Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SESSION 2021-2022
W I N T E R S E M E S T E R : JA N UA RY – M AY 2 02 2
U.G . SE M E ST E R - X
Student’s Corner:
LIST OF SUBJECTS
3 Affirmative Action & Distributive Constitutional Law Prof. I.P Massey 19-23
Justice Hons.
4 Constitutional Remedies Constitutional Law Ms. Vini Singh 24-28
Hons.
5 IP Valuation and Management IPR Hons. Ms. Kanika Dhingra 29-35
7 Trade in Services and Agriculture Trade and Dr. Rosmy Joan 46-52
Investment Law
Hons.
8 International Commercial Trade and Dr. Nidhi Gupta 53-63
Arbitration Investment Law
Hons.
9 Law relating to Cyber Crimes Criminal Law Ms. Preeti Badola 64-69
Hons.
10 Comparative Criminal Law Criminal Law Mr. Renjith Thomas 70-77
Hons.
11 Financial Markets and Regulatory Business Law Mr. Sarthak Mishra 78-84
Systems Hons.
12 Law of Project Finance Business Law Ms. Ruth Vaiphei 85-88
Hons.
Course Curriculum
A. INTRODUCTION
Advent of globalisation has given rise into a situation where an increasing number of
conflicts/disputes invite applicability of more than one legal system. With the rapid
growth in international trade along with revolutionary changes in information technology,
more often than not, legal experts are faced with issues such as choice of most
appropriate forum for litigation or challenges to the domestic jurisdiction in favor of a
foreign jurisdiction, or choice of law to invoke to decide the dispute at hand, or with the
demands of recognizing and enforcing in domestic jurisdiction the judgments delivered in
the foreign countries. The pressing demands for dealing with such legal challenges
arising from constantly changing commercial and economic environment has made the
subject of private international law, also known as Conflicts of Laws, gain importance in
legal education. In India, unlike many western jurisdictions where the laws and principles
relating to private international law are well-developed having received considerable
legislative attention, there is absolute dearth of clear and certain rules and principles to
deal with the questions concerning conflicts of jurisdiction and applicable law.
This course aims to equip students with basic subject knowledge as well as the ability to
apply the principles and rules of private international law in matters relating to cross
border disputes. While the main focus is to be on rules of private international law in
India, considering the underdeveloped state of law in the area, this course, also aims to
incorporate, where required, a comparative input from other countries representing
common law and civil law traditions.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
1
[CO.6] Understand and appreciate importance of dispute resolution clauses in
International Commercial Contracts
[CO.7] Effectively draft dispute resolution clauses
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in
professional lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and
problem solving in domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical
reading, writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral
communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research
and collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to
representation of clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves
in a sensitive manner toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for
lifelong learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and
environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable
development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal
profession, judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations,
entrepreneurships, and corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback,
and achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
2
COURSE CURRICULUM
TOPIC 1: Introduction
Definition
Nature and Scope of Private International Law (PIL)
o Denomination- PIL or Conflict of Laws
o Difference between Private International Law and Public International
Law
o Conflict of Laws within Domestic Jurisdictions
o Jurisdiction
o Choice of Law
o Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
o International Variety of Private International Law Rules
Historical Development
Theories of Private International Law
Sources of PIL
o National Law
o Multilateral and Bilateral Treaties
o Case Law
o Customary Law
o Public International Law
o Doctrine
Readings:
Books:
1. J.D. McClean, Morris: The Conflict of Laws, Universal law Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.,
New Delhi, 2004, Ch. 1
2. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.,
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, Ch. 1, 2
3. Abla Mayss, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K.,
1999, Ch. 1
4. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999, Ch. 1, 2
5. Atul M. Setalvad, Conflict of Laws, Lexis Nexis, Nagpur, 2009 (2nd edn),
(Chapters 1 to 7)
Articles:
1. R.C. Rama, Contemporary Indian Private International Law: Problems and Prognoses,
AIR 1995 Journal Sec, p. 88-89
2. Rama Rao T.S, “Some Recent Developments and Non-developments in India
Private International Law”, 27.4 JILI (1985) 555
3. Tier A.M, “Relationship between Conflict of Personal Laws and Private
International Law”, 18 JILI (1976) 241.
4. Lakshmi Jambolkar, Conflict of Laws, in ASIL, 28: 1992, p.339-341
3
Cases law:
1. Indian and General Trust Ltd. v. Raja of Khalikote, 1952 Cal 508
2. Winans v. Attorney General, (1904) AC 287
3. Smt. Satya v. Teja Singh, AIR 1975 SC 105
4. Miss Shanti Singh v. Governer of Punjab, AIR 1959 Punj 375
5. Laxmikant v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 23
6. Neerja Saraph v. Jayant Saraph, (1994) 6 SCC 461
Classification
o Classification of the cause of action
o Classification of a rule of law
o Classification of Substance and Procedure
Incidental Question
o What is incidental question
o Elements of incidental question
o Depecage
Renvoi
Connecting factors
o Nationality
o Domicile (of Origin, of Choice, of Dependence)
o Habitual Residence
o Temporary Residence
o Residence of Legal persons
Proof of Foreign Law
Exclusion of Foreign Law
Readings:
Books:
1. J.D. McClean, Morris: The Conflict of Laws, Universal law Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.,
New Delhi, 2004, Ch. 3, 4
2. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.,
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, Ch. 3,4,5,6,7,8
3. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999, Ch. 3-9
Articles:
1. Lakshmi Jambolkar, Conflict of Laws, in ASIL, 28: 1992, p.339-341
2. Campbell McLachlan, International Litigation And The Reworking Of The
Conflict Of Laws, Law Quarterly Review, 2004, 120(OCT), 580-616
3. Larry Cramer, Return of the Renvoi, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 979
4. Rogerson P, “Habitual Residence: The New Domicile”, 2000, 49 ICLQ 86
5. Smart P, “Domicile of Choice and Multiple Residence”, 1999, 10 OJLS 572
4
Case law:
Classification:
1. Parasram Perumal v. Air India, AIR 1955 NUC (Bom.) 18
2. Sankaran v. Laxmi Bharti, AIR 1974 SC 1764
3. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. v. Harnam Singh, AIR 1955 SC 590
4. Coupland v. Arabian Gulf Petroleum, [1983] 3 All ER 226
5. Sayers v. International Drilling Co NV, [1971] 3 All ER 163
Renvoi:
National Thermal Power Corporation v. Singer Company, 1992 (3) SCC 551
Connecting Factor:
Nationality:
1. Dattatraya Ganesh Bhatt v. Surendra Kumari, 1996 AIHC 2145 (Kant.)
Domicile:
1. Smt. Satya v. Teja v. Teja Singh, AIR 1975 SC 105
2. Udny vs. Udny, ( 1869) LR 1 Sc & Div 441
3. Cramer vs. Cramer, (1987) 1 FLR 11
4. Winans vs. A-G, (1904) AC 287
5. Ramsay vs. Liverpool Royal Infirmary, (1930) AC 58
Legal person:
1. Dickie & Co. v. Municipal Board, 1956 Cal 216
2. Raja Pramada Nath Roy v. Shebait Purna Chand Roy, (1908) 7 CLJ 514
TOPIC 3: Jurisdiction
5
Books:
1. J.D. McClean, Morris: The Conflict of Laws, Universal law Publishing CO. Pvt. Ltd.,
New Delhi, 2004, Ch. 3,4
2. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, Ch. 10, 11, 12
3. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999, Ch.
10,11, 13
4. Abla Mayss, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K.,
1999, Ch. 2
Articles:
1. Franco Ferrari, 'Forum Shopping' Despite International Uniform Contract Law
Conventions, 51 ICLQ 689 ( 2002)
Case law:
1. Mallappa Yellappa v. Raghvendra Sham Rao, ILR (1938) Bom 16
2. U.L. lastochkina Odesa, U.S.S.R. v. Union of India, AIR 1976 AP 103
3. Maganilal v. Satyanarayan, AIR 1978 All. 455
4. A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd. v. A.P. Agencies, AIR 1989 SC 1239
5. Bharat Nidhi Ltd. v. Meghraj Mahajan, AIR 1967 Del 22
6. G.M. ONGC, Sibsagam v. M/S Raj. Engg. Corporation, AIR 1987 Cal 165
7. Lalji Raja & Sons v. Hansraj Nathuram, AIR 1971 SC 974
8. Hari Singh v. Md. Said, AIR 1927 Lah 200
9. Swastik Gases Pvt.Ltd. v Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (2013)9SCC32
10. Modi Entertainment Network and Anr. v. WSG Cricket PTE Ltd., (2003) 4 SCC 341
11. Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. v. Veritas Investment Research Corp., 2019 SCCOnline Del
8294
12. Arif Buhary Rahman v Siddhesh Kshirsagar, 2019 SCC Online Mad 2243
13. Unicorn Maritimes ( India) Pvt. Ltd. v Valency International Trading Pte Ltd., 2020
SCC Online Mad 2325
14. Interdigital Technology Corporation v Xiaomi Corporation, Delhi High Court, May 3,
2021, I.A. 8772/2020 in CS ( Comm) 295/2020
Readings:
Books:
1. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.,
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, Ch. 15, 16, 17
2. Abla Mayss, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K.,
1999, Ch. 4
3. Paras Diwan and Peeyushi Diwan, Private International Law, 9th ed., Deep and
Deep Publications, Delhi, 1998, Ch. 25
6
4. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999, Ch. 14,
15
Case law:
1. Vishwanathan v. Abdul Wazid, AIR 1963 SC 1
2. Badat and Co. v. East India Trading Co., AIR 1964 SC 538 at p. 554
3. Schibsby v. Westenholz, (1870) 6 QB 155
4. Brijlal v. Govindram AIR 1943 Bom 201
5. K.M. Jabbar v. Indo- Singapore Traders (P) Ltd., AIR 1981 Mad. 118
6. Magan Bhai Chotu Bhai v. Mani Ben, AIR 1985 Guj 187
7. Shankaran Govindan v. Lakshmi Bharti, 7 AIR 1974 SC 1764
8. Algemene Bank Nederland NV v. Satish Dayal Choksi, AIR 1990 Bom 170
9. Middle East Bank Ltd., v. Rajendra Singh Sethia, AIR 1991 Cal 335
10. Gurdas Mann v. Mohinder Singh Brar, AIR 1993 Punj& Har 92
11. M/S International Woollen Mills v. M/S Standard Wool (U.K.) Ltd., (2001)5SCC265
12. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Salem S.A., (2017)2SCC253
13. Arvind Jairam Kotecha v. Prabhudas Damodar Kotecha, MANU/MH/1899/2020
( Bombay High Court)
14. Griesheim GMBH v. Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd., MANU/DE/4394/2013 ( Delhi)
Case Law:
1. Sulamérica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. and others v Enesa Engenharia S.A
[2012] EWCA Civ 638
2. Arsanovia Ltd v Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings [2013] 2 All ER 1
3. Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Andustrisi AS v VSC Steel Company Ltd
[2013] EWHC 4071 (Comm)
4. The Libyan Oil Nationalisation Arbitrations (Texaco, BP Oil, Liamco) (1981) VI
Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 89
5. Sapphire International Petroleum Ltd. v The National Iranian Oil Company,
(1964) 13 ICLQ 1011
6. Naviera Amazonica Peruana SA v. Compania Internacional de Seguros del Peru
[1988] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 116, 118 (English Ct. App.)
7. Abu Dhabi Inv. Auth. v. Citigroup, Inc., No. 13-1068-cv (2d Cir. Feb. 19, 2014)
8. Konkar Indomitable Corp. v. Fritzen Schiffsagentur und Bereederungs GmbH,
1981 U.S. 9637 (S.D.N.Y.)
9. B v. A [2010] EWHC 1626
10. Zurich Ins. Co. v. Ennia Gen. Ins. Co., 882 F.Supp. 1438, 1440 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
7
11. Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb, 2020 UKSC 38
Readings:
Books:
1. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.,
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, ch. 18
2. Abla Mayss, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K.,
1999, Ch. 5
3. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999, Ch. 16
4. V.G. Ramchandaran, ‘Conflict of Laws As to Contracts’, 12, JILI, 1970, pp. 269-286
5. Nandan Kamath, Law Relating to Computers Internet and e-commerce, Universal Law
Publishing, New Delhi, 2001, Ch. 2, pp. 20-52.
th
6. Paras Diwan and Peeyushi Diwan, Private International Law, 9 ed., Deep and
Deep Publications, Delhi, 1998, Ch. 20, 21
Case law:
1. T.N.S. Firm v. Mohammad Hussain, AIR 1933 Mad. 756
2. Rabindra Nath Maitra v. Life Insurance Corporation of India, 1964 Cal 141
3. Vita Food Products Inc. vs. Unus Shipping Co. (1939) A.C. 277
4. Tzortis vs. Monark Line A/B, (1968) 1 All ER 949
5. Compagnie Tunisienne de Navigation S.A. vs. Compagnie d’Armement Maritime S.A.
(1971) A.C. 572
6. Prithi Singh vs. Ganesh Prasad Singh, AIR 1951 All. 462
7. Chitra Devi vs. Chembagavalli, AIR 2000 Mad. 38
8. Modi Entertainment Network and Anr. v. WSG Cricket PTE Ltd., (2003) 4 SCC 341
9. Rhodia Ltd. v. Neon Laboratories, AIR 2002 Bom 502
10. Rhodia Limited, Rhodia Chemicals India Limited and Rhodia Organique Fine Limited v.
Neon Laboratories Limited, 2005(107)1Bom LR 178
11. Emmsons International Ltd. v. Metal Distributors (UK) and Anr., MANU/DE/0105/2005
12. Zippo manufacturing v. Zippo dot. com 952 F.Supp.1119
13. United States v. Thomas, 74 F. 3d 701 (6th Cir. 1996)
8
Foreign Torts and Double Actionability Rule
Multi-Country Torts
Readings:
Books:
1. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.,
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, Ch. 19
2. Abla Mayss, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K.,
1999, Ch. 6
3. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999, Ch. 17
th
4. Paras Diwan and Peeyushi Diwan, Private International Law, 9 ed., Deep and
Deep Publications, Delhi, 1998, Ch. 22
Case law:
1. Nawal Kishor v. Rameshwar Nath, AIR 1955 All 594
2. Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India, 1988 MPLJ 540
3. Kotah Transport Ltd. v. The Jhalawar Bus Service Ltd., AIR 1960 Raj. 224
4. Boys v. Chaplin, 1971 A.C. 356
5. Kishangarh Electric Supply com. v. United States of Rajasthan, AIR 1960 Raj. 4
6. Swami Ramdev v Facebook Inc., 2019SCCOnline Del 10701
Readings:
Books:
1. R.S. Chavan, Indian Private International Law, Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.,
1982, p. 138
2. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.,
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, Ch. 28, 29, 30, 31
3. Abla Mayss, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Cavendish Publishing Ltd.,
U.K., 1999, Ch. 8
4. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999,
Ch. 21
5. Paras Diwan and Peeyushi Diwan, Private International Law, 9th ed., Deep and
Deep Publications, Delhi, 1998, Ch. 15,16,17,18
9
Case law:
1. Chaturbhuj Piramal v. Chunnilal, AIR 1933 PC 150
2. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. v. Harnam Singh, AIR 1955 SC 590
3. Rabindra Mitra v. Life Insurance Corporation of India, AIR 1964 Cal. 141
4. R. Vishwanath v. Syed Abdul Majeed, AIR 1963 SC 1
5. Krishna D. Iyyar v. Subbarama Aiyer, AIR 1932 Mad. 462
6. Upendra Nath v. Het Lal, 1933 All. 380
7. Krishna swami v. Benugopal, 1942 Mad. 614
8. Prithvi Singh v. Ganesh Prasad Singh, AIR 1951 All. 462
9. State Bank of India v. Ghamandiram, AIR 1969 SC 1330
10. Imperial Chemical Industries v. Controller General Patents, Designs and Trade Marks,
AIR 1978 Cal 77
11. M/S Shining Industries v. M/S Shri Krishna Industries, AIR 1975 All.231 (234)
12. Ajay Industrial Corporation v. Shiro Kanao of Ibaraki City, AIR 1983 Delhi 496
Readings:
Books:
1. North and Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 13th ed.,
Butterworths: New Delhi, 1999, Ch. 21,22, 24, 26
2. Abla Mayss, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K.,
1999, Ch. 10, 11
3. John O’Brien, Smith’s Conflict of Laws, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., U.K., 1999, Ch.
18,19
Articles:
1. T.S. Rama Rao, Marriage in Indian Conflict of Laws: Some Recent Developments, 18.1
Indian Year Book of International Affairs, (1980) pp. 343-346.
2. Lakshmi Jhambolkar, Conflict of Laws, in 32 ASIL, (1996) p. 83-88
10
3. R.C. Saksena, Urgent Necessity for Legislation: Protection of the Rights of Women
Married to N.R.Is., AIR 1996 Journal section, p. 81-83
Case law:
Marriage:
1. Khambata v. Khambata, AIR 1935 Bom 5 ( Validity of Marriage)
2. Leelamma v. Dilip Kumar, 1992 ( 1) KLT 651 (Validity of Marriage)
3. Abdul v. Padma, AIR 1982 Bom 341
4. Marian Eva v. State, AIR 1993 HP 7
5. Brooks v Brooks, (1861) 9 HLC 193
6. Pugh v. Pugh, (1951) 2 ALL ER 680
7. Radwan v. Radwan, (1972) 3 All R 967
Divorce:
1. Smt. Satya v. Teja v. Teja Singh, AIR 1975 SC 105
2. Neerja Saraph v. Jayant Saraph, (1994) 6 SCC 461
3. Jagir Kaur v. Jaswant Singh, 1963 SC 1521
4. Joao Gloria Pires v. Ana Joaquina Pires, 1967 Goa 113
5. Jamsed Irani v. Bani Irani, (1976) 68 Bom. L.R. 469
Adoption:
1. In re Sister Gemma’s AIR 1970 Mad. 263
2. Laxmikant v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 23
3. K.S. Council for Child Welfare v. Society of Sisters of C.S.G. Convent, AIR 1994 SC 658
4. Dattatraya Ganesh Bhatt v. Surendra Kumari, 1996 AIHC 2145 (Kant.)
11
2. Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvind Dinshaw, AIR 1987 SC 3,
3. Jacqueline Kapoor v. Surinder Pal Kapoor, AIR 1994 P&H 309
12
61-64 Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in e-contracts Lecture, Case
Studies, Problem
based Exercises
64-68 Torts: Foreign Torts and Double Actionability Rule; Multi- Lecture, Case
Country Torts; Lex Loci Delicti- Defamation; Negligence; Studies, Problem
Fraudulent misrepresentation by instantaneous means; based Exercises
Economic torts
69-70 Law of Property: Distinction between Movables and Lecture, Case
Immovables- Lex Rei Sitae; Transfer of Immovable Property; Studies, Problem
Tangible and Intangible Movables- Transfer of Tangible based Exercises
Movables; Intangible Property Rights- Patent Law;
International Copyright
71-76 Conflict of Laws Issues in the domain of Family: Marriage, Lecture, Case
Divorce, Guardianship, Custody, Adoption Studies, Problem
based Exercises
Total Hours: 80
Lecture Hours: 77
Continuous Assessment: 3 Hrs
13
Course Curriculum
DRAFTING, PLEADING & CONVEYANCING| 6 credit|
Session : January – May 2022 | Faculty : Dr.Anjali Thanvi
Class: UG X Semester
A. INTRODUCTION
The legal profession swears by the maxim, “verba volant, scripta manent” which means
spoken words fly away, written words remain. Drafting is the heart of legal profession.
PleadingLegal drafting skills are of utmost importance to all lawyers but are often difficult to
master. Despite the challenges of mastering the art, the most effective lawyers are those who
actively implement strategies to improve their drafting skills. The process of drafting,
pleading and conveyance is of utmost importance in every court of law. Proper drafting of
arguments is necessary in order to ensure that the arguments are clear, precise and
understandable. Proper methodology of pleading in courts is also necessary in order to
convey the arguments put forward.
Drafting requires a host of skills to be effective. Lawyers need to have in-depth knowledge
of the law, the ability to express abstract concepts, investigative instincts and ability to
foresee future, and organisational skills. Thus, drafting is one of the most intellectually
demanding of all skills lawyers requires in its numerous ramifications, is essentially a
practical subject. Art of drafting a good pleading or conveyance can be acquired only by
more and more practice. The potential lawyers need to inculcate a culture of concise,
accurate and in accordance with rules and practice, drafting of pleadings resulting into quick
and effective administration of justice. With the increasing branches of legal practice in
addition to civil matters, other areas like constitutional, corporate and criminal matters are
also covered.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
At the end of the course, students will be able to
[CO.1] Analyse and apply general principles of drafting and conveyancing.
[CO.2]Understand the different types of legal drafts including pleadings, applications, orders,
deeds etc.
[CO.3] Appreciate the nuances in substantive law and procedure along with legal drafts.
[CO.4] Understand the requirements of Affidavit and Annexures with the legal drafts.
[CO.5] Appreciate the nuances of limitation period and court fees for the legal drafts.
[CO.6] Appreciate the procedure before courts, and tribunal established in India with respect
to implementation and enforcement under different laws
[CO.7] Clearly understand the manner of execution of decrees and setting aside of decrees
[CO.8] Demonstrate conceptual clarity with respect to procedure under CPC, CrPC, and
Constitution.
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1] Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
drafting skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem solving;
[PO.2] Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles;
[PO.3] An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of
14
clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner
toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.4]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for
lifelong learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.5]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.6]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.7]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurships,
and corporate entities
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
Criteria Description Weightage (%)
CONTINUOUS 3 Tests (Best Two will be 30
ASSESSMENT considered)
Project 20
E. CURRICULUM
TOPIC 1: INTRODUCTION
a) Pleadings generally
b) Fundamental Rules of Pleadings
c) Statutory provisions relating to Pleadings
d) Affidavit/Verification
e) Perseverance in legal profession, reflection on pleadings, its importance in administration
of justice.
Reading Material:
1. Odgers on Pleadings and Practice, Twentieth Edition, Page 76 to 80
2. Mogha P.C.: The law of pleadings in India with precedents
3. Order VI, VII, VIII, C.P.C.
4. Special L.A.O. vs. Mahboor 2009 (14) SCC 54 (cases taken casually, negligently,
routinely, filing beyong limitation deprecated)
5. In Re: The Sanjay Dutt. 1995 (3) S.C.C. 619 (casual drafting or settling of draft not only
augurs ill for the health of judicial system but also punishable under contempt). Para 19 &
20)
a) Clarification of Pleadings
b) Pleadings in Suit/other civil proceedings
c) Frame of suit/written statement
d) Suit for declaration, injunction of all kinds, specific performance, recovery of damages for
breach of contract.
e) Summery suit based on Promissory Note
f) Matrimonial Petitions
15
g) Claim petitions under Motor Vehicle Act
h) Application for appointment of Arbitrator
i) Application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act
j) Caveat
k) Civil Appeals, Revision, Review, Letters Patent Appeal, Appeal from order.
Reading Material
1. Sec. 96,100,115, Sec. 148 A O37, O39 R1 & 2, 151 P.C.C., Sec. 104, 105, O41, O43, O47
C.P.C., Sec. 5 & 14 of the limitation act.
2. Sec. 9, 11 Arbitration Act
3. Sec. 9, 10 & 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act
4. Sec. 165 to 176 Motor Vehicle Act
5. Gayathri Women’s Welfare Association vs. Gowramma & Anr., JT 2011 (1) SC 315 (Civil
Suit/ set off).
6. Skyline Education Institute (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. S.L. Vaswani, JT 2010 (3) SC 136
(Injunction in trade related matter).
7. Leela Gupta & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, JT 2011 (6) SC 38 (motor accident claim)
8. Santosh Hazari Vs. Purshottam Tiwari 2001 S.C. 965 (Sec. 100 CPC)
9. Shivashakti Co-operative Society Vs. Swaraj Developers 2003 S.C. 2435 (Sec. 115 CPC)
10. Collector, Land Acquisition vs Mst. Katiji 1987 S.C. 1353 (Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act.)
a) Pleadings in writ/Tribunals
b) Public Interest Litigation
c) Tribunals
d) Special Leave to Appeal
e) Curative Petition
Reading Material
1. Art. 32, 226, 227, 323 A, 323 B, 136, 142
2. Naresh Sridhar vs. State of Maharashtra 1967 S.C. 23 (Drafting of writ petitions under Art.
32 & 226)
3. Sayed Yakoob vs. S. Radhakrishnan 1964 S.C. 477 (Drafting of petition seeking writ of
certiorari)
4. M.C. Mehta vs. U.O.I. 2004 (6) SCC 588 (Drafting of P.I.L.)
5. BALCO Employees Union vs. U.O.I. 2002 S.C. 350 (PIL is not a pill or panacea for all
wrong)
6. State of Uttranchal vs. Balwant Singh, JT 2010 (1) SC 329 (Guidelines for PIL)
7. Kunhayammed vs. State of Kerala 2000 S.C. 2587 (Drafting of SLP)
8. Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Huna 2002 (4) SCC 338 (curative jurisdiction of Supreme Court).
a) Winding up petition
b) Application for Amalgamation
c) Petition before Competition Commission
d) Alternate Dispute Resolution
Reading Material
Sec. 433, 436 & 439, The Companies Act, 391 to 396A & Rules 67 to 82, Ramaiya’s Guide
to Companies Law
TOPIC 6: CONVEYANCING
(a) Introduction
(b) General requirement of Deeds of Transfer
(c) Precautions
(d) Rules of Construction of Deeds
(e) General Forms
(f) Acknowledgements
(g) Deeds:
a) Partnership Deed
b) Deed of Dissolution
c) Sale Deed
d) Lease Deed
e) Mortgage Deed
f) Indemnity Body
g) Agreement Sell
h) Will
i)Power of Attorney
j)Hypothecation Deed
Reading Material
1. P.C. Mogha “The Indian Conveyances”
2. De Souza’ “Conveyancing”
3. Mogha P.C., “The Indian Conveyances”
4. Kelly – Draftsman
17
5. Ghanshyam Singh – cases and material on Pleadings Conveyancing & Professional
Ethics
6. Kuppuswami Chettiar vs. A.S.P.A. Arumuvam Chettiar & Anr. Respondent AIR 1967
SC 1395
Lecture Plan:
LECTURE NO TOPICS MODE OF DELIVERY
1-8 Introduction, Pleadings Lecture, Self Study,
generally, Fundamental Discussion and Classroom
Rules of Pleadings exercise
9-20 Drafting of Civil Pleadings: Lecture, Self Study,
Plaint & Written Statement, Discussion and Classroom
Applications under specific exercise
Orders
21-30 Drafting of Applications Lecture, Self Study,
under specific legislations Discussion and Classroom
exercise
31-42 Drafting of Appeals Lecture, Self Study,
Discussion and Classroom
exercise
43-54 Drafting of Writs & Appeals Lecture, Self Study,
under Constitution Discussion and Classroom
exercise
55-65 Drafting of Applications Lecture, Self Study,
under CrPC, Appeals, Discussion and Classroom
Revisions, Bails etc. exercise
66-84 Conveyance Deeds Lecture, Self Study,
Discussion and Classroom
exercise
18
Course Curriculum
A. INTRODUCTION
This paper seeks to examine the scope and nature of affirmative action and for that purpose
delves into the various theories of distributive justice. In order to develop a deeper
understanding of the concept, we will also compare and analyse the various approaches to
affirmative action in India and abroad.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
At the end of the course the students will be able to –
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in
professional lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem
solving in domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical
reading, writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral
communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of
clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner
toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for
lifelong learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and
environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable
development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
19
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal
profession, judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations,
entrepreneurships, and corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback, and
achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
Criteria Description Weightage of Marks (%)
E. CURRICULUM
TOPIC 1: INTRODUCTION
Reading Material:
5. Michael J. Sandel, Justice-What’s the Right Thing to do, 2010, Penguin Books Ltd.
(U.K.)
20
Cultural and Educational Rights Protection
State Liability & Distributive Justice
Reading Material:
4. Mahajan, Jurisprudence and Legal Theory (1996 re-print), Eastern Book Co.,
Lucknow pp. 128-168
Case Laws:
Reading Material:
1. Asha Bajpai, Child Rights in India: Law, Policy and Practice, Oxford University
Press, 2003
2. B.R.Trivedi, Constitutional Equality and the Women’s Rights, Cyber Tech Pub,
2010
3. ShobhaSaxena, Crimes against Women and Protective Laws, Deep and Deep, 2004
4. John Henry Hutton, Caste in India: Its Nature, Function and Origins, Oxford
University Press, Indian Branch, 1963.
21
Case Laws:
Reading Material:
Case Laws:
American View
Canadian View
Australian View
Comparison of the above with Indian approach
Reading Material:
Case Laws:
22
1. Brown v. Board of Education 347 US 483 (1954)
2. Fisher v. University of Texas (2012)
3. Ontario v. Ontario Teachers Federation (no.4) (1994) 20 CHRR D/257
ARTICLES
1. Chandola, M. Varn. 1992, “Affirmative Action in India and the United States:
the Untouchable and Black Experience,” 3 Ind. Int’l &Comp.L.Rev. 101-133.
2. Rex Martin, “Rawl’s New Theory of Justice,” Chicago-Kent La Review,
Vol.69: 737-761, 1994
3. John Rawls: “Justice as Fairness,” Philosophical Review 67/2 (1958) 164-194
repr. in: Samuel Freeman(ed.): John Rawls. Collected Papers, Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press 1999.
4. Merill, Thomas W. 1996. “Three Models of Affirmative Action
Beneficiaries,” 19 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 779-784
5. Witten, Samuel M., “Compensatory Discrimination in India: Affirmative
Action as a means of combating class inequality,” 21 Columbia Journal of
Transnational Law 353
6. Armour, John W. 1987. “Compensatory Discrimination: The Indian
Constitution and Judicial Review,” 16 Melbourne University Law Review 126
F. LECTURE PLAN
Total Hours: 60
Lecture Hours: 57
Continuous Assessment: 3 Hrs
23
Course Curriculum
A. INTRODUCTION
Constitutional remedies ensure concretizations of various rights provided under the constitution.
It was a matter of concern for the drafters to ensure that the concept of fundamental right does
not merely remain a matter of abstraction of various ideals. Ensuring that these rights are realized
in the Indian comity was a matter of concern for the drafters. It was with this realization that the
drafters decided to grant prerogative powers upon the Supreme Court to issue writs in the form
of article 32 of the Indian Constitution. However, the concept of remedies was not limited to the
granting of various writs but also extended to other forms of directional orders.
This endeavor to construct an appropriate balance between Constitutional Rights and Remedies
provides a particular shape to various institutional mechanisms as well. In particular the
jurisdictional structure of a court is especially shaped by the balance so construed. Another
important issue at an institutional level that arises is with respect to the aspect of balance of
power between the judiciary and the executive.
A proper discussion on the course of Constitutional Remedies for this reason would inevitably
have a broader scope of having an effect on various political and legal matters.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
24
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem solving in domestic
and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and professional
values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of clients,
performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner toward
clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of ongoing
improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for lifelong learning
and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurships, and
corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time management,
discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback, and achieving balance
in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
Project 20
25
TE
R
END M
EXAMINATION Closed Book 50
E. CURRICULUM
Case Laws:
1. State of Madras v. G.G Row, AIR 1952 SC 196
2. Kihoto v. Zachilhu, AIR 1993 SC 412
3. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (3) SC 217
4. Romesh Thopar v. State of Madras, 1950 SCR 869
Case Laws:
1. Chiranjit Lal Choudhary v. Union of India, 1951 AIR 41
2. DS Rathi v. State of Punjab, 1958 SCJ 425
3. Haji Esmail v. Competent Officer, AIR 1967 SC 1244
4. M.K Gopalan v. State of M.P, (1995) 1 SCR 168
• Writ of Certiorari
• Writ of Quo Warranto
• Writ of Prohibition
• Writ of Mandamus
26
• Writ of Habeas Corpus
• Public Litigation
Case Laws:
1. A.D.M Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, AIR 1876 SC 1207
2. Vidya Verma v. Shiv Narain, AIR 1956 SC 108
3. Sabastian Horgray v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 571
4. State of Bombay v. Union Motors Ltd, 1953 SCR 572
5. Surya Dev Raj v. Ram Chandra Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675
Topic 4: Reliefs
• Damages
• Directions
• Constitutional Tort and Compensatory Relief.
• Continuous Mandamus
• Interpretational Meaning of Article 142.
• Concept of Other Relief.
Case Laws:
Topic 5: Principles
• Illegality
• Irrationality
• Alternative Remedy
• Procedural Impropriety
• Proportionality
• Due Process
• Reasonableness
Case Laws
1. Trilok Chand v. Munshi, AIR 1970 SC 898
2. Kashinath v. Speaker, SCC 1993 (2) 703
3. Shambu Ram Yadav v. Hanuman Das Khatri, (2001) 6 SCC 1
\
Topic 6: Miscellaneous Doctrines
27
• Judicial activism and Judicial Overreach
• Doctrine of Political Question
• Access to Justice
1. TEXT BOOKS
2. ARTICLES
Lecture Plan:
TOPI
LECTURE NO. CS MODE OF DELIVERY
an
1-5 Concept of Right d
Remedi
es Lecture and Discussion
Prerogative
6-7 Writs Lecture
Judi an
8-12 cial Review d
Enforceability Lecture and Discussion
13- 16 Scope of Article 32 Lecture
28
Scope and Nature of
17- 22 Article
226 and 227 Lecture
a
Appella n
23- 28 te d Original
Jurisdiction of Supreme
Court Lecture and Discussion
Complete Justice
29-31 Doctrine Lecture
32-36 Writ of Prohibition and Writ
of Certiorari Lecture and Discussion
o Mandamu an
37-40 Writ f s d Lecture and Discussion
Habeas Corpus
41-42 Concept of Public Litigation Lecture and Discussion
Reli o Compensati
43-44 ef f on in
Constitutional Matters Lecture and Discussion
Nature and Scope of
45-48 Reliefs
under the Constitution Lecture and Discussion
Political Question and
49-51 Judicial
Revi
ew Lecture and Discussion
Activism and
52-56 Overreach Lecture and Discussion
Total Hours: 59
Lecture Hours: 56
Continuous Assessment: 03 Hours
29
Course Curriculum
A. INTRODUCTION
Intellectual Property Rights have become a completely separate genre of valuable assets that
are being owned and transacted into by the Companies, both national and international these
days. Hence, there has emerged a growing need to denote the intellectual property rights as
an intangible asset and as such it has the same value and worth as that of a tangible asset of
the company. The IPR as an intangible asset appear on the balance sheet of the company and
affect the worth of all the assets of the company grossly when it comes to entering into
transactions like mergers and acquisitions, licensing and assignments and those involving
taxation and transfer pricing. The course seeks to delve into the matters concerning valuation
and management of an IP of a company and the risks and considerations involved while
applying the different methods available while valuing an IP, and the way in which all the
methods differently affect and influence the ultimate value of an IP. All these considerations
that are involved in choosing and applying a method to value an IP determine the actual value
and worth of an asset and affect the decision making process to undertake a particular
business transaction involving the transfer, use or acquisition of an IP as an asset. Apart from
this IP Management is inclusive of IP Dispute resolution mechanism that seeks to apply ADR
to IP Disputes and to test the arbitrability of IP Issues vis-à-vis litigation process.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem solving in
domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
30
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of
clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner
toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for
lifelong learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
entrepreneurships, and corporate entities.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
E. CURRICULUM
References:
31
5. European Commission Report on IP Valuation (available at-
https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-
union/pdf/Expert_Group_Report_on_Intellectual_Property_Valuation_IP_web_2.pdf)
6. Paul Flignorand David Orozco, Intangible Asset and Intellectual Property Valuation- A
Multidisciplinary Perspective (available at-
http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/ip_valuation_fulltext.html)
7. International Valuation Standard , 2013- Framework and Requirements (available at-
http://www.ivsc.org/sites/default/files/IVS%202013%20without%20guidance.pdf)
8. International valuation Standard on Intangible assets 210 (available at-
http://www.ivsc.org/sites/default/files/ivs210_intangible_assets.pdf)
9. International Accounting Standard 36: Impairment of Assets (available at-
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/consolidated/ias36_en.pdf)
10. IAS 36 (available at- http://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ias/ias36)
11. Accounting Standards 26 Intangible assets (available at-
http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/notification/pdf/AS_26.pdf)
12. Research report 134, Worldwide application of IFRS 3, IAS 38and IAS 36, related
disclosures, and determinants of non-compliance, (available at-
http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/financial-
reporting/rr-134-001.pdf)
13. Impairment Accounting- the basics of IAS 36, Earnest & Young, (Available at-
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Impairment_accounting_IAS_36_0810/$FI
LE/Impairment%20accounting%20IAS%2036%200810.pdf)
What is an asset
Characteristics of an asset
Difference between tangible and intangible assets
IP as an asset- characteristics, limitations and exceptions
What is and what is not intangible asset
Categories of intangible assets-identifiable and unidentifiable
Considerations before analysis
Reasons for intangible asset valuation
Intangible asset valuation report
References:
1. IASB Conceptual Framework of Asset, World Standard Setters Agenda Paper (available
at- http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/Other-
Public-Meetings-Observer-Notes/Documents/WSSAGENDAPAPER1A.pdf)
2. Elements of Financial Accounting, Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No.6
(available at-
http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175822102897&blobheade
r=application%2Fpdf&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs)
3. Trying to Grasp the Intangible (available at-
http://www.wiley.com/college/bcs/0471363049/updates/ch12_intangible.pdf)
4. “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142 (available at-
32
http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=i
d&blobwhere=1175820927971&blobheader=application%2Fpdf)
5. Summary on Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142 (available at-http://www.fasb.org/summary/stsum142.shtml)
6. Intangible Assets and Impairment of Assets (available at-
highered.mheducation.com/sites/dl/free/0077114523/.../SampleChap.pdf)
7. Jeffrey H. Matsuura, An Overview of Intellectual Property and Intangible Asset
Valuation Models, 14 Research management Review, 2004 (available at-
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.467.6261&rep=rep1&type=pdf
)
8. Kelvin King, The Value of Intellectual Property, Intangible Assets and
Goodwill(available at-
http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/value_ip_intangible_assets_fulltext.html)
9. Paul Flignorand David Orozco, Intangible Asset and Intellectual Property Valuation- A
Multidisciplinary Perspective (available at-
http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/ip_valuation_fulltext.html)
References:
33
References:
References:
34
4. Gorden V Smith & Russell L Parr , “Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible
Asssets”, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2000
5. IP Audit Tool- WIPO (available at-
http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/intproperty/927/wipo_pub_927.pdf)
6. WIPO Module 10 on IP Audits (Available at-
http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sme/en/documents/pdf/ip_panorama_10_learning_
points.pdf)
7. H.S. Chawla, Managing Intellectual Property Rights for better transfer and
commercialization of Agricultural Technology, Journal of IPR, Vol. 12, May 2007, pp
330-340
8. K.D. Raju, Intellectual Property Taxation: Need for a comprehensive Policy and Law in
India, Journal of IPR, Vol. 13, November 2008, pp 563-573
9. Karuna Jain & Vandana Sharma, Intellectual Property management System: An
Organizational Perspective, Journal of IPR, Vol. 11, September 2006, pp 330-333
10. Tulika Rastogi, IP Audit: Way to a Healthy Organization, Journal of IPR, Vol. 15, July
2010, pp 302-309
11. Lee Moerman, Accounting for Intellectual Property: Inconsistencies and Challenges,
Journal of IPR, Vol. 11, July 2006, pp 243-248
12. Mrinalini Kochupillai & Matthew A. Smith, Patent Valuation with Consideration For
Emerging Technology, Journal of IPR, Vol. 12, January 2007, pp 154-164
References:
35
4. “Arbitrability of Intellectual Property Disputes”, Available at:
https://www.aippi.org/download/reports/forum/forum07/12/ForumSession12_Presentatio
n_Lawrence_Boo.pdf
5. Jayant Kumar, “Intellectual Property Securitization: How Far Possible and Effective”,
2006, Available at:
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/3563/1/JIPR%2011%282%29%2098-
102.pdf
6. Hiroyuki Watanabe , “Intellectual property as Securitized Assets”, Available at:
https://www.iip.or.jp/e/e_summary/pdf/detail2003/e15_20.pdf
7. Akshat Panday, “Valuation of Intellectual Property Assets”, Eastern Law House 2010.
8. William J. Murphy, John L. Orcutt & Paul C Remus , “Patent Valuation”, John Wiley &
Sons Inc, 2012
9. Gorden V Smith & Russell L Parr , “Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible
Assets”, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2000
1. Akshat Panday, “Valuation of Intellectual Property Assets”, Eastern Law House 2010.
2. William J. Murphy, John L. Orcutt & Paul C Remus , “Patent Valuation”, John Wiley &
Sons Inc, 2012
3. Gorden V Smith & Russell L Parr , “Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible
Assets”, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2000
***
NOTE: Project topics shall be assigned during the course of the semester.
Lecture Plan:
36
Course Curriculum
IP DISPUTE RESOLUTION | 10 Credits
Session: January-May 2022| Faculty: Mr. Arunabha Banerjee|
Class: BA/BBA LLB X SEMESTER [IPR LAW HONORS]
A. INTRODUCTION
Any ownership over a property or transfer of a right is incomplete without remedies that
may be availed of in case the same is infringed or transgressed or the choices that the parties
may make when it comes to settling the disputes. The same is the case with intellectual
property rights and they are increasingly being recognised as properties, though intangible,
that can be owned, transferred or even assigned like any other property. In order to ensure
that the rights are preserved it is important that any terms or contracts entered into for
securing the rights over the same are also enforceable in the sense that in case of any breach
the settlement of any dispute between the parties may be availed easily. Since with more and
more burden on the Courts to determine the rights of the respective parties to a dispute in a
conventional manner by way of litigation, there has emerged the need to settle peacefully the
disputes out of Courts, and as a result, almost in all fields of law, the Alternative Dispute
Resolution Mechanism has been gaining gravity these days. So is the case with IPR and
disputes arising there of.
The present course seeks to delve into the arbitrability of IP Disputes and the challenges
or limitations that are there while engaging with the same. The course seeks to study further
the international and the national mechanisms as far as out of court settlement of IP Disputes
is concerned. Although in India the use and application of ADR to IP disputes is far from
being a realised in the real sense of the term at present, however rulings by the Courts in
some of the cases indicate the willingness of both the parties and the adjudicating authorities
to ensure inclination of dispute settlement by way of ADR as the same has certain important
advantages vis-à-vis litigation.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in
professional lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem
solving in domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical
reading, writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral
communication;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research
and collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of
37
clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner
toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose
of ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for life-
long learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and
environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable
development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal
profession, judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations,
entrepreneurships, and corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, teamwork, giving and receiving feedback, and
achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
E. CURRICULUM
PART I
[INTRODUCTION]
References:
1. Lee Jae Sung, Settlement Solution by ADR on Dispute in Intellectual Property Right,
29 J. ARB. Stud. 121 (2019).
2. Ay Yunus Emre, Intellectual Property Disputes and International Arbitration, 58 ZB.
RADOVA 929 (2021).
38
3. Arbitration of Intellectual Property Disputes, 19 No. 1 IBA Arb. News 88
4. Marc Jonas Block, THE BENEFITS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
DISPUTES, 44 Rutgers L. Rec. 1
References:
1. Kenneth R. Adamo, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Symposium International
Arbitration: Practice and Modern Developments April 1, 2011, 2 Global Bus. L. Rev.
7
2. M. Scott Donahey, UNIQUE CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL
ARBITRATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES, 65-APR Disp.
Resol. J. 38
3. Julien Chaissea and A. Marisport, ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY CONTRACTS: PAST, PRECEDENCE, AND FUTURE, 54 Int'l Law.
397
39
PART II
[THE INTERNATIONAL ADR REGIME FOR IP]
Topic 3: ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy & Rules (UDRP)
40
References:
1. Elizabeth C. Woodard, The UDRP, ADR, and Arbitration: Using Proven Solutions to
Address Perceived Problems with the UDRP, 19 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA &
ENT. L.J.1169 (2009)
2. Alpana Roy & Althaf Marsoof, A Critical and Comparative Review of auDRP and
UDRP Domain Name Decisions, 19 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 203 (2016).
3. John Magee, Domain Name Disputes: An Assessment of the UDRP as against
Traditional Litigation, 2003 U. ILL. J.L. TECH. & POL'y 203 (2003).
PART III
[DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INDIA]
Topic 1: Infringement of IP
Infringement of Copyrights
a. Issues involved in ownership, assignment and licensing of copyrights
b. The case of Neighbouring/Related rights and Copyright Societies
Infringement of Trademarks
a. Well-known Marks
b. Trade- dress and get-up
c. Trademark Dilution and Comparative Advertising issues
Infringements of Patents
a. Cases relating to compulsory licenses
b. Issue of parallel imports and regulatory use
Cases:
1. Gurukrupa Mech Tech Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat and Ors, R/Criminal Misc.
Application Nos. 15682, 15685 and 15686 of 2017
2. Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association,
AIR 1977 SC 1443
41
3. Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Aditya Pandey and Ors., FAO(OS) Nos. 423-
424/2011
4. Saregama Ltd. v. The New Digital Media and Ors., (2018)1WBLR(Cal)329
5. Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited v. The Commissioner of
Income Tax and Ors, 2021 SCC Online SC 159
6. Amway India Enterprises and Ors. v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and
Ors., [2008] 111 ITD 112 (Delhi)
7. Super Smelters Limited and Ors. v. SRMB Srijan Private Limited, 2020 (81) PTC 101
(Cal)
8. SRMB Srijan Pvt. Ltd. v. Shreegopal Concrete Pvt. Ltd, G.A. No. 261 of 2019 in C.S.
No. 15 of 2015, Decided on January 30, 2019
9. Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. Pioneer Trading Corporation and Ors, 2017 (72) PTC 253 (Del)
10. Carlsberg Breweries A/S v. Som Distilleries and Breweries Limited, 2017 (70) PTC
413 (Del)
11. Rolex Sa v. Alex Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. and Ors, 2009 (41) PTC 284 (Del)
12. Brahmos Aerospace Pvt. Ltd. v. FIITJEE Limited and Ors, 2014 (58) PTC 90 (Del)
13. ITC Limited v. Godfrey Phillips (India) Limited, MANU/MH/0820/2020
14. Khursheed Anwar Mohammad Ali and Ors. v. Merit Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, 2015 (61)
PTC 457 (Bom)
15. Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila, 2001 PTC 541 (SC)
16. Tata Sons Ltd. v. A.K. Chaudhary, 2009 (40) PTC 54 (Del.),
17. Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and Ors. v. Just Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd,
MANU/MH/1892/2016
18. Horlicks Ltd. and Ors. v. Heinz India Private Limited, 2019 (77) PTC 45 (Del)
19. Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited v. Hindustan Unilever Limited, CS(COMM)
340/2021 & IAs.8999-9005/2021
20. Bayer Corporation v. Union of India and Others, WRIT PETITION NO.1323 OF
2013
21. Novartis AG v. Cipla Ltd. 2015 (61) PTC 363 (Del)
22. Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Ors. v. SMS Pharmaceuticals Limited, 2021 (87)
PTC 398 (Del)
Topic 2: ADR and Indian IP Regime
Early Neutral Evaluation: a consideration of the ‘Bawa Masala Company Case’
Domain Name Dispute Settlement mechanism
42
Cases:
1. Sanjay Lalwani v. Jyostar Enterprises, O.A.NO.1194 OF 2018 (Decided on 3rd
September, 2020)
2. Golden Tobie Private Limited v. Golden Tobacco Limited, IA No.6080/2021
3. Hero Electric Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Lectro EMobility Pvt. Ltd. & Anr,
CS(COMM) 98/2020 and I.A. 3381/2020 (Decided on 2nd March, 2021)
Topic 3: IP Dispute Settlement and Litigation
Civil litigation
Criminal litigation
PART IV
[OTHER CONCERNS FOR IP DISPUTE RESOLUTION]
Cases:
1. Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia, (2015) 10 SCC 161
2. Ultra Home Construction (P) Ltd. v. Purushottam Kumar Chaubey, 2016 SCC
OnLine Del 376
3. World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. v. Reshma Collection, (2014) 60 PTC 452
4. Banyan Tree Holding (P) Ltd. v. A. Murali Krishna Reddy, 2009 SCC OnLine Del
3780
43
5. Millennium & Copthorne International Ltd. v. Aryans Plaza Services (P) Ltd, 2018
SCC OnLine Del 8260
6. Burger King Corpn. v. Techchand Shewakramani, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 10881
7. Exxon Mobil Corpn. v. Exoncorp (P) Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9193
8. HT Media v. Brainlink International, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1703
References:
1. Jeremy Lack, Addressing the IP Dispute Resolution Paradox: Combining Mediation
with Arbitration and Litigation, Global Arbitration Review,
https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-ip-arbitration/first-
edition/article/addressing-the-ip-dispute-resolution-paradox-combining-mediation-
arbitration-and-litigation
2. European Commission, Press Release, Solving disputes online: New platform for
consumers and traders,
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_16_297
3. NITI Aayog, Designing the Future of Dispute Resolution, The ODR Policy Plan for
India, https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-11/odr-report-29-11-2021.pdf
Topic 2: Remedies
Injunctions
John Doe Orders
Anton Piller orders
Mareva Injunctions
Norwich Pharmacal order
Criminal Sanctions
Quantification of Damages
Cases
1. Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. Jyoti Cable Network, 2011 SCC OnLine Del
5709
2. Balaji Motion Pictures Ltd. v. BSNL, 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 4636
3. Eros International v. BSNL, 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 10315
4. Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. Jyoti Cable Network, 2011 SCC OnLine Del
5709
5. UTV Software Communication Limited v. Home Cable Network Ltd, CS(OS) No
821/2011
6. Red Chilies Entertainments Pvt Ltd v. BSNL, CS No 601/2017
44
7. National Garments v. National Apparels, (1990) PTC 98
8. Shiv Kumar Chadha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, (1993) 3 SCC 161
9. Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca Cola Company, 1995(5) SCC 545
10. Bucyrus Europe Ltd v. Vulcan Industries Engineering Co Pvt Ltd, 2005 (30) PTC 279
11. Autodesk Inc. v. Mr. Kumar Sam Prahlad, CS (OS) 2375 of 2007
12. Microsoft Corporation v. Dhiren Gopal, FAO (OS) No. 624 of 2009
13. Autodesk Inc. v. Mr. Rajiv P. Gandhi & Ors, CS (OS) No. 366 of 2009
14. Microsoft Corporation v. Lokesh Kumar, CS (OS) No. 878 of 2010
15. Microsoft Corporation v. Jaysukh Patel, CS (OS) No. 878 of 2011
16. Microsoft Corporation v. Arunava Jana, CS (OS) No. 478 of 2011
17. Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34
Topic 3: Miscellaneous
Effect of Dispute Settlement on Access to Medicines
Disputes relating to Anti-Competitive practices in IP
1. Aamir Khan Productions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, (2010) 112 Bom L R 3778
2. Entertainment Network (India) Limited v. Super Cassette Industries Ltd, 2008 (5) OK
719
3. Samsher Kataria v. Honda Siel and Ors (Case No. 03/2011)
4. K Sera Sera Digital Cinemas Limited v. Pen India Ltd and Ors (Case No. 97/2016)
5. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson v. Competition Commission of India & Anr (WP(C)
464/2014 & CM Nos. 911/2014 and 915/2014)
Lecture Plan:
45
19-22 ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Lecture and Discussion
Resolution Policy & Rules (UDRP)
PART III [DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN
INDIA]
46
COURSE CURRICULUM
A. INTRODUCTION
Part I of this curriculum deals with services trade. The General Agreement on Trade in
Services (the “GATS”), negotiated and concluded as a result of the Uruguay Round of
multilateral trade negotiations, when it came into effect in 1995 was the first multilateral
agreement covering this important and growing area of services trade. It has a potentially
broad scope of application, in the sense that most measures imposed by governments –
national, regional and local – affecting trade in services are covered, with the important
exception of services supplied in the exercise of governmental authority and certain
specific sectors, such as air transport services. However, the general obligations that
apply to all measures affecting trade in services are few, most notably the most-favoured-
nation (“MFN”) and transparency obligations. Many other key obligations, such as
market access and national treatment, apply only when and if a WTO Member has
decided to make specific commitments relating to a particular service sector in its
Schedule. The GATS is a complex web of rights, obligations, exemptions/exceptions and
specific commitments. Despite its obvious detail and complexity, the GATS remains a
“work in progress”. This course curriculum is designed with an objective to provide
advanced, academic and practical understanding of GATS under the WTO legal
framework.
Part II of this curriculum examines both the agricultural sector specific provisions in the
Agreement on Agriculture and the general WTO rules in a number of other WTO
Agreements, which can impact agricultural trade.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
At the end of the course, students will be able
[CO.1]. To equip students with an advanced understanding of the WTO-GATS
Agreement within the global trade regime;
[CO.2]. To study the nature, scope and type of trade in services framework within the
GATS framework;
[CO.3]. To introduce students to the political economy dynamics of GATS and its
impacts on developing countries;
[CO.4]. To study the interface between GATS and National Regulatory regimes;
[CO.5]. To familiarize students with WTO jurisprudence on GATS and to expose the
potential problems of WTO dispute settlement mechanism in relation to GATS;
[CO.6]. To introduce contemporary and topical issues, including unilateral commitments
of developing countries, with special emphasis on India in liberalizing the services
economy and commitments in trade in services largely proliferating through bilateral and
regional trade agreements;
[CO.7]. To expose legal and development challenges in relation to specific sectors; and
46
[CO.8]. To understand the main legal provisions affecting trade in agricultural products.
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in
professional lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem
solving in domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical
reading, writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral
communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation
of clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive
manner toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for
life-long learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and
environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable
development;
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice;
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal
profession, judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations,
entrepreneurships, and corporate entities;
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback,
and achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
47
E. CURRICULUM
PART I: TRADE IN SERVICES
TOPIC 1: Introduction
MFN Treatment
Transparency
Increasing Participation of Developing Countries
Economic Integration and Labour Markets Integration Agreements
Domestic Regulation and Recognition
Monopolies and Exclusive Service Suppliers;
Restrictive Business Practices
Payments and Transfers; Restrictions to Safeguard the
Balance-of-Payments
Emergency Safeguard Measures; Subsidies; Government Procurement
General Exceptions and Security Exceptions
Market Access
National Treatment
Additional Commitments
Schedules of Specific Commitments
Preamble Recital 3
Negotiation of Specific Commitments
Schedules of Specific Commitments
Modification of Schedules
48
Consultations
Dispute Settlement and Enforcement
Special Procedures for Specific Services Sectors
Cases
Panel Reports
Readings
49
Max Planck commentaries on World Trade Law, WTO Trade in Services, By
Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll, Clemens Feinäugle Legal Guide to GATS,
By Nellie Munin, 2010 Kluwer law International BV, The Netherlands.
WTO Secretariat, GATS – Fact and Fiction (WTO, 2001).
WTO Secretariat, Guide to the GATS – An Overview of Issues for Further
Liberalization (Kluwer Law International, 2000).
WTO Secretariat, “Part III: The Results of the Uruguay Round for Services” in
Guide to the Uruguay Round Agreements (Kluwer Law International, 1999).
Werner Zdouc, “WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the GATS”,
Journal of International Economic Law, 1999, 295-346.
Aly K. Abu-Akeel, “The MFN as it Applies to Services Trade: New Problems for
an Old Concept”, Journal of World Trade, 1999, Vol. 33, No. 4, 103-129.
Hoekman B., Mattoo A. and English P. (eds.), Development, Trade and the WTO:
A Handbook (World Bank, 2002).
Bernard Hoekman and Carlos A. Primo Braga, “Protection and Trade in Services”,
Policy Research Working Paper 1747, World Bank, 1997.
International Trade Centre, Business Guide to the General Agreement on Trade in
Services, Revised Edition (ITC, 2000).
Market Access
Domestic Support
Export Subsidies
Dispute Settlement
Cases
50
Report, WT/DS108/AB/R.
GATT Panel Report, United States Tax Legislation (DISC), L/4422 - 23S/98,
adopted in December 1981.
Appellate Body Report, Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy
Products (“Canada – Dairy”), WT/DS103/AB/R and Corr.1, WT/DS113/AB/R
and Corr.1, adopted 27 October 1999.
Appellate Body Report, Chile – Price Band System and Safeguard Measures
Relating to Certain Agricultural Products (Chile – Price Band System),
WT/DS207/AB/R, adopted 23 October 2002.
Appellate Body Report, Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Import of
Certain Dairy Products (“Korea – Dairy”), WT/DS98/AB/R, adopted 12 January
2000.
Korea – Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef (“Korea –
Various Measures on Beef”), WT/DS161/R, WT/DS169/R, adopted 10 January
2001, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, WT/DS161/AB/R,
WT/DS169/AB/R.
European Communities – Measures Affecting the Importation of Certain Poultry
Products (“EC – Poultry”), Panel Report, WT/DS69/R, adopted 23 July 1998, as
modified by the Appellate Body Report, WT/DS69/AB/R.
Japan – Measures Affecting Agricultural Products (“Japan – Agricultural
Products II”), WT/ DS76/R, adopted 27 October 1998, WT/DS76/AB/R, adopted
22 February 1999.
Australia – Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon (“Australian – Salmon”),
WT/DS18/R, adopted 12 June 1998, WT/DS18/AB/R, adopted 20 October 1998.
Readings
Lecture Plan:
51
3-5 Genesis of GATS Lecture, & Discussion
Total Hours: 60
Class Hours: 57
Continuous Assessments Hours: 03
52
Course Curriculum
A. INTRODUCTION
Arbitration has emerged as one of the most preferred methods for resolution of disputes
arising mainly out of commercial contracts. Its popularity lies in the comparative advantages
it has over litigation process. This is more evident in the realm of commercial transactions
involving cross-border trade and business. Rising acceptance of arbitration in last few
decades has given rise to extensive developments, both at the normative and institutional
levels, in arbitration laws and also in methods of conducting arbitration. While debate
relating to ad hoc v institutional arbitration has given way in favour of latter, arbitrations laws
of different countries have also undergone significant transformations. Indian legal system is
gearing up for institutional arbitration, especially in wake of the recent 2018 Amendment
Bill, Indian arbitration laws and jurisprudence is also in a process of rapid developments,
especially during last decade. Research and training in arbitration laws is something which
needs to be given central importance, especially for the students willing to pursue career in
the world of commercial laws. This course provides a rigorous introduction to the field of
international commercial arbitration, which has become the default means of settling
international disputes. The course will deal with the internationalist elements of the subject
matter, but will also examine international commercial arbitration from an Indian
perspective.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
[CO.1] To provide students with the fundamental legal and jurisdictional underpinnings of
the international commercial arbitration as a system of dispute resolution,
[CO.2] To offer working knowledge of the Indian and International procedural mechanisms
for conducting international commercial arbitrations, and the enforcement of international
commercial arbitration awards in domestic courts,
[CO.3] To develop critical appreciation for developments in law and jurisprudence relating to
international commercial arbitration,
[CO.4] To make students appreciate the reform areas in ICA and also to appreciate the key
challenges in using arbitration as a method of dispute resolution,
[CO.5] To develop an understanding of investor-state dispute resolution through arbitration.
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem solving in
domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of
53
clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner
toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for
lifelong learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurships,
and corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback, and
achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
E. COURSE OUTLINE
54
“Overview of International Commercial Arbitration” in Gary Born, INTERNATIONAL
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION Vol 1, pg 20-65; Kluwers Wolters (2010)
“An Overview of International Arbitration” in Alan Redfern , J. Martin Hunter , et al.,
REDFERN AND HUNTER ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, (© Nigel Blackaby, Martin
Hunter, Constantine Partasides, Alan Redfern; Oxford University Press 2009) pp. 1 -
83
Morris S. Rosenthal, “Arbitration In The Settlement Of International Trade Disputes”,
11 Law & Contmep. Probs. 808.
UNCITRAL 2012 DIGEST OF CASE LAW ON THE MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (1985, WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN 2006) (United
Nations Publication, 2012) pp. 7- 15.
Cases
TDM Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd vs. UE Development Pvt. Ltd. [2008 (2)
ARBLR439 (SC)]
Channel Tunnel Group Ltd v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd [1993] AC 334
Private Company “Triple V” Inc. Ltd. v. Star (Universal) Co. Ltd. and Sky
Jade Enterprises Group Ltd., High Court—Court of First Instance, Hong
Kong, 27 January 1995
Agreement to Arbitrate
- Capacity of parties to enter into agreement
- New York Convention 1959: Art II and Art V
- Writing requirement [Model law options]
- Meaning of ‘defined legal relationship whether contractual or not’
- Meaning of the Term Commercial
- Parties to an arbitration agreement and Role of Non-Signatories
- Severability
- Arbitrable Subject Matter
- Drafting of Clauses and Model clauses from Institutional Arbitrations
- IBA Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses, 7 October
2010
Articles and Book Chapters:
55
Leboulanger, “The Arbitration Agreement: Still Autonomous?” in Albert Jan van den
Berg (Ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? ICCA Congress Series
2006 Montreal 13 (Kluwer Law International 2007) p. 3.
Niel Kaplan, QC, “Is the Need for Writing as Expressed in the New York Convention
and the Model Law Out of Step with Commercial Practice?” [1996] Vol 12 No 1
Arbitration International 27
Adam Samuel, “Separability …some awkward questions”, [2000] ADRLJ 36
Lawrence Boo, “The Writing Requirement- Is there really a need for change?”, [2008]
DRI vol 2, no 1, 75
Ross B. Bricker, Courtney M. Beemer, and Amy D. Wills, “Creative Drafting of
Arbitration Clauses: Resurrecting Arbitration’s Benefit by Moving Beyond the
Boilerplate”
John M. Townsend, “DRAFTING ARBITRATION CLAUSES: Avoiding the 7
Deadly Sins”
Cases:
1. Smith Ltd. v. H&S International, 1991 2 Lyod’s Reports 127
2. Union of India v. Mc Donnell Douglas Corp., 1993 2 Llyod’s Report 48
3. Sapphire International Petroleum v. National Iranian Oil Co.(1964) 13 ICLQ 1011
4. American Independent Oil Co. Inc. v. State of Quwait, (1982) 21 ILM 976
5. Fili Shipping Company Ltd v Premium Nafta Products Limited (Fiona Trust) [2007] 2
All ER 1053
6. Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, 105 S Ct 3346
7. CLOUT 406 (Bundesgerichtshof; II ZR 373/98 ) and 407(Bundesgerichtshof; III ZB
55/99) - German Supreme Court
8. World Sport Group v MSM Satellite Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 34978 of 2010)
[Decision of January 24, 2014]
9. Kaverit Steel Crane v Kone, 1974 (2)NZ;R 246,
Articles:
Singhal, “Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators” (2008) Int’l Arb. L. Rev. 124
John J. Barceló, “Who Decides the Arbitrators’ Jurisdiction? Separability and
Competence-Competence in Transnational Perspective”, 1116 Vanderbilt Journal of
Transnational Law, Vol. 36, [2003]
56
Chatterjee, “The Reality of the Party Autonomy Rule in International Arbitration”
(2003) 20:6 J. Int’l Arb. 539.
Rogers, “The Vocation of the International Arbitrator” (2005) 20 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev.
957.
Franck, “The Role of International Arbitrators” (2006) 12 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L.
499
William W. Park, “The Arbitrator’s Jurisdiction to Determine Jurisdiction”, 13 ICCA
Congress Series 55, ICCA Congress, Montréal 2006
Alan Scott Rau, On Integrity in Private Judging, Arbitration International, (© LCIA;
Kluwer Law International 1998, Volume 14 Issue 2) pp. 115 - 156
Charles B. Rosenberg, The Death of the Two-Headed Nightingale: Why the Paulsson–
van den Berg Presumption that Party-Appointed Arbitrators are Untrustworthy is
Wrongheaded, Arbitration International, (© LCIA; Kluwer Law International 2013,
Volume 29 Issue 1) pp. 7 - 44
R. Doak Bishop and Lucy Reed, Practical Guidelines for Interviewing, Selecting and
Challenging Party-Appointed Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration,
Arbitration International, (© LCIA; Kluwer Law International 1998, Volume 14 Issue
4) pp. 395 - 430
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, 2004
Cases:
1. SBP & Co v Patel Enggineering Ltd [2005] 8 SCC 618
2. NTPC Ltd v Siemens Atkeingesellschaft AIR 2007 SC 1491
3. Pando Compania Naviera SA v. Filmo SAS, (1975) 1 QB 742
4. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Causality Co. 393 U.S 145 (1968)
5. AT & T Corporation v Saudi Cable [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep 127
6. Commonwealth Coatings Corp v Continental Casualty 393 US 145 (1968)
7. AAY and others v AAZ [2009] SGHC 142
8. Pan Atlantic Group Inc. v. Hassneh Insurance Co. of Israel Ltd, [1992] ADRLJ 179
9. Veritas Shipping Corp. v. Anglo-Canadian Cement Ltd [1966] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 76, 77
(QB) (English High Ct.).
Interim Measures
Pre-hearing Procedure & Evidence Gathering - Conflict of Laws Issues
Hearings
Privacy and Confidentiality
Judicial Intervention
Articles:
Paulsson, “The Timely Arbitrator: Reflections on the Böckstiegel Method” in Law
of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21st Century, Liber
Amicorum Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel (2001) 607.
Jason Fry, “Interim Measures Of Protection: Recent Developments And The Way
Ahead”, Int. A.L.R. 2003, 6(5), 153-160
IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, 2010
Matthias Schrerer “The Limits of the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in
International Arbitration: Document Production based on Contractual or Statutory
Rights”, (2010) 13 Intl Arb LR 195-200.
58
Cases:
1. Delphi Petroleum Inc v Derin Shipping and Trading Ltd (1993) 73 FTR 241
2. Overseas Fortune Shipping Pvt Ltd v Great Eastern Shipping Co Ltd [1987] 1 Loyds
Rep. 270
3. Brandeis v Brokers Ltd v Black [2001] 2 All ER 980
4. Derby and Co Ltd v Weldon (No 9) [1991] 2 All ER 901
5. Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10
6. Bulgarian Foreign Trade Bank v A.I. Trade Finance Inc (2000) 15(12) Mealey's
International Arbitration Report 44 and 52 (Swedish Supreme Court)
7. Metalclad Corporation v United Mexican States, Final Award, 2 September 2000
8. Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding Co Ltd v Easton Graham Rush and Another,
[2004] 2 SLR 14
9. United States v. Panhandle Eastern Corp. et al. , 118 F.R.D. 346 (1988, Del)
10. Amazon.Com NV Investment Holdings v Future Retail Ltd. , Civil Appeals no. 4492-
93 of 2021, Supreme Court, Decided on August 6, 2021
Cases:
1. Chiswell Shipping Ltd v State Bank of India [1987] 1 Lloyd’s Report 157
2. Hassal v Childrens’ & Womens’ Health Centre of British Columbia [2001] BCD Civ
J 2705
59
3. European Grain and Shipping Ltd v Johnson [1982] 3 All ER 989
4. Agrimex Ltd v Tradigrain SA [2003] EWHC 1656
5. Renusagar Power Corp Ltd v General Electric Co AIR 1994 SC 859
6. ONGC v SAW Pipes Ltd AIR 2003 SC 2629
7. Venture Global Engineering v Satyam Computer Services Ltd AIR 2008 SC 1061
8. Phulchand Exports v OOO Patriot (2011) 10 SCC 300, SC Decision, October 12,
2011
9. Shri Lal Mahal Ltd v Progetto Grano Spa Civil Appeal No.5085 of 2013, SC
Decision of July 3, 2013.Soleimany v Soleimany [1998] 3 WLR 811
10. Enercon (India) Ltd v Enercon GMBHCivil Appeal No. 2006 of 2014, February 14,
2014.
11. Creighton v Quatar (2000) XXV Yearbook of Commercial Arbitration 458, decision
of the Cour de cassation of July 6, 2000
12. Ambassade de la Federation de Russie en France v Compagnie NOGA d’Importation
et d’Exportation SA, Cour d’Appel de Paris (1 Ch. A) August 10, 2000, (2001) XXVI
Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 273
13. Indian Organic Chemical Ltd. v. Subsidiary 1(US) Subsidiary 2 (US) and Chemtex
Fibres Inc. (1979) IVYB Commr. Arb. 271.
14. Astro Nusantara International BV v PT Ayunda Prima Mitra [2012] SGHC 212
15. Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. v NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131
60
Emerging forms of ISDS : The UNCITRAL ICS System, the CETA ICS and its
Constitutional Challenges, The EU Proposed ICS Model in TTIP and its
constitutional challenge in Germany
Cases
1. White Industries Australia Limited v. The Republic of India, UNCITRAL Award of
Nov 30, 2011
2. National Gas S.A.E. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/7
3. BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, US Supreme Court decision of March 5,
2014
SUGGESTED READINGS
Lecture Plan
Total Hours: 60
Lecture Hours: 57
Continuous Assessment: 3 Hrs
63
Course Curriculum
LAW RELATING TO CYBER CRIMES| 10 Credits |
Session: January- May 2022| Faculty: Ms. Preeti Badola |
Class: BA/BBA LL.B X SEMESTER(Criminal Law Hons.)
A. INTRODUCTION
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
At the end of the course, students will be able to
[CO.1] Acquaint with the basic rationale and various terminologies involved in the
criminal legal framework dealing with Cyber Space in India
[CO.2] Conceptualize the core of criminal liability and penal sanction in Cyber
Crimes
[CO.3] Encapsulate the national as well as international legal framework of cyber-
space and its various procedural intricacies
[CO.4] Identify and categorise the nature of various cyber-crimes and precise legal
provisions dealing thereto
[CO.5] Inspect the components of cyber investigation, adjudication and trial
applicable under concerned legal enactments
[CO.6] Analyse the role, functioning and liabilities of entities forming the canvas of
cyber space
[CO.7] Describe the contents of cyber activities resulting into cyber crimes
[CO.8] Indicate the synthesis of various national as well as international legal norms
dealing with cyber crimes
[CO.9] Analyse the judicial ethos dealing with cyber-crimes and its reflection under
contemporary cyber laws in India.
64
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1].Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem solving in
domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2].Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral communications;
[PO.3].Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4].An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and professional
values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of clients,
performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner toward
clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5].Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for life-
long learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6].Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.7].Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8].Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurships,
and corporate entities
[PO.9].Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback, and
achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
-
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
Project 20%
End Term Exam Closed Book 50%
65
Types of cyber offences to be criminalized: Spamming, hacking, cyber stalking, theft of
service, denial of service attacks, salami slicing, data transfer fraud,
Computer Viruses, Time Bombs, Trojans, Malicious Code (Malware)
Readings:
US v. SABLAN, 92 F.3d 865 (1995) (relationship of "mens rea" to "damages," and how are
damages calculated).
US v. MIDDLETON, 231 F.3d 1207 (2000) (Factual Background, pp. 1208-09, Part B.
Damages, p. 1213, and Part C. Sufficiency of Evidence, pp. 1213-14).
Jyh-An Lee, Hacking into China's Cybersecurity Law, 53, Wake Forest L. Rev. 57 (2018).
Josh Goldfoot; Aditya Bamzai, A Trespass Framework for the Crime of Hacking, 84 Geo. Wash.
L. Rev. 1477, (2016).
Sara Sun Beale; Peter Berris, Hacking the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Dangers, and Legal
Responses, 16 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 161 (2017-2018).
Maneela, Cyber Crimes: The Indian Legal Scenario, 11, US-China L. Rev. 570 (2014).
Readings:
Milana Pisaric, Electronic Records as Digital Evidence, 43 Zbornik Radova 519 (2009).
Jacqueline J. DeGaine, Digital Evidence, 2013 Army Law. 7 (2013).
Paul W. Grimm; Daniel J. Capra; Gregory P. Joseph, Authenticating Digital Evidence, 69 Baylor
L. Rev. 1 (2017).
Mrinalini Singh; Shivam Singh, Cyber Crime Convention and Trans Border Criminality, 1
Masaryk U. J.L. & Tech. 53 (2007).
66
Child porn and the law
Sending offensive messages S 66A
Voyeurism S 66E
Sexually explicit content and child pornography S 67A ND s 67B
Policy problems with a national or cyberspace standard
Constitutional and statutory rules governing obscenity
Online Gambling: UNLAW FUL INTERNET GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT ACT OF
2006(enacted as Title VIII of the Security and Accountability For Every Port Act of 2006 or
SAFE Port Act, Pub. L. 109-347):
Statutes:
Communications Decency Act of 1996 (Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996).
Child Online Protection Act (COPA) of 1998 (47 U.S.C. 231). (Cf. Children's Online Privacy
Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) 16 USC 6501-6506).
Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) of 2000 Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA),
Pub. L. No. 106-551, Div. B., Tit. XVII, 114 Stat. 2763A-335 (2000).
Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, subtitle N
(§7501 et seq.), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4485, 18 U.S.C. § 2251 et seq.) (enforced through "2257
Regs" guidelines, 28 CFR 75).
Readings:
Dan-Calin Besliu, Cyber Terrorism - A Growing Threat in the Field of Cyber Security, 6 Int'l J.
Info. Sec. & Cybercrime 35 (2017).
Loan Marcel, The Components of Cyber-Terrorism, 2 Int'l J. Info. Sec. & Cybercrime 49 (2013).
Ioana Martin, Cyber Security Strategies - An Overview, 4 Int'l J. Info. Sec. & Cybercrime 33
(2015).
Gerard V. Bradley, Prolegomenon on Pornography, 41 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 447 (2018).
Godwin Tan, Is Pornography Merely Obscene: Feminist Perspectives on the Regulation of
Pornography, 5 UK L. Student Rev. 97 (2017).
Shannon Russell, The Criminalisation of Extreme Pornography: Legitimacy and Scope, 3
Edinburgh Student L. Rev. 51 (2017).
Avinash Bajaj v State, 116(2005)DLT427
Fimbros v State of Kerala, AIR 2006 Ker 279
Ashcroft v. ACLU, 542 U.S. 656 (2004).
MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (Miller Test - community standards; "lacks
serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value").
U.S. v. AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC., 539 U.S. 194 (2003) (LII) (upholding Children’s
Internet Protection Act (CIPA).
Readings:
Eric Holm, The Darknet: A New Passageway to Identity Theft, 6 Int'l J. Info. Sec. & Cybercrime
41 (2017).
67
N. S. Nappinai, Cyber Crime Law in India: Has Law Kept Pace with Engineering Trends - An Empirical
Study, 5 J. Int'l Com. L. & Tech. 22 (2010)
LECTURE PLAN:
68
36-46 Pornography and online gambling Lecture, Discussion
50-54 Identity theft and impersonation S 66C and S66D Lecture, Self
Tampering with the source code S65, Study, Discussion
Total Hours: 60
Lecture Hours: 57
Continuous Assessment Tests: 03
69
Course Curriculum
A. INTRODUCTION
This course will look at Comparative Law as a discipline, focusing on its method, history, and
contemporary problems. It will also examine selected Criminal Law issues in different
jurisdictions and administration of criminal justice in these jurisdictions from a comparative
perspective. This course will have a comparative analysis of both substantive and procedural
criminal laws.
To understand the general principles of criminal liability underlying the Indian criminal
justice system and to compare them with other jurisdictions.
To understand the relationship between substantive criminal law and criminal procedure
in relation to issues such as the principles of territoriality, equality before the law
including the right to a fair trial, and the right to legal representation in the civil and
common law systems.
To acquire basic knowledge of the procedures for investigating, prosecuting and judging
crimes in both adversarial and inquisitorial-based systems.
C. COURSE OUTCOME
[CO.1]. To gather knowledge of enforcement system in a comparative framework and they will
be acquainted with different systems of criminal law and criminal procedure.
[CO.2]. To apply relevant theories and laws in Criminal Law in diverse jurisdictions.
[CO.3]. To make connections to theories and readings when analysing comparative Criminal
Law issues; and theorize, generalize, and hypothesize on these issues.
[CO.4]. To gain important skills in evaluating sources, researching, writing, normative analysis
of text, as well as some oral argumentation in Comparative Criminal Law.
70
D. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem solving in domestic
and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and professional
values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of clients,
performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner toward
clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of ongoing
improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for life- long learning
and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurships, and
corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time management,
discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback, and achieving balance
in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
71
COURSE OUTLINE
Recommended Readings:
Book Chapters
1. Ashworth, Andrew, and Michael Redmayne. The Criminal Process. 5th ed. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2019.
2. Dammer, H. R. and Albanese, J. S. Comparative criminal justice systems, 5th edition.
Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth, 2014.
3. Pakes, F. Comparative Criminal Justice. Gloucester, UK: Willan Publishing, 2004.
4. Reichel, P. Comparative Criminal Justice Systems, 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson, 2018.
5. Terrill, R. World Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Survey, 8th edition.
Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing, 2012.
6. M.A. Dupont-Morales, Michael K Hooper & Judi Schmidt (eds), Handbook of Criminal
Justice Administration, Marcel Dekker Publishers, New York, 2000
7. Tim Newburn and Richard Sparks (eds), Criminal Justice and Political Cultures, Willan
Pub., Cullompton, 2004
8. Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, Penguin Pub.,
London,2006
9. Alison Liebling and Shad Maruna (eds), The Effects of Imprisonment, Willan Pub.,
Cullompton,2006
Articles:
72
4. David F. Forte, Comparative Criminal Law and Enforcement: Islam, Encyclopedia of
Crime and Justice, New York, 2002 pp. 192-199
5. US Department of Justice, World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems, Bureau of
Justice " Statistics Washington DC. 1993
Recommended Readings:
Book Chapters
1. Ashworth, Andrew, and Michael Redmayne. The Criminal Process. 5th ed. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2019.
2. Dammer, H. R. and Albanese, J. S. Comparative criminal justice systems, 5th edition.
Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth, 2014.
3. Pakes, F. Comparative Criminal Justice. Gloucester, UK: Willan Publishing, 2004.
4. Reichel, P. Comparative Criminal Justice Systems, 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson, 2018.
5. Terrill, R. World Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Survey, 8th edition.
Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing, 2012.
6. Charles B. Fields and Richter H. Moore, Comparative and International Criminal Justice:
Traditional and Nontraditional Systems of Law and Control, 2" Edition, Waveland Press
Inc., Long Grove Illinois, 2005
7. M.A. Dupont-Morales, Michael K Hooper & Judi Schmidt (eds), Handbook of Criminal
Justice Administration, Marcel Dekker Publishers, New York, 2001
8. Tim Newbum and Richard Sparks (eds), Criminal Justice and Political Cultures, Willan
Pub, Cullompton, 2004
9. Peter J. Koppen and Steven D. Penrod (eds), Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice:
Psychological Perspectives on Criminal Justice Systems, Kluwer Academic/Plenum
Publishers, New York, 2003
Articles:
1. Anderson, policing the World: Interpol and the Politics of International Police Co-
Operation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989
73
2. J. Vagg, Context and Linkage: Reflections on Comparative Research and
'Internationalism' in Criminology, British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 33,1993, pp. 541-
554
Types of trial – speedy justice – role of judge, prosecution and defense attorney during
trial,
Punishment and Sentencing process.
Victim’s role in penal process
Plea bargaining
Appeal procedure – legal aid – public participation in criminal justice.
Probation and Community Punishment
Extradition
Mutual Legal Assistance
Recommended Readings:
Book Chapters
1. Brown, David, David Farrier, Sandra Egger, Luke McNamara, and Alex Steel. Criminal
Laws: Materials and Commentary on Criminal Law and Process in New South Wales 4th
ed. Sydney: Federation Press, 2006.
2. Keith Bryett and Osborne, Criminal Prosecution, Procedure and Practice:
International Perspectives, Stationery Office, Belfast, 2000
3. Ashworth, Andrew, and Michael Redmayne. The Criminal Process. 5th ed. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2019.
4. Dammer, H. R. and Albanese, J. S. Comparative criminal justice systems, 5th edition.
Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth, 2014.
5. Pakes, F. Comparative Criminal Justice. Gloucester, UK: Willan Publishing, 2004.
6. Reichel, P. Comparative Criminal Justice Systems, 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson, 2018.
7. Terrill, R. World Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Survey, 8th edition.
Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing, 2012.
Articles:
74
4. A Bossard, Interpol and Law Enforcement: Response to Transnational Crime, 11 Police
Studies, (1998), 177
General Exceptions
Infancy,
Insanity
Consent,
Necessity and
Private defense
Abetment and Attempt
Recommended Readings:
Book Chapters
1. Bronitt, Simon, and Bernadette McSherry. Principles of Criminal Law. 3d ed. Sydney:
Thomson Reuters, 2010.
2. Roach, Kent. Criminal Law. 4th ed. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2009.
3. Ashworth, Andrew, and Michael Redmayne. The Criminal Process. 5th ed. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2019.
4. Dammer, H. R. and Albanese, J. S. Comparative criminal justice systems, 5th edition.
Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth, 2014.
5. Pakes, F. Comparative Criminal Justice. Gloucester, UK: Willan Publishing, 2004.
6. Reichel, P. Comparative Criminal Justice Systems, 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson, 2018.
7. Terrill, R. World Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Survey, 8th edition.
Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing, 2012.
8. Elliott, Catherine. French Criminal Law. Devon: Willan Publishing, 2001.
9. Bohlander, Michael. Principles of German Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009.
Articles:
1. Dubber, Markus D., “Penal Law and Sexuality: Recent Reforms in German Criminal
Law,” 3 Buffalo Criminal Law Review (2000), 639.
2. Dubber, Markus D., “Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: The ‘Reasonable Person’
in a Comparative Perspective,” 11 New Criminal Law Review (2008), 1.
75
Recommended Readings
Book Chapters
1. Dressler, Joshua. Understanding Criminal Law. 5th ed. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis, 2009.
2. LaFave, Wayne R. Criminal Law. 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: West, 2010.
3. Model Penal Code and Commentaries (Official Draft and Revised Comments).
Philadelphia, PA: American Law Institute, 1980, 1985.
4. Robinson, Paul H. Criminal Law. New York: Aspen Publishers, 1997 (2d ed. 2011)
5. George F. Cole, Stanislaw J. Frankowski and Marc G. Gertz (eds.), Major Criminal
Justice Systems: A Comparative Survey, 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, Newbury Park,
California, 1987
6. Delmas Marty, Mireille and J.R. Spencer, European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge
University Press. New York, 2002
7. John Hatchard, Barabara Huber and Richard Vogler (eds.), Comparative Criminal
Procedure, BIICL. London, 1996
Articles:
1. Dubber, Markus D.,, “Offensive Behavior and German Penal Law,” 5 Buffalo Criminal
Law Review (2001), 255.
2. Dubber, Markus D.,, “Penal Law and Sexuality: Recent Reforms in German Criminal
Law,” 3 Buffalo Criminal Law Review (2000), 639.
3. Dubber, Markus D.,, “Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: The ‘Reasonable Person’
in a Comparative Perspective,” 11 New Criminal Law Review (2008), 1.
4. Malcom Davies, Comparative Criminal Law and Enforcement: England and Wales,
Encycicpr.: Crime and Justice, New York, 2002 pp. 182-192
5. Nancy Loucks, Contrasting Prisoners Rights: A Comparative Examination of England
and Germ. Br. J. Criminal, 45: 999-1001, 2004 p. 289
6. Trevor Jones and Tim Newburn, Comparative Criminal Justice Policy - Making in the US
and UK, I J. Criminal, 45:55-80,2005
Reference Readings
Judges and Judging in the History of the Common Law and Civil Law: From Antiquity to
Modern times edited by Paul Brand and Joshua Getzler CUP 2012
Charting the Divide Between Common and Civil Law Thomas Lundmark OUP USA, 27-Sep-
2012
The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America
John Henry Merryman, Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo Stanford University Press, 21-May-2007
76
Comparative criminal justice systems: A topical approach by Reichel, Philip L. 6th ed. Boston:
Pearson 2013.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems by Harry R. Dammer (Author), Jay S. Albanese (Author)
Cengage Learning; 5th ed (January 4, 2013)
* The faculty shall disseminate pertinent reference materials for each lecture. These reference
materials may consist of articles, videos, books etc.
Lecture Plan
Total Hours: 60
Lecture Hours: 57
Continuous Assessment: 3 Hrs.
77
COURSE CURRICULUM
FINANCIAL MARKETS AND REGULATORY SYSTEMS |10 CREDITS |
SESSION: JANUARY – MAY 2022 | FACULTY: MR. SARTHAK MISHRA|
SEMESTER – Class: BA/BBA LLB X SEMESTER (BUSINESS LAW HONOURS)
A. INTRODUCTION
Financial Markets and Regulatory Systems is an advanced undergraduate course designed to
analyze financial products, markets and organizations. Topics addressed include: flows of
funds; financial intermediation; financial organizations/services; central banking and
monetary policy; financial markets focusing largely on fixed income and equity markets;
management of financial risk; international financial markets and organizations, and current
and emerging trends in financial markets. The global business environment has changed
drastically. It has changed the financial markets also around world. New financial products,
their operations and regulatory framework have entered in the financial scenario in a big way
never seen before. Hence, the students are required to have an in-depth knowledge of the
Financial Markets basics, with the legal frame work in mind, which regulate the financial
market, in order to understand the changing world of finance. The purpose of this course
therefore is to familiarize the students with the concepts of Financial Markets and making
them aware about its importance in the functioning of an economy as it has assumed cardinal
importance in the light of increase in trade and globalization.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
At the end of the course, students will be able to:
[CO.1]: describe the concept and significance of Financial Markets.
[CO.2]: enumerate the functions of Financial Markets.
[CO.3]: classify and contrast between different kinds of Financial Markets.
[CO.4]: outline the evolution of the Capital Markets and discuss the issues related with long
term financing.
[CO.5]: discuss and explore the concept and intricacies of primary and secondary markets.
[CO.6]: highlight the significance of money market and its impact on economy.
[CO.7]: enumerate and discuss various capital market and money market instruments.
[CO.8]: discuss and comprehend the concept of derivatives and the related regulations.
[CO.9]: discuss the legal framework of SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2009.
[CO.10]: delineate the concept of Credit Rating and Securities Lending and Analysis.
[CO.11]: discuss the regulation of stock exchanges in India.
[CO.12]: enumerate and highlight the significance of various financial market participants.
78
[CO.13]: discuss the role of various financial market regulators like SEBI, RBI etc.
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem solving in
domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and
professional values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to representation of
clients, performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves in a sensitive manner
toward clients and colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for the purpose of
ongoing improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for life-
long learning and continuing improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurships,
and corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, team work, giving and receiving feedback, and
achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
E. CURRICULUM
79
PART I
PART II
TOPIC 2: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MARKET
Primary Market
Secondary Market
Share Capital and Public Issue
Merchant banker,
Stock Brokers,
Registrars,
Underwriters,
Portfolio Managers,
Debenture trustees,
Foreign Institutional Investors,
Custodians,
Venture Capitalists,
Depositories and Depository Participants
References:
1. Meir Kohn, Financial Institutions and Markets, Tata Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Company,
New Delhi, 2008, Chapter 19, Pp. 559-597
2. Anthony Saunders, Marcia Millon Cornett, Financial Markets and Institutions: An
Introduction to the Risk Management Approach, Third Edition, Tata McGraw Hill
80
Education Private Limited, New Delhi, Chapter 8, Pp. 253-286
PART III
References:
1. Meir Kohn, Financial Institutions and Markets, Tata Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Company,
New Delhi, 2008, Chapter 18, Pp. 525-554
2. Anthony Saunders, Marcia Millon Cornett, Financial Markets and Institutions: An
Introduction to the Risk Management Approach, Third Edition, Tata McGraw Hill
Education Private Limited, New Delhi, Chapter 5, Pp. 126-150
PART IV
TOPIC 6: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Derivative Securities
Forwards and Futures
Options
Swaps
Regulation of Futures and Options Markets
References:
1. Meir Kohn, Financial Institutions and Markets, Tata Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Company,
New Delhi, 2008, Chapter 21, Pp. 635-673
2. Anthony Saunders, Marcia Millon Cornett, Financial Markets and Institutions: An
Introduction to the Risk Management Approach, Third Edition, Tata McGraw Hill
81
Education Private Limited, New Delhi, Chapter 10, Pp. 294-326
PART V
TOPIC 7: REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
References:
1. N. Gopalsamy, Capital Market- The Indian Financial Scene.pg 300-315
2. Bharat's Guide to Indian Capital Market :pg 1042-1048,1073-1077
3. The SEBI Act, 1992
4. The Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956
5. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Act, 1999
6. Reserve Bank of India Act, 1935
7. http://finmin.nic.in/financial_regulators/financial_regulators.asp
I. Textbooks:
Stephen Cecchetti and Kermit Schoenholtz. Money, Banking, and Financial Markets.
McGraw Hill/Irwin, 2015. Fourth Edition
Anthony M. Santomero, David F. Babbel, Financial Markets, Instruments, and
Institutions, McGraw-Hill Europe; Second Edition, 2001
Anthony Saunders, Marcia Millon Cornett, Financial Markets and Institutions: An
Introduction to the Risk Management Approach, Tata McGraw Hill Education Private
Limited, Third Edition , New Delhi.
II. References:
82
Meir Kohn, Financial Institutions and Markets, Tata Mc Graw-Hill Publishing
Company, New Delhi, 2008
Ravi M. Kishore, Financial Management, Taxmann Allied Services (P.) Ltd., New
Delhi, 2007
Newspapers: The Business Line, The Economic Times, Business Standard, Financial
Express.
Additional Notes:
1. You are recommended to maintain knowledge of current financial market events by
reading various business-related Journals and the Economic Times.
2. You may also read business publications such as Business Today, the Economist, Business
Week, Fortune, Forbes India, Inc. India, Business World, Business India, Silicon India,
Outlook Business, Business and Economy, India Business Journal, Outlook Money
Construction, World Money Today, Business Week, Franchise Plus, Business etc.
* IMPORTANT NOTE
1. The reading material is preliminary and suggestive. The faculty shall distribute
pertinent study materials as pre/post lecture content (from time to time). Students must
keep themselves abreast of the distributed materials and clarify their respective
doubts with the faculty.
2. The faculty member-in-charge of the course reserves the right to modify any of the
contents, terms and conditions, provided in this curriculum.
3. A list of project topics would be notified to the class after the commencement of the
session.
Lecture Plan:
11-16 Exchange Rate Regimes & the Foreign Lecture, Interaction &
Exchange Market
Discussion
83
24-30 Money Market Lecture, Interaction &
Discussion
Total Hours: 64
Lecture Hours: 60
Continuous Assessment: 4 Hrs
84
Course Curriculum
LAW OF PROJECT FINANCE| 10 Credits |
Session: January – May 2022 | Faculty: Ms Ruth Vaiphei|
Class: Class: BA/BBA LLB X SEMESTER BUSINESS LAW HONOURS
A. INTRODUCTION
There are multiple perspectives on what project finance consists of. The one that will be
generally followed in this course is that it mostly comprises financing the development or
exploitation of a right, natural resource or any other asset, where the majority portion of the
financing is not contributed by the holders of any form of share capital, and where such
financing is sought to be repaid mostly out of any revenue that the concerned project yields.
Such projects usually require huge initial investments, but may have long pay-offs, mostly
stemming from cash-flow of the project, with the project sponsors preferring to protect their
assets and balance sheets from risks associated with the project by way of actions such as ring-
fencing. Asset-specific financial structuring is therefore often the hallmark of project finance.
Over the years, project financing has established its credentials as a highly effective instrument
for financing the delivery of investments and other services into the domain of infrastructural
development all over the world, especially in sectors such as transport, energy, environment and
even social infrastructure such as hospitals and schools. While public-private partnership models
have been given a fillip with project finance taking care of the underlying risk management, the
transactions involved in this discipline are often complex and require specific expertise including
analysis, structuring, negotiation and appreciation of the myriad stakeholder interests involved.
B. COURSE OUTCOMES
At the end of the course, students will be able to
[CO.1]. Gain insight into the motivations and objectives of the various parties involved in a
project.
[CO.2]. Have an understanding of the fundamental concepts underlying any public procurement
by way of competitions, bidding etc.
[CO.3]. Identify suitable corporate structures and financial plans for different projects based on
the requirements and interests of the parties involved, including how to make the project appear
an attractive prospect to the lenders.
[CO.4]. Learn about the various contracts involved in a standard project, the import of the
clauses therein, the negotiation between the parties in relation to said contracts and the
documentation involved.
[CO.5]. Analyse the risks associated with various projects, manage such risks by different
methods including insurance and contractual framework.
[CO.6]. Apply the international principles and best practices in the contexts of projects in India.
C. PROGRAM OUTCOMES
[PO.1]. Demonstrate the ability to think like a lawyer and basic proficiency in professional
lawyering skills to perform competent legal analysis, reasoning, and problem-solving in
domestic and international law contexts;
[PO.2]. Demonstrate communication skills, including effective listening and critical reading,
writing in objective and persuasive styles, and oral advocacy and other oral communications;
[PO.3]. Demonstrate the ability to conduct domestic and international legal research and
collaborate effectively with others in a variety of legal settings and contexts;
[PO.4]. An appreciation, understanding, and inculcation of the moral, ethical, and professional
84
values and application of knowledge of professional ethics to a representation of clients, the
performance of duties as an officer of the courts, and behaves sensitively toward clients and
colleagues of all cultures and backgrounds;
[PO.5]. Reviews and critically appraises legal literature and evidence for ongoing
improvement of the practice of law and exhibits commitment and aptitude for life-long
learning and continuous improvement;
[PO.6]. Understand the impact of professional lawyering skills in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
[PO.7]. Using technology in legal practice
[PO.8]. Equip with knowledge, passion and drive to excel as leaders in the legal profession,
judiciary, public service, non-profit & non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurship, and
corporate entities
[PO.9]. Explore and understand specific issues relating to the workplace such as time
management, discipline, workplace culture, teamwork, giving and receiving feedback, and
achieving balance in one’s life in a multidisciplinary environment.
D. ASSESSMENT PLAN
E. CURRICULUM
TOPIC1: INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT FINANCE
1. Definition of Project finance
2. Basic Characteristic
3. Difference between project finance and corporate finance
4. Evolution of project finance
5. Project types
6. Critical Steps in a project
1. Market Sizing
2. Market Insight area
3. Market research approach
4. Business model and Promoter analysis
5. Project feasibility analysis
85
TOPIC 4: PROJECT RISK
1. Project conceptualization risk
2. Financial closure risk
3. Project construction risk
4. Political risk and Policy risk
5. Market risk; supply chain risk and exchange risk
6. Force Majeure
1. TEXTBOOKS
JOHN NIEHUSS, INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL,
STEFANO GATTI, PROJECT FINANCE IN THEORY AND PRACTICE,
GRAHAM D. VINTER, PROJECT FINANCE: A LEGAL GUIDE
2. REFERENCE
JOHN NIEHUSS, INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL, Chapter 2 (2015).
STEFANO GATTI, PROJECT FINANCE IN THEORY AND PRACTICE, Chapter 4 & 7 (2013).
FINANCIAL AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, INSTITUTE OF COMPANY SECRETARIES
INDIA READING MATERIAL
PRAHALAD CK, COMPETING FOR THE FUTURE, HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL PRESS (1994)
HIGH LEVEL COMMITTEE ON FINANCING INFRASTRUCTURE (INTERIM REPORT)
A GUIDEBOOK ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN INFRASTRUCTURE
STEFANO GATTI, PROJECT FINANCE IN THEORY AND PRACTICE, Chapter 1 (2013).
JOHN NIEHUSS, INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL, Chapter 2 (2015).
STEFANO GATTI, PROJECT FINANCE IN THEORY AND PRACTICE, Chapter 4 & 7 (2013).
GRAHAM D. VINTER, PROJECT FINANCE: A LEGAL GUIDE, Chapters 1,3 & 15 (2003).
JOHN NIEHUSS, INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL, Chapter 3-6 (2015).
JOHN D. FINNERTY, PROJECT FINANCING: ASSET BASED FINANCIAL ENGINEERING,
Chapters 7 (2013).
KIATCHAI SOPHASTIENPHONG, YIBIN MU & CAROLOTTA SAPORITO, SOUTH ASIAN BOND
MARKETS: DEVELOPING LONG-TERM FINANCE, Chapter 1 & 3 (2008).
GRAHAM D. VINTER, PROJECT FINANCE: A LEGAL GUIDE, Chapters 6 & 7 (2003).
JOHN NIEHUSS, INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL, Chapter 11-13
(2015).
JOHN D. FINNERTY, PROJECT FINANCING: ASSET BASED FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, Ch. 8
86
(2013).
KIATCHAI SOPHASTIENPHONG, YIBIN MU & CAROLOTTA SAPORITO, SOUTH ASIAN BOND
MARKETS: DEVELOPING LONG-TERM FINANCE, Chapter 1 & 3 (2008).
GRAHAM D. VINTER, PROJECT FINANCE: A LEGAL GUIDE, Chapters 6 & 7 (2003).
JOHN NIEHUSS, INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL, Chapter 11-13
(2015).
JOHN D. FINNERTY, PROJECT FINANCING: ASSET BASED FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, Ch. 8
(2013).
JOHN NIEHUSS, INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL, Chapter 21 (2015).
Julian D. M. Lew, Arbitration and Other Dispute Settlement in Project Financing, in
NON-JUDICIAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS 289-
300 (Norbert Horn & Joseph J. Norton Eds., 2000).
G. LECTURE PLAN:
Total Hours: 60
Lecture Hours: 57
Continuous Assessment: 3 Hours
87