Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a. A simple regression model with paint sales (Y) as the dependent variable selling
price (P) as the independent variable.
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.8661797
R Square 0.750267273
Adjusted R Square 0.719050682
Standard Error 16.43239213
Observations 10
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance
F
Regression 1 6489.812 6489.81 24.03425 0.001190045
2
Residual 8 2160.188 270.023
5
Total 9 8650
Coefficients Standard t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Error
A 390.376176 44.238 8.8244 2.1415E-05 288.3622535 492.3900976 288.3622535 492.3900976
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
c. Economic interpretation of the estimated intercept (a) and slope (b) coefficient.
There are two variables those are dependent and independent variables, one is selling price (X),
and another one is sales (Y). The selling price “X” is independent variable and the Sale “Y” is
dependent variable
The Regression analyses model appear to us above, both explain to us the variables, and there is
10 observations. After analysis, according to regression analysis table, R 2 is equal 0.75 and this
explains that there is strong relationship between Selling price “X” and Sale Revenue “Y”, and
when we see F-statistics “0.001” explains or indicates that Selling price is significant relationship
to the sales revenue.
Therefore, there is a strong relationship between selling price and sales revenue however;
marketing managers should be more focused on selling prices and satisfying customers to pursue
business goals.
d. Coefficient of determination
Formula: Coefficient of Determination (R2) = (TSS – RSS) / TSS
R2 = 0.750267273 or 75% is the coefficient of determination
e. A multiple regression model with paint sales (Y) as the dependent variable and
promotional expenditures (A) and selling price (P) as the independent variables.
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.898462
R Square 0.807235
Adjusted R Square 0.74298
Standard Error 16.42777
Observations 9
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance
F
Regression 2 6780.771 3390.386 12.56296 0.007163
Total 8 8400
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
The above Table and Regression analyses model indicates the variables, and there is 10
observations. After analysis, according to regression analysis table, R 2 is equal 0.80 and this
explains that there is strong relationship between Selling price and Promotion expense and Sale
Revenue “Y”, and when we see F-statistics and the P-value of the whole regression “0.007265” ,
0.007265 respectively explains or indicate that Selling price and promotion expense are
significant relationship to the sale revenue.
On the other hand, the p-value of the selling price is “0.381097” and this issue tells us that is
promotion expense is non- significant to the sales revenue and the marketing manager should
improve the marketing relationship to enhance their selling price.
In conclusion, there is a strong relationship between selling price, promotion expense and sales
revenue however; but in separately the promotion expense is non-significant to the sales revenue,
marketing managers should be more focused on selling prices improvement and satisfying
customers to pursue business goals.