State of Condition Monitoring YAO)Contents Demographics State of Manual monitoring Boe) State of Remote monitoring alee Water Quality & Hydrometric 13 - 14 Air Quality eas) tt ee eo On ee coh a eee RSE eee en ee ea eee ee een eg Sire eae ean ras ‘ i i me Ries ta eer ee enc]Executive Summary Applications and technologies for monitoring are evolving rapidly. ‘We're seeing a rapid increase in enabling technologies and tools in the form of loT platforms, sensors, connectivity, and protocols, Regulators and stakeholders are increasingly demanding more data transparency and access to real-time conditions. ‘This report provides a snapshot of industry direction and understanding of the current landscape, formed by the expert opinions of over 200 scientists, engineers, and industry specialists End-users are moving to real-time with more than a quarter of end-users reporting an upcoming move in 2022 to real-time and three quarters expecting they will be monitoring precominantly remotely by 2025. ‘According to responses, this is largely (41.9%) driven by organizational needs for real-time data in decision-making processes, Given this real-time drive, almost a third (20%) of end-users are already reporting a shortage of talent as their most pressing challenge. This skis, {gap could be addressable by connecting organizations with technical sensor deployment skils to these end-users switching to real-time methods Respondents also identified mukiple limitations in sensing hardware inhibiting broader uptake of remote monitoring, from maintenance costs to lack of suitable sensors for their analyses Expect to see monitoring programs expand in 2022 as over tity per cent (@1.596) of respondents reported an increase in parameters as their biggest upcoming change for the year. ‘Steet Conte Mentoring 202 Gzewe Sunmay BentleyKEY INSIGHTS Demand for access 28% Pe ee Re LT) CO acer Cee eur re CTT cote Te [1g etelce lity REY ech UCase eed Cn aL Dt RC} mee rdSurvey Demographics Fa se es ‘aveaownatpee) wma ss F 208 survey responses, almost half the participants (48.9%) were located in Australia, just under a quarter (23.9%) in ‘the United States and the remaining distributed across Canada, the UK, New Zealand with outliers such as Brazil, Indonesia, Germany, Sweden, and Kenya, ‘The geographic spread was skewed by feagle.io's operations across Australia, New Zealand and the United States. We believe the resulting findings retain broad multinational application due to the ‘maturity of these markets, ‘toe f Condon Mentaing 2022) Oenoauehis BentleyReal-time monitoring via remote sensors was the most prevalent monitoring method across the industry. However, a large proportion of both service providers and end-users stil feature manual monitoring methods in their practice. This suggests the industry isin a transition period from manual to tealime, with several factors driving and inhibiting remote adoption covered later in this report. Monitoring method adoption The distribution was also heavily skewed towards sensor monitored ‘methods vs sample collection Sensors & realtime telemetry (erate) In-situ measurement wth hand held sensors Sensors with manusl downlod from ste Manual sample collection for laboratory analyse ‘Automated sample collection forlabanais other renote) ther (manus) =a ~~ as a5 a + a fed 1098 as Serdeupoc provers a End-user organisations Ms ‘toe f Condon Mentaing 2022) Oenoauehis BentleyWhat's measured Water, Air (quality and meteorological) and Hydrometrc (ground and surface water level measurement) were the most commonly monitored analytics across respondents With remote sensor talent shortages reported in both Air and Water Quality by end-users, there's a market opportunity for providers who have these capabilities to service end-user demand. A note of caution on extrapolating market ‘ize from this count data, although there are fewer companies and end-users Undertaking structural or geotechnical ‘monitoring by count, the number of sensors and scale of these monitoring systems when deployed can be very large. Proportion of respondents monitoring each measurement —_£nt-user organisations Service/product providers me va uy 2 I oy on EE cs 2 me I 2 an ~~ «BEL... un ne wm Br. 1088 " libelium . = soutn | con aeroaual® = wufos munisonse dataTaker C2 Parameters Instruments Sensors (parameters) poneuae oN ewan Comers Purple aos) vor fez Designs sensor LEM ‘CEN wth nee line units (PM 02 C02 NOx SOx Aevesos res COD Setocericl Some voerias et e70) cromet gis Aosphee dst Sensors Etocroenamica Sensors and Opts! Particle te Graven cst Opteal Panicle {counters PMI, PME, PIO, 8, NO, NO. S02. o Prarie release Comer fe c0, Coz, ToC, Temp, Presse, Reaive eo tg seaer Hons) coe Nove {ght seater, NOIR, PO Pancdetes, Gases) es PD arayzee Patio Probes ‘Sate Contin Mentoring 2022|ArOwy BentleyStructural & Geotechnical PVC lo Re tat Ket lai} St Cen | RUC eee a ee CS cere ce) rete oars eee tr cee earch rn Cn ir eet te Me tect wen emmy ori aCe er nei! shortage of talent. Even with the advanced» (50%) as two upeoming challenges and. renee) ee at on ee ~ — eter : Re ee aed Soon pee ee ee ems een eee DC a Ce ere ene eer eeReported Parameters, Vendors & Instrumentation HARDWARE VENDORS rsf Gj seienriee munisonse datalaker Parameters Providers: End-user Viration ian Displacement Deplcement race crack Stain Slope monitoring Detecbon svan oad Detection Ground Displacement Load Structure Displacement Ground Dspacement Geomates ‘Sucture Displacement Pore Pressure Pressure Instruments Providers Optia! Instant Crack gauge Vibrating Wire devices Shape arrays Manual inelinometer Pressure depth sensors Pezometer ‘ecelerometer Geophone End-users, Ti sensors sncinometes Handel probes RADAR Submersbe presse sneors Sensors (parameters) ‘Ww Plezometers and 420m Amp sensors (Pore presse) Instant! vibration (vibration) Manual incinometer probes (orzontal displacement RADARSeanner (Siop0 montero)(Others reported the lacking availabilty of 3636 ofall respondents who monitor broadarray Weather stations and their cost_ Meteorological reported regulators, SCO CUR LE cn meme cn Se canoe Pe eee et Poot gee eri as End-user organisations eee ests rd ce [oa ee ene cd ve err]. ea imeasurement with hand-held sensors ES Pe neces! a Le | | ary Bary aes 4 ro eee ee eeReported Parameters, Vendors & Instrumentation HARDWARE VENDORS ceroaual’ (> Gsawerne (Gute SBARANI Sesion @DTinytag geeermary situatcwe Smecoepnere Parameters Providers ccondcty Wind speed Wind erection er Raina ‘Ae Temperature ‘Snow depth ‘Snow Water Equivaloncy Precipitation uy Cloud near Visi (Goda aan Baromet pressure End-user conduct ‘wird speed ‘Wind rection ‘BP Curent speed (current ection A Temperature RH Saw depth Show temperature Sow Water Equvalency Precptaton veee oo EES vase. Instruments Sensors (parameters) Providers Providers Mul: pavameter weather isda (eche station win cata ogper atmos 41 (Weathe) {Cen and tence ineunts | Yili and ut sansre (Wind speed 8 directo, ght seater Pressure, Temp, Hum) NOIR ‘Kipp 6 Zonen sun ackers nd solr radiation sensors persaanet (Solar ery pare) PD “Tay Tag Temperature Huniiy) I radiometers IGT iteration Devices (Fl SPAC) eso sw sen ‘himaVUE (eather) ‘nay netraometes Sow Plows {GNSS storage Cans Presse Tansooes Lond ets Thermos Sate of Condon Mnterng 2022) Seuss Gesuemin! BentleySeer eee eed et conemereerieriateie ame pea re hea f | ost alone cae Deere te ee Ee et) Se ary Perea Cea eee ae ‘sector of survey fespondents, re aes Pierce eee OR EacEs omReported Parameters, Vendors & Instrumentation AROWARE VENDORS Airodis iH! Sigicom epeRYIe PU Cirrus VV Parameters Instruments deAlevels Sound tvel mete ‘bration ns Noise cosimeny VelosyiFreqvency Viratng we sensors Euivale Nee Pressure Level Sound Level meters Sensors (parameters) ‘Ruido Monitor Model U20 (Equivalent Noise Pressure Level) Sighoam (vibrations) ‘Aeroqual Al paameters) (8 fusion (32)METocean UCT ee Tolge late) METocean respondents represonted ee ea eer ty ce ee ee ee cr eee ag eet eee a ee ct acs Pee ena Bee eee es telemetry eo nee i er Pe eeu nee eset ne ean cnet eos) fom regulators, community groups, internal Cee ue aot Service/product providers il Ct CT DOC lila) Sel attr Can aro Lh) Smexewihnanel onsite TT 720: Ce kd eee es ee ey Ce eee nyReported Parameters, Vendors & Instrumentation HARDWARE VENDORS cCAMppeLe saints ?{* libelium Parameters | Instruments | Sensors 7 Weriacann | Ree a 2, goes peedinedeal 2 eae Seo oom Merce | setter po. tent mo |e eePsa mca: 7 .Pees ee irc ea ae url Ce eee Cae cm) peers an Peer Cee oy ‘ot once I 1. ee eee Ces other re Breaking down trends Inorganzatons. wend these feur major nds wonds in monsaing 4. Remate monitoring yer 509% of a end usor organizations are cero provider respondents reported oteeatie va oT and weeny bo he top upcoming nausty Wend, with E536 of he indus expecting to be most remete by 2025, land 24.49 fal respondent moving 0 Yea. 2. More parameters and data points 531.50 o al espondents reported that Imontoring more parameors ise bigest change inher ganization for 202 2. Increasing stakeholder demand for re the indy Fespondonts ropa data automation and fuly-automated montoing systems as one of the biggest upcoming ends.Challenges in industry Just over Lin 4 respondents indicated a Shortage of talent across the environmental ‘monitoring indus. ‘This sts shortage was worse in those companies focused an realximahemate ‘monitoring programs wih 30-296 of these respondents repating shortage of talent as, thei biggest upcoming challenge For end-user organizations, an increased requiremert fr reporting trom regulators and stakeholdes came in as the top challenge Together wih te skal shortage, and appetite tor enduser ganizations to move 1 100% realtime by 2025, this presers an intresting ‘opportuni for servicelproduct providers 0 meet this supply and demand gap. ‘Several respondents aso list cos facors of hardware (gartcutaly rotating to sensors inthe walter sector) and flagged potential supply Issues as challenges on the hoxzon From an industy standpoie, the push to digtal data management and increasing demand tron stakeholders for data ransparency could beset to pu pressure on sourcing talent across the industy, with several measurement verticals (Gir Quay, Water Quality and Nose Quality) ‘ready reporing talent shortages (over 3036 of respondents reported this as ther biggest chaenge) ther reported upcoming challenges sported in tree-text responses, + Managing costs coming rom rising wages (talent) and upskling stat + Automating loT operations vith low-cost solatons + Supply chain issues wih hardware due to global component shortage diving costs up + Challenges withthe aby of instruments to meet Data Quality objectives anc regulatory requirements + lag between government standards and technology preventing acceptance of new methods + Alack of shared best practices appicable Pore eeu et fi ead Shortage of talent To eee) oe Sea a8 Ce nas Se aaClient demands in 2022 ‘The automation of reporting and data ‘management was the most reported clen ‘demand in responses. ‘Service and product providers aso reported the folowing key demands trom clients for 2022: mult-parameter sensors, sensor data ‘and visualisation sofware integrations with 6. tools, eal-sime data transmission from sensors land more advanced sensor data analysis. ‘Across responses, sevice and product providers alsa reported end cents demanding ‘more realtime data access, alarms and alerts, with end cients requesting to integrate their remote-sensor data software ino other data toals (8 pattrms lke Power Bl, YelowFin for more advanced modeling and data transtormavon From a senice perspective, providers reported rising demand for automated data Interpretation (such as automated POF reports) services End cents seem to be seeking more assistance with eding, coding, transforming and reporting on their data. Servcelproduct providers should consider taloring solution Offerings to match demand for his type of one-for-you data service. Upcoming trends ‘According to respondents, were going 0 see {sein data volumes, wider upake of data analytics and data management over the coming years. This presents opportunities for employees skied in these speciates, and servicelproduct providers who cater to these reeds for organizations. There is also an ‘expectation af improvements in loT sensor technology smaller sizes, cheaper costs and higher quality data Progress in remoteltelemetry technology: Respondents expect better remote access and setup and low bt satelites trom new companies taking market share frm historically strong companies that are over. reliant on past technologies and nat able to ‘adapt 1 remote maritring ‘A move to automated systems: More organizations traneitioning to fly Automated loT systoms wih data contraisation and sel-serve system automaton. Respondents also noted the pus to ‘set & forget technologies with automated alerts and reporting Improved loT sensor technology: Respondents anticipate smal, cheaper devices that use small data packets with wireless sensors to become more affordable ‘and minaturised with longer batery ite take) yr LE et me Do ea Sy DO eee ‘Sensor data integration with Bltoo! rere a Ce ogee) Product Opportunities Pe ee ee Userhienaty multiparameter sensore Cann ‘Adyanéed sensor data analysis tools Re erBentley Infrastructure loT S Wyse D Architecture Options Matching Your Needs Bersales Al ito ‘Sell-provision and manage 1oT services within your own IT environment oF leverage scalable cloud services on demand, Our range of solutions adapts CS Se er ua eo ana eagle.io PTs etal crl Carat ee DR eer Cae eu ea Ce ees ee Com Poem este! Industry-leading support for loT devices eee . Cee cd tae = Ci Dre rece g ry See eeeState of Condition Monitoring YL) eee =CaiCiy