The student who study from the school to university get benefit less and contribute less too,

than those of student who go to travel or job and get skills and experience before going high. Do you agree or disagree? Nowadays, in our competitive world, to succeed, knowledge from school and university is not enough. Therefore, the students who study from the school to university get benefit less and contribute less too, than those of student who go to travel or job and get experience and skills before going high. There are two following reasons to prove for my opinion. I call the group of people who study from school to university is group A and the other group is group B. Firstly, at school and university, what group A gain is almost theory, theory and theor y. Of course, theory is very necessary, however, you cant do everything with theory. You must have pratical experience. This is what group A lacks. Although in the third of forth year at university, group A can be apprentices in some companies, to help th em approach their future jobs, they arent trained well because of short time. And the real job is still very strange with them. After graduating, without experience, group A cant accomplish their work perfectly. On the other hand, it take them time and money to keep up with other experienced ones and may be scorned. Therefore, group A can contribute less than group B who have the most two important things: skills and experience. Secondly, as group A is contribute less, they surely get less benefit. Moreover, many companies which employ people in group A have to train them from the back -ground. These companies take this cost from group As salary to get rid of the fact that their employees may leave after being trained to other companies. So, less benefit i s unavoidable and certain, On the Other handgroup B are more loyal and effective workers. They also have useful experience and skills. Besides, their education is the same as or even higher than group A. As the result, group B get more benefit absolutely.

In conclusion, I think student should go to travel or job before going high. Therefore, they cant only have basic knowledge but also skills and experience which are useful for them to get a good job and a brilliant future

The graph below gives information on wages of Somecountry over a ten -year period. Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown. You should write at least 150 words. ----------------------------------------------------------

The line graph describes the growth of wages in Somecountry from year 1993 to year 2003. The growth starts at two percent in 1993, but it doesnt stay there very long before it rapidly doubles in 1994. Further on, the percentages decline to three percent i n 1995, stays steady for year, before it start to rise slowly and ends up just under four percent in 1997. 1998 is the best year where the wages peaked at six percent. However, after 1998 the wages declines nearly every year. Only a year later , the percen tage drops to well under three percent, stays there on roughly three percent till 2000. In 2002 the wages reach the lowest point of just one percent growth. Luckily the growth rises in 2003 at just under two percent.

The table below describes percentages of home schooled students in Some Country in 1999-2004. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.

You should write at least 150 words. ------------------------------------------------------

This table shows home schooled students in in percentages.

The main trend is that all grades including kindergarten are growing every year. Kindergarten started with percentage of 2.4 and ended highest at 2.9 percent with a constant increase. Not quite similarly butgrades 1-2 and grades 5-6 show a little different trend, both started at 1,5 percent in 1999 and declineda little bit in 2000. Both of them increased slowly in 2002 and both held that course to 2004 where grades 1-2reached 2,1 percent and grades 5-6 reached 2.6 percent. Grades 3-4 had a slow but steady growth throughout all six years. It started at 1.6 percent in 1999 and increased by 0.1 every year except in 2003 when itpeaked up at 0.2 percent. Gra des 7-8 started at 1.6 percent and stayed there for three years until it rapidly rises up to 2.2 and peaks at 2.5 in 2004. Overall, all grades including kindergarten has had a rise at roughly minimum 1 perce

omecountry in year 1999 -2004

Task-2

We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits?
Today computers are use d almost everywhere, it is impossible to imagine our life without PCs, Internet, hand phones and other computer devices. It is reasonable that people look to the future of computers

Computers make our life easier, we can easily get information about any product we plan to buy or place we plan to visit over a second using personal computer and The internet. Scientists predict that in the nearest future it will be possible to smell a new perfume using Internet and watch 3D scenes at home like we do in the th eater. According to forecasts of HR agencies machines will replace job of cashiers, civil and military pilots. Some corporations in Japan already sellinghousewife -robots, which help old people to keep their home clean. Despite the fact that computers help us, they make us dependent. Apparently, people spend more time behind monitors that ever before. And some of them feel a need for more time to be spent with people in live contact. In addition, fall out of one of the important modules of specific computer can entail serious consequences. Enough to mention computer problem, occurred in the end of 1990s, problem concerned with coming year 2000 (Y2K) and catastrophes that were predicted. Fortunately imminent disasters did not happen. However, it is difficult t o imagine what could have happened if all the predictions had occurred. We live in technological era, computers penetrated everywhere with all benefits they provide and all dangers they hide. However we are satisfied with them and sometimes we even thank t hem because they help us in communicating, studying, doing business, entertaining and saving lives in critical situations.

Task-2

In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion on this?
Nowadays, many children involved in different types of jobs to have some kind of financial assurance for themselves. However, w hether this is good for their development and personality is a much debatable issue. I personally believe that paid works is harmful for children for several reasons. It is said that children learn valuable experience in the work place. This may be true. However, I would argue that children are mainly employed for jobs that require manual work and are low paid. The recent statistic reveals the common tasks that children are assigned are washing dishes, cleaning floors or serving food in restaurants. Meanwh ile, this kind of jobs actually does not provide children with necessary and useful skills so that they can apply in their future career. This brings me to the second point. Defenders of child work argue that it is an effective method of learning. The poi nt is children should be able to apply knowledge taught to them in a real life working environment. Although this is undoubtedly true, it also means that children may neglect the classroom study and even fail the class. The worst thing is yet to come. They may become so occupied with the benefits ahead of them like small salary and leave school. Finally, supporters said that it helps them to build responsibility in the family. They will understand how it is difficult to earn money and therefore have a comp assionate view with their parents. This is true to a certain extent, but may have a totally adverse effect on children. As children can make money at an early age, they would feel that it is appropriate to spend on luxury things by their own money, which c ould be recovered later. In conclusion, I think that parents should take measures to restrict their child to work, otherwise it would have a negative consequences on their futures.

Task-2

Advertising is all around us, it is an unavoidable part of everyone's life. Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is negative. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write at least 250 words.
Many people wonder about advertisements. Some people think that it has negative impact in our life. However,Other it has a positive effect in this world. This is not an easy essay to be answered, but I will look at this issue. Advertisement has been playing a negative effect in our life.Of Course for several reasons: firstly, it motivates the psychological point in every body especially women. They will run to buy this advertised product especially if its from cosmetic industry, just to show their beauty to men, which will leads to moreoffenders and rapeing cases. Secondly, you can sit comfortably with your family and suddenly the telephone is ringing, nothing important, rather than one of the companies try to convince you to buy one of their products. It is a real example of intrusive advertisement. Lastly, sometimes you do not have the financial ability to buy something, but with these new methods of advertisement, you might run to buy it, which could affect your budget. On the other hand, there are some good things. Such as, it compares the prices of the most of companies which benefits the consumer. Beside, it really gives us a chance tosee more products which we would not know about unless TV and Radio show these things. In addition, it cut down our daily routine to see new faces and know more language with daily update for their method ofadvertising. In conclusion, as we can see there are many aspects to this argument. I feel that there is no benefit at al l from advertisement, it plays with peoples minds to make them buy more thing that they do not need it at all

Task-2

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
I think wealthy nations should be required to share their wealth among poorer nations. However, their help should stop at providing such things as food and education because of three following reasons. Firstly, citizens of both wealthy nations and poorer nations are human beings. Therefore, we can not look at, hear of, and talk about people who lack food, education, housing, clothing,without compassion and sympathy. Sharing wealth among poorer nations is not only a good deed but also a dutyitself. Secondly, many nations in Africa and Asia are very, very poor. Famine, diseases, crime and illiteracy are killing their citizens. On the contrary, a lot of nations in Europe and America are very rich. If there are no actions taken, this inequality will increase dramatically. Poor countries will become poorer andpoorer while rich countries will become richer andricher. As a result, poorest countries will be slaves of richest countries. So, sharing wealth is a useful way to prevent people from that bad future. Thirdly, although sharing wealth among poorer nations is very necessary, this helping should only stop at providing such things as food, medicin e and education. Or else, poor nations may depend on aid. They wont have enthusiasm to build their countries by themselves. Moreover, rich nations can take advantage of sharing wealth to interfere deeply in poor nations governments. This cant be conside red humane action and should be prevented. In my opinion, sharing wealth among poorer nations has both bad side and good side. What we have to do is avoid its bad side and practice its good side.

Tsk-2

In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules?
Freedom plays a mandatory role in everybody's life. We can see in today?s modernized era nobody likes to get some restrictions upon them, whether it would be a child or an adult. Some people think that there should be some strict rules of behaviour for children, but I disagree with this statement. It is a reality that sometimes more restrictions can cause more frust ration in children, which leads to many other mental diseases as well. Moreover they can be very stubborn. Sometimes they feel under pressure, which can be a main reason for their poor performance in their field. In some cases children would be crazier to do the things we try to prevent them from doing. In other words, we have to look at other aspects as well, because if we usually ignore our children?s bad habits, then they might not become good human beings in their future life. Moreover_ if we never dra w attention tothe children's main activities then they may be acquiring bad company. They should learn the value of respect for their elders and the importance of relationships. They must understand their cultural values as well. In a nutshell, I would li ke to say that children should be taughtregarding the value of their customs, rituals and respect towards their elders for their future life, but most of the extra restriction should be avoided. It would be help them become good human beings in their coming future.