Public Financial Management Assessment Too! for Local Government Units (PFMAT for LGUs)
Name ofiGu_[OPoL
Province IMISAMIS ORIENTAL
LGU Type Municipality
Region REGION X
Income Class [2nd
Year Administered [2019
‘SUMMARY OF LGU SCORES , BY CRITICAL DIMENSION
ecu Gees rene ee
1. Policy based budgeting | Multi year perspective in ficcal planning and
budgeting ae
PEM improvement polices are included in the
2 budgets covered by appropriation ordinances | 2°?
5 Orderliness of activities in the annual budget |
preparation and authorization phases
a Financial self-reliance of local economic 7
enterprises (LEEs) and public utilities (Pus)
‘Score for policy based budgeting 267
2. Comprehensiveness and | Comprehensiveness of budget information
5 transparency contained in the appropriation ordinance ca
covering the annual budget
6 Public access to key information 0.00
‘Score for comprehensiveness and transparency 0.50
7 3. Credibility of the budget | Actual revenue collections compared with
estimated revenues in the budget 4.00
A ‘Actual expenditures compared with oa
appropriations , by allotment class
of budget 167
5 4. Pradictability and control | Real property tax accomplishemnt rate a
budget execution (RPTAR)
10 Effectiveness of tex enfiencement measures 187Public Financial Management Assessment Too! for Local Government Units (PFMAT for LGUs)
a Predictability in the vailability of cash for
committed expenditures
2 Value for money and controls in procurement | 2.60
B Effectivenessof payment controls 4.00
a Effectiveness of internal controls for non- ‘too
personal services (PS) expenditures
‘Score for predictability an control in budget execution 2a)
5 5. Accounting, recording | Timeliness and regularity of accounts
and reporting reconciliation 2.00
fa ‘Quality and timeliness of regular financial
reports and annual financial statements 4.00
Score for accounting, recording and reporting 150
v7 Internal and external Effectiveness of internal audit 1.00
18 audit Follow-up on external audit 2.67
Score for internal and external audit 1.83
7. Citizens’ participation | Civil society organization (CSO) accrediation
19
by local sanggunian 4.00
ea Degree of citizen's participation in the budget
process 4.00
‘Score for citizens’ participation 4.00
cd