The prosecutor intends to introduce evidence of an admission the accused made to a justice of the peace, peace officer, or magistrate. The prosecutor argues the admission complies with the requirements to be admissible. However, the defense objects, arguing the accused was assaulted, not informed of their right to remain silent, and not informed of their right to legal representation. As the accused disputes voluntariness, which is required for admissibility, the prosecutor requests a trial within a trial to determine the admission's admissibility.
The prosecutor intends to introduce evidence of an admission the accused made to a justice of the peace, peace officer, or magistrate. The prosecutor argues the admission complies with the requirements to be admissible. However, the defense objects, arguing the accused was assaulted, not informed of their right to remain silent, and not informed of their right to legal representation. As the accused disputes voluntariness, which is required for admissibility, the prosecutor requests a trial within a trial to determine the admission's admissibility.
The prosecutor intends to introduce evidence of an admission the accused made to a justice of the peace, peace officer, or magistrate. The prosecutor argues the admission complies with the requirements to be admissible. However, the defense objects, arguing the accused was assaulted, not informed of their right to remain silent, and not informed of their right to legal representation. As the accused disputes voluntariness, which is required for admissibility, the prosecutor requests a trial within a trial to determine the admission's admissibility.
ADDRESSING THE COURT WHERE AN ADMISSION WAS MADE TO A JUSTICE
OF THE PEACE / PEACE OFFICER / MAGISTRATE
PROSECUTOR - THE STATE INTENDS LEADING THE EVIDENCE OF AN
ADMISSION MADE TO A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, NAMELY A CAPTAIN IN THE SAPS A PEACE OFFICER, NAMELY A CONSTABLE / SERGEANT / WARRANT OFFICER MAGISTRATE IT IS THE SUBMISSION OF THE STATE THAT THE STATEMENT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSIBILITY IN TERMS OF SECTION 219A OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, IN THAT IT WAS FREELY AND VOLUNTARY MADE BY THE ACCUSED COULD THE COURT PLEASE DETERMINE WHETHER THERE IS AN OBJECTION FROM THE DEFENCE AND IF SO WHAT THE NATURE OF THE OBJECTION IS.
THE DEFENCE – WE OBJECT YOUR WORSHIP/MY LORD/MY LADY.
MY INSTRUCTIONS ARE THAT THE ACCUSED WAS ASSAULTED TO MAKE THIS STATEMENT WAS NOT INFORMED OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT WAS NOT INFORMED OF HIS/HER RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION
PROSECUTOR – IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ACCUSED IS DISPUTING A
REQUIREMENT FOR ADMISSIBILITY, NAMELY VOLUNTARINESS PROSECUTOR – IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ACCUSED ALLEGES THAT THE STATEMENT WAS OBTAINED IN A MANNER THAT VIOLATED HIS/HER RIGHTS IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS