Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OSPREY
PUBLISHING
First published in Great Britain in 2011 by Osprey Publishing Ltd.
Osprey Publishing
Midland House, West Way, Botley, Oxford OX2 0PH, UK
443 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10016, USA
E-mail: info@ospreypublishing.com
All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose
of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under
the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, no part of this
publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical,
chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright
owner. Enquiries should be addressed to the Publishers.
TATAR 30 POLISHLITHUANIAN 83
Tatar Allies
COMMONWEALTH
EARLY RUSSIAN 33 Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Allies
Early Russian Allies
LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH 91
EARLY POLISH 39
Later Ottoman Turkish Allies
Early Polish Allies
EARLY GUSTAVAN SWEDISH 97
EARLY LITHUANIAN 45
INTRODUCTION
4
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
Poland would be plunged by revolt and invasion into passive, sluggish, or erratic responses to external
the trial of the “Deluge”, which it seemed unlikely to threats and internal problems. This would prove
survive (and which will be covered in Field of Glory a serious risk for the Commonwealth when
Renaissance Companion 5: Duty and Glory). surrounded by relentlessly ambitious empires
Poland-Lithuania was the central power of seeking to encroach upon its territory, and the
Eastern Europe – vast, populous, and prosperous, reason why it was constitutionally unsuited to
having a numerous nobility with proud warrior develop into an aggressive super-state.
traditions – yet frequently passive and slow to The Ottomans were the strongest power in
muster its strength in a crisis. One important Eastern Europe or the Middle East at the
reason for the latter problem was that, unlike its beginning of the period, and continued as a threat
neighbours, who had evolved powerful or even in the minds of Europeans until after their
absolute monarchies, so that war and peace were resounding defeat at Vienna in 1683. Their success
at the will of the King, Tsar, Sultan or Emperor, was based on a large army of good quality troops
the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was an with a high standard of organization, equipment
elective federal monarchy. The authority of the (early adoption of gunpowder weapons) and supply.
state was limited and the business of government Its most important components were the mounted
constrained by each legislator’s right of liberum sipahis and Janissary foot. Whilst the Janissaries
veto – the ability, acting alone, to dissolve the sejm have captured modern imaginations, at the time it
(parliament) and nullify its proceedings. This was the sipahis who were considered the most
principle of unanimity was praised as a bulwark dangerous part of the Ottoman army.
of freedom, a restraint on oppressive government The Ottoman tide ebbed and flowed in
and royal overreaching, but at times it also fostered strength and aggressiveness, depending on the
qualities of the Sultan and Grand Vizier in power,
Ottoman Janissaries as well as the human and material costs of war,
5
CLASH OF EMPIRES
waged both in Europe and in the Middle East, The character of armies and warfare in Eastern
but ideally not at the same time. These wars are Europe and the Middle East in the 16th century
outlined in the introductions to the corresponding and early 17th century differed from that in
army lists. Western Europe. Mounted troops were most
The Ottomans successfully conquered the suitable for campaigning across the vast distances
Mamluks, the North African coastal states, and of the east, usually lightly settled with few useful
most of the Middle East, but were effectively roads but often good grazing, and the opponents
stopped in Persia by the Safavids. In Europe, they they faced were usually similar horsemen or
expanded their holdings to include most of relatively weak infantry. Accordingly, the common
Hungary, as a result of which the Habsburgs attribute of eastern armies was the continued
became the bulwark protecting Central Europe dominance of the mounted arm, usually a mix of
against the Turkish tide. Like the Sultan, the heavy and light cavalry relying mainly on archery.
Emperor sought to avoid wars on two fronts, so Some armies employed lancers as shock cavalry,
that there were extended periods of both war and but these were more lightly armoured than
peace. The Imperialist armies were initially western western knights. A well-known example is the
in character, but adapted to the Ottoman challenge colourful Polish “winged hussars”. Their effective
by evolving their tactics and including numerous mobile and aggressive shock tactics influenced
specialized eastern light troops. These tactics and tactical developments by their opponents, notably
troops were also used in western campaigns. the Swedish king, Gustavus Adolphus.
The trend in Eastern Europe was for firearms
German Mercenary Pike and Shot to replace bows for cavalry by the 17th century,
6
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
although rates of adoption varied. While the and Persia were among the countries that formed EARLY OTTOMAN
Ottomans were early adopters of gunpowder trained corps of “shot” (infantrymen with arquebus TURKISH
weapons and sought to increase their use, in the or musket) to utilize these advantages and counter
Middle East many mounted troops disdained opposing shot. Like the Janissaries before them,
firearms and saw no need to change. these forces tended to become indispensable both
The vulnerability of eastern infantry to cavalry, in war and in maintaining political authority, and
and its lower strategic mobility, meant that early in could form a large portion of an army.
the period it was often an ancillary arm, useful During this period in the west, mixed pike and
mainly in sieges and the defence of towns and shot infantry formations became the rule, but in
fortified places. It usually consisted of missile troops, the east these were used mainly by mercenaries
expected to weaken the enemy with shooting and (commonly Germans). The role of the pike was
support the cavalry, but not ordinarily expected to to deter heavy cavalry charges and face opposing
successfully stand alone against mounted charges in pike and shot formations, which were typically
open ground – although it could hold its own from not tactical demands in the east. Eastern armies
behind wagon forts or other defences. The role of did, however, face western-style forces, and both
infantry tended to increase over time, with the major sides learned from the interaction.
changes involving the use of firearms and better Wars in the east were primarily wars of mobility
organization and discipline. rather than dominated by sieges. Siege artillery was
Although the maximum rate of fire of a musket valuable when needed, but a permanent artillery
or arquebus is slower than a bow, with poor train for field battles was a drag on strategic
accuracy, the physical and training requirements mobility. Some armies turned to light cannon as a
for effective use were much lower than for the bow, useful and more mobile complement to foot troops,
and increased penetrating power and lethality but the Ottomans in particular based their standard
compensated for low rate of fire, even at battle array on a static main battle line of heavy
considerable distances. Firearms had a greater guns and good Janissary foot in the centre,
moral effect on eastern cavalry, who sought to use protected against cavalry charges by field defences,
their mobility and mix of shooting and charges to such as chains between the guns in front and
catch opposing infantry at a disadvantage. Russia wagons protecting the flanks.
7
CLASH OF EMPIRES
8
EARLY OTTOMAN TURKISH
EARLY OTTOMAN
TURKISH
Ottoman troops, early 16th century, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd.
Taken from Men-at-Arms 140: Armies of the Ottoman Turks 1300–1774.
9
CLASH OF EMPIRES
founded circa 1362 by Murad I, and was initially weapons and they are famous for their individual
recruited from Christian prisoners of war fighting skills. Accordingly “bow” and “arquebus”
converted to Islam. By the end of the 14th century weapon categories reflect only the dominant
a second method of recruitment had been weapon and players are free to make their choice
instituted, the devşirme – a levy of boys aged 12 to and either have all Janissary foot armed with
16 from the conquered Christian territories. the same missile capability or to have a mix of
Separated from their families, these boys largely capabilities if more than one battle group is
converted to Islam. Their own children would be fielded (but not within each battle group).
Muslims and hence not eligible to become “Swordsmen” capability also reflects a
Janissaries, thus preventing the development mix of close quarter weaponry.
of hereditary ties within the corps. Thus, in Azaps (“bachelors”) were lightly-
theory at least, the Janissary corps gave the equipped Turkish infantry, recruited for
Ottoman Sultans an unswervingly loyal the duration of each campaign.
standing army.
Sources refer to Janissary soldiers
being allowed to choose their own Azap Archer
10
EARLY OTTOMAN TURKISH
EARLY OTTOMAN
TURKISH
Ottoman troops, early 16th century, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd.
Taken from Men-at-Arms 140: Armies of the Ottoman Turks 1300–1774.
11
CLASH OF EMPIRES
12
HUNGARIAN
HUNGARIAN
13
CLASH OF EMPIRES
TROOP NOTES
Hungarian armies of the time tended to be small,
engaging mostly in a raiding, counter-raiding and
border skirmishes with the Ottomans. When
large armies were required, the Hungarians
usually had to hire numerous mercenaries to make
up numbers, as the availability of trained local
troops was limited and most of those could not be
called upon for campaigns, given that they usually
garrisoned vital fortresses along the border.
King Louis II at the Battle of Mohacs There was little innovation in the Hungarian
army of this period. What little did occur was
those Turks” – meaning “someone else”. Given usually introduced via Germany/Bohemia – such
that situation, the very survival of Hungary for as as the use of pikes and massed arquebus-armed
long as it did was due to the occasional heroic infantry.
actions of a few, and because the Ottomans were The rich Szekler nobles, who had provided the
largely preoccupied on other fronts. armoured Szekler cavalry earlier, had largely by
Vladislav died in 1515 and was succeeded now adopted full plate armour and acted as other
by his ten-year-old son Louis II. When the gendarmes. While they continued to carry a bow
inevitable Turkish invasion finally materialized, it is unlikely that their
the boy-King found it impossible to put an armour allowed the
effective army into the field before the Ottomans effective use of it
captured Nándorfehérvár (modern Beograd/ on the battlefield.
Belgrade). When the army had finally assembled,
it turned out to be ill-equipped, ill-disciplined
and badly led, so disbanded itself before even
attempting to recapture the city.
In 1526, when another large scale Ottoman
invasion descended upon Hungary, Louis, aided Hungarian
by his wife, at least managed to assemble an army Hussar
in time to meet the invaders, resulting in the
disastrous battle of Mohács. The Hungarian army
was all but obliterated and Louis drowned while
trying to escape.
14
HUNGARIAN
HUNGARIAN
Moldavian light cavalryman, Transylvanian halberdier, and Hungarian handgunner, c.1500, by Angus
McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 195: Hungary and the fall of Eastern
Europe 1000–1568.
15
CLASH OF EMPIRES
HUNGARIAN
Territory Types: Agricultural, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting Impact per base per BG bases
Combat
Core Troops
Fully Heavy
Gendarmes Superior – Swordsmen 21 4–6 0–8
Armoured Lancers
Fully Light 4–
Nobles Gendarmes Average – Swordsmen 15 4–6
Armoured Lancers 4– 16
Light 12
Cavaliers Armoured Average – Swordsmen 14 4–6
Lancers
0–
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – – 7 4–6
12
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6 8–
Hussars 30 8–
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6 30
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Light 0–8
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow* Swordsmen 12 4–6
Lance
16
HUNGARIAN
Optional Troops
Armoured Average – Spearmen Spearmen 5 6–8 0–8
City militia Heavy Foot Average 4 0–
Unarmoured – Spearmen Spearmen 6–10
Poor 2 16 0– HUNGARIAN
16
Only after Armoured 6 0–
City militia Heavy Foot Average – Pike Pike 8–12
1512 Unarmoured 5 12
Medium Average 4
Unarmoured Crossbow – – 6–8
Militia or mercenary Foot Poor 2 0–
crossbowmen Average 4 16
Light Foot Unarmoured Crossbow – – 6–8 0–
Poor 2 16
Militia or Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6
Only after
mercenary Medium 0–6
1515 Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6
arquebusiers Foot
German mercenary men- Heavily Light
Horse Average – Swordsmen 12 4–6 0–8
at-arms Armoured Lancers
Light 0–
Poorly-equipped German Horse Armoured Average – Swordsmen 10 4–6 0– 16
Lancers
mercenary men-at-arms 16
Horse Armoured Average – – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Armoured Superior – Pike Pike 9 8–16
10–
Heavy Foot Heavy Heavy
Armoured Superior – 9 0–2 16
Weapon Weapon
Unarmoured Superior – Pike Pike 8 8–16
10–
Heavy Foot Heavy Heavy
Unarmoured Superior 8 0–2 16
Weapon Weapon 0–
Landsknechts
Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 8–16 24
Only from 10–
1514 Heavy Foot Heavy Heavy
Armoured Average – 6 0–2 16
Weapon Weapon
Unarmoured Average – Pike Pike 5 8–16
10–
Heavy Foot Heavy Heavy
Unarmoured Average – 5 0–2 16
Weapon Weapon
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4–6
Landsknecht
Medium 0–8
arquebusiers Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Foot
Superior 12
Light Horse Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 9
Unarmoured Superior 13
Unarmoured Average Light 10
Cavalry Bow* Swordsmen 4–6
Armoured Superior Lancers 16
Szekler cavalry 0–16
Armoured Average 12
Unarmoured Superior 13
Unarmoured Average 10
Cavalry Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Armoured Superior 16
Armoured Average 12
Superior 8
Light Foot Unarmoured Bow – –
Average 5
Medium Superior 8
Szekler foot Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8 0–12
Foot Average 5
Medium Superior 9
Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen
Foot Average 6
Light Light
Light guns – Average – – 12 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Medium Medium
Field guns – Average – – 20 0–6
Artillery Artillery 2, 3 or
0–6
Heavy Heavy 4
Heavy field guns – Average – – 25
Artillery Artillery
Field
Field fortifications – – – – – 3 – 0–16
Fortifications
Fortified camp 24 0–1
17
CLASH OF EMPIRES
18
EARLY VENETIAN COLONIAL
Venetian Elmeti
19
CLASH OF EMPIRES
20
WALLACHIAN, MOLDAVIAN AND TRANSYLVANIAN
WALLACHIAN, MOLDAVIAN
AND TRANSYLVANIAN
EARLY VENETIAN
COLONIAL
T
WALLACHIAN,
MOLDAVIAN
his covers the armies of these three states, Ottomans were on occasion sent on wide-ranging AND
TRANSYLVANIAN
covering the area that is now Romania, independent actions to distract the enemy, draw off
which spent most of the period as vassals of the troops and cause widespread devastation.
Ottoman Empire. Wallachia was such a vassal for The list covers Wallachian and Moldavian
the whole of the period, whilst Moldavia was armies from 1494 to 1698, and Transylvanian
initially independent, but succumbed to vassal armies from 1494 until the eve of the Thirty
status in 1504. Transylvania was initially Years’ War.
part of Hungary, but, following
the Ottoman conquest of the TROOP NOTES
majority of Hungary in the Haiduks were border settlers and highly skilled at
aftermath of Mohács in 1626, the guerrilla-type warfare, and would
Ottomans split it off as a semi- be adopted by the Poles. Whilst
independent vassal. primarily shooters, they were
Most military activity above the level willing to fight in hand-to-hand
of raiding was in conjunction with combat with swords and axes if
the Ottomans, or in occasional necessary. Thus we give
rebellion against them. them Swordsmen melee
The sometimes substantial capability in addition to
contingents provided for the their shooting capability.
21
CLASH OF EMPIRES
22
MAMLUK
Allies
Polish allies (Only Moldavians before 1576) – Early Polish
Crimean Tatar allies (Only Moldavians) – Tatar
Ottoman Turkish allies – Early Ottoman Turkish (Before 1596) or Later Ottoman Turkish (From 1596)
Medium 0–
Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8
Only before Foot 16 0–
Archers
1600 16
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8 0–8
MAMLUK
23
CLASH OF EMPIRES
redoubts the Mamluks had constructed. The with lance and mace, but some of the Syrian
ensuing battle was hard fought, but it ended in troops had reverted to lancer tactics. The usual
Mamluk defeat and the end of their state. deployment was Mamluk horse archers in the
This list covers Mamluk armies from 1494 to centre, with Turcomans on one wing and Bedouin
1517. on the other.
As with many other armies in the east based
TROOP NOTES around the horse archer, the Mamluks were
Mamluks were exhaustively trained slave soldiers instinctively reluctant to adopt firearms or
of steppe origin. Halqa were mostly free-born gunpowder artillery. It was only in their final,
cavalry, paid less than the mamluks, and of lower unsuccessful, campaign against the invading
status. Devastating horse archery was central to Ottomans that the Mamluks used artillery in the
Mamluk tactics, although they were also equipped field, but this proved too late to save them.
24
MAMLUK
MAMLUK
Mamluk troops, c.1515, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 259:
The Mamluks 1250–1517.
MAMLUK
Territory Types: Agricultural
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Heavily Elite 22
Cavalry Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 0–6
Armoured Superior 19 0–
Sultan’s mamluks
Superior 16 0– 12
Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 12 12
Amirs’ and previous Superior 16
Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 12–36
sultans’ mamluks Average 12
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 8 4–6
Lancers
Bedouin 4–18
Light
Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Lancers
25
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Optional Troops
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Turcomans 0–12
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Average 5
Medium Foot Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8
Poor 3
Foot archers 0–12
Average 5
Light Foot Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8
Poor 3
Light
Javelinmen Warriors Unarmoured Average – – 4 6–8 0–12
Spear
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4–6
Handgunners 0–6
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4–6
MAMLUK ALLIES
Allied Commander Field Commander/Troop Commander 40/25 1
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Superior 16
Sultan’s mamluks Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4 0–4
Average 12
Amirs’ and previous Superior 16
Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 4–12
sultans’ mamluks Average 12
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 8 4–6
Lancers
Bedouin 4–6
Light
Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Lancers
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4
Turcomans 0–4
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 12 4
Syrian halqa Light 0–4
Cavalry Armoured Average – Swordsmen 11 4
Lancers
26
AQ QOYUNLU TURCOMAN
AQ QOYUNLU TURCOMAN
TROOP NOTES
Pushan-dar were the best-equipped of the cavalry,
with a significant proportion being equipped with
horse armour. The Tirkash-band were similarly
equipped, but with lighter armour for the riders
and no horse armour.
27
CLASH OF EMPIRES
AQ QOYUNLU TURCOMAN
Territory Types: Agricultural, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Heavily
19 0–6 6–
Pushan–dar Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
18
Armoured 16 0–18
Superior 16
Tirkash–band Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 4–32
Average 12
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Turcoman tribesmen 4–24
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Medium Average 5
Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8 0–24 6–
Archers Foot Poor 3
24
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8 0–8
Optional Troops
Light
Kurdish cavalry Cavalry Armoured Average – Swordsmen 11 4–6 0–12
Lancers
Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Handgunners Foot 0–12
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Heavy Heavy
Bombards – Average – – 25 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Fortified camp 24 0–1
ANATOLIAN EMIRATES
TROOP NOTES
Without the resources of their richer Ottoman
neighbours, the armies of the various Anatolian
states retained a very traditional composition,
although they did add gunpowder artillery to the
mix, mainly small guns.
28
ANATOLIAN EMIRATES
ANATOLIAN EMIRATES
Territory Types: Agricultural, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Noble cavalry Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 16 4–6 6–24
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Turcoman tribesmen 12–84
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Optional Troops
Medium Average 5
Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8
Foot Poor 3
Archers 0–32
Average 5
Light Foot Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8
Poor 3
Light
Spearmen Warriors Unarmoured Average – – 4 6–8 0–16
Spear
Heavy Heavy
Bombards – Average – – 25 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Light Light
Light guns – Average – – 12 2, 3 or 4 0–4
Artillery Artillery
Fortified camp 24 0–1
Allies
Mamluk allies (only Dulgadir) – Mamluk
29
CLASH OF EMPIRES
TATAR
30
TATAR
TATAR
Tatars, 17th century, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 188:
Polish Armies 1569–1696 (2).
6 bases of Tufekci guards and Zarbuzan light guns supporting Tufekci guards:
Tufekci guards 1 BG Average, Unarmoured Medium Foot – Musket, Swordsmen; and 1 Average
Regimental Gun
Volga Germans 1 BG 8 bases of Volga Germans: Average, Unarmoured Medium Foot – Musket
Segban 3 BGs Each comprising 3 bases of Segban: Average, Unarmoured Dragoons – Arquebus
Camp 1 Unfortified camp
Total 11 BGs Camp, 24 mounted bases, 23 foot bases, 3 commanders
31
CLASH OF EMPIRES
TATAR
Territory Types: Agricultural (only Tatars), Steppes
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities Bases
Points Total
Troop name Impact Close per
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base bases
combat Combat BG
Core Troops
Best-equipped cavalry Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 16 4–6 0–18
Light Superior 12
Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Horse Average 9
Tatar tribesmen 16–72
Superior 13
Cavalry Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 10
Optional Troops
Only Crimean, Average 5
Moslem or
Kazan and Medium
Armenian Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8 0–12
Astrakhan Foot
archers Poor 3
Khanates
Only Crimean
Medium
Khanate before Unarmoured Average Arquebus – Swordsmen 7 6
Foot
1621
Tufekci guards 0–6
Only Crimean
Medium
Khanate from Unarmoured Average Musket – Swordsmen 8 6
Foot
1621
Zarbuzan light
Only Crimean Regimental Regimental Regimental
guns supporting – Average – 9 n/a 0–1
Khanate Guns Guns Guns
tufenkci guards
32
EARLY RUSSIAN
TATAR ALLIES
Allied Commander Field Commander/Troop Commander 40/25 1
Troop Type Capabilities Bases
Points Total
Troop name Impact Close per base per bases
Type Armour Quality Shooting BG
combat Combat
Best-equipped cavalry Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 16 4–6 0–6
Light Superior 12
Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Horse Average 9
Tatar tribesmen 4–24
Superior 13
Cavalry Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 10
Only Crimean, Average 5
Moslem or
Kazan and Medium 0–
Armenian Unarmoured Bow – – 6
Astrakhan Foot 6
archers Poor 3
Khanates
TATAR
Only Crimean EARLY RUSSIAN
Medium
Khanate before Unarmoured Average Arquebus – Swordsmen 7 4
Foot
1621 0– 0–
Tufekci guards
Only Crimean 4 6
Medium
Khanate from Unarmoured Average Musket – Swordsmen 8 4
Foot
1621
Zarbuzan light
Only Crimean Regimental Regimental Regimental 0–
guns supporting – Average – 9 n/a
Khanate Guns Guns Guns 1
tufenkci guards
Only Crimean Light
Petyhortsy Cavalry Armoured Average Bow* Swordsmen 12 4 0–4
Khanate from Lancers
Segban 1550 Dragoons Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 3 or 4 0–4
EARLY RUSSIAN
In 1457, after a 14 year regency, Ivan IV, known As a result of the worsening situation in
to posterity as Ivan the Terrible (Ivan Grozny) Livonia, and the Tatar raid to Moscow, Ivan
ascended the throne and became the first Russian decided that the oprichnina had failed and
Tsar, his predecessors having been Grand Dukes returned to normal methods of governance.
of Moscow. Ivan immediately began to reform This allowed the Russian army to once again be
and improve his army, introducing more modern an effective force in Livonia, although very much
weaponry, and launched a number of aggressive on the back foot in the war. Under pressure from
campaigns. These were immediately successful, both Sweden and Poland-Lithuania, the latter
with the Tatar khanates of Kazan and Astrakhan now more closely integrated following the
falling in less than a decade, Ivan’s new troops election of Stefan Bathory to the throne, Russia
proving decisive. was forced to ask for peace in 1582. This was
With these successes under his belt, Ivan agreed, although it meant Russia giving up
turned west and invaded Livonia, which was still territory it had previously won.
ruled by the remnants of the Teutonic Order, now Following the death of Ivan’s son, Fedor, in
known as the Livonian Order. Once again the 1598, Russia entered a period of civil war that has
Russian army was successful, overrunning much become known as “The Time of Troubles”. This
of Livonia and capturing a number of important did not end until the election of Tsar Mikhail
towns. However, such rapid success alarmed other Romanov in 1613. It even saw Moscow occupied
powers in the region, and soon the war expanded by Polish troops in 1610–1611 and the temporary
to include Denmark, Sweden and Poland- imposition of a Pole, the king’s son Prince
Lithuania, all of whom had interests in the region Wladislaus Vasa, as Tsar.
and did not want to see it dominated by Russia. This list covers Russian armies from 1494 to
As the war was expanding, and turning against 1630 when native Russians in western-style units
Russia, the increasingly erratic Ivan left his court were introduced by Tsar Mikhail Romanov.
in Moscow to set up what was effectively a state
within a state under his direct personal rule, as TROOP NOTES
opposed to the more traditional forms of Russian Russian cavalry retained the horse archer tactics
government. These lands were known as the that they had adopted centuries earlier under
oprichnina, and even maintained their own armed Mongol influence. Whilst the ideal was for the
forces. The remainder of the kingdom, called rider to be well-armoured, many made do with
the zemshchina, was administered separately. quilted armour, especially the less well-off. Thus
On occasion the forces of the oprichnina were we allow cavalry battle groups to be Armoured or
used against the zemshchina, such as when Unarmoured as the player chooses, depending on
Novgorod, the second city of Russia, was whether the majority of the riders have metal
viciously sacked as a result of Ivan suspecting armour or not.
them of treason. To make things worse, in 1571 a Streltsy were professional infantry founded by
major Crimean Tatar raid reached the outskirts Ivan IV in 1550 to provide the Russian army with
of Moscow itself. a reliable infantry force. They were armed with
34
EARLY RUSSIAN
EARLY RUSSIAN
Muscovy and Russian feudal infantry, 16th century, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken
from Men-at-Arms 427: Armies of Ivan the Terrible.
35
CLASH OF EMPIRES
long firearms and a heavy berdische axe, which a professional artillery corps, after which heavy
could also be used as a rest for the firearm. artillery were a regular feature of Russian field
Although long, the firearms were initially of a armies, as well as being invaluable in sieges as
small bore and so we classify them as arquebus Russia expanded.
rather than musket. Later, in the 17th century, At the start of the 17th century, the rebel army
heavier bullets were used and a full musket of Dmitrii Ivanovich was based around a core of
classification is justified. The streltsy were so useful Polish volunteers. These proved to be all but
that their numbers rapidly increased, and they were unstoppable by the loyalist Russian troops, beating
deployed as garrisons throughout Russia. far larger numbers of Russian cavalry in two
Whilst light artillery had been used by Russian battles. As well as the Poles, Dmitri was supported
armies for the best part of a century, Ivan founded by a large number of Cossack allies.
36
EARLY RUSSIAN
EARLY RUSSIAN
Strelets and urban Cossack musketeer, late 16th to early 17th century, by Angus McBride © Osprey
Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 427: Armies of Ivan the Terrible.
EARLY RUSSIAN
Territory Types: Agricultural, Steppes
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Superior 16
Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Dvoryane, deti boyarskie and Average 12
8–60
retainers Superior 13
Cavalry Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 10
Only from Medium Heavy Heavy
Unarmoured Average Arquebus 7 6–8 6–24
1550 to 1620 Foot Weapon Weapon
Streltsy
Only from Medium Heavy Heavy
Unarmoured Average Musket 8 6–8 8–48
1621 Foot Weapon Weapon
Heavy Heavy
– Average – – 25 2, 3 or 4
Only from Artillery Artillery
Pischals 2–4
1550 Medium Medium
– Average – – 20 2, 3 or 4
Artillery Artillery
37
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Optional Troops
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Tatar cavalry 0–12
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Militia
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Poor – Spearmen Spearmen 2 6–8 0–12
spearmen
Medium
Militia archers Only before Unarmoured Poor Bow – – 3 6–8 0–12
Foot
1550
Militia Medium 0–
Unarmoured Poor Arquebus – – 4 6–8
arquebusiers Foot 18 0–
18
(pishchal’niki) Light Foot Unarmoured Poor Arquebus – – 4 6–8 0–8
Only before
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8 0–8
Cossack 1550
infantry Only from Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8 0–16
1550 Foot
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow Swordsmen 10 4–6
Lancers
Cossack cavalry Light 0–12
Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Lancers
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Medium
German Only from Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 6 9
Foot 0–9
mercenaries 1598 (LT)
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 3
Sorokas, valkoneyka and other Light Light
– Average – – 12 2 or 3 0–3
light guns Artillery Artillery
Field
Gulay gorod – – – – – 3 – 0–16
Fortifications
Fortified camp 24 0–1
Allies
Crimean Tatar allies (only before 1509) – Tatar
Special Campaigns
Dmitrii Ivanovich, 1604–1605
Cossack allies are compulsory. No German mercenaries, streltsy, pischals or gulay gorod are allowed
Determined Impact
Polish hussars Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 23 4–6 8–12
Horse Mounted
Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 16 4–6
Cavalry Armoured Superior Carbine – Swordsmen 16 4–6
Polish armoured cossacks 4–8
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Cavalry Armoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Cossack allies – Cossack
Tsar Vasilii Shuiiskii, 1606–1610
Only core troops, sorokas, valkoneyka and other light guns, gulay gorod and fortified camp are allowed
Swedish allies – Vasa Swedish
38
EARLY POLISH
EARLY POLISH
39
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Polish commander, hussar, and men-at-arms, early 16th century, by Gerry and Sam Embleton © Osprey
Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 445: Medieval Polish Armies 966–1500.
40
EARLY POLISH
with Russia and the Crimean Khanate. Those strzelcy replaced their crossbows with lances, and
with Russia were mainly as a result of Lithuanian gentry increasingly replaced knights. At the same
inability to deal with its aggressive neighbour, time the lance became lighter, and developed
which resulted in the King, in his role of King of into the hollow kopia lance, of up to 5 metres in
Lithuania, having to use his Polish resources to length. These men would become the famous
bolster and maintain his Lithuanian ones. winged hussars.
This list covers the armies of Poland from 1494 The Draby infantry deployed in formations
until the accession of Stefan Bathory in 1576. It that were 8 to 10 ranks deep, with the front rank
also includes combined Polish-Lithuanian armies or two armed with spears, pikes or halberds, and
from circa 1530, of which the most important sometimes armoured. The remaining ranks were
component were the Polish troops, the Lithuanians missile armed, initially using crossbows, but
having become largely ineffective. rapidly changing to the arquebus in the second
quarter of the 16th century. We represent these EARLY POLISH
TROOP NOTES formations with a front rank with Light Spear
From the mid-15th century, standing companies capability in addition to their missile weapon, and
were raised to replace the general feudal knightly a second rank of bases armed only with missile
levy. These had proved a liability by refusing to weapons. In accordance with Field of Glory
fight until the king agreed to their political design philosophy, we give them the armour
demands, and then losing against a smaller force capability of the majority of the battle group, in
of Teutonic Knights. In peacetime, a relatively this case Unarmoured, despite a proportion being
small standing army was maintained, mainly in more heavily armoured.
the eastern provinces, but in wartime their
numbers were increased. They were categorised Landsknechts
as Lancer banners or Volley banners. Lancer
banners contained men-at-arms and mounted
crossbowmen in the approximate ratio of 1:2.
In Volley banners the ratio was more like 1:4
or 1:5. Crossbows were replaced from around
1525 with the composite bow, which was more
useful against eastern opponents. In the second
half of the century the bow was itself replaced
with the arquebus.
Battle groups with a substantial proportion of
lancers are treated as Superior. Where the
proportion of strzelcy is higher, the battle group
is treated as Average. The armour of later
men-at-arms got progressively lighter as some
41
CLASH OF EMPIRES
BUILDING A CUSTOMISED LIST or partial rank can include either or both types.
USING OUR ARMY POINTS • Draby do not obey the normal formation
Choose an army based on the maxima and rules for mixed battle groups, but instead
minima in the list below. The following special (except as a result of lost bases) must have a
instructions apply to this army: front rank with Light Spear and a 2nd rank
without. Any additional rank or partial rank
• Commanders should be depicted as lancers. can include either or both types.
• Lancer banners do not obey the normal • Landsknecht Light Foot cannot be fielded
formation rules for mixed battle groups, but unless Landsknecht Heavy Foot are.
instead (except as a result of lost bases) must • Non arquebusier-only Landsknecht battle
have a front rank of lancers and a 2nd rank with groups must have more Heavy Foot bases
crossbow, bow or carbine. Any additional rank than Medium Foot bases.
EARLY POLISH
Territory Types: Agricultural, Woodlands
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Heavily Heavy
Horse Superior – Swordsmen 16 1/2
Armoured Lancers
4–6
Heavily
Only before Horse Superior Crossbow – Swordsmen 15 1/2
Armoured
1525 Heavy
Horse Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 13 1/2
Lancers 4–6
Lancer Horse Armoured Superior Crossbow – Swordsmen 12 1/2 6–24
banners Light
Only from Horse Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 13 1/2
Lancers 4–6
1525
Horse Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 14 1/2
Light
Only from Horse Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 13 1/2
Lancers 4–6
1550
Horse Armoured Superior Carbine – Swordsmen 14 1/2
42
EARLY POLISH
Only before
Cavalry Armoured Average Crossbow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
1525
Volley Only from
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 12 4–6 6–24
banners 1525
Only from
Cavalry Armoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 12 4–6
1550
Light
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Crossbow – 4 1/2
Spear 6–8
Only before Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Crossbow – – 4 1/2
1525 Light
Medium Foot Unarmoured Poor Crossbow – 2 1/2
Spear 6–8
Medium Foot Unarmoured Poor Crossbow – – 2 1/2
Draby 6–32
Light
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – 6 1/2
Spear 6–8
Only from Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 1/2
1525 Light
Medium Foot Unarmoured Poor Arquebus – 4 1/2
Spear 6–8
Medium Foot Unarmoured Poor Arquebus – – 4 1/2
Optional Troops
Only before Heavily Heavy EARLY POLISH
Gendarmes Average – Swordsmen 15 4–6
1525 Armoured Lancers
Noble levy Average 11 0–24
Only from Light
Cavalry Armoured – Swordsmen 4–6
1525 Poor Lancers 8
Average 10
Lithuanian noble levy Cavalry Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 0–12
Poor 8
Lithuanian levy dregs Cavalry Unarmoured Poor Bow – – 6 8–10 0–10
Superior 12
Light Horse Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 9
Tatars 0–6
Superior 13
Cavalry Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 10
Light
Serbian hussars Light Horse Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 8 4–6 0–12
Lancers
Heavily
Mercenary 13
Horse Armoured Average Pistol – Pistol 4–6 0–8
reiters
Armoured 11
Haiduks Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – Swordsmen 7 6–8 0–8
10–
Armoured – Pike Pike 6
16 10–
Heavy Foot Average
Heavy Heavy 16
Armoured – 6 0–2
Weapon Weapon
10–
Unarmoured – Pike Pike 5
16 10–
Heavy Foot Average
Heavy Heavy 16
Only from Unarmoured – 5 0–2
weapon Weapon
1550 6–
– Pike Pike 6 0–24
Landsknechts 12
Heavy Foot Armoured Average 10–
Heavy Heavy
– 6 0–2 16
Weapon Weapon
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4–6
6–
– Pike Pike 5
12
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average 10–
Heavy Heavy
– 5 0–2 16
Weapon Weapon
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4–6
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4 0–4
Light Light 2, 3 or
Light guns – Average – – 12 0–4
Artillery Artillery 4
Battle
Tabor – Average Arquebus – – 20 2–4 0–8
Wagons
Field
Wagon fortress – – – – – 3 – 0–20
Fortifications
Fortified camp 24 0–1
43
CLASH OF EMPIRES
44
EARLY LITHUANIAN
EARLY LITHUANIAN
45
CLASH OF EMPIRES
• Polish lancer banners do not obey the normal with crossbow or bow. Any additional rank or
formation rules for mixed battle groups, but partial rank can include either or both types.
instead (except as a result of lost bases) must • Minima marked * only apply if any Polish
have a front rank of lancers and a 2nd rank banners are used.
EARLY LITHUANIAN
Territory Types: Agricultural, Woodlands, Steppes
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Superior 16
Best-equipped boyars Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 0–12
Average 12
Average 10
Lesser boyars Cavalry Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 12–60
Poor 8
Heavily Heavy
Horse Superior – Swordsmen 16 1/2
Armoured Lancers
4–6
Heavily
Only before Horse Superior Crossbow – Swordsmen 15 1/2
Armoured
1525
Polish lancer Heavy
Horse Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 13 1/2 *4–12
banners Lancers 4–6
Horse Armoured Superior Crossbow – Swordsmen 12 1/2
Light
Only from Horse Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 13 1/2
Lancers 4–6
1525
Horse Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 14 1/2
Only before
Cavalry Armoured Average Crossbow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Polish volley 1525
*4–12
banners Only from
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 12 4–6
1525
Optional Troops
Superior 12
Light Horse Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 9
Tatar or similar mercenaries 0–8
Superior 13
Cavalry Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 10
Light
Lithuanian spearmen Warriors Unarmoured Average – – 4 6–8 0–24
Spear
Medium
Lithuanian archers Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8 0–24
Foot
Light
Serbian style hussars Light Horse Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 8 4–6 0–6
Lancers
Noble levy dregs Cavalry Unarmoured Poor Bow – – 6 8–10 0–10
Light Light
Artillery – Average – – 12 2, 3 or 4 0–4
Artillery Artillery
Field
Field fortifications – – – – – 3 – 0–12
Fortifications
Fortified camp 24 0–1
Allies
Crimean Tatar allies – Tatar
46
KALMAR UNION
KALMAR UNION
47
CLASH OF EMPIRES
48
KALMAR UNION
KALMAR UNION
Territory Types: Agricultural, Woodlands, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Scandinavian Allied
Field Commander/Troop Commander 40/25 0–2
Commanders
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Close per base per BG
Type Armour Quality Shooting Impact bases
Combat
Core Troops
Fully Superior Heavy 21
Gendarmes – Swordsmen 4–6 4–8
Scandinavian Armoured Average Lancers 15
6–12
gendarmes Heavily Superior Heavy 21
Gendarmes – Swordsmen 4–6 0–8
Armoured Average Lancers 15
Fully Superior Heavy 21
German gendarmes Gendarmes – Swordsmen 4–6 *4–6
Armoured Average Lancers 15
German men-at-arms Heavily Light
Horse Average – Swordsmen 12 4–6 0–12 KALMAR UNION
with mixed equipment Armoured Lancers
*4–12
German separately Light
Horse Armoured Average – Swordsmen 10
deployed Lancers
4–6 0–8
poorly-equipped
men-at-arms Horse Armoured Average – – Swordsmen 9
49
CLASH OF EMPIRES
50
CAUCASIAN STATES
CAUCASIAN STATES
51
CLASH OF EMPIRES
CAUCASIAN STATES
Territory Types: Agricultural, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 16 4–6
Cavalry Unarmoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 13 4–6
Any date Light
Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow* Swordsmen 16 4–6
Lancers
Noble cavalry 4–32
Light
Cavalry Unarmoured Superior Bow* Swordsmen 13 4–6
Lancers
Only from Horse Armoured Superior – Pistol Swordsmen 13 4–6
1620 Horse Unarmoured Superior – Pistol Swordsmen 11 4–6
Light
Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Light cavalry Horse 8–64
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Light 0–
Warriors Unarmoured Average – – 4 6–8
Spear 48 6–
Foot warriors
Light 0– 48
Warriors Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 5 6–8
Spear 24
KNIGHTS OF ST JOHN
52
KNIGHTS OF ST JOHN
numbers of Ottoman Turks. In the first siege they roles of commanders or at best small bodies of
were forced to surrender Rhodes to the besiegers, elite troops to lead the line and inspire the
albeit then being allowed to march out with the mercenaries and local militias who supported
full honours of war. them. They were, however, heavily armoured and
At Malta, despite desperate moments and near excellent fighters, so their contribution either
disaster, they held out to record one of the greatest mounted or on foot must not be underestimated.
victories of the Order. Despite this, the Order At Rhodes, in addition to the approximately
began to decline sharply and whilst surviving to 500 brethren, the garrison consisted of
the end of the 18th century they were never again 1,000 men-at-arms, 800 Cretan mercenaries
a significant force. (crossbowmen), and several thousand militia.
At Malta the defenders were 500 or so brethren
TROOP NOTES supported by 3,000 Maltese militia, 1,200 Spanish
As stated above, the actual number of Brother and other mercenaries, including armoured
Knights was very small and tended to adopt the pikemen, and many Greek residents, slaves etc.
CAUCASIAN
STATES
KNIGHTS OF ST
JOHN
The fall of St Elmo’s Fort, 1565, by Christa Hook © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Campaign 50:
Malta 1565.
53
CLASH OF EMPIRES
KNIGHTS OF ST JOHN
Territory Types: Agricultural,
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Fully Heavy
Brother knights Gendarmes Elite – Swordsmen 25 2–4 0–4
Armoured Lancers
Other Heavily Heavy
Any date Gendarmes Superior – Swordsmen 21 4–6
brethren, Armoured Lancers
4–8
turkopoles, Only from Heavily Heavy Heavy
Heavy Foot Superior – 10 4–6
etc. 1523 Armoured Weapon Weapon
Cretan and
Medium
colonist Unarmoured Average Crossbow – – 4 6–8 12–96
Foot
crossbowmen Only
Mercenary before Heavy Heavy
1523 Heavy Foot Armoured Average – 6 6–8 6–24
halberdiers Weapon Weapon
Mercenary Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8 6–18
arquebusiers Foot
54
SAFAVID PERSIAN
Optional Troops
Only Medium
Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8
Greek archers before Foot 0–12
1523 Light Foot Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8
Mercenary
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 8–12 0–32
pikemen
Mercenary Only from Heavy Heavy
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – 6 6 0–12
halberdiers 1523 Weapon Weapon
Mercenary Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8 12–48
arquebusiers Foot
Organ guns and other light Light Light 2, 3 or
– Average – – 12 0–4
artillery Artillery Artillery 4
Medium Medium
– Average – – 20 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Bombards or field artillery 0–4
Heavy Heavy
– Average – – 25 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Special Campaigns
Siege of Malta, 1565
Maltese levies Mob Unarmoured Average – – – 4 8–12 8–24
Heavy Heavy
Greek and other residents Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average – 5 6–8 8–24
Weapon Weapon
Neapolitan Spanish allies – Early Imperial Spanish Allies
55
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Other qizilbashes and 4 bases of Other qizilbashes and Persian cavalry: Superior, Armoured Cavalry –
1 BG
Persian cavalry Bow, Swordsmen
Other qizilbashes and Each comprising 4 bases of Other qizilbashes and Persian cavalry: Average,
2 BGs
Persian cavalry Armoured Cavalry – Bow, Swordsmen
56
SAFAVID PERSIAN
SAFAVID PERSIAN
Territory Types: Agricultural, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Heavily Elite 22
Elite qizilbashes Cavalry Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 0–6
Armoured Superior 19 12–
Other qizilbashes and Superior 16 48
Cavalry Armoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6 8–48
Persian cavalry Average 12
Only from
Medium
1515 to Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Foot SAFAVID PERSIAN
Tufangchis 1590 6–36
Only from Medium
Unarmoured Average Musket – – 7 6–8
1591 Foot
Optional Troops
Light
Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Turcomans Horse 0–18
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Medium Average 5
Levy archers Unarmoured Bow – – 6–8 0–24
Foot Poor 3
Spears placed in the ground All levy
Portable
to cover half the bases of – – – – – 3 – archer BGs
Defences
each levy archer BG or none
Only Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4–6 0–6
Arquebusiers before Foot
1515 Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4–6 0–6
”Falconetti” on 0–2 before
carts or Light Light 1591
– Average – – 12 2, 3 or 4
zamburak Only from Artillery Artillery 0–4 from
camel guns 1515 1591
Topchis Medium Medium
– Average – – 20 2 0–2
artillery Artillery Artillery
57
CLASH OF EMPIRES
58
EARLY IMPERIAL AUSTRIAN
the forewarned Emperor Charles V, still once again tried to take Buda, but the siege went
remembering the close call of three years earlier, nowhere and in 1541 an Ottoman relief force
managed to assemble around 80,000 men to face routed the besiegers. The net result was the
the Ottoman host. In the face of such a force, and Ottomans now taking direct control of Buda.
with winter approaching, Suleiman decided to A further attack on Buda and Pest in 1541 was
fall back rather than risk an attack with his also routed.
exhausted force, conducting a scorched earth It was now Suleiman’s turn to go on the
policy during the retreat. offensive, and he did so with an invasion of
The damage caused to the south-eastern parts Habsburg Hungary in Spring 1543. He succeeded
of his realm, and the now well-entrenched enemy in taking several key fortresses and cities, among
forces in southern Hungary, meant that them Esztergom and Székesfehérvár (traditionally
Ferdinand I lacked the resources to mount an the place where Hungarian Kings were crowned).
effective invasion into Hungary for years to come. Following this invasion, a new peace treaty was
Thus a more or less accepted border between the signed between the Habsburgs and the Ottomans
two superpowers had been established and a and the area went back to the normal “low” level
peace treaty was signed. skirmishes and raids for almost ten years. These
That treaty naturally was unsatisfying to both skirmishes were nonetheless costly and both sides
John Zápolya and Ferdinand I, so despite the suffered significant losses during this time, with
treaty and both sides being somewhat exhausted, the Austrians usually coming off second best.
a continual cycle of raids, counter-raids and Now it was Suleiman who broke the “peace” to EARLY IMPERIAL
AUSTRIAN
intense border skirmishes was kept up. attack Eger in 1552. The city successfully repulsed
With the Franco-Ottoman alliance from 1536, the attack, however. (According to the defenders,
the Ottomans had more than one reason to be thanks to being well supplied with the local red
aggressive and the Habsburgs had one more wine, which they called Bulls’ Blood.)
reason to worry. Ferdinand therefore decided to
pre-empt a possible invasion by taking the TROOP NOTES
strategically important fortified city of Osijek. French sources of this period state that Spanish
The siege turned into a disaster, however, when men-at-arms used a lighter lance than the French,
the besiegers were surprised by an Ottoman relief and thus we classify them as Light Lancers to
force and almost completely annihilated. reflect this.
Despite this blatant violation of the peace Hussars were usually of mixed origin, most
treaty, Suleiman did not immediately counter- were Hungarian, Polish, Moldavian or Croatian.
attack into Austria. Instead he sent a force into Szekler numbers were in general decline during
Italy, where they tried to hook up with a planned this period and losing parts of the Szekler lands to
French invasion force which, however, failed the Ottomans didn’t help.
to materialise. Celadas were well-equipped light cavalry, used
After John Zápolya’s death in 1540, and with to attack enemy skirmish formations and isolated
his son being mere weeks old, the Habsburgs units of missile foot.
59
CLASH OF EMPIRES
60
EARLY IMPERIAL AUSTRIAN
61
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Light
Light Horse Armoured Average – Swordsmen 10 4
Lancers
Celadas Heavily
Light 12
Horse Armoured Average – Swordsmen 4–6 0–6
Lancers
Armoured 10
Armoured 9
Jinetes Light Horse Average Javelins – Swordsmen 4–6
Unarmoured 7
Armoured 9
Light Horse Average Carbine – – 4
Spanish or Italian Unarmoured 7
0–4
mounted arquebusiers Armoured 9
Horse Average Carbine – – 4
Unarmoured 7
Mounted Only Average 10
crossbowme before Cavalry Armoured Crossbow – Swordsmen 4–6 0–4
n 1543 Poor 7
Heavily
Average 14
Berittene Armoured
Cavalry Armoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 12 4–6 0–12
Hakenbüchsenschützen
0–
Armoured Poor 9 12
Heavily
13
Horse Armoured Average Pistol – Swordsmen 4–6
Only Armoured 11
Reiters from 0–8
Heavily
1543 13
Horse Armoured Average Pistol – Pistol 4–6
Armoured 11
Superior 12
Light Horse Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 9
Unarmoured Superior 13
Unarmoured Average Light 10
Cavalry Bow* Swordsmen 4–6
Armoured Superior Lancers 16
Szekler cavalry 0–8
Armoured Average 12
Unarmoured Superior 13
Unarmoured Average 10
Cavalry Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Armoured Superior 16
Armoured Average 12
Average 4
Light Foot Unarmoured Crossbow – – 6–8
Poor 2
Medium Average 4
Any date Unarmoured Crossbow – – 6–8 0–8
Foot Poor 2
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Foot
City Unarmoured 5 0–
militias Only Heavy Foot Average – Pike Pike 8–12 0–24 24
Armoured 6
before
1525 Armoured Heavy Heavy 6
Heavy Foot Average – 6–8 0–8
Unarmoured Weapon Weapon 5
Unarmoured 3
Heavy Foot Poor – Pike Pike 8–12 0–24
Armoured 4
Any date
Armoured Heavy Heavy 4
Heavy Foot Poor – 6–8 0–8
Unarmoured Weapon Weapon 3
Heavy Foot Armoured Superior – Pike Pike 9 3
Heavy Foot Armoured Superior – – Swordsmen 9 1 6
Medium
Only Unarmoured Superior Arquebus – – 10 2
Colunela Foot
before 0–12
foot Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 3
1534
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – – Swordsmen 6 1 6
Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 2
Foot
62
EARLY DANISH
Medium
Unarmoured Superior Arquebus – – 10 6–8 12–
Foot 16
Only Heavy Foot Armoured Superior – Pike Pike 9 6–8 (ET)
Tercios from 0–32
Medium
1534 Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 6–8 12–
Foot 16
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 6–8 (ET)
Light Light
Light guns – Average – – 12 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Field
Schanzen & Letzen – – – – – 3 – 0–20
Fortifications
Allies
German allies – German States – See Field of Glory Renaissance Companion 2: Trade and Treachery
EARLY DANISH
63
CLASH OF EMPIRES
64
EARLY DANISH
EARLY DANISH
Territory Types: Agricultural, Woodlands, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Close per base per BG bases
Type Armour Quality Shooting Impact Combat
Core Troops
Only before Gendarmes Fully Superior Heavy 21
– Lancers Swordsmen 4–6 0–4
1540 Armoured Average 15
Only before Gendarmes Heavily Superior Heavy 21
– Lancers Swordsmen
Scandinavian 4–6 0–8
1555 Armoured Average 15
gendarmes Heavily Heavy
Horse Armoured Superior – Lancers Swordsmen
Only from 16 4–6 0–4
1540 to 6–
1574 Heavily Heavy 12
Horse Average – Swordsmen 12 4–6 0–8
Armoured Lancers
Heavily Superior 16
Horse – Pistol Pistol 4–6
Only from Armoured Average 12 6–
Cuirassiers 1575 Superior 13 12
Horse Armoured – Pistol Pistol 4–6
Average 10
German Only before Gendarmes Fully Superior Heavy 21
– 4–6 *4–
gendarmes 1550 Armoured Average Lancers Swordsmen 15 6
German men-
at-arms with Heavily Light
Horse 4–6 0–
Armoured Average – Lancers Swordsmen 12
mixed 12
equipment
Only before
German 1575 Light
Horse Armoured Average –
separately Lancers Swordsmen 10 *4–
deployed 4–6 0–8 12
poorly-equipped
men-at-arms Horse Armoured Average – – Swordsmen 9
EARLY DANISH
Heavily Superior 16
Horse – Pistol Pistol 4–6
German Only from Armoured Average 12 4–
Kürassiere 1570 Superior 13 12
Horse Armoured – Pistol Pistol 4–6
Average 10
8–
Armoured – Pike Pike 9 16 10–
Heavy Foot Superior
Heavy Heavy 16
Armoured – 9 0–2
Weapon Weapon
8–
Unarmoured – Pike Pike 8 16 10–
Heavy Foot Superior 16
Heavy Heavy
Unarmoured 8 0–2
Only before Weapon Weapon
1580 8–
Armoured – Pike Pike 6 16 10–
Heavy Foot Average
Heavy Heavy 16
Armoured – 6 0–2
Weapon Weapon
8–
Unarmoured – Pike Pike 5 16 10–
Landsknechts Heavy Foot Average
Heavy Heavy 16 12–48
Unarmoured – 5 0–2
Weapon Weapon
6–
– Pike Pike 6 12
Heavy Foot Armoured Average
Heavy Heavy
– 6 0–2 10–
Weapon Weapon 16
Medium Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4–6
Only from Foot
1550 6–
– Pike Pike 5 12
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average
Heavy Heavy
– 5 0–2 10–
Weapon Weapon 16
Medium Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4–6
Foot
65
CLASH OF EMPIRES
VASA SWEDISH
66
VASA SWEDISH
Swedes – partly because they were fighting multiple available in Sweden. Swedish horses were smaller
enemies and they were stretched financially, and than would be acceptable for the equivalent cavalry
partly because they were involved in fighting against in other armies. Thus even the noble cavalry, who
the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth whose were theoretically equipped in the same manner
army enjoyed a significant measure of superiority as European nobles, did not quite reach the same
over the Swedes, as illustrated by a series of stunning levels of equipment as their contemporaries.
victories such as Kircholm in 1605. We therefore classify them as Heavily Armoured
In the 1530s Sweden adopted Lutheranism, rather than Fully Armoured, and limit their lancer
which was to have a profound influence on its capability to Light Lancers to represent the effect
subsequent history, not least because it was a of their smaller and weaker horses.
factor in Gustavus Adolphus entering the Thirty From circa 1560, the noble cavalry were
Years’ War a century later. re-equipped as caracoling reiters, and by the
This list covers Swedish armies from the 17th century they had started to discard armour as
breakup of the Scandinavian Kalmar Union in their role now had less emphasis on hand to hand
1523 until Gustavus Adolphus started to introduce combat, along with the limitations of their horses.
army reforms following his coronation in 1617. A minority were formed into a body of cuirassiers,
the Adelsfana, who we assume to have used the
TROOP NOTES usual cuirassier tactics of the time. However, again
Throughout this period, and indeed until after due to their small horses, we cannot classify them
Gustavus Adolphus had entered the Thirty Years’ as better than Average quality.
War, the native cavalry in Swedish armies were During the 16th century the nobles were EARLY DANISH
hampered by the poor quality of horse flesh supported by their retainers, known as Skytter, VASA SWEDISH
who supplied fire support to their betters. In the
Swedish Infantry 17th century these instead supplied additional
reiter-style cavalry, who were mainly distinguished
from their betters by having less armour.
Swedish infantry were nearly all missilemen,
initially mainly crossbowmen, but with an
increasing number of firearms being used as the
period progressed. The different types of missile
weapons were not separated out into units with
a uniform armament, but were instead mixed
together – presumably because they were a peasant
levy who brought their choice of weapon and
fought in regional units. We classify the shooting
capability of these battle groups by the dominant
type of missile weapon in each.
The pike was not a popular weapon in Sweden,
and as the country was heavily forested it was
67
CLASH OF EMPIRES
not actually much needed in wars of self-defence. abandon the weapon for firearms if they were
The army’s needs for pikemen were met by the not properly supervised. They proved unable to
hiring of the ubiquitous landsknechts. withstand the Poles at Kircholm in 1605: A much
Despite this, Erik XIV attempted to raise some larger Swedish army was lured out of position by
native infantry regiments equipped in a more a Polish feigned retreat. Advancing uphill, the
modern style with pike and shot. However, against Swedish first-line infantry were disrupted by shot
the contemporary trend, the shot do not appear and artillery fire and then broken by the charge of
to have remained in a body with the pikemen, but the Polish Hussars, who then proceeded to envelop
to have skirmished ahead in a traditional “forlorn and sweep away the remaining elements of the
hope” style. These regiments do not seem to have Swedish army in turn. As a result of their lack of
lasted long after the death of Erik’s successor, enthusiasm, and poor battlefield performance, we
Johan III, in 1592. grade such regiments as Poor quality.
The next attempt to equip Swedish infantry Good quality pike and shot units were more
with pikes was during the 1600–1611 war with usually hired mercenaries, mostly recruited in
Poland in Livonia, where the Polish cavalry proved Germany, Scotland and England.
a dominant force on the battlefield, and against The other way that the Swedes attempted to
which the Swedes had little defence unless they nullify their weakness in mounted troops was to
had suitable terrain or constructed some sort construct field fortifications. In the 17th century
of field fortifications. Thousands of pikes were these often incorporated “Swedish feathers” (also
supplied and the units so equipped formed up in known as “Spanish riders” at this time), however,
formations similar to those in use in Germany at unlike in the 1620s, these do not appear to have
the time. Unfortunately, the infantry so equipped been used in a manner that would justify Portable
were not always well trained, and were also Defences, and should be modelled as a part of
unenthusiastic about the pike, and would often field fortifications.
68
VASA SWEDISH
VASA SWEDISH
Territory Types: Agricultural, Woodlands, Hilly
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities Points Bases Total
Troop name
Type Armour Quality Shooting Impact Melee per base per BG bases
Core Troops
Only before Heavily Superior Light 21 4–
Swedish nobles Gendarmes – Swordsmen 4–6
1560 Armoured Average Lancers 15 12
Only from Heavily 4–
Horse Average Pistol – Pistol 13 4–6
1560 to 1599 Armoured 12
Only from Armoured 11 4–
Noble Horse Average Pistol – Pistol 4–6
landsryttare 1600 Unarmoured 9 4– 12
Only from Armoured 11 12
Horse Average Carbine – Pistol 4–6
1610 Unarmoured 9 VASA SWEDISH
Adelsfana Only from Heavily
Horse Average – Pistol Pistol 12 4 0–4
cuirassiers 1600 Armoured
Only before
Skytter Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine – – 7 4–6
1600
Only from Average 9
Horse Unarmoured Pistol – Pistol 4–6 4–12
Other 1600 Poor 7
landsryttare Only from Average 9
Horse Unarmoured Carbine – Pistol 4–6
1610 Poor 7
Medium 0–
Unarmoured Average Crossbow – – 4 6–8
Only before Foot 72 12–
Mixed 1560 Medium 0– 96
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
crossbowmen Foot 36
and Medium 0–
Unarmoured Average Crossbow – – 4 6–8
arquebusiers Only from Foot 32 6–
1560 to 1592 Medium 6– 80
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Foot 54
Infantry Only from Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average – Pike Pike 5 8–12 8–36
regiments 1560 to 1592 Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4–6 4–18
Mixed
Only from Medium 0–
calivermen and Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
1593 Foot 90
musketeers
12–
Infantry Medium 90
regiments in Only from Unarmoured Poor Arquebus – – 5 6 9 0–
Foot
German 1604 (LT) 36
formations Heavy Foot Unarmoured Poor – Pike Pike 3 3
69
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Heavy Heavy
– Average – – 25 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Artillery 0–6
Medium Medium
– Average – – 20 2, 3 or 4 0–6
Artillery Artillery
Optional Troops
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Bow – – 5 6–8
Finnish or similar skirmishers 0–12
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
8–
– Pike Pike 6
16 10–
Heavy Foot Armoured Average
Heavy Heavy 0– 16
– 6
Weapon Weapon 2
Landsknecht Only before 0–32
8–
mercenaries 1560 – Pike Pike 5
16 10–
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average
Heavy Heavy 0– 16
– 5
Weapon Weapon 2
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4 0–4
German, Medium
English, Scots Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 6 9
Foot 0–36
and other (LT)
mercenaries Only from
1600 Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 3
Heavily
Livonian 12
Horse Armoured Average – Pistol Pistol 4 0–4
cavalry
Armoured 10
Field
Abatis or similar barricades – – – – – 3 – 0–24
Fortifications
70
COSSACK
COSSACK
contemporary opponents in the open field, and Cossack cavalry were slower to use massed
so they would usually fight from behind a static firearms, with the bow remaining the most
tabor wagon barricade. They are described thus common missile weapon well into the 17th
in the 1620s: century, probably under Tatar influence.
and
Cossack Horsemen
71
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Cossacks, mid- to late 17th century, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from
Men-at-Arms 188: Polish Armies 1569–1696 (2).
72
COSSACK
COSSACK
Territory Types: Agricultural
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Ally–commanders Field Commander/Troop Commander 40/25 0–2
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Core Troops
Light
Any date Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Lancers
Light
Only before Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow
Lancers
Swordsmen 10 4–6
1650
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Light
Cossack Only from Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine Lancers Swordsmen 10 4–6 12–
horsemen 1630 64
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine Pistol 10 4–6
Lancers
Only from Light
1650 Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Pistol 9 4–6
Lancers
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Carbine – Pistol 10 4–6
Only before
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Cossack 1650 12–
infantry Only from 72
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Musket – – 7 6–8
1630
Optional Troops
Medium
Only before Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4
Foot 6
1650
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average – Pike Pike 5 2
Cossack Medium
Only from Unarmoured Average Musket – – 8 4
infantry in Foot 6 0–18
mixed 1630
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average – Pike Pike 5 2
formations Medium COSSACK
Unarmoured Average Musket – – 8 4
Only from Foot
6
1650 Heavy Heavy
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average – 5 2
Weapon Weapon
Cossack Only before
Dragoons Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 3 or 4
infantry 1650
0–8
mounted on Only from
Dragoons Unarmoured Average Musket – – 8 3 or 4
horses 1630
Only before
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
1650 0–
Skirmishers
Only from 12
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Musket – – 7 6–8
1630
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Superior Bow Swordsmen 13 4–6
Lancers
Only before Light
1650 Cavalry Unarmoured Superior – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Lancers
Cavalry Unarmoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 13 4–6
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Superior Carbine Swordsmen 13 4–6
Lancers
Hetmens’ Only from Light
retainers 1630 Cavalry Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 15 4–6 0–8
Lancers
Cavalry Armoured Superior Carbine – Swordsmen 16 4–6
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Superior Carbine Pistol 13 4–6
Lancers
Only from Light
1650 Cavalry Armoured Superior – Pistol 15 4–6
Lancers
Cavalry Armoured Superior Carbine – Pistol 16 4–6
73
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Light Light 2, 3 or
Light artillery – Average – – 12 0–4
Artillery Artillery 4
Captured Polish Only from Medium Medium
– Average – – 20 2 0–2
artillery 1648 to 1657 Artillery Artillery
Peasant levies Mob Unarmoured Poor – – – 2 8–12 0–16
Field
Tabor wagon fortifications – – – – – 3 – 0–30
Fortifications
Fortified camp – 24 – 0–1
Allies
Crimean Tatar allies (only from 1648) – Tatar
COSSACK ALLIES
Allied Commander Field Commander/Troop Commander 40/25 1
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting per base per BG bases
combat Combat
Light
Any date Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Lancers
Light
Only before Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow
Lancers
Swordsmen 10 4–6
1650
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Light
Cossack Only from Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine Lancers Swordsmen 10 4–6
4–20
horsemen 1630
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine Pistol 10 4–6
Lancers
Only from Light
1650 Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Pistol 9 4–6
Lancers
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Carbine – Pistol 10 4–6
Only before
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Cossack 1650
6–24
infantry Only from
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Musket – – 7 6–8
1630
Cossack Only before
Dragoons Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 3
infantry 1650
0–3
mounted on Only from
horses Dragoons Unarmoured Average Musket – – 8 3
1630
Only before
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 4–6
1650
Skirmishers 0–6
Only from
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Musket – – 7 4–6
1630
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Superior Bow Swordsmen 13 4
Lancers
Only before Light
1650 Cavalry Unarmoured Superior – Swordsmen 12 4
Lancers
Cavalry Unarmoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 13 4
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Superior Carbine Swordsmen 13 4
Lancers
Hetmens’ Only from Light 0–4
retainers 1630 Cavalry Armoured Superior – Swordsmen 15 4
Lancers
Cavalry Armoured Superior Carbine – Swordsmen 16 4
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Superior Carbine Pistol 13 4
Lancers
Only from
Light
1650 Cavalry Armoured Superior – Pistol 15 4
Lancers
Cavalry Armoured Superior Carbine – Pistol 16 4
74
LATER IMPERIAL AUSTRIAN AND GERMAN STATES
Cossacks, 17th century, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 427:
COSSACK
Armies of Ivan the Terrible. LATER IMPERIAL
AUSTRIAN AND
GERMAN
LATER IMPERIAL AUSTRIAN STATES
75
CLASH OF EMPIRES
still employed occasionally, especially by poorly- be Polish, while those in Imperial Service were
trained or equipped units (i.e. lacking the skill or more often from Hungary or Croatia. Hussars in
number of arquebusiers to form proper Tercios). German States’ armies from the South and South
The proportion of musketeers to arquebusiers East (Bavaria, Bohemia, etc.) could be either.
slowly increased during this period, but remained Numbers of Szeklers, as well as their eagerness
too low to give the shot integrated in tercios to get stuck in, continued to dwindle. They were
musket capability. also slow to adopt firearms, preferring the bow for
Hussars were usually of mixed origin – most its higher rate of fire and greater accuracy.
were Hungarian, Moldavian, Croatian or Polish. Celadas were well-equipped light cavalry, used
Those used by German States’ armies originating to attack enemy skirmish formations and isolated
from East and North-East Germany tended to units of missile foot.
76
LATER IMPERIAL AUSTRIAN AND GERMAN STATES
• Gendarmes can always dismount as Heavy • Each non “(ET)” or “(LT)” Fußknechte
Foot, Heavily Armoured, Superior or battle group must include more bases of
Average (as mounted type), Heavy Weapon. Heavy Foot than Medium Foot.
• Men-at-arms with mixed equipment can • German States’ armies cannot include any
always dismount as Heavy Foot, Heavily Spanish troops, Musketier Kompanien or
Armoured, Average, Heavy Weapon. Szeklers. Those of Central, North or West
• Separately deployed poorly-equipped men- Germany also cannot include any Italian
at-arms can always dismount as Heavy Foot, Troops, nor more than one battle group of
Armoured, Average, Heavy Weapon. Hussars.
• At least half the Fußknechte bases must be • If a Spanish ally is fielded, the Spanish troops
of Average quality. from this list cannot be used.
77
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Medium
Unarmoured Superior Arquebus – – 10 6–8 10–
Foot 16
Only Heavy Foot Armoured Superior – Pike Pike 9 4–8 (ET)
before
Medium
1600 Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 6–8 10–
Foot 16
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 4–8 (ET)
Medium
Unarmoured Superior Arquebus – – 10 6 9
Foot
(LT)
Only from Heavy Foot Armoured Superior – Pike Pike 9 3
1570 Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 6 9
Foot
(LT)
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 3
8–
Armoured – Pike Pike 9
16 10–
Heavy Foot Superior
Heavy Heavy 16
Only Armoured – 9 0–2
Weapon Weapon
before
8–
1570 Unarmoured – Pike Pike 8
16 10–
Heavy Foot Superior
Heavy Heavy 16
Unarmoured 8 0–2
Fußknechte Weapon Weapon 9–90
8–
Armoured – Pike Pike 6
16 10–
Heavy Foot Average
Heavy Heavy 16
Armoured – 6 0–2
Weapon Weapon
8–
Unarmoured – Pike Pike 5
16 10–
Heavy Foot Average
Heavy Heavy 16
Unarmoured – 5 0–2
Weapon Weapon
6–
– Pike Pike 6
12
Any date Heavy Foot Armoured Average
Heavy Heavy 10–
– 6 0–2
Weapon Weapon 16
Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4–6
Foot
6–
– Pike Pike 5
12
Heavy Foot Unarmoured Average
Heavy Heavy 10–
– 5 0–2
Weapon Weapon 16
Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4–6
Foot
Medium 0–
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Foot 12
Hakenbüchsenschützen
0– 4–
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
12 18
Average 7
Musketier Kompanien Light Foot Unarmoured Musket – – 4–6 0–6
Superior 10
Medium Medium
Field guns – Average – – 20 2, 3 or 4
Artillery Artillery
2–8
Heavy Heavy
Heavy field guns – Average – – 25 2, 3 or 4
Artillery Artillery
Optional Troops
Heavily Light
Spanish men-at-arms Gendarmes Superior – Swordsmen 21 4 0–4
Armoured Lancers
0–4
Heavily Heavy
Italian men-at-arms Gendarmes Average – Swordsmen 15 4 0–4
Armoured Lancers
Light
Light Horse Armoured Average – Swordsmen 10 4
Lancers
Spanish Celadas Heavily 0–6
Light 12
Horse Armoured Average – Swordsmen 4–6
Lancers
Armoured 10
78
LATER IMPERIAL AUSTRIAN AND GERMAN STATES
Armoured 9
Light Horse Average Carbine – – 4
Spanish or Unarmoured 7
Any date
Italian Armoured 9
Horse Average Carbine – – 4 0–4
mounted Unarmoured 7
arquebusiers Armoured 11
Only from
Horse Average Carbine – Pistol 4
1573 Unarmoured 9
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – – 7 4–6
0–8
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine – – 7 4–6
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 9 4–6 0–
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6 12
0–
Hussars Cavalry Unarmoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 10 4–6 16
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Light
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow* Swordsmen 12 4–6
Lance 0–6
Cavalry Armoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Cavalry Armoured Average Carbine – Pistol 12 4–6
Superior 12
Light Horse Unarmoured Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Average 9
Unarmoured Superior 13
Szekler cavalry 0–6
Unarmoured Average 10
Cavalry Bow – Swordsmen 4–6
Armoured Superior 16
Armoured Average 12
Medium
Unarmoured Superior Arquebus – – 10 6–8 12–
Foot 16
Only from Heavy Foot Armoured Superior – Pike Pike 9 6–8 (ET)
1534 to
Medium
1600 Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 6–8 12–
Foot 16
Spanish Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 6–8 (ET)
0–32
Tercios Medium
Unarmoured Superior Arquebus – – 10 6 9
Foot LATER IMPERIAL
(LT) AUSTRIAN AND
Only from Heavy Foot Armoured Superior – Pike Pike 9 3
1570 GERMAN
Medium
Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 6 9 STATES
Foot
(LT)
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 3
Light Light
Light guns – Average – – 12 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Field
Schanzen & Letzen – – – – – 3 – 0–20
Fortifications
Allies
German States allies – Later Imperial Austrian and German States
Spanish allies – Early Imperial Spanish Allies
79
CLASH OF EMPIRES
80
EARLY IMPERIAL SPANISH ALLIES
81
CLASH OF EMPIRES
82
POLISHLITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH
POLISH-LITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH
EARLY IMPERIAL
SPANISH ALLIES
POLISH
LITHUANIAN
COMMONWEALTH
83
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Hussars in Cracow, 1605, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from
Men-at-Arms 184: Polish Armies 1569–1696 (1).
Ottoman Turkish Empire. Unlike the other wars, was a more even affair. Although on balance
this initially went against the Commonwealth, the Commonwealth possibly came out ahead in a
with the Turks invading Polish-Lithuanian lot of the fighting, Sweden did maintain its
territory after they invaded the Turkish vassal of Livonian territory and was left with a peace that
Moldavia. Peace was eventually agreed after the allowed them freedom to intervene in Germany.
Turks were halted by a combined Commonwealth The fighting was fierce and Gustavus was
and Cossack army at Chocim in 1621. wounded on a number of occasions. One of these
A second war with Sweden erupted in 1617, would lead, indirectly, to his death at Lützen
with the new and aggressive Swedish king, in 1632.
Gustavus Adolphus, aiming to increase Sweden’s This list covers armies of the Poles and
Baltic possessions. Unlike the earlier war, this Lithuanians from 1576 to 1631.
84
POLISHLITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH
85
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Polish Haiduks 1600–25, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 184:
Polish Armies 1569–1696 (1).
were not the same peoples that are covered by the the similar Cossack foot. German mercenaries
Cossack list, but were from within the borders of were also recruited, and these would often be
the Commonwealth, although their backgrounds wholly arquebus- or musket-armed. With the
would have been similar to those outside. They dominance of their cavalry, the Poles had little
adopted firearms whilst mounted at an earlier date need for pikemen.
than other Cossacks. In Polish they were known On occasion, camp servants and similar were
as Kozacy. given spare lances and mounted on pack horses in
As with the cavalry, the infantry also came an attempt to fool the enemy into thinking that
under Transylvanian influence, with the most usual there were more hussars present than there
type of native infantry now being haiduks and actually were.
86
POLISHLITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH
87
CLASH OF EMPIRES
POLISHLITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH
Territory Types: Agricultural, Woodlands, Steppes
C-in-C Great Commander/Field Commander/Troop Commander 80/50/35 1
Field Commander 50 0–2
Sub-commanders
Troop Commander 35 0–3
Troop Type Capabilities
Points Bases per Total
Troop name Impact Close
Type Armour Quality Shooting combat per base BG bases
Combat
Core Troops
Determined Armoured Superior Impact
Hussars – Mounted Swordsmen 23 4–6 4–24
Horse
Cavalry Armoured Superior Bow – Swordsmen 16 4–6
Cavalry Armoured Superior Carbine – Swordsmen 16 4–6
Armoured Cossacks
Cavalry Armoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Cavalry Armoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 12 4–6
Armoured Light 12
Lithuanian petyhortsy Cavalry Average Bow* Lancers Swordsmen 4–6
Unarmoured 10
4–12
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Cavalry Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 10 4–6
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – – 7 4–6
Other Cossacks
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine – – 7 4–6
Light Horse Unarmoured Average Carbine – Swordsmen 9 4–6
Medium Unarmoured Average Arquebus – Swordsmen 7 6–8
Haiduks and registered Foot
6–24
Cossacks Medium Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Foot
Medium – Average Medium – – 20 2 0–2
Artillery Artillery
Artillery 0–4
Light Light
– Average Artillery – – 12 2, 3 or 4 0–4
Artillery
Optional Troops
Lithuanian Tartars Light Horse Unarmoured Average Bow – Swordsmen 9 4 0–4
German Heavily
Only before 13
mercenary 1611 Horse Armoured Average Pistol – Pistol 4–6
reiters Armoured 11
0–
German Armoured 11 12
mercenary Only from 0–
Horse Average Carbine – Pistol 4–6
bandellier 1611 12
reiters Unarmoured 9
German or Only from Heavily
Livonian Horse Average – Pistol Pistol 12 4 0–4
cuirassiers 1619 Armoured
Noble levy Cavalry Armoured Poor Bow – – 7 8–10 0–20
Dragoons and cossacks Dragoons Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 3 or 4 0–6
6–
– Pike Pike 6
Heavy 12
Armoured Average
Infantry Heavy Heavy
– 6 0–2 10–
Only before Weapon Weapon 16
0–16
1611 Medium Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 7 4–6
Foot
Medium
German Unarmoured Average Arquebus – – 6 6–8
Foot
mercenary Only from Medium
infantry Unarmoured Average Musket – – 7 6
1611 Foot
Only from Medium Unarmoured Average Musket – – 8 6 9
1611 until Foot
(LT) 0–18
1629 Heavy foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 3
Medium
Only from Unarmoured Average Musket – – 8 4
Foot 6
1625
Heavy Foot Armoured Average – Pike Pike 6 2
88
POLISHLITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH
89
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Scout of Gostomski’s Hussars and militiaman, Cracow, 1605, by Angus McBride © Osprey Publishing Ltd.
Taken from Men-at-Arms 188: Polish Armies 1569–1696 (2).
90
LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH
Janissaries
LATER OTTOMAN
TURKISH
91
CLASH OF EMPIRES
The Ottomans at the gates of Vienna, 1683, by Peter Dennis © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from
Campaign 191: Vienna 1683.
92
LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH
TR
PODOLIA net 1541 Year of acquisition
s
AN 15
Buda Pest Dnie 1672
s Boundary of Ottoman Empire
SY 41
t
Genoa Venice
Vo
Desert
er
LVA
lga
Mohács MOLDAVIA YEDISAN Approximate extent of desert
NIA
CROATIA 1526 1504 OF THE
1528 HUNGARY 1526 NATE C ARA L
KHA
03
1541
SEA
RI
/15
SEA OF
ME
Belgrade
84
Corsica AZOV
14
A
BOSNIA 1521 WALLACHIA
1463 SERBIA 1393
ITALY
1459 D a n u be
RO
Nicopolis
Sofia BULGARIA Ox
EG Kosovo us
Sardinia N
AP TE Varna
B LACK SEA
D
UL MO N 1389 1393
CA
AG
IA RUMELIA
SP
HE
Adrianople
GEO
ST
ALBANIA
IAN
1478 Constantinople Trebizond RG Tiflis
IA
AN
1453 1461
Tunis Bursa T R EBIZ O N D
Sicily KARABAGH
SEA
G
Ankara
RE
Lepanto Chaldiran
Qayrawãn M
EC
1571 1514
E
Izmir A N AT O L I A ARMENIA
TUNISIA
1574
E Athens
D Konya KURDISTAN
AZERBAIJAN
IT Marj Dãbi
Tabriz
E 1516 Edessa
R
Tig
Qazvin
Tripoli R
r is
RHODES
Aleppo IRAQ
A CRETE 1522
N 1669
CYPRUS Euphra
E A 1571 te
LURISTAN
N
s
Benghazi
S E Damascus PERSIA
TRIPOLI
A Tyre
1551 Acre SYRIA Baghdad Isfahãn
1516
Alexandria Karbala
CYRENAICA Jerusalem
1521
Cairo Basrah
EGYPT
1517
ER
P
SIA
N
N il
GU
e
RED
LF
0 250 miles
SEA
HIJAZ
1517
0 500 km Medina
The expansion of the Ottoman Empire, 1481–1683 © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Essential
Histories 62: The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699.
It was not just the timariots who were declining exclusive recruitment, the Janissaries were deployed
in effectiveness – even the Janissaries suffered. From to garrison posts throughout the Empire, and no
1568 they were no longer wholly recruited by longer served under the eye of the Sultan. Numbers
the devşirme system, as the sons of ex-Janissaries also increased as a result. The impact of these
started to be allowed into the corps. From 1582, changes was that although the Janissaries remained
freeborn men were also allowed in under certain the best of the Ottoman infantry, they were no LATER OTTOMAN
TURKISH
circumstances, and then in 1594 any Muslim longer quite as effective as before. We represent this
volunteers were allowed entry. In addition to the less by allowing only one Superior Janissary battle group.
93
CLASH OF EMPIRES
94
LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH
95
CLASH OF EMPIRES
Light
Light Horse Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 8 4–6
Lancers
Bedouin
Light
Cavalry Unarmoured Average – Swordsmen 9 4–6 0–8
Lancers
Light
Kurds Cavalry Armoured Average – Swordsmen 11 4–6
Lancers
Balkan and Anatolian
Light Foot Unarmoured Average Musket – – 7 4–6 0–8
sharpshooters
Poorly-equipped levies Mob Unarmoured Poor – – – 2 10–12 0–12
Wagons, ditches, stakes,
Field
chained guns and tethered – – – – – 3 – 0–24
Fortifications
camels
Fortified camp 24 0–1
Allies
Crimean Tatar allies – Tatar
Wallachian allies – Wallachian, Moldavian and Transylvanian
Moldavian allies – Wallachian, Moldavian and Transylvanian
Transylvanian allies (only from 1618) – Hungarian–Transylvanian: Field of Glory Renaissance Companion 1: Wars of Religion
Hungarian rebel allies (only from 1670) – Hungarian: Field of Glory Renaissance Companion 5: Duty and Glory
0 500 km
RUSSIA
(MUSCOVY)
N
Warsaw
D
P OL A N D
on
Kiev
nie
D
1621, 1673
sa
os Cossac ks
SS
Buda C
AR
HUNGARY
ABI
Ta Sea of Azov
A
IA
t ar 1695–6
Akkerman s Azov
AV
S a v Karlowitz
a
Temesvar
LD
Belgrade MO Kaffa
H IA
WA L L A C
BLACK SEA
D a n ub e
AD
RIA Sinope
Edirne Constantinople
TIC
SEA
ASIA MINOR
The Ottoman Eastern European front, 17th century © Osprey Publishing Ltd.
Taken from Essential Histories 62: The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699.
96
EARLY GUSTAVAN SWEDISH
T
LATER OTTOMAN
TURKISH
his list covers the Swedish armies from it was not until he had toured Germany in EARLY GUSTAVAN
the time Gustavus Adolphus started to 1620–1621 that he devised the major reforms for SWEDISH
introduce reforms following his coronation in 1617, which he is famous. It must also be pointed out
until his entry into the Thirty Years’ War in 1630. that, in implementing his reforms and finding
Despite inheriting a country that was practically ways to finance his wars, Gustavus was greatly
bankrupt, and in poor shape militarily, Gustavus assisted by his chancellor, Axel Oxenstierna. In fact
was ambitious. However, until he came of age and it is doubtful whether, without Oxenstierna,
was crowned in 1617, he was in no position to Gustavus would have been able to make his
make changes. Although he started to implement changes, and develop the Swedish army into the
reforms almost immediately after his coronation, force that it was to become.
97
CLASH OF EMPIRES
98
EARLY GUSTAVAN SWEDISH
The Adelsfana cuirassiers survived, but they no In addition to the use of the pike, Gustavus
longer served abroad. Mercenary cuirassiers were believed that it was imperative for the pikemen,
recruited in their stead. as the assault troops, to be armoured, and in this
If anything, infantry reforms were even more he seems to have been more successful than with
substantial, and were introduced in two main the cavalry.
phases. Firstly, at the start of the reign, mostly Despite these changes, and improved
under the instruction of Gustavus’ chancellor performance, there was still concern that the
Axel Oxenstierna, they were organised into infantry were vulnerable to Polish cavalry. As a result
Landsregiments, each based on a region of the of this, Swedish feathers were used during the mid-
kingdom. These were organised along the same 1620s, although they were subsequently abandoned
lines as contemporary Protestant infantry in again as being both cumbersome and unnecessary.
Germany and raised by conscription. The second The Swedish and Finnish infantry regiments
phase was the development of the famous were supplemented by large numbers of foreign
“Swedish brigade” system by Gustavus from mercenaries, Germans, Scots and English in the
1622 onwards. This went through a series of main, who came to be identified by colour names
iterations, initially being comprised of three (Yellow, Red, Blue and Green being the oldest)
“squadrons”, then four, before reverting to in imitation of current Protestant practice in the
three again when the army was in Germany. Thirty Years’ War. The mercenary regiments,
The number of squadrons makes no difference regardless of origin, fought in the same manner as
to the battle group classification. the native regiments.
99
CLASH OF EMPIRES
100
EARLY GUSTAVAN SWEDISH
Leather guns
Superior 12 0–1 per
or 3–pounder
Only from Regimental Regimental Regimental Swedish
guns attached – – n/a
1625 Guns Guns Guns brigade
to Swedish Average 9 BG
brigades
Medium Medium
– Average – – 20 2, 3 or 4
Artillery Artillery
Artillery 2–4
Heavy Heavy
– Average – – 25 2, 3 or 4
Artillery Artillery
Optional Troops
Commanded Only from
Medium Foot Unarmoured Average Salvo – – 8 2 0–6
shot 1622
Dragoons and mounted
Dragoons Unarmoured Average Musket – – 8 3 or 4 0–4
jägers
Heavily
Adelsfana cuirassiers Horse Average – Pistol Pistol 12 2 0–2
Armoured
Livonian or German Heavily
Horse Superior – Pistol Pistol 16 2–4 0–4
cuirassiers Armoured
“Swedish
feathers” to Only from
Portable
cover 3 files of 1624 to – – – – – 3 – Any
Defences
each infantry 1627
regiment
EARLY GUSTAVAN
SWEDISH
Swedish infantry, 1626, by Richard Hook © Osprey Publishing Ltd. Taken from Men-at-Arms 235:
The Army of Gustavus Adolphus (1): Infantry.
101
CLASH OF EMPIRES
102
APPENDIX 1 USING THE LISTS
arquebusiers – as specified for the Colunela armour class is given in a list, this allows
foot in the list example below. battle groups to differ from each other.
• All troops in a battle group must be of the It does not override the above rule for each
same quality. Where a choice of quality is battle group.
given in a list, this allows battle groups to
differ from each other. It does not override EXAMPLE LIST
the above rule for each battle group. Here is a section of an actual army list, which will
• All troops in a battle group with the same help us to explain the basics and some special
troop type and combat capabilities must be features. The list specifies the following items for
of the same armour class. Where a choice of each historical type included in the army:
Pike and Shot Battlegroup with regimental gun • Troop Type – comprising Type, Armour and
Quality.
• Capabilities – comprising Shooting, Impact
and Melee capabilities.
• Points cost per base.
• Minimum and maximum number of bases in
each battle group.
• Minimum and maximum number of bases in
the army.
103
CLASH OF EMPIRES
104
APPENDIX 1 USING THE LISTS
battle group with men-at-arms with mixed more than 8 bases of them in total, it must
equipment or separately deployed poorly- include at least 1 base of men-at-arms (of
equipped men-at-arms. (Note that in reality any type) for every base of Imperial, feudal
battle groups of gendarmes and men-at-arms or mercenary gendarmes.
did include a mixture of men with different • Landsknechte must be organised in battle
equipment levels, but for simulation purposes groups of 10, 12, 14 or 16 bases, comprising
each battle group is rated according to the between 8 and 16 bases inclusive of pikemen,
prevailing armour and quality of the troops it and between 0 and 2 bases inclusive of
comprises, so that all the bases in a battle halberdiers (with heavy weapon). Each
group have the same grading). Landsknechte battle group’s quality can be
• Men-at-arms with mixed equipment must Superior or Average, but all the bases in each
be organized in battle groups of 4 or 6 bases. Landsknechte battle group must have the
Before 1526 the army can include up to same quality grading. Different Landsknechte
16 bases of them, after 1526 up to 8. battle groups can have different quality
Men-at-arms with mixed equipment cannot gradings. Landsknechte can be fielded either
be mixed in the same battle group with as Armoured or Unarmoured. All the bases in
gendarmes or separately deployed poorly- each Landsknechte battle group must have
equipped men-at-arms. the same armour grading. Different
• Separately deployed poorly-equipped Landsknechte battle groups can have different
men-at-arms can have Light Lancers and armour gradings. The army must include at
Swordsmen capabilities, or Swordsmen least 16 bases of Landsknechte, and cannot
capability alone. All the bases in each include more than 64.
separately deployed poorly-equipped men- • Landsknecht Hakenbüchsenschützen can be
at-arms battle group must have the same fielded as Light Foot or Medium Foot. Light
capabilities. Different separately deployed Foot must be organised in battle groups of
poorly-equipped men-at-arms battle groups 4 or 6 bases, Medium Foot in battle groups
can have different capabilities. They must be of 6 or 8 bases. All the bases in each battle
organized in battle groups of 4 or 6 bases. The group must be classified the same, but
army can include up to 12 bases of separately different battle groups can be different. The
deployed poorly-equipped men-at-arms. army can include up to 12 bases of Light
Separately deployed poorly-equipped men- Foot Landsknecht Hakenbüchsenschützen,
at-arms cannot be mixed in the same battle It can include up to 12 bases of Medium
APPENDIX 1
group with gendarmes or men-at-arms with Foot Landsknecht Hakenbüchsenschützen. USING THE
mixed equipment. It cannot include more than 18 bases of LISTS
105
CLASH OF EMPIRES
• As per the special instruction, the army can have different quality gradings. Before
must include at least twice as many 1534 the army can include up to 12 bases of
Landsknecht battle groups and bases Colunela foot and need not include any.
(including Landsknechte and Landsknecht From 1534 the army cannot include any
Hakenbüchsenschützen) as Colunela or Colunela foot.
Tercio battle groups and bases. • From 1534 Spanish foot are organized into
• Celadas can be fielded either as Armoured Tercios. Each Tercio battle group must be
Light Horse, or as Heavily Armoured or organized in battle groups of 12, 14 or 16
Armoured Horse. All the bases in each bases, comprising between 6 and 8 bases
Celadas battle group must be the same. inclusive of arquebusiers and between 6 and 8
Different Celadas battle groups can be bases inclusive of pikemen. It counts as an
different. Light Horse Celadas must be Early Tercio. Each battle group’s quality can
organized in battle groups of 4 bases. Horse be Superior or Average, but all the bases in
Celadas must be organized in battle groups each Tercio battle group must have the same
of 4 or 6 bases. quality grading. Different Tercio battle groups
• Jinetes can be fielded either as Armoured or can have different quality gradings. From
Unarmoured. All the bases in each Jinetes 1534 the army can include up to 32 bases of
battle group must have the same armour Tercio foot and need not include any. Before
grading. Different Jinetes battle groups can 1534 the army cannot include any Tercio foot.
have different armour gradings. They must • Field guns and heavy field guns can be
be organized in battle groups of 4 or 6 bases. organised in battle groups of 2, 3 or 4 bases.
• The army cannot include more than 6 bases A 3 base battle group is allowed in this case
of Celadas or Jinetes in total, and need not because it is explicitly stated in the army list.
include any. If the list had “2-4” in the Bases per BG
• Before 1534 Spanish foot are organized into column, a battle group of 3 would not be
Colunelas. Each Colunela battle group allowed. Field guns are Medium Artillery.
consists of 3 bases of pikemen, 1 base of Heavy field guns are Heavy Artillery. All the
swordsmen and 2 bases of arquebusiers. Each bases in each Artillery battle group must be
battle group’s quality can be Superior or the same. Different Artillery battle groups
Average, but all the bases in each Colunela can be different. The army must have at least
battle group must have the same quality 2 bases of Artillery, and cannot include more
grading. Different Colunela battle groups than 6 in total.
106
INDEX
107
CLASH OF EMPIRES
108
Covering Eastern Europe during
the Renaissance, and Western Europe
in the latter half of the 16th century,
Clash of Empires, the third Field
of Glory Renaissance Companion
provides aspiring generals with
everything they need to command
an army of steadfast Janissaries, or
the troops of one of the Ottoman
Empire’s foes. With Osprey artwork,
maps, and historical background,
Clash of Empires brings to the gaming
table the great conflicts between the
Cross and the Crescent.
OSPREY
PUBLISHING