Professional Documents
Culture Documents
preceptors
MD, USA
t
ip
Carley Castelein, PharmD, BCPS, CPPS, Medication Safety and Systems Innovation, HCA Healthcare,
cr
Nashville, TN, USA
us
an
C. Whitney White, PharmD, BCPS, FASHP, FALSHP, Samford University, McWhorter School of
Twitter: @deepdev511
ce
© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please
e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) has over 75 years of experience
developing and applying pharmacy practice standards to ensure the delivery of quality care in both
practical and innovative ways. Accreditation through ASHP provides a residency program with the
postgraduate training. ASHP’s rigorous accreditation standards provide a necessary bridge between
education and practice and address critical components influencing how future practitioners will
t
ip
Current ASHP residency standards across different types of programs require the inclusion of
cr
a preceptor development plan with a documented schedule of activities for each residency year for a
program to be fully compliant for accreditation.1 These development plans can be designed for
us
individuals or groups based on the specific institution. In addition, the current residency standards
an
require new preceptors who do not meet eligibility and qualification requirements to have a
documented plan to help the new preceptor meet requirements within 2 years and also be
M
appointed a mentor who will cosign the new preceptor’s evaluations. New preceptors who do not
meet the criteria are known as preceptors-in-training in the current standard. The current residency
e d
standards will be replaced by a single new harmonized standard for all residency programs as of July
pt
1, 2023, that requires all preceptors who do not meet qualifications to have a development plan to
meet criteria within 2 years.2 Additionally, the term “preceptor-in-training” has been eliminated in
ce
the harmonized residency accreditation standard as well as the requirement for the assignment of a
Ac
mentor or coach (although the option to assign a mentor will remain in PharmAcademic). Although
the requirements related to preceptors will change with the implementation of the new standard in
2023, the concepts for training new preceptors and guiding them to meet preceptor qualifications
new pharmacy residency preceptors have many benefits. Structured programs allow for consistency
in educational and professional development as well as accountability. Moreover, these programs
can include topic areas that meet the needs of new preceptors, with the ability to tailor to areas in
which they may be deficient or less experienced. The mentor/coach relationship can also positively
Although training programs for new preceptors can be beneficial, they also come with
t
implementation challenges, particularly for smaller institutions or those with smaller residency
ip
classes. Details such as scheduling, staff turnover, preceptor availability, financial considerations,
cr
and accessibility to off-campus preceptors can be logistically difficult. Incorporating the program into
us
the performance review process and holding preceptors accountable for attending development
activities can also pose a challenge. In addition, fully gauging the needs and interests of your new
an
preceptors and fulfilling those specific needs can be complex and requires much planning.
M
The objective of this paper is to describe how to successfully develop and implement an
effective training program for new pharmacy residency preceptors that meets both ASHP residency
d
accreditation standards and the goals of the residency program and institution.
e
Establishing a training program for new preceptors. New preceptors who do not meet the
pt
qualifications defined by the ASHP residency accreditation standards must have a documented
ce
preceptors often struggle with meeting these requirements due to the lack of a support system and
Ac
opportunities for ongoing professionalism. Creating an organized process for new preceptors who do
not meet ASHP qualifications will help them be successful. Figure 1 outlines some of the key roles
action plan needs to be developed to address key components (see Table 1 for an example
checklist). The first step is establishing a preceptor development committee to oversee the
preceptor appointment process and coordinate preceptor development activities. This committee
typically consists of residency program directors and coordinators, experienced preceptors, new
and the overall preceptor development plan for the institution.4 The institution’s preceptor
development plan should include the roles and responsibilities of program directors, coordinators,
and preceptors; the committee charges; the needs assessment process; and a schedule of preceptor
t
ip
development activities (eg, quarterly seminars).5,6
cr
Conducting a needs assessment survey can generate ideas for preceptor development
seminars to guide new preceptors.7,8 Truong and colleagues8 conducted a needs assessment of
us
preceptors from 31 accredited Canadian general hospital pharmacy residency programs using
an
interviews and focus group discussions with key informants, a pilot study, an online survey, and
member checking. In this study, preceptors ranked communication skills, giving effective feedback,
M
and clinical knowledge as the top priorities for being an effective preceptor. Preceptors reported
challenges with managing workload, performing evaluations, and managing difficult residents.
e d
and mentorship programs with experienced colleagues when first becoming preceptors. The
preceptors selected the following as the most important topics to include in the workshops:
ce
constructive feedback, practical assessment strategies, small group teaching strategies, effective
Ac
The second step is for the committee to review new preceptor applications and determine
whether a candidate is prepared to precept pharmacy residents. Typically, new preceptors are asked
to submit a statement of interest and complete the ASHP Academic and Professional Record, which
cannot be substituted with a curriculum vitae. The preceptor development committee then reviews
the submitted documents to determine whether the new preceptor meets the qualifications defined
by the ASHP residency accreditation standards.1,2 Preceptors who do not meet the qualifications (eg,
recent residency graduates) would need to develop goals to become an effective preceptor.2
The third step is for new preceptors to create a documented individualized preceptor
assign an experienced preceptor to serve as a mentor. While mentorship is not required by ASHP, a
mentor can ensure that the new preceptor is successful in achieving their goals. The mentor and
t
new preceptor should work together to create a preceptor development plan for the next 2 years.
ip
This development plan should include all ASHP qualifications that the new preceptor has not yet
cr
achieved with a planned timeframe for fulfillment (eg, achieving board certification in 1 year for
us
development plan should then be submitted to the committee for approval.
an
The fourth step is to develop a process for new preceptors to complete their preceptor
M
development plan. Guidance on the requirements to become a preceptor should be provided. For
example, the new preceptor could be required to do the following: (1) attend preceptor
d
development programs, (2) precept a resident on rotation with oversight, (3) mentor a resident
e
presentation, and (4) mentor a resident research project. A new preceptor orientation is
pt
recommended to ensure that new preceptors have the skills needed to precept residents. Suggested
ce
topics for this orientation include (1) identifying qualities of an effective preceptor; (2) defining
resident roles, expectations, and responsibilities; (3) developing a rotation syllabus; (4) evaluating
Ac
trainees with the use of criteria-based feedback; (5) defining preceptor roles; and (6) reviewing
common precepting challenges. The new preceptors should then meet with their mentors every
quarter at a minimum to discuss progress updates on development goals. When possible, new
preceptors should attend preceptor development activities at the local, state, or national level for
ongoing development and advancement of teaching skills and to ensure clinical and precepting
competence.
The fifth step is to conduct an annual assessment of the new preceptor until they meet
preceptor qualifications. The new preceptor should submit a progress report annually for the
preceptor development committee to review. The committee should also ask the mentor and
assess performance and precept residents using the 4 preceptor roles (instructing, modeling,
coaching, and facilitating).5 The committee should also have a plan for preceptor remediation if the
new preceptor is not achieving their goals. A designated party to oversee the remediation (eg, a
t
ip
pharmacist supervisor, residency advisory committee, or the preceptor development committee)
cr
should be included in the policy.
us
The final step is to implement a continuous review process to ensure the effectiveness of the
program. The preceptor development committee should ask new preceptors and their mentors for
an
their feedback. On the basis of their feedback, the committee should develop an action plan to make
Activities for new preceptors. Both formal and informal proactive learning behaviors help
d
an individual grow into an independent preceptor. This section will focus on formal opportunities to
e
engage in and document development activities, but preceptors should also practice self-reflection
pt
The institution should provide programming for new preceptors to learn the primary
responsibilities of a residency preceptor. Potential topics can include assessment of preceptor skills,
Ac
guidelines or providing continuing education on clinical topics. They should focus on effectively
precepting residents regardless of practice setting (eg, methods for providing effective feedback,
important aspects of being a preceptor and thus becoming a lifelong learner. New preceptors should
plan to meet with their assigned mentor to review feedback content and style as well as receive
premeeting be held 1 to 2 workdays before the resident’s feedback session. The mentor should
document their coaching, and this should be reviewed during the next session with the new
preceptor when their reflection is shared. Figure 2 provides an example of this cycle, which should
t
ip
occur at the rotation’s scheduled evaluations and as needed.
cr
When possible, it is advantageous for a new preceptor to work with an established
us
preceptor to lead resident research projects, thereby ensuring that the requirements are met. When
using this layered learning approach, it is best for the senior preceptor to orient the new preceptor
an
to the established processes and share effective strategies to set the resident up for success. The
new preceptor should then serve as the primary preceptor and establish expectations with the
M
resident, following up regularly with the senior preceptor during the longitudinal rotation for
questions or concerns that arise, in addition to the feedback cycle described above.
e d
New preceptors should work with their employers to pursue learning opportunities that
pt
improve their skills and support professional growth. When possible, individual preceptors should
ce
include their precepting goals in regular conversations with their manager and in their annual
performance review documentation to help facilitate synergy between the institution’s goals and
Ac
ensures a high level of quality and excellence in postgraduate training. ASHP standards require the
incorporation of preceptor development plans, which include additional support and mentorship for
new preceptors as they work toward the achievement of preceptor requirements. For residency
programs to efficiently and effectively implement a training program for new pharmacy residency
preceptors, thoughtful planning and use of pragmatic processes must be employed. Preceptor
development committee oversight, tailored development plans, and continuous assessment and
evaluation of preceptors and the training program are key components required for overall success.
information and tools that residency programs can utilize to develop and implement training
programs for new preceptors that meet accreditation standards and align with the professional
goals of preceptors.
t
ip
cr
Disclosures
us
The authors have declared no potential conflicts of interest.
an
M
e d
pt
ce
Ac
References
Information/Residency-Program-Resources/Residency-Accreditation/Accreditation-
Standards-for-PGY1-Pharmacy-Residencies
t
ip
2. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP accreditation standard for
cr
https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/professional-
us
development/residencies/docs/examples/ASHP-Accreditation-Standard-for-
an
Postgraduate-Residency-Programs-effective-July-2023.pdf
/media/assets/professional-development/residencies/docs/preceptor-development-
e d
plan-examples.pdf
pt
4. Weitzel KW, Walters EA, Taylor J. Teaching clinical problem solving: a preceptor’s
ce
5. Fuller PD, Peters LL, Hoel R, Baldwin JN, Olsen KM. Residency preceptor
Ac
2013;70(18):1605-1608. doi:10.2146/ajhp120684
doi:10.4212/cjhp.v65i3.1143
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
e d
pt
ce
Ac
Figure 1. Established roles and responsibilities to implement preceptor requirements.
preceptors.
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
e d
pt
ce
Ac
Table 1. Action Item Checklist for Implementing A New Preceptor Training Program
t
Match new preceptors to
ip
mentors
Create development plan
template using ASHP required
cr
elements
Construct a process for new
us
preceptors to proactively use
the development plan
Coach new preceptors on the
aforementioned process
an
Conduct annual assessment of
new preceptors
Solicit annual feedback from
M
future change
pt
ce
Ac
Figure 1
t
-Reviews applications to
determine qualified preceptors and self-reflection
ip
and preceptors new to precepting -Provide peer to peer support
-Conduct annual assessment of -Continue to grow self
preceptors new to precepting
cr
-Identify established preceptors as
mentors
us
an
M
e d
pt
ce
Ac
Figure 2
t
ip
New preceptor reflects
cr
New precptor provides
and documents how
feedback to resident
the session went
us
New preceptor solicits
feedback from resident
an
on rotation and
preceptor style
M
e d
pt
ce
Ac