of industries and working directly with
companies, we have discovered that managers often fail to recognize the less
obvious but profound ways these trends are influencing consumers’
aspirations, attitudes, and behaviors. This is especially true of trends that
managers view as peripheral to their core markets.
27. In the first paragraph, the writer says that most managers
A. fail to spot the key consumer trends of the moment.
B. make the mistake of focusing only on the principal consumer trends.
C. misinterpret market research data relating to current consumer trends.
D. are unaware of the significant impact that trends have on consumers’ lives.
The Happiness Industry describes how the project of a science of happiness has
become integral to capitalism. We learn much that is interesting about how
economic problems are being redefined and treated as psychological maladies.
In addition, Davies shows how the belief that inner states of pleasure and
displeasure can be objectively measured has informed management studies
and advertising. The tendency of thinkers such as J B Watson, the founder of
behaviorism*, was that human beings could be shaped, or manipulated, by
policymakers and managers. Watson had no factual basis for his view of
human action. When he became president of the American Psychological
Association in 1915, he ‘had never even studied a single human being’: his
research had been confined to experiments on white rats. Yet Watson’s
reductive model is now widely applied, with ‘behavior change’ becoming the
goal of governments: in Britain, a ‘Behaviour Insights Team’ has been
established by the government to study how people can be encouraged, at
minimum cost to the public purse, to live in what are considered to be socially
desirable ways.
28. The reviewer refers to the Greek philosopher Aristotle in order to suggest
that happiness
A. may not be just pleasure and the absence of pain.
B. should not be the main goal of humans.
C. is not something that should be fought for.
D. is not just an abstract concept.
29. According to Davies, Bentham’s suggestion for linking the price of goods
to happiness was significant because
A. it was the first successful way of assessing happiness.
B. it established a connection between work and psychology.
C. it was the first successful example of psychological research.
D. it involved consideration of the rights of consumers.
Practice 10 : The growth of bike-sharing schemes around the world
( Cam 14 reading test 1 part 2 )
How Dutch engineer Luud Schimmelpennink helped to devise urban bike-
sharing schemes
E. Theo Molenaar, who was a system designer for the project, worked
alongside Schimmelpennink. ‘I remember when we were testing the bike
racks, he announced that he had already designed better ones. But of course,
we had to go through with the ones we had.’ The system, however, was prone
to vandalism and theft. ‘After every weekend there would always be a couple
of bikes missing,’ Molenaar says. ‘I really have no idea what people did with
them, because they could instantly be recognised as white bikes.’ But the
biggest blow came when Postbank decided to abolish the chip card, because it
wasn’t profitable. ‘That chip card was pivotal to the system,’ Molenaar says.
‘To continue the project we would have needed to set up another system, but
the business partner had lost interest.’
A.In my view, it is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in zoos
or wildlife parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild.
Animals in good zoos get a varied and high-quality diet with all the
supplements required, and any illnesses they might have will be treated. Their
movement might be somewhat restricted, but they have a safe environment in
which to live, and they are spared bullying and social ostracism by others of
their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of predators, or the
irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal will
have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will
not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. A lot of very
nasty things happen to truly ‘wild’ animals that simply don’t happen in good
zoos, and to view a life that is ‘free’ as one that is automatically ‘good’ is, I
think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes.
C. Zoos also provide education. Many children and adults, especially those in
cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that
television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive,
and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is
nothing to compare with seeing a living creature in the flesh, hearing it,
smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That
alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and
hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts
and how they can contribute.
D. In addition to this, there is also the education that can take place in zoos
through signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate
information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the
world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now
increasingly sophisticated in their communication and outreach work. Many
zoos also work directly to educate conservation workers in other countries, or
send their animal keepers abroad to contribute their knowledge and skills to
those working in zoos and reserves, thereby helping to improve conditions and
reintroductions all over the world.
E. Zoos also play a key role in research. If we are to save wild species and
restore and repair ecosystems we need to know about how key species live, act
and react. Being able to undertake research on animals in zoos where there is
less risk and fewer variables means real changes can be effected on wild
populations. Finding out about, for example, the oestrus cycle of an animal of
its breeding rate helps us manage wild populations. Procedures such as
capturing and moving at-risk or dangerous individuals are bolstered by
knowledge gained in zoos about doses for anaesthetics, and by experience in
handling and transporting animals. This can make a real difference to
conservation efforts and to the reduction of human-animal conflicts, and can
provide a knowledge base for helping with the increasing threats of habitat
destruction and other problems.
C. Beyond these direct benefits, we can consider the wider implications for
transport and society, and how manufacturing processes might need to
respond as a result. At present, the average car spends more than 90 percent
of its life parked. Automation means that initiatives for car-sharing become
much more viable, particularly in urban areas with significant travel demand.
If a significant proportion of the population choose to use shared automated
vehicles, mobility demand can be met by far fewer vehicles.
D. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology investigated automated mobility
in Singapore, finding that fewer than 30 percent of the vehicles currently used
would be required if fully automated car sharing could be implemented. If
this is the case, it might mean that we need to manufacture far fewer vehicles
to meet demand. However, the number of trips being taken would probably
increase, partly because empty vehicles would have to be moved from one
customer to the next.
Modeling work by the University of Michigan Transportation Research
Institute suggests automated vehicles might reduce vehicle ownership by 43
percent, but that vehicles’ average annual mileage double as a result. As a
consequence, each vehicle would be used more intensively, and might need
replacing sooner. This faster rate of turnover may mean that vehicle
production will not necessarily decrease
G. It’s clear that there are many challenges that need to be addressed but,
through robust and targeted research, these can most probably be conquered
within the next 10 years. Mobility will change in such potentially significant
ways and in association with so many other technological developments, such
as telepresence and virtual reality, that it is hard to make concrete predictions
about the future. However, one thing is certain: change is coming, and the
need to be flexible in response to this will be vital for those involved in
manufacturing the vehicles that will deliver future mobility.
Thomas Hardy set some of his novels in Egdon Heath, a fictional area of
uncultivated land, and used the landscape to suggest the desires and fears of
his characters. He is delving into matters we all recognise because they are
common to humanity. This is surely an act of exploration, and into a world as
remote as the author chooses. Explorer and travel writer Peter Fleming talks
of the moment when the explorer returns to the existence he has left behind
with his loved ones. The traveler ‘who has for weeks or months seen himself
only as a puny and irrelevant alien crawling laboriously over a country in
which he has no roots and no background, suddenly encounters his other self,
a relatively solid figure, with a place in the minds of certain people’.
In this book about the exploration of the earth’s surface, I have confined
myself to those whose travels were real and who also aimed at more than
personal discovery. But that still left me with another problem: the word
‘explorer’ has become associated with a past era. We think back to a golden
age, as if exploration peaked somehow in the 19th century – as if the process
of discovery is now on the decline, though the truth is that we have named
only one and a half million of this planet’s species, and there may be more
than 10 million – and that’s not including bacteria. We have studied only 5
per cent of the species we know. We have scarcely mapped the ocean floors,
and know even less about ourselves; we fully understand the workings of only
10 percent of our brains.
Here is how some of today’s ‘explorers’ define the word. Ran Fiennes, dubbed
the ‘greatest living explorer’, said, ‘An explorer is someone who has done
something that no human has done before – and also done something
scientifically useful.’ Chris Bonington, a leading mountaineer, felt exploration
was to be found in the act of physically touching the unknown: ‘You have to
have gone somewhere new.’ Then Robin Hanbury-Tenison, a campaigner on
behalf of remote so-called ‘tribal’ peoples, said, ‘A traveler simply records
information about some far-off world, and reports back; but an explorer
changes the world.’ Wilfred Thesiger, who crossed Arabia’s Empty Quarter
in 1946, and belongs to an era of unmechanised travel now lost to the rest of
us, told me, ‘If I’d gone across by camel when I could have gone by car, it
would have been a stunt.’ To him, exploration meant bringing back
information from a remote place regardless of any great self-discovery.
Each definition is slightly different – and tends to reflect the field of endeavor
of each pioneer. It was the same whoever I asked: the prominent historian
would say exploration was a thing of the past, the cutting-edge scientist would
say it was of the present. And so on. They each set their own particular
criteria; the common factor in their approach being that they all had, unlike
many of us who simply enjoy travel or discovering new things, both a very
definite objective from the outset and also a desire to record their findings.
I’d best declare my own bias. As a writer, I’m interested in the exploration of
ideas. I’ve done a great many expeditions and each one was unique. I’ve lived
for months alone with isolated groups of people all around the world, even
two ‘uncontacted tribes’. But none of these things is of the slightest interest to
anyone unless, through my books, I’ve found a new slant, explored a new idea.
Why? Because the world has moved on. The time has long passed for the great
continental voyages – another walk to the poles, another crossing of the
Empty Quarter. We know how the land surface of our planet lies; exploration
of it is now down to the details – the habits of microbes, say, or the grazing
behavior of buffalo. Aside from the deep sea and deep underground, it’s the
era of specialists. However, this is to disregard the role the human mind has in
conveying remote places; and this is what interests me: how a fresh
interpretation, even of a well-traveled route, can give its readers new insights.
28. According to the second paragraph, what is the writer’s view of explorers?
A. Their discoveries have brought both benefits and disadvantages.
B. Their main value is in teaching others.
C. They act on an urge that is common to everyone.
D. They tend to be more attracted to certain professions than to others.
30. In the fourth paragraph, the writer refers to ‘a golden age’ to suggest that
A. the amount of useful information produced by exploration has decreased.
B. fewer people are interested in exploring than in the 19th century.
C. recent developments have made exploration less exciting.
D. we are wrong to think that exploration is no longer necessary.
31. In the sixth paragraph, when discussing the definition of exploration, the
writer argues that
A. people tend to relate exploration to their own professional interests.
B. certain people are likely to misunderstand the nature of exploration.
C. the generally accepted definition has changed over time.
D. historians and scientists have more valid definitions than the general
public.
Humans start developing a sense of humor as early as six weeks old, when
babies begin to laugh and smile in response to stimuli. Laughter is universal
across all human cultures and even exists in some form in rats, chimps, and
bonobos. Like other human emotions and expressions, laughter and humor
provide psychological scientists with rich resources for studying human
psychology, ranging from the development of language to the neuroscience of
social perception.
Researchers have also found that different types of laughter serve as codes to
complex human social hierarchies. A team led by Christopher Oveis from the
University of California, San Diego, found that high-status individuals had
different laughs from low-status individuals, and that strangers’ judgements
of an individual’s social status were influenced by the dominant or submissive
quality of their laughter. In their study, 48 male college students were
randomly assigned to groups of four, with each group composed of two low-
status members, who had just joined their college fraternity group, and two
high-status members, older student took a turn at being teased by the others,
involving the use of mildly insulting nicknames. Analysis revealed that, as
expected, high-status individuals produced more dominant laughs and fewer
submissive laughs relative to the low-status individuals. Meanwhile, low-status
individuals were more likely to change their laughter based on their position
of power; that is, the newcomers produced more dominant laughs when they
were in the ‘powerful’ role of teasers. Dominant laughter was higher in pitch,
louder, and more variable in tone than submissive laughter.
The students then completed a task requiring persistence in which they were
asked to guess the potential performance of employees based on provided
profiles, and were told that making 10 correct assessments in a row would
lead to a win. However, the software was programmed such that it was nearly
impossible to achieve 10 consecutive correct answers. Participants were
allowed to quit the task at any point. Students who had watched the Mr. Bean
video ended up spending significantly more time working on the task, making
twice as many predictions as the other two groups.
Cheng and Wang then replicated these results in a second study, during which
they had participants complete long multiplication questions by hand. Again,
participants who watched the humorous video spent significantly more time
working on this tedious task and completed more questions correctly than did
the students in either of the other groups.
‘Although humor has been found to help relieve stress and facilitate social
relationships, traditional view of task performance implies that individuals
should avoid things such as humor that may distract them from the
accomplishment of task goals,’ Cheng and Wang conclude. ‘We suggest that
humor is not only enjoyable but more importantly, energizing.’
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 27-31 on your answer sheet.
27. When referring to laughter in the first paragraphs, the writer
emphasizes
A. its impact on language.
B. its function in human culture.
C. its value to scientific research.
D. its universality in animal societies.
31. In the fifth paragraph, what did the results of the San Diego study
suggest?
A. It is clear whether a dominant laugh is produced by a high- or low-status
person.
B. Low-status individuals in a position of power will still produce submissive
laughs.
C. The submissive laughs of low- and high-status individuals are surprisingly
similar.
D. High-status individuals can always be identified by their way of laughing.
Practice 15 : Environmental practices of big businesses
( Cam 15 reading test 4 part 3 )
It is easy for the rest of us to blame a business for helping itself by hurting
other people. But blaming alone is unlikely to produce change. It ignores the
fact that businesses are not charities but profit-making companies, and that
publicly owned companies with shareholders are under obligation to those
shareholders to maximize profits, provided that they do so by legal means. US
laws make a company’s directors legally liable for something termed ‘breach
of fiduciary responsibility’ if they knowingly manage a company in a way that
reduces profits. The car manufacturer Henry Ford was in fact successfully
sued by shareholders in 1919 for raising the minimum wage of his workers to
$5 per day: the courts declared that, while Ford’s humanitarian sentiments
about his employees were nice, his business existed to make profits for its
stockholders.
In turn, big businesses can exert powerful pressure on any suppliers that
might ignore public or government pressure. For instance, after the US public
became concerned about the spread of a disease known as BSE, which was
transmitted to humans through infected meat, the US government’s Food and
Drug Administration introduced rules demanding that the meat industry
abandon practices associated with the risk of the disease spreading. But for
five years the meat packers refused to follow these, claiming that they would
be too expensive to obey. However, when a major fast-food company then
made the same demands after customer purchases of its hamburgers
plummeted, the meat industry complied within weeks. The public’s task is
therefore to identify which links in the supply chain are sensitive to public
pressure: for instance, fast-food chains or jewelry stores, but not meat packers
or gold miners.
33
In the fourth paragraph, the writer describes ways in which the public can
A. reduce their own individual impact on the environment.
B. learn more about the impact of business on the environment.
C. raise awareness of the effects of specific environmental disasters.
D. influence the environmental policies of businesses and governments.
34
What pressure was exerted by big business in the case of the disease BSE?
A. Meat packers stopped supplying hamburgers to fast-food chains.
B. A fast-food company forced their meat suppliers to follow the law.
C. Meat packers persuaded the government to reduce their expenses.
D. A fast-food company encouraged the government to introduce legislation.