Test Report : H] Fire resistance test in Bf accordance with British Standard 476 : Part 21: 1987 on a steel beam protected with Catco Sprayfilm WB2 intumescent paint with four unloaded short co two unloaded short bear included in the fumace. Test report number 206307 Prepared for : Catco Europe SA Alfreton, Derby. DESS 4RA 27 March 2002 Page 1 49| Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB. Bytes Prepared by ‘Signature KD Fett Name (Kb. Farge Position Testing Consultant Date Qy MACH 2002. Approved on behalf of BRE ‘Signature «Bre. ‘Name Richard A Jones Position Centre Director Date 24(3lor This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd BRE Fire and Risk Sciences Division Bucknalis Lane Garston Watford WD25 9XX Email : trsenquiries @bra.co.uk Website : www.bre.co.uk ‘This report may only be distributed ints enirety andin accordance with the tems and condivons of the contract. Tact resus relate only tothe ams tostod. BRE has no responsibilty forthe design, materia, ‘workmanship or partomance of the product or iloms tasted. This report dos not const an approval, certication oc endorsement ofthe product tested. “Test report number 206907 ‘© Building Rosoarch Establishment Lid 2002 (Commercial in confidence Page 20t 49 pune ueneaneee eee ke oe ee ome ee em aenmenwnmnetnemeneenenekh tf & wk wt we ao wh Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. This assessment / test report is not valid unless Contents endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. ‘Summary 4 1 Objective 5 2 Materials & Sections 5 24 Primer. 5 22 Sprayfilm WB2, 5 3 ‘Specimens 5 3.4 Steet sections 5 3.1.4 Loaded beam 5 3.1.2 Unloaded sections 6 82 Application of protection 6 32.1. General 6 32.2 Loaded beam 6 3.2.3 Unloaded short columns. 6 3.2.4 Unloaded short beams. i 4 CONDITIONING 7 5 TEST PROCEDURE 7 5.1 General 7 52 Loading 8 53 Measurement of steel temperatures 10 5.4 Beam deftection 10 5.5 Fumace control 10 5.6 Residual foadbearing capacity test 10 6 RESULTS W 6:1 Observations "1 6.2 Temperature measurements, 1" 6.3 Beam deflection 2 64 Residual hadbearing capacity test 12 7 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 12 8 CONCLUSION 13 9 REFERENCES 13 10 FIGURES 14 "1 GRAPHS 19 12 PHOTOGRAPHS: 29 13 APPENDIX 1 41 14 APPENDIX 2 49 Testing rubs 20607 ‘Seung snc Ester Ls 2Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraylilm WB2. reare This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd ‘Summary ‘A.universal stee! beam (406mm x 178mm x 6okg/m), protected with norninally 1.19rnm- thick Sprayiim WB2 intumescent paint, as described in this report, complied with the requirements of B.S. 476 : Part 21 : 1987 for loadbearing capacity while supporting its maximum permissible load for a period of 93 minutes, ‘The specimen therefore was found to have the following fire resistance: Loadbearing capacity: 93 minutes. Four short unloaded columns, and two short unloaded beams coated with different thicknesses of Sprayfilm WB were also included in the fumace. Al the steel sections tested, along with protection thickness on each section are ‘summarised below. Identification ‘Steel designation | Protection thickness mm x mm x kg/m (excluding primer) [ain Goasea) boar 406 x 178 x 60 1.19mm ‘Short column 4 208 x 183.x 25 448mm ‘Short column 2 208 x 133 x 25 121mm Short column 3 203 x203x 52 124mm Short column 4 203 x 203 x 52 149mm, ‘Short beam 5 305 x 102 x 25 120mm ‘Short beam 6 ‘406 x 178 x60 748mm Teptspapambezoso7 (a Panna cabana neFire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayilm WB2. uo ee eo aaa aaa This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd 1 Objective To determine, at the request of Cafco Intemational, the fire resistance of a steel beam protected by Sprayflm WB2 intumescent paint when subjected to a fire resistance test in accordance with British Standard 476 : Part 21 : 1987", 2 Materials & Sections 24 Primer. ‘The primer was described by the sponsor as Universal Barrier primer and was described asa fast drying, lead free rust inhibiting alkyl metal primer. It was observed to be off- white in colour. 22 Sprayfilm WB2. ‘SprayFilm WB2 was described as a water-based intumescent fire protective coating, with a slated wet density of 1.36g/cc and a stated dry density of 1.45g/cc. The paint was ‘observed to be white in colour. 3 Specimens 3.1 Steel sections 3.1.1 Loaded beam ‘The loaded steel beam was of universal-section to British Standard 4 : Part 1: 19937, 4.4m long, and designated 406mm x 178mm x 60kg/m. When placed in the loading rig it had a simply Supported clear span of 4.25m (Figure 1). Actual dimensions of the beam are given in Appendix 1. Web stiffeners, 5mm thick, were welded to the beam 200mm from each end at the boundaries of the 4m exposed length. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd “Test report umber 206907 (© Buildeg Rasoarch Establishment Lid 2002 Commercial in contdence Page 5 of 49Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2, BRE scene ween ewww neane ‘Aconerete slab, 820mm wide x 130mm deep, was cast along the top of the beam and keyed to the beam with five steel lugs. This assessment / test report is not valid unless 3.1.2 Unloaded sections | endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd Four 1m-high unloaded columns (two designated 203mm x 203mm x S2kg/m and two designated 203 x 133 x 25kg/m) and two 1.2m-long unloaded bearns (one designated 406mm x 178mm x 60kg/m and one designated 305mm x 102mm x 25kg/m) were also included in the furnace. The actual dimensions of the columns and beams are given in the Appendix 1 For identification the short columns wore referenced as numbers 1 to 4, and the short beams as numbers 5 and 6. 3.2 Application of protection 3.2.1 General The surfaces of the steel sections were shot blasted to an average profile of 25m to 45jum and to grade Sa2¥% of Swedish Standard SIS 05 5900 : 1967° using mineral slag ‘of grain size 0.1mm to 0.8mm, and a hose pressure of 95 p: ‘The steel was shot-blasted on 22 November 2001 and one coat of primer applied to all sections by brush. The dry fim thicknesses of the primer on each section are given in Appendix 1. 3.2.2 Loaded beam ‘Sprayfilm WB2 intumescent base coat was applied to the loaded beam betwoon 23 and 30 November 2001. The mean dry film thickness of the basecoat and primer was found tobe 1.2mm, The general arrangement of the loaded beam is given in Figure 1 and the beam is shown betore the test in Photo 1. 3.2.3 Unloaded short columns. Each 1mn-high unloaded short column was coated with Spraylilm WB2 inturnescent paint (as described in section 2 above) and included in the fumace. The dry film thickness. ‘measurements for these sections and the measured dimensions of the sections are given in Appendix 1. An example of an unloaded shart column is shown before the test in Photo 2. “Test report number 206307 (© Builaing Research Estabishmont Lid 2002 Commorcal in confidence Page 6 ol 49Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfiim WE2. —_—we ww eo ew we me me mall This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd 9.2.4 Unloaded short beams Each 1.2m-long unloaded beam was coated with Sprayflm WB2 intumescent paint and included in the fumace. The dry film thickness measurements for these sections and the measured dimensions of the sections are given in Appendix 1. An example of an unloaded short beam is shown before the test in Photo 3, and the general arrangement ‘of mounting the shor, beams in the furnace is shown in Figure 5. 4 CONDITIONING All steel Sections were coated between 22 and 30 November 2001. At the time of application, steel! sample plates wore coated at a thickness corresponding to the thickest protection applied to the steel sections. ‘The mass of these plates was monitored during the conditioning period to ensure that the paint was in equilibrium with the ambient conditions of the laboratory before the fire test. 5 ‘TEST PROCEDURE 5.1 General ‘The test was cartied out in accordance with Section 5 of B.S, 476 : Part 21 : 1987' on 20 December 2001, and witnessed by Messrs. K. Hart and S. Russell representing the ‘sponsor, and by Mr. C. Newman, consutant, ‘The ambient temperature at the start of the test was 12°C. ‘The imposed load on the main beam was removed after heating for 93 minutes and the heating continued for a further 41 minutes. ‘Test report number 206907 ‘© Gulcing Research Estabshment Ltd 2002 Commercial in confidence Pape 7 ot 48Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraytilm WB2. 52 Leading | endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd This assessment / test report is not valid unless ‘The load to be applied to the steel beam was calculated to give a test load which would induce the maximum permissible bending stress stated by B.S, 449 : Part 2: 1969°, ‘assuming there to be no composite action between the concrete slab and the steel beam. The beam was simply supported and loaded using a fout-point loading system (Figure 1). Data: Universal beam section : 406mm x 178mm x 60kg/m Clear span between supports (L) = 4.25m Elastic modulus (Z) = 10580m* Allowable stress (1,.) = 165Nimm? (From Table 2, B.S. 449 : Part 2 : 1969°, page 28) Test load: Maximum permissible bending moment M = fy:Z. = 165 x 10" x 1058 x 10°Nm = 174.57kNm Dead load: Mass of beam = 60kg/m Weight of beam = 60 x9.81 x 10° = 0.589kN/m Size of concrete slab: 920mm wide x 130mm deep Density of concrete approximately = 2210kg/m’ Weight of concrete 92 x 0.13 x 2210 x 9,81 x 10° = 2.593kN/m Total selt-weight (w) = 2.595 + 0.589 = 3.182kNimn Moment induced by self-weight = wL?/B = (8.182 x 4.25°V8 = 7.A84kNm Test report nuriber 20607 (Commercial in confidence ‘© Buuiding Research Establishment Led 2002 Page 80149Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfiim WB2, This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd Applied load: ‘The applied load is required to induce a bending moment at centre span of 174.57kNm - 7.18kNm = 167.39kNen ‘Atotal applied load of PkN would induce a bending moment at the centre span of {2.425 x Pi2)- (15 40.5) xP/4 5625 x P kN to Induce maximum permissible stress: 5625 x P = 167.39kNM Total imposed load required (P) = 167.99/0.5625 297.6KN Calculation of moment capacity (M.) in accordance with B.S, 5950 : Part 1 : 1985", Data: Plastic modulus (S) = 1194em? ‘Section of beam can be considered as Class 1 (plastic) as defined in 8.S. 5950°. From Table 6, page 15 of B.S, 5950‘ design strength (P,) for grade 43 steal = 275Nimm*. ‘Moment capacity (M,) = PyS = 275 x 1194 x 10°kNm_ = 928.95kNm Load ratio = appiied moment at limit state / moment capacity at 20°C = 174.57/828.95 =0.53 ‘The load to be applied to the steel beam was calculated to give a test load which would induce the maximum permissible bending stress stated by B:S. 449 : Part 2: 1969°, assuming there to be no composite action between the concrete slab land the steel beam. The beam was simply supported and loaded using @ four-point loading system (Figure 1). Test ropott number 206307 ‘© Bulding Research Estabiarment Lid 2002 Gonumercial in conience. Page 90 49Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfiim WE2, Pua wees eaeet ee ae eee a ee ‘The load was applied to the beam at least 15 minutes before the heating period and was, maintained for the first 93 minutes of the test. The applied load was then removed and the test continued for a further 41 minutes. 5.3 Measurement of steel temperatures: Bofore the loaded beam was protected, five chromeValumel thermocouples were peened to the lower tlange and four to the web at mid-height as shown in Figura 1. Before the unloaded short columns were protected, three chromelalumel thermocouples were pened to (one to each of three of) the flanges, and two on the web as shown in Figure 3. Before the unloaded short beams were protected, tour chromeVaiumet thermocouples, were peened to the lower flange and two on the web at mid-height as shown in Figure 2. 5.4 Beam deflection A\linear displacement transducer activated via a taut fine steet wire attached to the cid span of the beam recorded the central vertical deflection of the beam during the test. 5.5 Furnace control ‘The tumace temperature was controlled by means of ten bare-wira chromeV/alumet thermocouples, five on each side of the loaded beam at approximately 675mm centres. ‘The thermocouple measuring junctions were 100mm trom, and level with the underside of the protection of the loaded beam. ‘The fumace was controlled so that the heating regime satisfied the requirements of B.S. 476 : Part 20 : 1987°, The mean furnace temperature is plotted against time in Graph 1 with the specified temperature curve for comparison. The tumace pressure at a point 100mm below the soffit of the concrete stab was ‘maintained, as closely as possible, between 18 and 20Pa above the laboratory pressure. 5.6 Residual loadbearing capacity test ‘The load was reapplied to the beam over 24h after the end of the heating period, ‘The resutt of the residual toadbearing capacity testis given in Appendix 2. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. ‘Test report number 208307 (© Buiding Research Estabiistenent Ltd 2002 (Cornmmorcial Ft conidence Page 10 of 29Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfin WB2, BRE This assessment / test report is not valid unless 6 RESULTS sul endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. 6.1 Observations “The observations made during the test are given in Table 1. Table 4 Observations TIME ‘OBSERVATION Min pp 0 | Test started 17 _ | The intumescent coating on the sections has activated. The char is quite uneven and lumpy on all the specimens. ‘30 | The intumescent char has ceased expanding end has filed the space 1 between the web and flange tips on all bearn sections. The char on web of short colurnns 1 and 2 has filled the space between the tlanges, and is approximately 40mm thick on the outes anges of column 2. The char of the web of short columns 3 and 4 has nearly filled the void between the flanges ‘and is approximately 50mm thick on the outside of the flanges of column 3 and approximately 40mm thick on the outer flanges of column 4. 35 | Acrack in the char on short beam 5 was observed running along the bottom comer of the bottom flange tip. 40 | Acrack in the char approximately 30mm wide has formed along the web of the main beam on both sides at approximately % height of the web. The crack extends along the length of the bearn. Occasional flaming from all ‘specimens was observed. 70. | The size of the crack in the char on the main beam has reduced slightly. ‘93 | Deflection of main beam is 142.2mm. Load removed from main beam. ‘98 | Small pieces of char are falling (rom the main beam. 134 | All sections are above 750°C. Test Stopped. ‘The specimens after the test are shown in Photo's 4 to 11. 6.2 Temperature measurements “The mean and maximum temperatures of the lower flange and web of the loaded bearn are plotted against time in Graph 2. The mean and maximum flange and web temperatures of the unloaded sections are plotted against time in Graphs 8 to 8. “Tost sepadt umber 206307 ‘© Building Resoarch Establishment Lt 2002 ‘Commercial in confidence Page 11 of 29 ante wa AK KH KAM Hee wea ewa we waeFire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfiim WB2. ee ee ee ee ee ‘Times taken to reach critical temperatures are given in Appendix 1 6.3 Beam deflection ‘The central deflection of the loaded beam is plotted against time in Graph 9. The maximum deflection after 93 rrinutes, just before the imposed load was removed, was 142.2mm. The deflection rate wes 14.2mm/min at this time. 6.4 Residual loadbearing capacity test ‘The result of the residual loadbearing capacity testis given in Appendix 2. 7 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA The standards‘ state that a beam is regarded as having a fire resistance (expressed in minutes) that is equal to the elapsed time (to the nearest completed minute) between the commencement of heating and the termination of heating, or until failure to meet the loadbearing capacity criterion occurs, whichever is the sooner. Failure is deemed to occur when the beam is no longer able to support the test load. This is taken as either of the following, whichever is exceeded first: (a) deflection of L/20 4250/20 = 212.5mm) {b) where the rate of deflection (in mm/min), calculated over tmin intervals, starting at {min from the commencement of the heating period, exceeds the limit set by the following equation: rate of deflection = L?/ 9000d (ie. 4250" / 9000 x 406) = 4.9mm. Where: Lis the clear span of the specimen (in mm); is the distance from the top of the structural section to the bbottom of the design tension zone (in mm). However, this rate of deflection limit shall not apply before a deflection of U80 (141.7mm) is exceeded. ‘The results only relate to the behaviour of the specimen of the element of construction under the particular conditions of test; they are not intanded to be the sole criteria for assessing the potential fire performance of the element in use nor do they reflect the actual behaviour in fires. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. ‘Test report numbet 206907 ‘© Bulking Resaarch Establishment Lid 2002 ‘Commercial in confidence. Page 12 of 49Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. TRAP are h OOK HKKHLKA HH EKKO MG EM HA A 8 CONCLUSION ‘universal steel beam (406mm x 178mm x 60kg/m}, Protected wit ( cagan) 82 intumescent paint (nominally 1.19mm-thick) as described in this repo requirements of B.S. 476 : Part 21 : 1967 for loadbearing capacity while supporting its ‘maximum permissible oad for a period of 93 minutes, ‘The specimen theretore was found to have the following fire resistance: Loadbearing capacity: 93 minutes ‘The specification and interpretation of fire test methods are the subject of ongoing development and refinement. Changes in associated legislation may also occur. For these reasons it is recommended that the relevance of test reports over 5 years old ‘should be considered by the uset. The laboratory that issued the report will be able to offer, on behalf of the legal owner, a review of the procedures adopted for a particular test to ensure that they are consistent with current practices, and if required may endorse the test report. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd 9 REFERENCES 1. Fire tests on building materials and structures. Part 21. Methods for determination of the fire resistance of loadbearing elements of construction. British Standard 476 : Part 21 : 1987. British Standards Institution, London, 1987. 2. Structural steel sections. Part 1. Hot rolled sections. British Standard 4 : Part 1: 1993, British Standards Institution, London, 1993. 3. The use of structural steel in building. Part 2. Metric units. British Standard 449 : Part 2: 1969. British Standards Institution, London, 1969. 4. Structural use of steelwork in building. Part 1. Code of practice for design in ‘simple and continuous construction : hat rolled sections. British Standard 5950 : Part 1: 1990. British Standards Institution, London, 1992, 5. Fire tests on building materials and structures. Part 20. Method for determination of the fire resistance of elements of construction (general principles). British Standard 476 : Part 20 : 1987. British Standards institution, London, 1987. 6. Pictorial surtace preparation standards for painted steel surfaces. Swedish ‘Standard SIS 05 5900 : 1967. Sveriges Standardiseringskommission, 1967. “Test report number 206907 ‘© Bulking Research Estabishment Lid 2002 Commercial in consdence Page 13.0140Fire resistance test on stee! sections protected with Sprayfiirn WB2, agaemeaneteanh dd tit dt we Hd KH KH KH HH He This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd 10 FIGURES “Test report number 206307 (© Building Research Establishment Lid 2002 Commercial in confidence Page 14.0149ee |] Fi rexitanco tet sol econ protected wih Spey WE2 Bee | This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd | Figure 1 General arrangement of loaded beam. “Test report number 206507 (© Busing Research Establishment Lid 2002 (Commercial in confidence, Page 15 of 49gaononnbee GO & HH HK KH HK KE HK HK KMAH A HK Fira resistance tast on steel sections protected with Sprayfim WB2. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd Figure 2 Thermocouple locations on short beams. “Test report number 206907 ‘© Building Research Establishment isd 2002 Commorcal in conidenco Page 16 of 49 BRweeww www ew km Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2, Ea This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. T { — Figure 3 Thermocouple locations on short columns. ‘Test report number 206307 ‘© Building Research Estabishment Ltd 2002 ‘Commercial in corticanee Page tron)pomeuawehtRth & weed wm hk me mm ot Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraylilm WB2. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd Figure 4 General arrangement of boams located in the furnace. ‘Test roport number 206907 report (© Bulking Research Establishment Ld 2002 Page 18 0149, BIwemameee eke ee ell a Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd BR 11 GRAPHS “Test report number 206907 (© Butdng Research Estabitment Commercial in contdenee Page toateFire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraytilm WB2. rete This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd Temperature '< 200 3 8 ea 0 100 120 ‘Time - minutes Graph 1 Mean furnace temperature with specified curve for comparison. “Test report number 206907 ‘© Builcing Resoasch Establishment Ltd 2002 ‘Commercial in confidnce. Page 20 of 49pl Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayflm WBZ, om ma te me me me hee HM KR ee oe This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. — Temperature © Graph 2. Mean and maximum temperatures recorded on main beam. ‘Test report numbor 206907 report ‘© Bulcing Research Establishment Ltd 2002 in confidence Page 21 of 49aoa ea MH eK HKD KA He ee ee a a a ld ll ld Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. BRE 1000 700 600 00 Temperature © 400 200 100 This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd, ——Column 1 moan wob column 1 max ange = =Goluma 1 max web “Column | mean flange | 20 0 © 80 100 120 ‘Time - minutes ‘Graph 3 Mean and maximum temperatures recorded on short column 1. ‘Tost report number 206307 ‘Commercial in conidence ‘© Building Recoarch Establishment Lid 2002 Page 22 of 49npmoeememoamnmanmtnaanee wm wm me me mw mh i tk tl Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfiim WB2, BR This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd, Temperature 'C Graph 4 Mean and maximum temperatures recorded on short column 2. ‘Test report number 206507 ‘© Buldng Resoarch Estabehment Lk! 2002 ‘Cernmercial in confidence Page 23.0149uae em aaa aaa aaah talk ld Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraylim WB2. Ta This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. —L #00 column 3 mean wab f ~Column 3 max wed ‘Cowmn 3 mean flange lama 3 max lange 700 —t 500 ‘Temperature ‘© Time - minutes, Graph § Mean and maximum temperatures recorded on short column 3. ‘Test report umber 206307 {© Bulaing Flesoarch Establishment Lid 2002 ‘Commercial in confidence age 24 of 49aaah nid kaa ad aa Fr resistarce est on to eto protected wth Srytin WE This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. 700 500 400 Temperature 'C 300 g 200 100 ° 20 40 80 80 100 120 Tine - minutes Graph 6 Mean and maximum temperatures recorded on short column 4. “Test report number 206907 Toot oport ur (© Bulding Research Establishment Lid 2002 Page 25 of «9Fire resistances tast on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. ee ee | This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. Tempers Lesssssssalessiial ° Bs 0 60 80 100 120 Tima - minutes Graph 7 Mean and maximum temperatures recorded on short beam 5. “es copont number 206907 (© Building Resoarch Estabtshment Lid 202 Commercial In conhdence nang Page 26 of 49bd ad @ oe a fo Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. BARE This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd, wb 700 sm 6 moan wed m6 max wed ‘ove Boam 6 mean flange —— beam 6 max tange 400 Temperature © 200 Time - minutes Graph 8 Mean and maximum temperatures recorded on short beam 6. “Test report rumbor 206907 Commarcal in confidence (© Buding Rosoarch Establishment Lid 2002 Page 27 of 49Fire resistance tast on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. om 2 mw om mm lalallala aa This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd, L wo E——J | Cc Temperature ‘© — 10 ° Leeland nl ssslasnl ° 20 40 60 ‘0 109 120 Tine minutes Graph 9 Deflection recorded at cantre span of mean beam, “Test report number 206307 ‘© Building Research Estailsrment Lid 2002 Commercial n confidence Page 28 of 49oct eee eee a a Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd 12 PHOTOGRAPHS “Test report number 206307 ° Bulaing Resaarch Estabshment Lid 2002 ‘Commercial in Pago 29 01 49 BIRmt a ae mammal adh ied Fire rasistance test on steel sections protected with Spraytilm WB2. Bake Photo 1 Main beam betore test This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd “Tost report number 206307 (© Building Research Establishment Ld 2002 Comercial in confidence ‘Page 30 of 49ee ee ee ee ee ee Firo resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. Photo 2 Main beam betore test. “Test report numnbor 206307 ‘© Buiing Research Establishment Lad 2002 ‘Commercial in confidence Page St of 9tilt Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraylim WE2, a | Photo 3 Short beam 5 bofore test. ‘Tost report number 206507 (© Butding Research Establishment Lid 2002 ‘Commercial in confidence | Page 22 of 49a a a ee ee) er er Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayiiim WB2. sR Ee Photo 4 Main beam after test. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd ‘Test report number 206307 {© Building Research Establishment Lis 2002 Commercial in confidence Page 33 of 48Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraytiim WE2. tm tal tle Photo 5 Main beam after test. “Test report numbor 206907 (© Bulcing Research Establishment Le 2002 Gormmercial in confidence Page 34 01 49yaks ma Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. pate Photo 6 Short column 1 after test. ‘Test report number 206307 ‘© Bulding Research Establishment Lid 2002 ‘Commercial in confidence Page 5 of 49ee Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfiim WB2. Ia Be Photo 7 Short column 2 after test. “Tost report number 206907 ‘© Bulding Research Estabishmont Lit 2002 ‘Commercial in contidence Page 38 of 48jd aid d a a ee ee ee | Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraytim W82. Photo 8 Short column 3 after test. “Tost report number 206307 (© Building Reeoarch Establishment Lid 2002 ‘Censenorcal in confienc® Page 37 of 49 BREeee A Ss ss ss ss a Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraylim WB2. Photo 9 Short column 4 after test. ‘Test ropon number 208207 (© Guiding Rosearch Estabishment Lid 2002 ‘Commercial n confidence Page 38 of 49Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfiim WB2. ee a ee ee Photo 10 Short beam 5 after test “Tost report number 206907 (© Bukiog Flesoarch Establishment Li 2002 Cornorcialin contre Pago 39 01 49aaa aaa Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfim WB2. Photo 11 Short beam 6 after test. BRE ‘Text ropon number 206307 ° Research ep Bulking Establishment Lid 2002 Pago 40 of 49“ | Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraylilm WB2. omit 13 APPENDIX 1 Details of steel sections and times taken to reach critical temperatures. This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. “Test report number 206307 ° he Building Pssaarch Establishment Lid 2002 Page 41 of 49Tost report numbor 206907 ‘© Buluing Rosoarch Establishment Lis 2002 Page 42 of 49 % Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. ats a al Leaded beam a Serial size 406mm x 178mm x 6Okg/m Width over flange (b) . 179.3mm_ a Width over web (h) = 406.2mm Web thickness (s) 739mm, 7 Flange thickness (1) = 128mm 4a Area of steel (A) = 744m? Contoured perimeter (Hp) = = 1335mm a ‘Section factor (Hp/A) = 180m" Ap = 5.5mm 1 Grade of steel = 43 : Prime mean measured dry film thickness = 27m a Basecoat (Sprayflm WE 2) Mean measured dry fim thickness (including primer) = 1.22mm a Times take to reach critical temperatures: a Temperature Time — min i °C Mean web Mean flange Max web ‘Max flange 500 73.5 65.5, 72.5 62.5 a 550, 825 73.5 80.5 70 600 90.5 82 87.5 78.5 i 620 93.5 85.5, 90 82 a 650 98 ot 93.5 87.5 700 106.5 99 99.5 94.5, i 750 V7.5 109 109, 100 i This assessment / test report is not valid unless i endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. i a akee aaa a aa & & bb Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. Serial size Width over flange (b) Width over web (h) ‘Web thickness (8) Flange thickness (t) ‘Area of steel! (A) Contoured perimeter Section factor (HpyA) Alp Grade of stee! ‘Short column 1 (Hp) 203mm x 133mm x 28kg/m 132: 205. 54mm 4mm 5.65mm 7.48men 30.5m? 929mm 305m 3.3mm, 43 Primer mean measured dry film thickness = 24um Basecoat (Spraytilm WBII) mean measured dry film thickness (including primer) = 1.5mm Times take to reach critical temperatures Temperature Time ~ min — *c Mean web | Meanflange | Maxweb | Max flange 500 60 36 575 53 550 65 615 25 58 600 715 67 685 63 620 4 5 7a © 650 78 73 745 685 700 855 80 805 74 750 935 8 90 as This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. “Teatreport number 206307 (Comenercai in confidence (© Building Research Establishment Lid 2002 Page 49 of 49,Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. IBaRAE mea skal aa atta Serial size Width over flange (b) Width over web (h) ‘Web thickness (s) Flange thickness (t) ‘Area of steel (A) Contoured perimeter Section factor (Hp/A) Alp Grade of stee! ‘Short column 2 (Hp) 203mm x 192mm x 28kg/m 192: 204, 2mm 75mm 564mm 754mm, 30.7me 930mm, 303m 3.3mm 43 Primer mean measured dry film thickness = 33} Basecoat (Sprayfilm WBII) mean measured dry film thickness (including primer) Times take to reach critical temperatures 24mm “Temperature Time = min c Mean web | Meanflange | Maxweb | Max flange 500 oS 53 555 50 550) 3 58.5 615 55 600 69 645 7 605 620) nS 7 695 625 650) 75.5 7 73 66 700) 2.5 785 80 2B 750) 93.5 885 90.5 63 Lo This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. “Test report number 206907 Commercial in confidence. ‘© Building Research Estabishment Ltd 2002 Page 44 of 49Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. a ee ee ee ee ee: ee Serial size Width over flange (b) ‘Width over web (h) Web thickness (s) Flange thickness (1) Area of stee! (A) Contoured perimeter ‘Section factor (Hp/A) AVHp Grade of steel (Hp) 20amm x 203mm x S2kgim 204.61mm 206.83mm 8.06mm, 12.21mm 64.6m2 1216mm 188m" 5.3mm Primer mean measured dry film thickness. = 82m Basecoat (Sprayfilm WBIl) mean measured dry film thickness (including primer) = 1.27mm ‘Times take to reach critical temperatures Temperature Time = min °c Mean web | Meanflange | Maxweb | Max flange ‘500 aS 65 ws] 550 605, 735 765 67 ‘600 09.5 @2.5 845) 745 620 8 86.5 8 78 650 99) 92.5 93.5 83 [700 110) 104 104 93 750 123.5 17, 119 106.5 This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. Tost report numbor 206307 ‘Commercial n confidence (© Buiding Ressarch Estabishment Ltd 2002 Page 45 of 49m oo wh uk uk aaa kaa aaa aaa Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Spraytilm WB2. reat ‘Short column 4 Serial size - 203mm x 203mm x 52kg/m Width over flange (b) = 204.57mm ‘Width over web (h) = 207.47mm Web thickness (s) = 8.06mm Flange thickness (t) = 12.48mm Area of steel (A) - 64.6m? Contoured perimeter (Hp) === 127mm. ‘Section factor (HPA) = 188m" Ap = 5.3mm Grade of steel = 43, Primer mean measured dry fim thickness = 294m Basecoat (Spraytilm WBII) mean measured dry film thickness (including primer) = 152mm Times take to reach critical temperatures Temperature ‘Time - min °C Mean web | Meanlange | Maxweb | Maxilange 500 815 76 78 AS 550 90.5 85.5 86.5 795 600 100 5 95.5 8a 620 103.5 99 99 15 650 110 105.5 104.5 7 700 121.5 17.5 15 105.5 750 _ 130.5 130.5 Ve This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. ‘Test report number 206307 Cornmercal in confidence (© Building Research Establishment Lis 2002 Page 46 of 49Fire istance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. ‘Short Beam 5 Serial size = 305mm x 102mm x 2Bkg/m Width over flange (b) = 104.26mm ‘Width over web (h) = 307.35mm ‘Web thickness (s) = 616mm Flange thickness (!) = 686mm ‘Area of steel (A) = 92.42 ‘Comoured perimeter (Hp) = == 915mm. ‘Section factor (Hp/A) = 282m" Alp = 3.5mm Grade of steel - 6 Primer mean measured dry film thickness ‘324m Basecoat (Spraylilm WEI!) mean measured dry film thickness (including primer) =1.23mm Times take to reach critical temperatures “Temperature Time ~ min *c ‘Mean web | Mean fiange | Max web 500 2 a 61 550 | 68 545 or 535 600 745 60 73 385 620 77 62 755 a — 650 80.5 co 75 64 700 75 5 865 70 750 7 at 955 795 This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. “Tost report number 206307 ‘© Bulking Research Establishment Ltd 2002 (Commercial in conidence Page 47 of 49kaka alka @eexrwtdoeuwveebeedbk ue we me Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2, marae ‘Short beam 6 Serial size = 406mm x 178mm x 65kg/m Width over tange (b) = 1789mm Width over web (h) = 409.5mm Web thickness (s) 8.3mm Flange thickness () = 124mm ‘Area of steel (A) = 763m? Contoured perimeter (Hp) = 1339mm_ ‘Section factor (Hp/A) = 176m" AIHp = 5.7mm, Grade of ste! = 4 Primer mean measured dry film thickness. = 3Oum Baseceat (Sprayliim WBII) mean measured dry film thickness (including primer) mon Ties ak o reach erica temperatures Temperature Time — min °c Mean web Mean flange Max web Max flange ze 7% 7 7 7 ‘550 86.5, 79 85.5 78 oo = 7 28 we = ws | os ae % 650 103.5 96 102 95 700 113, 105 aw 104 7 we] es} eas This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd. ‘Tat report number 206307 (© Buling Research Estabichmont Lid 2002 ‘Commercial in confidance: Page 48 of 49r Fire resistance test on steel sections protected with Sprayfilm WB2. BRE ne idad> asides, in, asic) 14 APPENDIX 2 ‘Supplementary report - Residual loadbearing capacity test During the fire resistance test the applied load was removed after 93 minutes and the heating period continued for a further 41 minutes. The fumace was then tured off and the beam allowed to coal in the furnace. The full test ioad was reapplied 24 hours after the end of the heating period. ‘The beam supported the full test load, and therefore satisfied the requirements of the residual load bearing capacity This assessment / test report is not valid unless endorsed by Promat International (Asia Pacific) Ltd “ost report muenber 206907 ‘© Building esearch Estabishmont Ltd 2002 Commercial in consgence ‘Pepe 49 of 49