Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Designation: D 3363 – 00
Copyright © ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
D 3363
by cementing the abrasive paper to a flat motor-driven disk. By 8.1.1.1 Gouge Hardness—The hardest pencil that will leave
supporting the pencil at 90° to the rotating disk a uniform flat the film uncut for a stroke length of at least 3 mm ( 1 ⁄ 8 in.).
lead end may be obtained more reproducibly. 8.1.1.2 Scratch Hardness—The hardest pencil that will not
7.2 Place the coated panel on a level, firm, horizontal rupture or scratch the film.
surface. Starting with the hardest lead, hold the pencil or lead 8.1.2 The make and grade of lead or pencil used, and
holder firmly with the lead against the film at a 45° angle (point 8.1.3 Any deviation from standard conditions, including
away from the operator) and push away from the operator. roughness in the finish.
Exert sufficient uniform pressure downward and forward either
to cut or scratch the film or to crumble the edge of the lead. It 9. Precision and Bias
is suggested that the length of the stroke be 6.5 mm ( 1 ⁄ 4 in.). 9.1 Precision—In an interlaboratory test of this test method
7.3 Repeat the process down the hardness scale until a with three different films on panels, ten laboratories and
pencil is found that will not cut through the film to the substrate operators, and repeated by switching leads and panels between
(either metal or a previous coat) for a distance of at least 3 mm laboratories, the within-laboratory standard deviation was
(1 ⁄ 8 in.) (see 8.1.1). found to be 0.52 and the between-laboratory standard deviation
NOTE 1—The operator must watch closely for cutting into or scratching was found to be 0.61. Based on these standard deviations, the
the film. Some finishes contain compounds that may tend to lubricate the following criteria should be used for judging the acceptability
film. Checks should be made by close visual inspection and by fingernail of results at a 95 % confidence level:
feel.
9.1.1 Repeatability—Two results obtained by two operators
NOTE 2—In conducting the test, if the sharp edge of the lead is slightly
chipped or crumbled, the lead must be resharpened.
within a laboratory using the same pencils and panels should be
considered suspect if they differ by more than one pencil unit
7.4 Continue the process until a pencil is found that will on the scale described in 5.1.
neither cut through nor scratch the surface of the film. Any 9.1.2 Reproducibility—Two results, each the mean of at
defacement of the film other than a cut (gouge) is considered a least two determinations, obtained by operators in different
scratch. Record each end point (if applicable) for gouge and laboratories using the same pencils and panels or different
scratch hardness (see 8.1). pencils with the same panels should be considered suspect if
NOTE 3—With some films, the two end points will be identical. they differ by more than one pencil unit on the scale described
7.5 Make a minimum of two determinations for gouge in 5.1.
hardness (7.3) and scratch hardness (7.4) for each pencil or 9.1.3 Bias—Since there is no acceptable material suitable
lead. for determining the bias for the procedure in this test method
for measuring pencil hardness, bias cannot be determined.
8. Report
8.1 Report the following information: 10. Keywords
8.1.1 The two end points as follows: 10.1 hardness (scratch); pencil hardness
The American Society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above address or at
610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website (www.astm.org).