Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any
representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The
accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently
verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions,
claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever
caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of
this material.
Biocontrol Science and Technology (1995) 5, 365± 369
(Received for publication 3 October 1994; revised manuscript accepted 30 April 1995)
The effect of sim ulate d rain at two intensiti es (26.7 or 112.7 mm h 2 1 ) and duratio ns (30 or
60 min) on the persiste nce of Beauveri a bassian a conidi a applie d in water on leave s of alfalfa
leave s of alfalfa (M edicag o sativ a) or wheat (Triticum aestivu m) was investig ated. Initia l
populati ons of conidi a on the leaves of both crops were sim ilar, and ranged from 1.7 3 10 5 to
3.5 3 10 5 colony-f orm ing units cm 2 2 . The sim ulate d rain reduce d the concentratio n of conidi a
on leaves by 28± 61% . A lthoug h there was a sligh t effect due to rain intensit y for alfalfa , there
was no in¯ uenc e of either rain duratio n or crop type on the retentio n of B. bassiana conidia .
Keyw ord s: precipit ation, irrigati on, Beauveri a bassian a, ento mopathog en, epigea l habitats ,
persiste nce
containi ng C ornell mix. Im m ediatel y before treatm ent, the plants w ere trimm ed to a heigh t of
8±10 cm . The conidia l suspens ion (100 m 1) was applie d to individu al plants in a 10.8-c m
diam eter 3 35.5-c m high Plexiglas s cylinde r using an airbrus h (Artek , Rockford , IL, USA ) at
103 kPa. The drople t size, densit y and distribu tion pattern w ere m onitore d usin g water-sen sitiv e
paper (Teeje t Sprayin g System s Co., W heaton , IL, USA ). Follow ing inoculat ion, plants were
maintaine d in the dark at am bien t temperatur e for 15±20 min to allow the water carrie r to
evapora te, before exposin g dry conidi a on leaf surface s to sim ulate d rain.
1/4 14 W nozzle s respecti vely . Plants were expose d to rain for 30 or 60 m in at each rain level.
Statistica l Analyses
Each of the three trials conduct ed w as arrange d as a com pletely rando mized desig n with tw o
levels of crop , rain intensit y and duration , each replicate d three tim es. The normality of the
conidia l populat ion data was teste d usin g the Shapiro- W ilk’ s W test. Log 10 transfor mation s were
require d to norm alize the conidia l populati on data , but untrans form ed m eans and standar d errors
of the means ( 6 ) are present ed through out the text. Prior to poolin g the data , the hom ogeneit y
of varianc e between trials w as examined usin g Bartlett ’ s test. The combined data was analyze d
with weighte d analysi s of covarian ce, usin g the genera l linea r m odel routin e of SAS (SA S
Institute , 1988). Conidia l populati ons on leaves before rain exposur e w ere used as the covariat e,
and, in all instance s a trial effect was include d in the m odels. In the absenc e of interacti ons
between crop , rain intensit y, rain duratio n and the covariat e, individu al treatm ents within each
EF FEC T OF R AIN ON B . BASSIAN A 367
crop w ere compared w ith the contro l treatment usin g weighte d analysi s of covaria nce and
least-squ are means.
In this study , it was observe d that sim ulate d rain caused the removal of B. bassiana conidia from
leave s of alfalfa (P 5 0.011) and wheat (P 5 0.007) , w ith the decreas e in populati on densit y
(P < 0.05 ) rangin g from 28.1 6 12.5 to 60.6 6 9.0% (Table 1). The duratio n of rain exposur e had
no effect (P 5 0.42), and conidi a were rem oved equall y from leave s of both crop s (P 5 0.65).
There w as a weak effect (P 5 0.031) due to the differen ce in rain intensit y. A lthoug h the
interacti on betw een crop and rain intensit y was non-sign i® cant (P 5 0.094) , the rain intensit y
effec t occurre d only for alfalfa (T able 1). Rain has been show n to decreas e the folia r persiste nce
of Bacillus thuringi ensis (Frankenh uyzen & Nystro m , 1989), and to facilitat e the dispersa l of
some funga l propagu les (Fitt et al., 1989). D rople t velocit y and size affec t the dispers al of funga l
propagu les (Fitt et al., 1989). A lthoug h the nozzle s and pressur e used produce d a relativel y wide
rang e of drop sizes, the 1-m boo m heigh t selecte d produce d rain w ith relativel y low drople t
velocitie s.
R ain, particula rly that fallin g imm ediatel y afte r the applicat ion of inoculu m, has been
implicate d with decreas ed ef® cacy of B. bassiana by m any research ers (e.g . G ardner et al., 1977;
Johnson et al., 1992). R esults from the presen t stud y indicat e that rain could reduc e the ef® cacy
of this ento m opathog en in epigea l habitats . However, the author s had previou sly observe d that
rain acco m panie d by w ind in excess of 80 km h 2 1 w ithin 30 m in of applicat ion had no apparen t
effec t on persiste nce of B. bassiana conidi a on leaves (Inglis et al., 1993). It now appear s that
the rapid deactiva tion of conidi a by solar radiatio n that occurs unde r ® eld conditio ns obscure s the
effec t of conidia l removal by rain, as determ ined by change s in populati ons over tim e.
A lthoug h simulate d rain rem oves B. bassian a conidi a from leaves , a substant ial proporti on of
the conidi a applie d in water rem ain after exposur e to relative ly high-int ensity rain . Further more,
the effects of rain are not all detrimental, becaus e infectio n can be enhance d unde r conditio ns of
high ambient hum idity (Schae rffenber g, 1964) provide d by precipit atio n or irrigatio n (C am pbell
et al., 1985). W hether precipit atio n w ill enhanc e or jeopardi ze the develop m ent of an epizooti c
will depen d on whethe r conidia l populati ons are decreas ed belo w the inoculu m threshol d
require d to incite mycosis in the targe t insect. Formulatio n adjuvan ts such as stickin g agents
might also reduc e the im pact of rain on conidia l rem oval and prolon g the tim e that inoculu m
densitie s rem ain abov e the threshol d level.
TABLE 1. Effect of simulated rain on retention of B. bassiana conidia on leaves of alfalfa and wheat
Alfalfa Wheat
a a
Rain Before After Reduction Before After Reduction
2 2 5 2 2 5 2 2 5 2 2 5
treatment (CFU cm 3 10 ) (CFU cm 3 10 ) (% ) (CFU cm 3 10 ) (CFU cm 3 10 ) (% )
b
Medium intensity
c c
30 min 1.96 6 0.35 1.13 6 0.12ab 28.1 6 12.5 1.90 6 0.28 1.10 6 0.20bc 35.4 6 11.80
60 min 2.50 6 0.43 2.09 6 0.52bc 24.6 6 14.0 1 83 6 0.20 0.85 6 0.21ab 56.0 6 6.70
d
High intensity
30 min 2.19 6 0.45 0.74 6 0.24a 60.6 6 9.00 1.60 6 0.39 1.07 6 0.50ab 49.7 6 14.0
60 min 2.58 6 0.81 1.21 6 0.41ab 46.8 6 12.9 1.72 6 0.48 1.16 6 0.55ab 50.7 6 9.70
e
Control 3.51 6 0.64 4.24 6 0.96c 2 2.2 6 16.8 3.07 6 0.46 3.28 6 0.52c 2 4.0 6 7.80
a 2 2 2
G . D . ING LIS E T A L .
Percentage reductions in conidial populations were calculated as: ([CFU cm 2 at time T 0 2 CFU cm 2 at T x ]/CFU cm 2 at T 0 ) 3 100. Percentage increases
2 2 2 2 2 2
were calculated as: ([CFU cm at time T 0 2 CFU cm at T x ]/CFU cm at T x ) 3 100.
b 2 1
Medium-intensity rain 5 26.7 mm h .
c
Post-rain exposure treatment means ( 6 standard error) within each crop not followed by the same letter are signi® cantly different (P < 0.05) according
to least-square means. Conidial populations on leaves after rain exposure were adjusted for the covariate (conidial populations before rain exposure) but
unadjusted means are presented.
d 1
High-intensity rain 5 112.7 mm h 2 .
e
No rain treatment and exposure to the same light conditions for 60 min.
EF FEC T OF R AIN ON B . BASSIAN A 369
REFERE NCES
C AMPBELL , R.K., A NDERSON , T.E., S EME L , M. & R OBERTS , D.W. (1985) Management of the Colorado potato beetle
using the entomogenous fungus Beauveria bassiana. American Potato Journal 62, 29±37.
C HASE , A.R., O SBORNE , L.S. & F E RGUSON , V.M . (1986) Selective isolation of the entomopathogenic fungi
Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae from an arti® cial potting medium. Florida Entomologist 69,
285±292.
D AOUST , R.A. & P E RE IRA , R.M . (1986) Survival of Beauveria bassiana (Deuteromycetes: M oniliales) conidia on
cadavers of cowpea pests stored outdoors and in laboratory in Brazil. Environmental Entomology 15,
642±647.
F ENG , M .G., P OPRAWS KI, T.J. & K HACHAT OURIAN S , G.G . (1994) Production, formulation and application of the
entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana for insect control: current status. Biocontrol Science and
Technology 4, 3±34.
F ITT, B.D.L., M C C ARTNEY , H.A. & W ALKLATE , P.J. (1989) The role of rain in dispersal of pathogen inoculum.
Annual Review of Phytopathology 27, 241±270.
F RANKEN HUYZEN , K.V. & N YSTROM , C. (1989) Residual toxicity of a high-potency formulation of Bacillus
thuringiensis to spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 868±872.
G ARDNE R , W .A., S UTTON , R.M . & N OBLE T , R. (1977) Persistence of Beauveria bassiana, Nomuraea rileyi, and
Downloaded by [University of Western Cape] at 21:25 20 November 2012