You are on page 1of 1

 Your Scribd membership has expired.

Click here to renew it

    

evocative political discourse. Where collective emotions are not fully explained by  Critiques of the “ancient hatreds” hypothesis have successfully shown that hatreds 
the linguistic content of political discourse, I construct plausible inferences about  are socially constructed rather than primordial. I take these arguments a step fur- 
the paralinguistic elements also present. The result is an account that begins not  ther, positing the category “hatred” as an abstraction that obscures the complex 
with settled identities but with the dynamic emotions that make global politics  emotional processes involved in violent conflict. I show how political speeches, 
both multiscalar and unpredictable.  crowd activities, and reburial rituals created environments in which diverse senti- 
Chapter 3 investigates the powerful emotions associated with terrorist violence  ments and memories were creatively blended into the emotional politics of vio- 
after September 11. By tracing the emotional expressions circulating through pop-  lence. These cases involved wide-reaching and multidimensional processes of 
ular media and political speeches, I show that familiar emotions such as fear and  mobilization that theories of identity construction, elite manipulation, and sym- 
anger were not generic responses but adaptive ones—affected by prior normative  bolic politics have yet to appreciate. Because so much of the existing scholarship 
commitments, evolving social practices, and available memories. Rather than pur-  on ethnic conflict proceeds with a simplistic image of emotion, the accounts we 
port to offer a comprehensive theory of how emotions prepared elites and ordinary  have of recent conflicts remain one-sided, with many focused on the guiding role 
Americans for war, the chapter concentrates on specific emotional processes,  of identity. And so this chapter returns to cases well rehearsed in IR but whose 
especially those contributing to the social construction of the terrorist enemy.  emotional aspects remain poorly understood. 
Drawing from research in cultural studies and evidence gathered by public interest  Misunderstanding the emotional genesis of conflict has concrete implications 

 
groups, I show that government-sponsored acts of racial profiling helped to invent  for the way we approach security, peace, and justice in conflicted societies. Those 
the terrorist enemy as a racialized synthesis of Arab, Muslim, and Middle Eastern  who expect endemic “cycles of hatred” worry about the re-emergence of repetitive 
phenotypic and cultural stereotypes. The resulting constructions had, I argue, a  emotional expressions and consequently miss the originality of emotional re- 
subtle but important impact on public tolerance for the use of force. The chapter  sponses to violent conflict—and their potential to fuel innovative solutions to it. In 
also uses a comparison to the Madrid bombings of March 2004 to sharpen the  chapter 5 I turn to the emotional politics of justice, reconciliation, and social repair. 
contention the emotions evoked by terrorist violence are shaped by the normative  With an empirical focus on Rwanda and, to a lesser extent, South Africa, I examine 
commitments, social practices, and emotional sensitivities present in a given con-  the role of emotions in juridical and quasi-juridical institutions. My concern is not 
text. Amplified by public acts of protest, popular emotions adapted to evolving  to offer new institutional solutions to ethnic conflict but to show how existing ap- 
political developments: initially mixed reactions developed into anger directed at  proaches to transitional justice—tribunals, truth commissions, communitybased 
the governing party, seen as having provoked the attack by supporting the US war  courts, and grassroots initiatives—can benefit from increased concern for the 
in Iraq. Whereas the attacks of 9/11 mobilized popular support for war, the 3/11  emotional contexts in which they operate. I show that quasi-juridical institutions 
bombings reactivated antiwar sentiment and sparked anger toward the Spanish  such as truth commissions have permitted an emotionally engaged form of justice, 
government. The chapter shows that emotions such as fear and anger are not fixed but have often also limited this through insistence on “forgiveness,” “national 
psychological responses but shifting composites of contagious affect.  unity,” and other forms of identity-based reconciliation. Rwanda’s experiment with 
Chapter 4 studies the circulations of affect involved in ethnic conflict, focusing  local courts illustrates both the potential and fragility of participatory models of 
on the early stages of nationalist mobilization in Serbia and Kosovo between 1987  justice. The process of lived participation can generate trust among coparticipants, 
Enjoying
and 1991,this
andpreview? Resume
the incitement membership
of genocide in Rwanda to read late
between the1990
full and
title.
1994.  but is readily undermined by political campaigns promoting unity. 
Need help?
Resume Membership


2 pages (3 min) le in this chapter  PAGE 29 OF 378  8% read

You might also like