You are on page 1of 6

Accelerat ing t he world's research.

Biodiversity in natural versus


managed forest in Denmark
Morten Christensen

Forest Ecology and Management

Cite this paper Downloaded from Academia.edu 

Get the citation in MLA, APA, or Chicago styles

Related papers Download a PDF Pack of t he best relat ed papers 

T he st ruct ural dynamics of Suserup Skov, a near-nat ural t emperat e deciduous forest in Den…
Mort en Christ ensen

Nat ural forest st and dynamics in t ime and space-synt hesis of research in Suserup Skov, Denmark an…
Richard Bradshaw

Nat ural forest st and dynamics in t ime and space--synt hesis of research in Suserup Skov, Denmark a…
Richard Bradshaw
Fores;;;ology
Management
EISEVIER Forest Ecologyand Management85(1996) 47-51

Biodiversity in natural versus managed forest in Denmark


Mortdn Christensen a** , Jens Emborg b
a University of Aarhus, Department o$Ecology und Genetics, Ny Munkegode, Building 540, DK-8000 irhrhus C, Denmark
b The National Forest ad’ Nature Agency. Haraldsgade 53, DK-2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark

Abstract

During recent millennia the biodiversity patterns of the Danish forests have changed. Many of the rare or threatened
species in Denmark are related to habitats characteristic of natural forest ecosystems, By comparing the structure and
dynamics of natural and managed forests the following key elements related to biodiversity were identified: woody debris,
forest heterogeneity, (successional) continuity and water. To incorporate these elements into modem forest management, a
change in attitude and practice is needed. Education and training will be an important part of this move towards
sustainability.

Keywords: Mosaic-cycle; Sustainability; Temperate forest dynamics

1. Introduction ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and elm (Ulmus glabra


Hudson). The last glaciation of Denmark ended about
It has recently been realized that protection of 13000 years ago, at which time most of the country
biodiversity will be a major task for future forest was covered by a glacial ice-sheet. After the glacia-
management. As in most of Europe, the Danish tion, a large-scalesuccessiontook place, new species
landscape has been heavily influenced by humans successively arrived and some disappeared as the
during the last 5-6 millennia. This has changed the climate, soil and vegetation changed.
biodiversity patterns of Danish forests. In this article During the first 7000 years after the glaciation,
we try to explain the main reasons for this change the country was inhabited by a limited human popu-
and give some suggestions for forest management to lation of fishers, hunters and food-gatherers. From
resolve the problem. about 6000 years ago, the land use pattern gradually
changed as the population increased and slash-and-
bum agricultural methods were adopted. The whole
2. The historical background landscape changed as the forests were turned into
The surviving semi-natural vegetation in most agricultural land, a development which continued
parts of Denmark is cool-temperate deciduous forest throughout the succeedingmillennia.
dominated by beech (Fugus sylvarica L.), oak The forest area gradually decreasedto a minimum
(Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea L. ex Liebl.), level in 1805 AD, representing less than 3% of the
total area of Denmark.
Since 1805 the forest area has increased to its
* Corresponding author. present level of about 12%. Most of the area consists

037% I 127/96/$ IS.00 Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII SO378- 1 127(96)03749-8
48 M. Chrisrensm. J. Emborg/ Forest Ecology and Manugemrnt 85 (1996) 47-51

of plantations, i.e. monocultures of introduced Table I


conifers. The area of forest genetically originating Status of terrestrial species in Denmark (The National Forest and
Nature Agency. 1990)
from the pristine forests is estimated to be about 1%
Total number Number of Red data list
of the total area of Denmark (The National Forest
of species species on spectes primartly
and Nature Agency, 1994). Today, most of these in Denmark the red data restricted to
genetically authentic forests are intensively managed. (approx.) list of 1990 forest habitats
^_____-
In 1993, only about 500 ha were protected as non-in- Macrofungi a 3ooo 903 (30%) 758 184%)
tervention forest. Lichens 900 634 (70%) 218 (34%)
Vascular plants 1200 261 (22%) 63 (24%)
Insects b 3684 1110(30%) 5651519;)
3. Red data book of threatened species in Den- Birds 185 97 (520/r,) 22f23qt
Mammals 50 19 W3%) ! 7 ~68’:: I
mark
Only Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes with fruit-bodies larger
In 1990, a red data book for Denmark was pub- than 1 mm are included.
lished, considering the rare or threatened species of Only beetles (Coleoptera), butterflies (RhophaloceraL and bumets
(Zygaeidae) and included.
fungi, plants and animals (The National Forest and
Nature Agency, 1991). Out of a total of 9360 species
considered in the list, 3 176 were classified as rare or developmental phases (Fig. 21. With a typical patch-
threatened (Table 1). Of these, 353 had not been size of 500-1500 m2, spatial heterogeneity and
observed during the last 30 years and were thus beta-diversity are high. The natural temperate forest
classified as extinct. About half (1642) of the rare or ecosystem produces a lot of habitat gradients within
threatened species have their natural habitat in the relatively small areas, resulting in a high beta-diver-
forests, indicating the present problems of maintain- sity. Gamma-diversity is also high in natural forests.
ing biodiversity in the managed forests. In Suserup Forest (20 ha), a non-intervention ancient
forest in eastern Denmark, a total number of 601
species of fungi have been recorded between 1900
4. The biodiversity of natural temperate decidu-
and 1995, of which 74 were on the red dam list
ous forest
(Heilmann-Clausen, unpublished data). In Kaas For-
The dynamics of natural temperate deciduous
forests can be described by the mosaic-cycle concept
(Remmert, 1991). The forest cycle describes a con-
tinuous shift between a sequential series of develop-
mental phases (Fig. 1). Each of the phases provides
different life conditions for the organisms in the
forest. At the ‘innovation’ phase, many herbs and
shrubs have optimal conditions. The ‘degradation’
phase provides habitats for saprophytic fungi, wood-
living insects and hole-nesting birds, while the long-
lasting ‘biostatic’ phases provide the continuity and
stability needed for the establishment of tree-depen-
dent mosses, lichens and mycorrhiza fungi. This
explains the extremely high alpha-diversity (Whit-
taker, 1972) found in some patches or phases of the
mosaic-cycle.
Over time, every patch of forest goes through the
phases of the forest cycle, but unsynchronously from Fig. I. The forest cycle of natural temperate deciduous forest
patch to patch, thus creating a shifting mosaic of the (after Emborg, 1996).
M. Christensen, J. Emborg/ Forest Ecology and Management 85 (1996) 47-51 49

innovation
aggradation
early biostatic
late biostatic
m degradation
Fig. 2. The shifting mosaic of Suserup Forest (10 ha) in 1993, a non-intervention ancient forest in eastern Denmark (after Emborg, I 996)

est (100 ha), an ancient oak-dominated non-interven-


tion forest in western Denmark, a total of 111 species
of epiphytic lichens have been found, of which 31
were red data species (Sochting and Christensen,
harvesting
1989).
early biostatic

I:
5. Tbe biodiversity of managed temperate decidu- ::
ous forest ::
::
The dynamics of the managed forests can be ::
described as a sequential shift between the early or
young phases of the forest cycle, equivalent to about
m!l!!u
aggJndstion
t :I
half of the full forest cycle (Fig. 3). Typically man-
aged beech stands are harvested when they are about innovation

120 years old, i.e. in the ‘early biostatic’ phase. The Fig. 3. The forest cycle of managed temperate deciduous forest.
consequence of this is an almost complete lack of
trees in the ‘late biostatic’ and ‘degradation’ phases
in managed forests. This affects the diversity of forest management. The light open conditions at the
oFganisms restricted to old trees and woody debris forest floor after thinning or clearcutting may even
(e.g. insects, fungi and hole-nesting birds). The di- be beneficial for these organisms.
versity of organisms primarily related to the ‘innova- The structural differences between the natural and
tion’ phase (e.g. vascular plants) is less affected by the managed deciduous forests are reflected in both
50 h4. Christensen, J. Emhorg/Forrst Ecology und h4anagement 85 (1996147-51

the alpha- and the beta-diversity of the two forest To summarize, the result of human impact is a
types. A typical managed forest in Denmark is com- loss of both alpha- and beta-diversity, and hence a
posed of a number of even-aged monospecific stands, lower gamma-diversity of the Danish forests.
each typically within a size range of l-4 ha (Fig. 4).
The spatial heterogeneity is low compared to the
natural forest mosaic, and accordingly the beta-diver- 6. Sustainable forestry in Denmark
sity is relatively low. Many species are specialized to
live in the border-zone between two patches (e.g. In short, we conclude that the main biodiversity
birds, insects, or mammals hiding in a closed dark problems in the intensively managed forests of Den-
patch and feeding in an open patch). The large mark are related to lack of woody debris, lack of
patch-size in a managed forest reduces the frequency floristic and structural heterogeneity, lack of (forest
of such border zones. Further, the long distance successional) continuity and lack of permanent water
between different patches of the same phase causes in the forests. Hence, part of the solution of the
lower alpha-diversity for organisms with a limited biodiversity problem of the Danish forests is:
dispersal capability, thus increasing the risk of ex- 1. To set aside non-intervention forest reserves where
tinction (see McArthur and Wilson, 1967). natural forest dynamics (i.e. the full forest cycle)
During the last 150 years up to some 80% of the can take place.
forest wetland areas in Denmark have been drained 2. To improve forest management systems such that
(Petersen, 1988). This development has further re- they allow for the continuation of natural forest
duced the heterogeneity of the forest mosaic and dynamics, including forest heterogeneity, the re-
with this the beta-diversity of the forests. Accord- tention of woody material on the forest fhr, and
ingly, many species related to the wet areas, or to the protection of water bodies and swamps.
gradient from moist to dry. are threatened in the To mention one example of management im-
managed forests. In this way draining has con- provements: dead wood should be left behind after
tributed to the reduced diversity of the forests. cutting or felling operations (Fig. 51. Such efforts do

u innovation
aggradation
early biostatic
coniferous plantation
Fig. 4. Typical Danish managed forest (IO ha from Ringelmose Forest, Denmark; after M. Christensen, unpublished data, 1%).
M. Christensen, J. Emborg / Forest Ecology und Munagement 85 (1996) 47-51 51

already to act in order to improve our caretaking of


biodiversity in the Danish forests.
Education and training of forest staff at all levels
(from forest workers to technicians and managers) is
needed to change attitudes and practices after many
years of clearcut-based management. Educational ini-
tiatives should be among the first steps to be taken in
the long-term process towards sustainability.

References
Emborg, J., 1996. The structure dynamics and light conditions of
Suserup Forest, a semi-natural temperate forest in Denmark.
Ph.D. Thesis, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural Univer-
innovation
sity, Copenhagen.
Fig. 5. The forest cycle of a sustainably managed forest. The basic McArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O., 1967. The Theory of Island
principle is to integrate key elements of the full forest cycle in the Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
management system. Petersen, F.R., 1988. Aspects of the Decline in Extent of Mires in
Central North Zealand State Forests During the 19th and 20th
Century. Prize Essay, University of Copenhagen, 99 pp.
not need to be very costly, often trees of limited Remmert, H., 1991. The mosaic-cycle consept of ecosystems-an
economic value provide perfect habitats for birds, overview. In: H. Remmert (Editor), The Mosaic-Cycle Con-
cept of Ecosystems. Ecological Studies, Vol. 85. Springer-
fungi and insects, for example. To create heterogene-
Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-2 1.
ity and continuity, large clearcut-based monocultures Sochting, U. and Christensen, S.N., 1989. Overv%gning af laver i
should, wherever possible, be converted into selec- danske naturskove 1988 (Monitoring of lichens in Danish
tive cutting management systems. Such systems natural forest 1988). Miljoministeriet. Skov- og Naturstyrelsen,
would be characterized by a mixture of tree species 80 pp. (In Danish with English summary.)
The National Forest and Nature Agency, 1991. Rodliste ‘90,
of different age and size forming a small-scale mo-
Smrligt beskyttelseskrmvende planter og dyr i Danmark (Red
saic pattern. In fact, many of the drained areas of the data book of threatened plants and animals in Denmark).
forests are rather marginal for tree production. Many Miljprministeriet, Skov- og Naturstyrelsen, Kobenhavn, 222
of those former lakes or swamps could be re-estab- pp. (In Danish with English summary.)
lished, simply by closing the ditches draining the The National Forest and Nature Agency, 1994. Strategy for
Natural Forests and Other Forest Types of High Conservation
area. We need more knowledge about natural forest
Value in Denmark. MiIjraministeriet, Skov- og Naturstyrelsen,
dynamics and a deeper understanding of the relation Kobenhavn, 48 pp.
between biodiversity of forest ecosystems and pre- Whittaker, R.H., 1972. Evolution and measurement of species
sent management practices. But we do know enough diversity. Taxon, 21 (2/3): 213-251.

You might also like