tragedy for the man who feels." Ou) SPANISH PROVERB.
Section I Sovereignty in the External Order
I T IS generally recognized today that the successive legal concep
tions of sovereignty are reflections of historical changes in political power both in its internal organization and in its external relations. What doctrine is still unwilling to admit is the persistence in the reality of international life of a conception of sovereignty which in some respects contradicts the doctrinal conception. Doubt less the contrasts have been exaggerated. The politician does not usually mistake the limits imposed on State action by the existence of other States. In the ordinary course of things he accepts the duties and burdens which these limits imply. But the fact remains that over against the law the State holds in reserve the plea of sovereignty. A unit of power, it balks at being a mere subject of law. It proposes not only to define for itself those of its interests that it holds vital but also to defend them with all the means at its disposal, including that of armed force, the use of which in the external order is the negation of the common law of coexistence. In this political perspective, sovereignty shares the concrete and eminently contingent character of all political conceptions. In fact there is often little relation between the measures that it dictates to Powers of the first magnitude, animated by vast ambitions, and the attitude that small States take in wholly similar circumstances. Of course, considerations of prudence, the desire for an economic superiority that finds in a peaceful climate its best chance of de velopment, or the wish not to interrupt a sequence of political events that is proceeding to their advantage, may moderate the claims of the great. When moderate in substance, these claims readily take legal form. But adjustments of this sort, counselled by convenience, do not alter the political character of sovereignty. At
The 1648 Peace of Westphalia is a Milestone That Plays an Irreplaceable Role in Formingtheprinciple of Sovereignty in the Modern International Law System