Rational

male preventive medicine free pdf

Check the status of the file... #1. It's hypergamy in a nutshell Hypergamy is one of the most defining concepts in Rolos theory. And we can summarize as follows: hypergamy is the female will to secure the best genes and ideally, but not necessarily from the same man, as many resources as possible. Rollo Tomassi says he ideally gets both great genes
and many assets from the same man. My point: are men really poorer today than in the past? It's a recurring theme in the manosphere that men today aren't quite as good or manly as they once were, and if I'm potentially right, I'm far from convinced - and there's no data to support that, if possible, I'm Glad to Know Also Read: Why You Need to Stop
Complaining About Female Hypergamy #1 2 Beta Bucks Rollo Tomassi fucks Alpha Science fucks the Kinsey Institute studio. The study shows how women's facial preferences change depending on their menstrual period.
And, says Rollo, women want men when they ovulate and are more likely to be fertilized, and more women prefer it when they get pregnant. Rollo Tomassi says this is the basis and proof of the "Alpha fucks Beta Bucks" theory.

My point: The study was not clear, this is actually what Rollo is saying, that the study he cites actually disproves his own theory. Here's what the study says: However, there was no significant difference in masculinity preferences between women in the low- and high-likelihood groups to read more reviews in the magazine section. #3. How women
behave, depending on their stage Rollo Tomassi ranks women – and their dating behavior and expectations – into different categories depending on their stage of life: 15 : hot guys with good bodies , symmetrical face, color too some eyes and a decent hairstyle.

Between the ages of 15 and 25, even a beta male can be successful if he has a good physique. Females between the ages of 18 and 20 are unable to commit to anything. Breakup: Late teen Moves to college, tends to end relationship and take advantage of her Early years (20-25): Makes the most of PMS and begins to develop and appreciate inner
alpha qualities. the ideal alpha maleStage (28-30): Realizing that it is difficult to compete with younger women indicates that she needs to find a good man. Still hoping to "change" Bad Alpha Kids in Transition (29-31): Increasing competitor concern is now more interested in beta vendors in Safety Phase (31-34): Lightness, status and resources
become the main attraction for women. They are more difficult to play because they need a developmental stage (7-9 years after commitment and children): After a few years it has strengthened its position with the provider and a woman is no longer needed. Her SMV shrinks and stabilizes so she tries to be more dominant to maintain the balance of
power (my note: I'm not sure if this is true: in long marriages usually women initiate divorce) my score: lots of good points at these stages. But some mistakes, some generalizations. Ages and customs also vary significantly from culture to culture, and this is true for both liberal and free cultures (ie, highly Western-oriented today). #4. These are tools
of female manipulation.

I really enjoyed these pearls of wisdom.

For example, "Men can't make commitments": to fix their egos "What happened to all the gentlemen? Women say this to beta idiots to show they're willing to commit... if she's playing the role of a nice guy, "men have to pick up on guys": they want men 30 and over because they're serious. but actually their sense of concealment is now losing all their
power to seduce men "men threaten strong women": embarrassing men for severely "giving up young women and valuing other (less important) qualities". She does this when she can't find a "forgiving" man or refuses to give. Also read: #5.

Suppliers are culturally manipulated by men. I just agree, but I like this part. Rollo Tomsssis, "female obligation" (sic) and cultural expectations can become t-spiked. recommends watching the evil clip: To understand how women create women, read this site's classic article: The Domestication of Women: How Women Control Men and Relationships
Don't. 6. The stronger he is, the more honest he is about hypergamy. It was a profound observation. rolloHe says women who can be more open about their dual dating strategy (i.e. love the alpha bad boy but pretend you prefer the provider out there). An example is Sheryl Salzberg, author of Lean-In. Salzberg openly advises a woman to hang out
with the bad guys, but only to marry a man who wants a stable partnership and is "happy, or better yet, does a lot of housework." LOL, Rollo Tomassi totally got him. Women who can't be as real as Salzberg are still playing the game and pretending that they actually prefer a "straight man". This is because most women have to settle for a compromise
between alpha males and men. And when it's time to count, they have to pretend they prefer to take the men out. Preventive medicine quotes about what women want: Women want men where other men want to be, and other women want to ruin women's place in a man's life: Women should be an addition to a man's life, not the center of attention.
Efforts to Manipulate Women to Turn Men into Providers (paraphrased): Men Need to Start is every woman's wardrobe of over 30 life skills based on psychological and sociological principles to promote sex-criticism. liked rational male preventive medicine. And I agree with most of the content. However, as with its predecessor, Rational Man, I have a
lot to disagree with. If you're a fan of roller blinds with a red cabinet, keep an open mind before installing.

Yes? Excellent. For the red pill rating, check out the video analysis: Okay, so here we go: #1. The data is misleading (to fit the narrative) Rollo Miscy's quotes have been researched to fit his narrative.
For example, citing the New York Post, he said: “According to recent research, less than half of married women in the Ivillage have married the person who had the best sex of their life (52 percent say they were). title in book Chapter. "No one associates themselves with the better sex, which is, of course, an almost complete misrepresentation. But
mostly he's feeding data into his story. In short, he's saying that research shows that women fuck with alphas when they're young, but later marry a beta and look for a beta supplier However, Rollo does not know about the studyThe opposite of what Rollo Tomassi says. You just need some logic and math to figure it out.
If there is an average number of sexual partners a woman has, 5 partners - just to stay at the lower limit - then there is a chance of having the best sex of her life, only 20%. Instead, it's more than double! And it completely refutes the roll theory. #2. Rollo Tomassi says there are several unsubstantiated claims: the safest monogamous bond that women
deal with are men who consider a point or two on their own sexual market value. In fact, I agree with most of the concept. But ... what gives "points" and in what scale? Famous old PUA scale "0 to 10 HB"? And again: quarrels about housework and sex life are more common in couples where a woman decides. Women's decision status is an even
stronger predictor of relationship dissatisfaction than the status of a breadwinner. (...) Do women despise being a leader based on what she says? Because my personal observations don't support it at all. Relationships with managers tend to be more stable and last longer. So I would look for resources. Or at least for a deeper analysis of why. But
nothing... just Rolla's thoughts presented as the truth. Overall, the entire "preventive medicine" series is basically a book based on unsubstantiated claims.
This doesn't necessarily have to be wrong. I often repeat that a good observer of social dynamics can be better than a good researcher, but we must not forget this. Pop psychology is fun. Rollo Tomassi makes fun of what he calls "Pop Psychology of Love of Love". But love languages ​​are not pop psychology and their existence has been confirmed by
several studies. Psychologists who criticize their usefulness also confirm their relevance. It's "rational male preventive medicine," which sometimes sounds like pop psychology. #3. Evolutionary psychology's inadequacy of evolutionary psychology is the best tool for understanding sexual dynamics.
But not if you think of stories that sound believable but have no scientific basis.
It's just a story. And it's okay if you make it clear that this is personal conjecture. This has not always been the case with "preventive medicine". I have sometimes found that evolutionary psychology contradicts some roll theories. For example, a popular theory that beta males always keep a purse to themselvesDamned men. But if Beth was so stupid
to provide and constantly maintain older men and less fertile women - and very confident! -Shouldn't these guys get out of the line? Or shouldn't it be at least small that the fucking Alfa strategy stops working so well? It seems not to do it. Apparently, beta males seem to generate many other beta males. After all, it may be right to say that the Alfa are
more cocks and they give less, the beta allow a little less to fuck and more. Read: Alpha School Beta Bucks (myths, etc.) #4. Young girls correspond to Alpha, the older girls correspond mathematically to Beta, do not collect. The idea of Alpha Fucks is to give Beta Bucks Alpha a sexy, cool and single member. Beta are boring and simple women who act
as emotional bearings and support them financially.
Young women say Rollo, women want Alpha. This is a fact and it is for some women. But reality is not too much black and white. For all women, you have to be twice a man to fuck an Alfa as a young man and a beta married by Oldster. It does not make sense. This is a more complex and attentive fact. Some beta also explode (slightly). And some Alfons
got married and have been kept around (just look at Trump, Berlusconi and many other potatoes. There are really two important categories of Alfa: Alpha alpha suppliers or watch here: Beta/Alfa very simple in two categories should be a lot Simple. Like Marx, the Manicheic company of the owner division was wrong. So you can not be right because
you are simplifying a complex reality Alpha and Beta follow this video for a quick roundup: or a slightly more in -depth explanation of the market values Sexual lovers vs tests vs tests Alpha fucks: an instrument of posture and ego, where the mantra is often used as a tool to massage the ego in the manosphere. The people who read Alfa think they are
seeing themselves as the alphabet. And then they circulate in the repetition of mantra as a social climb to some blue beta presented (or sometimes real). It is called the position of the Alfa male. And as Roll said in the same preventive medicine A: rich people who do not need to be informedRich men and alpha do not have to say they are alpha. # 5.
Inversion of ovulation has no scientific basis, Alfa's theory of fucking Tomassi represents the conversion of ovulation as if confirmed the theory of the alpha broom in beta dollars. Logically, it makes sense. However, ovulation inversion in humans is a hypothesis and support tests remain sufficient, well. Although it seems very attractive, the real results
with regard to people are not as obvious or so strong - as Rollo looks. The meta -analysis shows both evidence and contrasting tests. I quote a good recent study that offers a beautiful overview: while some studies that measured female hormones to characterize the current fertility marked with female preferences for male figures, the stronger concept
was. Preferences for female elections in the perovulating phase for Musculity48.49, masculinity face23,49,50, beard23,51, vocal masculinity52.53 and face symmetry49.
As a result, the rate is associated with the preferences of the auditor's preferences to the ovulation cycle, it could be overvalued in previous studies due to inaccurate and small sample methodology54. Marcinkowska et al., 2019.
Personally, I think ovulation movement is probably real. However, the ovulation movement is not as strong as the distance that Rollo Tomassi resembles in his "rational male trilogy". Women's personal preferences seem stronger than cycles. Overall, I believe that part of the science of Rollo theories is a properly composed psychology that adapts to
the story.
# 6. Cultural infusion of female imperative is (significantly) exaggerated. Rollo Tomassi is obsessed almost as much as feminists for the patriarchate. He seems to be convinced that there is a female propaganda that will upset the natural instincts of all people. For example: is it a great frustration for young beta beta, which has predisposed
conditioning that convinces them of loyalty, support and capital of the construction of relations that were in a hurry? I understand what Rollo is talking about, but it's not sophisticated conditioning. Loyalty and support are valid properties for exchange in the sex market. Companions, under certain conditions. In equality of genetics, loyal andThe male
often beats an unsupported and unfaithful individual due to prolonged mating.
Makes sense, right? I also miss something that could be an alternative to a roll. Infidelity, selfishness and inequality in a relationship?
Sounds like a great recipe for a great relationship… it's not. #7. The rational man has seven shades, in this philosophy these are elements of sectarian dynamics. A group that must stick together, a "manipulating enemy" to work and defend, and other men to recruit and return to the red pill. This game also includes tagging. Cults make their members
feel "special". And what's the easiest way to do it without offending someone who doesn't believe in a cult? Insert the term "beta" for those who don't believe in your theories. The "blue-haired Beta" are the idiots and fools who come into play. And to the concept of "we", the Russians in the cult are cool alpha. It looks childish and offensive. And I
wanted a more thoughtful leader. See also: Manipulation: Techniques, Strategy and Ethics.
Brain. For example, the feminine imperative has learned to recognize and use this natural respect, inherent as an inevitable part of the first conditioning of future men. . . . What? Again, I agree with the general principle that different interest groups try to manipulate each other. But it is rarely an organized effort, and even more rarely an organized
effort will be able to dominate the interests of all other groups.
Instead, Rollo Tomassi talks as if there is a secret cult of female "puppeteers" who successfully manipulate the media and culture to win over men. It's shit. Let me be clear: The idea that there is hidden propaganda controlled by "female imperative" that effectively feminizes men and manipulates men into serving women is nonsense. But that's what
Tomassi feels. We talk about "female imperative", "conditioning", "female influence radiating over men", etc. etc. A. The key word in the sentence is "effectively". She tends to adopt and formulate values ​​for the sake of men. But so are men. The truth is that society is too complex and remote.Minority populations are stolen from offers or propaganda.
Of course, everyone will try to promote their interests, but rarely every voice can be strong enough to drown out all the interests of other groups (not to mention brainwashing). In addition, Rollo uses this conspiracy as a straw technique on the ends of the fingers for women and "a company of blue pills in general". # 9.
Culture supports men because it benefits the world (not only women), which is true: there is really a powerful industry of culture that affects men to conquer women. I have even spent my whole life by rejecting the cultural assumptions of the role of the provider. But this is not what Rollo has achieved: (only) This is not a necessity for women trying to
attract men to the roles of providers. Good for men to leave, instead of telling it to pregnant women. And this is not because it is part of the female need to separate people, but because a man's decision is good for everything that society accepts. Rollo seems to have never understood. Of course, when men leave their party history and remain loyal,
women benefit from it. In addition, we can reveal that a person who emphasizes his family accepts certain values that need to be respected and do not laugh (even if we have personally decided on this way of life). # 10. Roll Tomass's Cultural Mistake - with simple results of supply and demand, female duties, Tomassi everything wrong. He says men
beat women of necessity and cultural condition. I do not see it. Of course, some men may fall into the cultural branch of the female view of the world. I even agree that the female picture is the strongest today. But the most powerful is not the necessity of women, but the supply and demand of the flirting market that affects the behavior of men. Since
most men are glad to be pregnant, and most women and women are more picky, the basic rule is that women are in demand and men on offer.
This naturally (and moderately) makes women objects desire. Propaganda is not female orders, conditional or other plot. In addition, we canThat most men, with few opportunities, makes sense to communicate with women. Read: #11 to find out more about the offer and offer.
Numerous radical generalizations that cause a bad analysis of roll theory are not bad in themselves. However, they usually make mistakes when they claim to summarize everyone. For example: a girl who plans to create life in Disneyland stands out for you because her opportunities are expanding your boundaries. I can't believe what prejudice this
sentence is. And almost most of them are true. Especially to make them go immediately immediately. For example: do you think he intends to say Disneyland's imagination? Do you think you don't have Disneyland Fantasy? Do you think he is attending college, but doesn't he do it? He assumes that he wants to "shop" (really?) He thinks that his options
are expanding, but it is not known that each one is possible and in some situations it is even probable. However, to do them at the same time, it is not the real scenario. Basically, what Rollo says is true ...
in some cases. But as soon as he writes as if he described a typical situation, Rollo's great microanalysis becomes an insignificant macroteor. The rational male volume 2 is full of large generalizations.
Most of them are a large analysis of specific situations, but most of them turn into very bad systemic theories when the roll sums up too much.
#12. We are honest: like "Rational Man Volume 1", there are Missogenic bases. Roll tomeses in the visions of the world are "fueled by hypergamy" and men are idealists.
For example: Hygergamy does not worry about the idealistic male love expectations. Of course, Roll Tomsi looks like neutral and open. -mind. But it doesn't seem good.
He says "yes", "women can love in depth", but pay attention to the warning: women can love deep but completely opportunistic prospects. What does it mean that men "deeply love" from a purely altruistic point of view? Absurdity. Find out more in this video. #13. If some men are reliable, he is not necessarily guilty of a woman, right? The feeling of
"preventive medicine" is a feeling of manipulating men who deceive men. However, I heard that the men described by Rollo were not "typical" men, but a minority of trusted men. Are women guilty that some men already dream of Disneyland? I do not think so.Rollo confuses handling and self -confidence. Not only women may want to hide their wild
sex past: men who do not want to see this past.
Also read the dichotomy "Madonna-Wake". A rational man is a feminist male equivalent. Have you noticed similarities to feminism? The female imperative is the equivalent of the patriarchate and "hypergamia is a feminist equivalent of toxic masculinity". My challenge for you, dear readers, is to exceed the identification of a small group and rather
consider humanity and genres as subgroups. As Robert Green says (I will paraphrase) - the only feeling that is worthy of name belongs to the human race. Rather, it is looking for the relationship of winning victories: you can be better and stronger, looking for everything, instead of looking for reasons why you should be in war. See also: MindSets
Toxic Manosphere #14. I do not see human society renewed priority relations in generalization, otherwise it is bad. Rollo says that men are caused by holding on relationships to damage their professional successes.
Instead, they are determined to stand in the first place. I do not know in which world live, but in this world, women who primarily create the average importance of relationships, and men who have the average importance of work, success and success. And in liberal societies, men are less due to long -term relationships and do what they want,
nothing more.
They have never been free to remain alone as today. The Rollo Council, which men should prefer at work and not distract women, is my opinion, is my opinion. From a college student to the success of men. If something can be the opposite. As Amir Levin explains, studies show that solid intimate relationships help people have more confidence in life
and make more. #15. This is an excellent analysis, but 100% distorted and one side is called a "rational person". But if someone wanted to pretend, they could relate to them with distorted men. Rollo says he connects glasses. But it only combines points from a distorted point of view of what he wants to see. What Rollo is saying is not necessarily
incorrect, but it represents (very) best, only half of reality.
Nor is it mentioned in their own games, handling and cultural efforts.
And you, of course, notMen are innocent creatures that do not participate in the sex weapon race, right? So accept it as a call to wake up and read it a little more. #16. It does not agree: men do not agree with women. This is the least what I love in business tomsi: very broken. And only better than feminism for more realistic analysis. But not because
of its effects. Most rational male theories are deeply deep. Otherwise it wouldn't be because only half of the game watch. We have already seen an example: women have "the possibility of love" and men have a "idealistic approach to love." And again, even though it is real ... It is a mistake to do it in a common rule. Roll Tomsi quotes one of his
readers, says: I know how hunger feels, and I think women feel the same. However, I have no idea what hypergamine means, I never felt his charm.
What shit! Hypergamy is nothing but maximizing their return, and in any case men are trying to maximize their return (at least good). It manifests itself differently in men. Read more: Hypergamia No. 17. The Rollo theory leads to toxic relationships because it is wrong and does not understand that the theory of game is "the basic principle of Roll
Toms's sexual strategy": Viennese sexual strategy is effective, the second sex must be threatened or abandoned. ; In fact, they are a very faulty misunderstanding of the theory of game theory used for relationships (see "negotiations of game theory"). It is true that one player of each sex can change the other briefly. For example, from a purely
utilitarian perspective, if a woman can deceive more than one man to finance and invest in a lifestyle, she can get more and get more if she begins and leaves. The reason for this is that social relations can be some social changes and determine in terms of game theory. And other tricks (disadvantages) can bring great success. And in fact it is the
essence of the rational philosophy of a person: a long story about how to see withdrawal strategies. The problem is that Rollo is standing! Rollo Tomssi never goes beyond his paradigm against you. " Why does Rollo Tomsi see it as a fight? Because Rollo's philosophy looks at women as male enemies. Therefore, throw the philosophy of Tomsi, as I said
and confirmed hereMissogynist. Problem? First, morality. If you have an enemy, everyone is encountered by Cupid to become moral (see Zimbardo, 2008). Returns are also a kind of "model strategy" that you would apply to the enemy. But let's stay with the facts without morality. Second, and this is the most important thing, both sexes can gain
evenly if they support each other.
This means that there is a standard approach to a relationship that society seeks - exactly what it should do -.
Nowadays it is extremely important to know the theory of manipulation ("defective" in terms of game theory) to understand and protect reality. Like the "true reality" that should follow men, it is not only nonsense but also poisonous nonsense. The truth of sexual weapons in evolutionary psychology is also called the overflow strategy as a "sexual
hand".
He was well inspected and discussed by Robert Wright, whose reading I invited (a good deputy of evolutionary manosphere, driven by injury). The truth about sexual weapons is so much - and probably stronger - incentives to work. And you can reduce encouragement at -nenser and continue to enjoy the perfect, supportive relationship. TL, DR: Roll
Tomsi's "Red Pill" is a potentially very toxic misinterpretation of the relationship. I promptly ask readers to look for more information, at least if they are interested in a relationship for winning and support. #18. For those who are not very enticing, women like to say this: I am a man. I was mostly lonely because I like adventures. And I really don't like
feminism because he plays a woman against men.
And even I think this society wants war with (white) people, especially with laws to divorce. It gives me reliability to criticize Roll Tomsi's philosophy.
And Rollo Tomsi's philosophy is poisonous to men who love women, including men who like to sleep with many women.
Because enticing women love women and do not consider them as enemies! Also read: 10 types of seduction: Choose your niche! Ultimates do not miss the program in the real world: women provide Ultimates when they think their control give way and has to rush. But they will lose respect for men who also refuse (read "how to deal with the threats
of separation"). Don't be sensitive: Sensitivity became Brene Brown's hit, but Rollo says it was a joke. You will doBe more attractive - open and show your weak and fragile side (I agree, read: vulnerability is not a force), are not satisfied, because you are afraid to die alone: the image of your family is a fabulous dream. If you are working on yourself,
the value of a man does not decrease, as in women (Rollo says that men are moving from 36 to 38). Instead of fear of being lonely, fear suffering without passion. Do not buy Pua: Rollo does not believe in the sale of Pua and "Environment". The information is public, and your reality is too specific to find answers in one course/program.
Disadvantages, in addition to criticism: not as open as Rollo says at the beginning of preventive medicine, that he “knows that he does not know and does not invite readers to express his opinion. It is mistaken to make mistakes or give dissidents to disagree with the freedom. I believe that the “rational person” is sometimes aggressive and fights with
someone, who does not agree: it was difficult to follow when Thomasi talked about what stage is what.
For example, for example. He has two different words, transitional and transitional, which, it seems, are at the same stage. It is vague that he does not stop changing words a minute after another.
This is a shame, because the things he talks about are good, and some of the idea are magnificent. I can’t help but think that these “beta/alpha” dichotomies “blue tablets/red pills” are too simplified, and sometimes used in children's terms (for example, “you do not do this”). I do not agree, so you are a shitty elephant ...). Think about a very bad
relationship that Rollo believes that his books help men (they say: “They save life.” But I am a little concerned that there are conflict and toxic relationships for every “saved life”. I have a positive critical list of positively About the rational male volume 2 ”, as you can see. But this does not mean that there is not so much wisdom. In fact, there is a lot of
wisdom and analysis in the range: the analysis of“ social agreements ”is brilliant, and the analysis of Rollo of shame as protection The ego is excellent. Analysis at the highest level of social shame of women and men in society (for example, the restoration and adoption of their wild past). Analysis of the disclosure of various interests of women and men
and a cultural struggle. The spirit of Rollo is concentrated only on one side of the super fun and a deep equation )Salzberg's "Lean, Preventive Medicine Review â Preventive Medicine" is Power Medicine. But not in a positive and effective way. It reminds me of how the main character was sold as a "cough cure". Preventive medicine "is somewhat
similar: (in fact)" in the cure "view of the Pollyan patient on dating and relationships that potentially infect him by misogynia. In short: preventive medicine book 2 If you are a beginner Relationships. It must be both. And it is up to you to allow it, not the other one. Look: the best collection of red pill books or get a book on Amazon We found that
JavaScript is forbidden in this browser. To continue using Twitter.com, Enable JavaScript, or switch to a supported browser.
You can see a list of supported browsers in our help center. Help Center