Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Affordable Housing Panel also identified data types needed to address these research
problems. They were grouped according to their corresponding research problem category,
listed above, and presented in a table in order to more easily navigate the information. The
two-column table lists the specific data needs along with examples and/or sources of the
corresponding data type, where they exist. Those data types that are either unavailable or
difficult to access were identified with an asterisk.
The findings from the Affordable Housing Panel contained in this report will be used to
further inform the development and expansion of UDC’s data repository/catalogue.
1
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Format of Panel 3
Panel Members 4
2
Introduction
The development and operation of “smart cities” is predicated on the availability of
relevant, accurate urban data. Yet the plethora of sources of urban data, be it open city
data, IoT data, or data from 3rd parties, presents both opportunities and challenges:
opportunities in what the scale, breadth and depth of the data enables practitioners and
researchers to achieve, and challenges in achieving useable results due to issues of quality,
sparseness, validity, interoperability, accessibility and relevance of the data.
A goal of the Urban Data Centre (UDC) is to develop an Urban Data Catalogue1 that will
document the existence of urban datasets and a repository for open Canadian urban data.
The Catalogue documents three categories of datasets: 1) datasets stored in the repository
in their native format that are openly available for download; 2) datasets not stored in
repository but are accessible under separate agreement; and 3) datasets that are accessible
by web services (API).
In order to identify the data and data sources to be included in the UDC catalogue, a series
of expert panels were conducted on specific topics in urban research, thereby providing a
variety of views on the problems currently existing within each area, as well as a wide range
of suggestions for the data needed to tackle them.
This report outlines the findings from the UDC’s Affordable Housing Panel, held in the
second quarter of 2022.
Format of Panel
Panel members from academe and industry were brought together to discuss and share
their thoughts and experiences, with the goal of identifying the major research problems in
the Affordable Housing domain along with the types of data necessary to address them.
Specifically, the panel consisted of two one-hour sessions, held virtually in June and July of
2022. Both sessions were facilitated and recorded. In preparation for the first session, panel
members were asked to consider a three-point questionnaire, below:
1. What are the main research problems in the area of Affordable Housing?
2. What types of data do you believe are necessary to address these problems? Are any
of these data types currently available to you? If so, where and how can they be
accessed?
3. What data types are NOT available to you? Where can they be found, if they exist?
How can they be accessed?
The first panel session, led by the facilitator, centred around these three areas. The
recording of the session was subsequently transcribed and distilled into a working
document that captured the responses to these questions. This document was shared with
1
https://urbandatacentre.ca/urban-data-catalogue
3
the panel members in preparation for the second session. Members were asked to review
the summary and provide feedback and additional thoughts in the second session. Again,
the session was recorded and transcribed. The working document and the subsequent
feedback form the basis of this report.
Panel Members
The Affordable Housing Panel was composed of the following experts:
● Ahmad Bonakdar - York University
● Cherise Burda - Toronto Metropolitan University
● Cheryll Case - CP Planning
● Prentiss Dantzler - University of Toronto
● Iain Dobson - SRRA
● Tahereh Granpayehvaghei - StrategyCorp
● Mukhtar Latif - Pomegranate Housing Consultancy
● Nemoy Lewis - Toronto Metropolitan University
● Mark Richardson - HousingNowTO
● Patrick Sheils - Public Realm Capital
● Jeanhy Shim - Housing Lab Toronto
● Alan Walks - University of Toronto
4
○ How do we define “affordable housing”?
○ Who is the end customer?
○ What metrics should be used?
○ Can we use outcome-based solutions, metrics?
■ i.e., optimise for transportation costs
○ How do we distinguish between housing affordability vs affordable housing?
○ How should transportation/transit costs be factored into affordability?
5
○ What role does infrastructure play, including transportation and the need for
regional transit plans and oversight?
○ What impact do regional economic development policies have on rural
housing?
HOUSING CONTINUUM
● Rental Housing
○ How is rent control operationalized?
○ What is the effect of the pressure placed on the rental stock from
unaffordable home ownership (i.e., people staying in the rental market
longer)?
○ What is the trajectory of people being pushed further down the housing
ladder?
■ i.e., people who had the most affordable rents end up with nowhere
to go and are pushed down to the street
○ What is the net loss/gain on affordable rentals over time?
■ What is the net gain of what we are losing in terms of rental housing?
How many rental units are being removed from the system versus
how many are being added?
■ What kind of rental buildings are being approved and delivered in
terms of their price point of affordability?
● Homelessness
○ How do we determine the true number of people experiencing
homelessness, including the hidden homeless?
■ What is the true demand for affordable housing?
○ What is the impact of addiction and mental health on homelessness rates?
○ What other factors contribute to homelessness?
■ Most people fall into homelessness for reasons other than addiction
and mental health.
○ What are the health outcomes of homelessness?
■ Health services close involvement.
6
● i.e., household income between 40-120 K - can they afford
home ownership? If not, how can they get there?
■ Can we define who they are? How many people are there in a
particular segment? Where are they now? What are the linkages to
transportation, to employment, to social services, to medical
services?
● Affordable Ownership
○ What are the needs around affordable ownership?
○ What models exist for expanding affordability?
● Social Housing
○ Outside of Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, is social housing still being built?
○ What plans, if any, are there to create more social housing, either within
urban areas or outside of them?
● Cooperative Housing
○ What kinds of cooperative housing currently exist?
● Zoning
○ Are changes to zoning, such as inclusionary zoning, up zoning, density
bonuses, leading to affordability?
7
○ Do these changes/policies create a situation where we depend on the private
sector to deliver affordable housing units?
○ How does restrictive zoning open neighbourhoods up to profit motivated
developers?
○ Are cities that have passed zoning changes to address missing middle housing
and residential development getting the results that they were expecting? Is
there uptake? Is it going to result in anything that's affordable, instead of
market housing, as some new studies are suggesting?
○ Can we track these missing middle housing policies and what kinds of housing
they are actually translating to in real time?
○ Is there the potential to promote area specific development by reducing
development charges rather than an ad hoc site specific zoning negotiation
process?
○ Do these non-prescriptive by-laws that allow for subjectivity create
uncertainty and result in the public realm negotiating from a position of
weakness?
8
● Public Policy
○ What policies are actually creating affordable housing as opposed to more
and more market housing?
9
■ This creates opportunities of operational leverage/economies of scale
and the access to capital that could see additional density built on to
relevant sites.
10
○ How do interest rates impact the ownership market vs the rental market?
○ At what point do people leave the ownership market in favour of renting?
Does this eventually lead to more affordability?
● Inclusivity, Community Investment
○ How can we build an inclusive economy?
○ Can the wealth being created in development be invested into supporting the
well-being of our communities?
○ How much of a role can NFPs play in creating, maintaining inclusivity?
DEMOGRAPHICS
● Race Demographics in housing
○ What are the race-based disparities within affordable housing? Evictions?
● Housing Mismatch
○ How much of a problem within housing is a result of families living in houses
that are either too big or too small?
○ What is the role of policy to facilitate smoothing out some of these
mismatches without taking away from the community, being prescriptive?
11
● Gentrification
○ What impact does gentrification have on the rental housing stock?
○ What impact does gentrification have on homelessness?
■ i.e., as prices start to increase alongside gentrification, houses are
sold, basement suites renovated and re-rented at a higher price,
people are moving/moved out, sometimes with nowhere to go.
○ How are particular neighbourhoods being gentrified?
○ Can gentrification be tracked through retail, commercial space?
■ What types of buyers are buying within these particular geographies,
which are likely to be destined for redevelopment?
● Density Changes
○ What are the drivers for changing densities?
○ What is the impact on affordable housing?
○ What templates exist to bring a broader group of stakeholders into the
development process earlier.
○ Could more localised planning in major urban centres provide wider
perspectives that could be turned into a shared vision?
○ What does density look like, and how does it serve the community?
● Virtual Workers
○ What is the impact of increasing numbers of people working from home?
● Housing Trends
○ Can we understand housing trends earlier, before they are a “problem”?
■ i.e., using vacancy rate for an appropriately sized economic region
may be a better metric than an absolute number of units, tying
housing to other public policy areas and encouraging creative
solutions.
12
○ What is the percentage or number of evictions in a particular area?
○ Are there race-based connections to evictions? If so, what are they?
○ Who is being evicted?
○ Who is carrying out the evictions?
INFRASTRUCTURE
● Housing Shortage
○ Is a lack of supply impacting housing affordability, affordable housing? How?
● Transportation
○ What is the relationship between disposable income and transportation
costs, and how may this inform definitions of affordable housing?
○ How can we better align transit and housing development?
13
○ How long must they remain affordable (wide variation from project to
project, based on who is involved, communication, etc)?
○ How best can we use data related to the length of time a unit will remain
affordable?
■ It is important for future risk mitigation so as to plan on how to
address future affordability as units move back to market rents over
time.
■ It also establishes needs on a regional/localised level that is important
for communities to recognize well ahead of time.
● Private Sector
○ What is the role of the private sector in housing, creating housing? What
should it be?
○ Is there a lack of expertise? What is the impact?
● Non-Profit Organisations
○ What is the role of non-profit organisations? What should it be?
○ Are they a means of helping to address the housing issue at scale, and if so
what needs to be in place to achieve that?
14
○ Can this information be accessed in one place?
15
Affordable Housing Data Needs
The following table conveys the data types identified that are needed to address the major
research problems in the Affordable Housing domain. Data needs were grouped within the
table in order to more easily navigate the information. The groupings correspond with the
research problem categories above. The left-hand column of the table lists specific data
needs within each group. The right-hand column provides examples and/or sources of the
corresponding data, where it exists. Those data types that are either unavailable or difficult
to access are identified with an asterisk.
16
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
○ Source of income
○ Income levels
○ Race, ethnicity-based data*
● Cost per unit
● Community Land Trust data
○ Outcomes
17
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
18
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
(municipal)
● Funding data*
○ Fund allocation
○ Spent funds
○ Recipients
■ E.g., private
developers?
○ Overall funds available to
subsidise affordable housing
○ Value for money
● Outcomes*
○ E.g., rent prices post-2018 (end
to Ontario rent control)
○ Soft evictions
○ Units built
○ Impact on affordability
○ Housing prices
○ Completion rate
19
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
DEMOGRAPHICS DATA
20
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
21
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
going
INFRASTRUCTURE DATA
22
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
● Impact on affordability
23
Data Needs Examples/Sources
* Barriers to access or unavailable
24