Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRESCRIBED READING
Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong, signed 19
December 1984 http://www.cmab.gov.hk/en/issues/joint3.htm [Please read the text of the
Declaration and Part I (Constitution) of Annex I].
Chapter 1 (“From Colony to Special Administrative Region”) in Chan & Lim Law of the Hong Kong
Constitution (3rd ed).
Benny Yiu-ting Tai, “The Development of Constitutionalism in Hong Kong” in The New Legal Order
in Hong Kong (edited by Raymond Wacks, 1999) [Please read pp. 39-65].
TUTORIAL QUESTIONS
2. How has constitutionalism developed in Hong Kong from the colonial era to the
handover?
• Rule of law
• Decentralized central gov’t
• Checks and balance
• Democratic Electoral System
• In-built human rights protection system
• Since local entrepreneurs and a middle class were on the rise, they demanded more
participation in local affairs
• Advisory committees and consultative organizations were set up
• More Chinese unofficial members were appointed
3. Superficial checks & balance
• The consultative org/committees were a closed system and colonial administration would
only appoint those that have shared interests à not effectively restrain the government
4. No democratic electoral system in major government institutions such as Legco
5. Marginal human rights protection
• ICCPR was made applicable, but it did not enjoy direct legal status so human rights of the
locals were still not protected
• More social welfares so people’s quality of life improved
Chinese refugees under the Cultural Revolution demanded better and more rights
3rd stage: Representative government that came late (1980s)
Bilateral treaty between the PRC and the Joint Declaration à laid down the terms of how HK would
hand over to the PRC à HK had little say in this bilateral treaty
People are starting to think about the different elements of Constitutionalism
Tai is not a formalist, so his assessment of different periods is based on substantive rule of
law
But you might have a different view if you’re a formalist