Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
In the recent decades, consumption of energy within the world has an emerging trend
[1]. Energy sources are classified into two types’ renewable sources and non-renewable
sources, in which non-renewable sources of energy, which include an enormous portion
of energy consumption, could be categorized into two major classifications: nuclear and
fossil energy [2]. Fossil fuels negatively influence the nature owing to the emission of
carbon dioxide (CO2). Consumption of fossil fuels has severely imperilled human life
through its drastic aftermaths, such as global warming and atmospheric pollution.
However, miscellaneous countries around the world have made significant efforts to find
a piece of convincing solution for energy crisis by revolving the eyes into renewable
energy sources such as solar energy, energy produced from wind and water. As an
outcome of these efforts, one of the future alternative energy sources is Fuel Cell (FC),
which generates energy using high value metal catalysts [1]. The prime advantage of this
types of energy generator lead to-no emissions of environmental polluting gases (such as
SO2, NO2, CO2 and CO), higher efficiency, no existence of transportable parts [2].
MFCs are the kind of FCs uses an active microorganism as a biocatalyst in an anaerobic
anode compartment for production of bioelectricity. A MFC transforms organic energy,
Microbial Fuel Cells (MFC) have been defined as bioreactors, which transform the
energy stored in biological compounds present in wastewater into electric power
through catalytic activity of micro-organisms under anaerobic conditions. Many
researchers have worked on the generation of power from wastewater using different
electrodes under varied operational conditions. In this work, laboratory experiments
were conducted to generate power from sugar and distillery industrial wastewater by
using Aluminium and Copper electrodes in DC-MFC. The detailed discussion on the
materials used and methods adopted have been discussed in the following sections.
2.1 Materials
Fabrication of MFC necessitates the use of materials that are often utilized in the
construction of conventional fuel cells. It is important to note that, microorganisms are
the vital components of the MFC. The materials which have been used in the present
MFC study have been discussed in the following sub-sections.
In this study, Double Chamber MFCs were fabricated with acrylic Plexi glass was
used to conduct the laboratory experiments. Electrodes such as, Aluminium and Copper
electrodes were used. In this experimental study Distillery and Sugar industrial
wastewater were used as substrate, which were collected from Mymul Nandini Dairy,
Nazarbad, Mysore, India and JSS Hospital, Near Agrahara, Mysore, India. For the
preparation of the Salt-bridge, Potassium Chloride and Agar media were used. Medi-
ators such as, Potassium Permanganate, Phosphate buffer and Potassium Ferri cyanide
of laboratory grade was used to enhance the electron transfer. For conducting the
laboratory experiments, chemicals such as, sulphuric acid, hydrochloric acid, was used.
2.2 Methods
Laboratory experiments were planned to conduct under various conditions such as: dif-
ferent electrode materials, MFC module and different wastewater. A detailed discussion
442 C. Shakunthala and S. Manoj
In the present experimental study Distillery and Sugar industrial wastewater were
used as substrate, which were collected from Mymul Nandini Dairy, Nazarbad, Mysore,
India and JSS Hospital, Near Agrahara, Mysore, India. Glucose has been added for the
growth of micro-organisms present in the wastewater. The wastewater collected from
both the industries was analysed for Nitrate, Phosphate, BOD, COD and pH
concentrations.
2.4 Analysis
DC-MFC experiments have been carried out in different phases over a period of 3–5
days. However, voltage and current have been measured at an interval of one hour for
1st day and every two hour during 2nd and 3rd days. The influent and effluent COD,
BOD applications and pH were monitored as per Regular Methods for analysis of water
and wastewater (Fig. 1).
In the degradation of Dairy wastewater, it was found that, Dairy wastewater using
Copper electrode generated more voltage (*1000 mV) compared to Hospital
wastewater (*800 mV) using Aluminium electrode. The reason might be due to, BOD
and COD of the Dairy wastewater was found to be more when compared to Hospital
wastewater, which leads to movement of more electrons. It was also observed that, at
the initial stage of the experiment, voltage increases, then drops and finally again
reduces and maintains constant. Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 represent the variation of voltage,
current, current density and power versus time for Dairy and Hospital wastewater in
MFC reactor.
1200
Voltage
1000
800
Voltage (mV)
600
400
Hospital ww
200
Dairy ww
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time (Hours)
Fig. 2. Variation of voltage with time in double chambered microbial fuel cell.
5
4.5 Current Hospital ww
4 Dairy ww
3.5
Current (mA)
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time (Hours)
Fig. 3. Variation of current with time in double chambered microbial fuel cell.
Energy Harvesting from Dairy and Hospital Wastewater 445
0.45
0.4
Current Density Hospital ww
Current Density (A/m²)
0.35 Dairy ww
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time (Hours)
Fig. 4. Variation of current density with time in double chambered microbial fuel cell.
5000
4500
Power Hospital ww
4000 Dairy ww
3500
Power (µW)
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time (Hours)
Fig. 5. Variation of power with time in double chambered microbial fuel cell.
From the Fig. 3, it was found that, Dairy wastewater using Copper electrode
generated more current (*4.5 mA) when compared to Hospital wastewater using
Aluminium electrode. This may be due to; Copper electrodes are more favourable to
transfer electrons to the cathode than Aluminium electrodes. However, a maximum
current density of approximately 0.4 A/m2 (Fig. 4) was observed for Dairy wastewater,
which was found to be greater than the current density (0.05 A/m2) generated from
Hospital wastewater using Aluminium electrode. It was also observed that, at the initial
stage of the experiment, current density was found to be maximum and then drops and
finally maintains the constant value. Power generation from the MFCs were also cal-
culated (Fig. 5) and found that, Dairy wastewater using copper electrode generated
more power (*4700 µW) compared to Hospital wastewater (*500 µW).
4 Conclusion
Dairy wastewater was 1000 mV and 4.5 mA, respectively, which was found to be
higher than the voltage and current values of 825 mV and 2.1 mA, respectively,
obtained from Hospital wastewater. It was also found that, Copper electrodes were
more effective in electron transfer and electricity generation when compared to Alu-
minium electrodes.
References
1. Kim, H.J., Park, H.S., Hyun, M.S., Chang, I.S., Kim, M., Kim, B.H.: A mediator-less
microbial fuel cell using a metal reducing bacterium, Shewanella, putrefaciens. Enzyme
Microb. Technol. 30, 145–152 (2002)
2. Logan, B., Cheng, S., Watson, V., Estadt, G.: Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power
production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 3341–3346 (2007)
3. Bond, D.R., Lovley, D.R.: Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to
electrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 1548–1555 (2003)
4. Fan, Y., Hu, H., Liu, H.: Sustainable power generation in microbial fuel cells using
bicarbonate buffer and proton transfer mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 8154–8158
(2007)
5. Patra, A.: Low-cost, single-chambered microbial fuel cells for harvesting energy and
cleansing wastewater. J. U. S. SJWP 10, 72–85 (2008)
6. Banik, A., Jana, N.K., Maiti, B.R., Ghosh, T.K.: Development of microbial fuel cells and
electrode designs with waste water anaerobes. Greener J. Biol. Sci. 2, 013–019 (2012). ISSN
2276-7762
7. Ahn, Y., Logan, B.E.: Domestic wastewater treatment using multi-electrode continuous flow
MFCs with a separator electrode assembly design. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 409–416
(2013)
8. Cheng, S., Liu, H., Logan, B.E.: Increased performance of single chamber microbial fuel cells
using an improved cathode structure. Electrochem. Commun. 8, 489–494 (2006)
9. Ahn, Y., Logan, B.E.: Altering anode thickness to improve power production in microbial
fuel cells with different electrode distances. Am. Chem. Soc. 27, 271–276 (2012)