SAMPI
DEFENCE OF VOLENTI NON INJURIA
IN THE SESSIONS COURT AT KUALA LUMPUR,
IN WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA
CIVIL SUIT No. AS2NCve
555-12/2022
BETWEEN
ALFRED SIM.
(NRIC NO. : 771020-14-5506) PLAINTIFF
AND
AHMAD BADRUL BIN ALI
(NRIC NO.: 711101-14-5555) DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT OF DEFENCE
1. The Defendent files and serves this Statement of Defence without
prejudice and/or without waiving the Defendant's right to apply to
this Honorable Court to strike out the Plaintiff's claim against the
Defendant,
2. The Defendant states that the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim dated
12-12-2020 (hereinafter referred to as the “sald Statement of
Claim") is defective and not in compliance with the provisions of
the Rules of Court 2012.SAMPLES
The Defendant does not have knowledge of the Plaintiff's
averments at paragraph 1 of the sald Statement of Claim and the
Defendant puts the Plaintiff to strict proof thereof.
Save and except that the Defendant resides at ~~, the Defendant
denies all the other averments of the Plaintiff at paragraph 2 of the
said Statement of Claim and the Defendent puts the Plaintiff to
strict proof thereof,
Save and except that the Defendant was driving the Proton Saga,
having registration number BK 2345 (hereinafter referred to as the
motor car”) and was involved in an accident with the
Plaintiff, who was pedestrian and all the other averments of the
Plaintiff at paragraph 9 of the said Statement of Claim are denied
‘and the Defendant puts the Plaintiff to strict proof thereof.
The Defendant denies all the Plaintif’s averments at paragraph 4
of the said Statement of Claim and in particular the Particulars of
Negligence, which the Defendant strenuously denies, and the
Defendant puts the Plaintiff to strict proof thereof.10.
SAMPLES
The Defendant contends and will continue to contend that the
Defendant was not negligent in any way whatsoever and/or was not
blameworthy and the sé
accident occurred without the fault
and/or negligence of the Defendant, as the Plaintiff had voluntarily
assumed the risk by running across the road when the traffic lights
for the traffic had turned green.
The Defendant states that the Plaintif had knowledge snd was
fully appraised of the facts giving rise to the risk of injury and
Understood the risk of injury when the Plaintiff ran across the road
knowing that the traffic lights for the oncoming traffic had turned
green. By reason thereof the Plaintif voluntarily undertook to be
responsible for the risk
Further, the Defendant states that the PI
tiff had voluntarily
assumed the risk with complete knowledge of the circumstances
when the Plaintiff had decided to run across the road knowing that
the oncoming traffic had started to move forward.
The Defendant denies the applicability of the Maxim of Res Ipsa
Loguitor in this matter and the Plaintiff's averments at paragraph §
of the sald Statement of Claim are also denied and the Defendant
puts the Plaintiff to strict proof thereof."
12.
13
14
16.
SAMPLES
‘The Defendant denies the Plaintiff's averments at paragraphs 6, 7
and 8 of the said Statement of Claim and the Defendant puts the
Plaintiff to strict proof thereof.
The Defendant denies the Particulars of Injury and the Particulars
of Special Damages and the Defendant puts the Plaintiff to strict
proof thereof.
Further, the Defendant states that the Defendant has no knowledge
of the injuries alleged to have been sustained by the Plaintiff and
further the Plaintiff is not entitied in fact and in law to the Special
Damages as pleaded in the said Statement of Cisim ané the
Defendant puts the Plaintiff to strict proof thereof,
‘The Defendant denies that the Defendant is liable to the Plaintiff as
claimed by the Plaintiff in the said Statement of Claim and the
Defendant states that the Plaintiff Is not entitled to all the reliefs
sought in the Statement of Claim in fact and in law.
Save and except as expressly admitted hereinabove, the
Defendant denies each and every averment of the Plaintiff In the
‘said Statement of Claim as if the same are set out herounder and
traversed in seriatim and the Defendant puts the Plaintiff to strict
proof thereof.SAMPLES:
18. Wherefore the Defendant prays that the Plaintiff's claim against the
Defendant as in the said Statement of Claim be dismissed with
costs and the costs to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant
Dated this day of December, 2022
This DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT OF DEFENCE is filed by Messrs
Lee, Lim & Co., Solicitors for the Defendant, whose address for service
is at No. 3 Jalan Cantik, Petaling Jaya, 40280 Selangor Darul Ehsan
[RefLLAB-A8/25678.16
Tel: 03-6548700 Fax: 03-6546701]